The Democrat Media Complex will always be in the tank for whoever the Democrat nominee is; but given the scope and depth of Hillary’s corruption, this year, they have to be wearing scuba gear.
The Internet home for American gay conservatives.
The Internet home for American gay conservatives.
The Democrat Media Complex will always be in the tank for whoever the Democrat nominee is; but given the scope and depth of Hillary’s corruption, this year, they have to be wearing scuba gear.
the American people need to recognize this fact, the democrat party-media complex is the greatest threat to the freedom of the American people in the history of this country.
#1 – What salg said!!
“Hillary Clinton isn’t just a nasty woman. She’s a ruthless hatemonger devoted wholly to two corrupt pursuits while on the federal teat: tearing down and cashing in.” — Michelle Malkin
Regards,
Peter H.
“tearing down and cashing in.”.. the Soros method.
” How did this happen? Who’s to blame? Well, certainly, there are those who are more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable. But again, truth be told, if you’re looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
I know why you did it. I know you were afraid. Who wouldn’t be? War, terror, disease. They were a myriad of problems which conspired to corrupt your reason and rob you of your common sense. Fear got the best of you…and in your panic you turned to Hillary Clinton.”
And so the Republic was lost.
I would argue that it has been just as brazen and blatant (the Media) in protecting President Boyfriend (Obama) as they have been with the Haggard Queen.
They were always biased, but I think the masks REALLY came off when the Low-Information President was running. Today it’s just business as usual for them, protect the Left — At. All. Costs.
Dems nominated the worst candidate for prez in the last 80 years. But then conservatives chose someone worse.
littlelettermikey, the fascist, here is an honest, heartfelt invitation: Please return and give everything you’ve got on Donald Trump that makes him worse for the presidency than Hillary Rodham Clinton.
I really, sincerely want to read your no-hold-barred opinions, fears and distaste of Donald Trump.
Here is my pledge: I will stay silent and you may blow a category 5 hurricane of reasoned response or pure ideological invective or some of both. I just want to hear you vent. So blow, littlelettermikey, the fascist, blow.
They left the scuba gear behind long ago; they have been doing deep mining to support her for years.
In this case, getting their minds into the gutter would be a BIG improvement!
Helio I merely am pointing out that he is the only person who could lose to Clinton. There is no ideological argument to be made because Trump has no ideology. Clinton isnt a good candidate I know very few people who are happy to be voting for her. But Trump is a man with no intellectual curiosity, no intellectual honesty, supremely unpredictable, illogical and he is a person who has no ideas, no plan, no vision and lacks the capacity to listen to others with ideas. He embodies every bad quality of human nature.. Clinton isnt great either but she is smart enough to at least hide her foibles.
I view Clinton as a caretaker for 4 years. Hopefully by then conservatives might come up with a leader who has a plan and ideas so we can have a national conversation on the direction of this country…..instead of this rridiculousness we have now.
You get the Clintons (Hillary, Bill, and the Kids) installed in the White House and it will take a generation or two to get them out and undo the damage wrought.
1. If the Democrats get close to a working majority in the Senate, all the elderly SCOTUS Associates will resign and the Bench will be packed with Liberals and Socialists for the next 20-years or more.
2. The lose of the WH and one or both Houses of Congress will throw the remnants of the GOP into a hard internecine struggle effectively-insuring Democratic control of the WH for the next 12-16 years. Once in the WH, I don’t think the GOP can field a strong, effective candidate and field operation to counter the corrupt advantages of the Hillary Clinton-DNC apparatus to retain power in the near-term.
3. The finger-pointing and legislative failures within the GOP over the next few Congresses will cripple the Party’s clout at the National-level — even as it has successes at the State Governors’ and local-level as a strong, effective Regional Party.
4. Once the “Party of Free Stuff” opens the taps to Uncle Sugar’s largess and public-policy favoritism to special interests and to their friends in Big Business, the Crony-Capitalism, Wall Street, the Banks and the Public Employee Unions, it will take two generations to survive then undo the damage.
– Assuming the Clintons’ “successful foreign policy initiatives” don’t embroil us in a hundred-years-struggle of foreign entanglements and pandering to our enemies. And if we have a functioning Economy left.
If Hillary and Democrats win-big next week and think they have a NATIONAL MANDATE, …we’re doomed.
Facts, mike. We want facts. Not your feelings which, amount to a fart in a hurricane. What facts do you have that Trump is a worse candidate than Clinton? What has he DONE that disqualifies him? Not what he has said, because words mean nothing. Has his actions gotten four men killed in Libya? Has he funneled money from a charity for his own aggrandizement? Has he gotten a child rapist off scot free and gloated about the outcome. Has he destroyed the lives of those his spouse raped? Did he turn the State Department into a quid pro quo, pay to play enterprise. Does he have operatives sent to his opponents rallies to foment violence? If he had done any of this, do you think he should be disqualified?