Gay Patriot Header Image

Ingratitude and Shame

Posted by V the K at 11:06 am - August 11, 2016.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace

Mohammedan “refugees” (read colonists) in Sweden are not pleased with their accommodations. Seem the housing constructed for them using the funding of Swedish taxpayers aren’t quite up to snuff. How awful it must be to flee death, terror, and oppression and then be forced to suffer the horrific human indignity of having to sharing your kitchen with other “refugees“.

Here’s a point you should think about from an article you should read.

Every time Western society is treated to another charmingly impish killing spree or terror attack at the hands of a Muslim, we’re told (by those guardians of all that’s good and decent—leftist pundits and politicians) how important it is to safeguard the fragile feelings of those poor, beleaguered followers of Muhammad. “Please, people, let’s not hold them responsible for what their coreligionists do. Let’s not shame them.” Of course, no one knows the power of shame better than leftists; no one better understands this one simple truth: Shame works. Shame is the most powerful tool for manipulating a group—any group—of human beings. When a leftist tells you, “Making ordinary Muslims feel ashamed is no way to wage a war against extremism,” they’re lying and they know it. Leftists, more than anyone else, get the awesome power of shame. They fight against using it in the war on Muslim terror precisely because they understand what an amazing weapon it is. They don’t want Muslims shamed, because they don’t want a reduction in Islamic belligerence. Muslims are vital to the left’s plan to forge a Europe hostile to its indigenous population, culture, and traditions. So damn right you don’t want to create an army of milquetoast Muhammadans. The more proud and belligerent, the better.

The left is eager to shame anyone else for the slightest transgression of political correctness. But Mohammedans mass murder people and we’re supposed to rationalize it.

Share

10 Comments

  1. Mark Steyn expressed my sentiments quite well:

    ” …. I’m Islamed out. I’m tired of Islam 24/7, at Colorado colleges, Marseilles synagogues, Sydney coffee shops, day after day after day. The west cannot win this thing with a schizophrenic strategy of targeting things and people but not targeting the ideology, of intervening ineffectually overseas and not intervening at all when it comes to the remorseless Islamization and self-segregation of large segments of their own countries.

    So I say again: What’s the happy ending here? Because if M Hollande isn’t prepared to end mass Muslim immigration to France and Europe, then his “pitiless war” isn’t serious. And, if they’re still willing to tolerate Mutti Merkel’s mad plan to reverse Germany’s demographic death spiral through fast-track Islamization, then Europeans aren’t serious. In the end, the decadence of Merkel, Hollande, Cameron and the rest of the fin de civilization western leadership will cost you your world and everything you love.

    So screw the candlelight vigil.

    We quite simply have zero choice about Islam. Shari’a and Western law can not mix. Islam can survive under the basic assumptions of Western civilization only if Islam reorganizes itself from within to be compatible with a diversity of religions and tolerance for gays, women, cripples, drunks, atheists, blasphemers, sinners, reprobates, and you and me.

    I am saying in no uncertain terms that if Islam means humping camels and little boys and stoning gays and chopping off limbs and covering women in tarps and honor killings and so forth, then they will just have to stay where the are and revel in the hell of their intuitions. I don’t want to bomb them, I don’t want to reform them, I don’t want them to do anything but what they feel entitled to do to each other in their own damned corner of Hell.

    Along with Mark Steyn, I also and Islamed out. The Khizr and Ghazala Khan dog and pony show at the DemonizingRat Convention was culturally bankrupt. Khizr can wave his Constitution until his elbow freezes and claim his American credentials all he wants. But he is an Islamic fifth columnist who is not interested in blending into our civilization. He is dedicated to using our laws against us and changing our civilization to suit his Islamic view of what our civilization should be.

    We can have the Khizr and Ghazala Khan conversation in a way that reflects representative democracy and then all of us can vote on whether we want to stone gays and beat women and whatever. But that is not the process that Khizr and Ghazala Khan envision. And any sentient person should be awake enough to know it.

