Gay Patriot Header Image


Posted by V the K at 11:54 am - October 6, 2016.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

A major hurricane is threatening millions of lives along the Florida coast. The Hillary campaign saw this as an excellent opportunity to buy ads on The Weather Channel.

Politico reports that the Clinton campaign has purchased $63,000 worth of ads on the go-to weather station slated to run over the course of five days in the Florida market.


And This Is Why Countries Don’t Have Two Queens

Posted by V the K at 8:33 am - October 6, 2016.
Filed under: Big Journalism,Divas

Apparently, there’s a lot of cat-fighting going on behind the scenes at the next Presidential debate. CNN’s Anderson Cooper and ABC’s Martha Radditz have both decided the debate really ought to be about them, and are behaving accordingly.

They are feuding over petty things, such as ‘Who does each particular topic?’ Both Anderson and Martha want to shine, to be tough on the candidates, and not to be accused of bias. There’s a lot at stake. So there’s a lot of turf-grabbing going on — attempts to box each other out to get the territory they are most well-suited for … They are supposed to be deep in rehearsals — the anchors and their teams have met a bunch of times, and the atmosphere has been acrimonious at best, at all levels, from the producers right up to the execs.

Meh, we know they’re both part of Team Hillary. What Donald Trump ought to do is bring a couple “I’m With Hillary” buttons to the debate and the first time Andy or Marty interrupts him, or cuts him off, or softballs Hillary (all of which will happen), he should cross the stage and say, “If you’re going to behave like that, you might as well be wearing these.”

Why Was “Body-Shaming” OK When Michelle Obama Was Doing It?

Posted by V the K at 8:27 am - October 6, 2016.
Filed under: Democrats & Double Standards

Hillary Clinton must have some polling data to indicate that fat, angry women are the key to the election. How else to explain how the top political issue of last week was a pudgy beauty queen complaining that Donald Trump had maybe twenty years ago “body-shamed” her by commenting on her weight?’

Because a $20 Trillion Debt, a deteriorating economy, and a global situation edging toward war are beyond the intellectual capacity of the typical Democrat voter. But, “Donald Trump said mean things about a woman” is at the level they can relate to

And the Hillary camp has not given up on this electoral chew toy. In fact, she even apparently set up a teenage actress at a staged town hall to ask this scripted question.

“Hi Madam Secretary. I’m Brennan and I’m 15 years old. At my school, body image is a really big issue for girls my age. I see with my own eyes the damage Donald Trump does when he talks about women and how they look. As the first female president how would you undo some of that damage and help girls understand that they’re so much more than just what they look like?”

All right, we get it. According to the Democrat left, telling people they could stand to lose a few pounds is a barbarity that’s worse than anything ISIS has ever done to anyone.

But, wait a minute, didn’t our present First Lady make her entire cause about body shaming? Why, yes, I believe she did.

Reducing childhood obesity is both “a moral obligation to our children” and “a patriotic obligation to our country,” Obama said.

So, body-shaming was very, very good when Michelle Obama was doing it, but it’s now very, very bad because Donald Trump may possibly once have done it. Or is it OK to body-shame children, but not pudhy Latina beauty queens. No, wait, it can’t be okay to body shame children, because Hillary’s town hall plant specifically said that it was bad to make “girls” feel bad about their bodies.

And I would be remiss if I didn’t cover Hillary’s scripted answer to the staged question:


Obama’s Bottomless Pettiness

Posted by V the K at 12:58 am - October 6, 2016.
Filed under: Obama Arrogance

George W. Bush proposed building a base on the moon. Obama cancelled it … to deny Bush a legacy achievement

Chiao suggested the decision to remove the Moon as a possible destination was driven by politics, rather than what might be best for the US space enterprise. “Frankly, it came down to us on the committee to not talk too much about the Moon, because there was no way this administration was going to go there, because it was W’s program,” he said. “Ok, that’s a pretty stupid reason not to go to the Moon. I’m hopeful with this election cycle that maybe the moon will be a possibility again.”

This is why we can’t have nice things… like moonbases.