Gay Patriot Header Image

Four More Years of This, Good Lord

Posted by V the K at 1:34 pm - September 8, 2016.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

Some completely rhetorical question:

1. Why is a participant in a townhall asking this question and not a member of the alleged news media?

2. Could she possibly be any more patronizing/condescending in the tone she uses to address the veteran’s question?

And a fact: Markings do not determine if information is classified, the substance of information is what makes it classified.

Any service member who mishandled classified information the way she did would be court-martialed. Any corporate executive who erased 30,000 emails while they were under investigation would be looking at prison time.

But the laws don’t matter when you’re a prominent Democrat.

YouTube Preview Image



  1. Four more years? I don’t like fatalism. Especially when there’s no substantial reason, but fear. How long have people been fearing this woman? I remember people wiffle waffling & chicken littling in the 90’s over her health care proposals & maneuverings. Harridans so easily intimidate the weak.

    Comment by Hanover — September 8, 2016 @ 2:05 pm - September 8, 2016

  2. Next four years? Not if I can help it. Check out the latest polls:

    And don’t forget that Reuters-Ipsos routinely oversamples the Dhimmicrats.

    Peter H.

    Comment by Peter Hughes — September 8, 2016 @ 2:18 pm - September 8, 2016

  3. The particularly charming part is how she carefully and slowly e-n-u-n-ci-a-t-e-s , as if he had some kind of impediment.

    Comment by Fausta — September 8, 2016 @ 3:00 pm - September 8, 2016

  4. @3, not condescension, repeating what she hears while being coached.

    Comment by rjligier — September 8, 2016 @ 3:13 pm - September 8, 2016

  5. The first Benghazi hearings didn’t even have access to Ambassador Steven’s emails asking for real marine security a month before he died.

    Comment by Steve — September 8, 2016 @ 3:48 pm - September 8, 2016

  6. Polls go up, polls go down. The problem with The Polls is that the best they can do is to sample “likely voters”, not actual voters. Elections aren’t won by supporters, or likely voters; they’re won by people who truly bother to cast a ballot. That could be a problem this year, when even die-hard voters are considering not voting for the very top of the ticket. The presidential election isn’t like constitutional amendments in some states, where passage requires a majority of registered voters; the winning candidate only [technically] needs one vote more than their opponent.

    Combine this with what appears to be an abysmal ground game by the Trump campaign, where some state offices are just now opening and there seems to be no discernible GOTV effort as well as rumors that some attendees at The Donald’s rallies are not registered to vote with some not even planning to vote, and that spells trouble in even the most rosy of paradise scenarios. The only saving grace is that Hacking Granny is now equally as unpopular as her opponent. But there still has to be enough actual voters to show up to outshine her support at the voting booth.

    Comment by RSG — September 8, 2016 @ 5:44 pm - September 8, 2016

  7. But the laws don’t matter when you’re a prominent Democrat.

    At this point, she doesn’t even need to be a Democrat—just not a Republican. She is the Queen-In-Waiting and the Queen shall not be challenged, nor made to comply with laws for the commoners. To do otherwise is a show of profound disrespect for her stature as a privileged Earthling.

    Comment by RSG — September 8, 2016 @ 5:51 pm - September 8, 2016

  8. The breadcrumbs that should be followed:
    1. It is the content that makes something classified.
    2. If a Secretary of State can manage to never handle classified information, then we don’t need one. Even her own calendar is classified as confidential.
    3. Many of her Secret emails didn’t have markings because she told her underlings to remove the markings… another crime. She doesn’t want to hang Huma out to dry… yet.
    4. Her early denials were never “it wasn’t classified”. It was, “they weren’t MARKED as classified”. In her lawyer brain, this tell me that she knew the difference and was trying to hide in the boundary between the two. Typical Clinton weasel-wording.

    Comment by Professor Hale — September 9, 2016 @ 9:48 am - September 9, 2016

  9. Polls may go up and down, but as a former campaign strategist and Poli-Sci prof, I can say with certainty that once a candidate starts losing this early in the polls, it’s downhill from there.

    To wit:

    Peter H.

    Comment by Peter Hughes — September 9, 2016 @ 11:35 am - September 9, 2016

  10. Four more years? If Madame Lizard wins the White House, the GOP may not be able to mount a successful challenge to the Dhimmicrats for 12-16 years — maybe more. By then the damage to the Republic — and damage to functional two-party rule — may be insurmountable for a generation or longer.

    Crushing bureaucracy micromanaging all facets of commerce and daily-life. A Supreme Court that’s not just heavily-tilted Liberal, but solidly national socialist through the nomination of 5-7 new Justices by the Left. And a vast ideological and electoral schism between the left-leaning coastal zones and their disgruntled and restive flyover states of the heartland as the GOP is rediced to a States-level apparatus of Governors, Senators and Congress-members.

    Comment by Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — September 9, 2016 @ 1:05 pm - September 9, 2016

  11. Peter H…this is for you:

    Comment by RSG — September 12, 2016 @ 6:19 pm - September 12, 2016

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.