    Comment by Heliotrope — August 11, 2016 @ 1:29 pm - August 11, 2016

  2. The Gay Star Trek:STD will have a vagina of color in command, if they can find one able to remember lines. The Rachel Jeantel, & ICE T problem.

    https://deadline.com/2016/08/star-trek-discovery-series-reboot-female-lead-cbs-all-access-casting-1201801744/

    Still, Star Trek Discovery possibly will boldly go where no other Star Trek installment has gone before: with a woman of color as the lead. I hear virtually all women seen for the part so far — and there have been a lot of them as the casting process has kicked into high gear — have been African-American or Hispanic.

    No one has been cast yet, so it is possible that the role ultimately could go to a Caucasian actress, but the intention is to go diverse.

    Comment by Steve — August 11, 2016 @ 5:00 pm - August 11, 2016

  3. I like the conclusion of the first linked article about the refugees:

    “Caving into the demands of ungrateful people is taking the idea of humanitarianism a step too far. The refugees should be told to take what’s so generously given them or offer them a one-way ticket back to whatever hellhole they crawled out of.”

    Comment by TheQuietMan — August 11, 2016 @ 5:48 pm - August 11, 2016

  4. Where have you been, Steve? According to Nazis like mikey, Hispanic is Caucasian.

    Comment by Lobogris — August 11, 2016 @ 9:19 pm - August 11, 2016

  5. all the muslims are is the communists surrogate army. they don’t need their own terrorist groups like bader- meinhof and the red brigades when the muslims will gladly kill you for them.

    Comment by salg — August 12, 2016 @ 1:06 am - August 12, 2016

  6. @5 Hispanic is not a race, they come in all races. they fact is most Hispanics are Caucasian. the Hispanic race was invented by the democrat party to keep them from aligning politically with Caucasians.

    Comment by salg — August 12, 2016 @ 1:11 am - August 12, 2016

  7. Technically speaking, Hispanic refers to somebody whose ethnic/cultural heritage is specifically Spanish. It is an in-group of Latinos, who include people of Portuguese ethnic/culutral heritage. Thus, a Brazilian is Latino, but not Hispanic.

    Getting down to the nitty-gritty of ethnicity, a lot of Latinos are what is referred to as “mestizo,” which basically means “mixed.” It has a very wide umbrella, but requires some combination of European, American Indian, and/or African ancestry.

    Thus, when the LSM called George Zimmermann a “white Hispanic,” the whiteness was already implied by “Hispanic,” so “white mestizo” may have been more correct.

    Comment by Sean L — August 12, 2016 @ 8:14 am - August 12, 2016

  8. This is how I normally deal with charges of racism.

    I will stop the person and ask them to define ‘race.’ I offer to help them by going down to Home Depot to get a color swatch so they can point out where different races begin and end. Alternately, I ask them what percentage of which backgrounds make up a ‘race.’

    They usually get frustrated and say, “Well you know what I’m talking about!” and I go, “No, before we can have a discussion, we need to agree exactly on what “race” is and the definitions thereof.”

    Race is whatever the left wants it to be, that’s why you have to nail them down on the usage of it.

    Comment by CH — August 12, 2016 @ 2:40 pm - August 12, 2016

  9. Sean L: According to some definitions, “mestizo” specifically implies Euro-Amerindian — the term “zambo” was used for Afro-Amerindian, and “mulatto” for Euro-African. Furthermore, Spanish had terms for 3/4 or 7/8 blends — including terms that distinguished the “passably white” from the “conspicuously non-white.” (Cf. “high yellow” in Black English).

    But as you say, all of the above could be “Hispanic”.

    Comment by Throbert McGee — August 12, 2016 @ 6:03 pm - August 12, 2016

  10. Hispanic I a tee invented and shoved down our throats by the Nixon administration. The Denocrats have much to answer for, but the Hispanic nonsense is not one of them.

    Comment by The Gentle Grizzly — August 12, 2016 @ 8:01 pm - August 12, 2016

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.