Gay Patriot Header Image

FBI Announces New Clinton Email Cover-Up

Posted by V the K at 3:50 pm - October 28, 2016.
Filed under: Democratic Scandals

The FBI announced today that in the course of investigating (it’s okay ‘cos he’s a Democrat) underage sexting aficionado Anthony Weiner, they  have discovered additional email document evidence that Hillary Rodham Clinton grossly violated Federal Law and they are currently investigating the best way to let her get away with it because she’s Hillary Clinton the law just does not freaking apply to her.

Nothing will come of this, kids. Republicans will probably hold some hearings… which will go nowhere and accomplish nothing. Hillary’s associates will plead the fifth (even though they totes didn’t do anything illegal, pinky swear) and Republicans will issue a “damning report(TM)” that will be “discredited” by media lapdogs like those identified in the Wikileaks emails.

All the same, the hedge fund managers, Saudis, Terry MacAuliffe, and others who’ve been financing the Clinton Global Initiative should probably keep their checkbooks handy in case Hillary needs to pay off some more FBI Directors.

If you are voting for Hillary, you are complicit in her corruption.

Update:  NYT Democrat Hack Paul Krugman goes nanners over the FBI reopening the investigation.

Update: According to Townhall, this video describes the Republican response to the FBI reopening the investigation.

Update: (from RSG) The NYPost weighs in.


Dilbert: Democrats Are the Party of H8rs ‘n’ Bullies

Scott Adams notes that the Democrats are the party of bullying.

I’ve been trying to figure out what common trait binds Clinton supporters together. As far as I can tell, the most unifying characteristic is a willingness to bully in all its forms.

If you have a Trump sign in your lawn, they will steal it.

If you have a Trump bumper sticker, they will deface your car.

if you speak of Trump at work you could get fired.

On social media, almost every message I get from a Clinton supporter is a bullying type of message. They insult. They try to shame. They label. And obviously they threaten my livelihood.

We know from Project Veritas that Clinton supporters tried to incite violence at Trump rallies. The media downplays it.

We also know Clinton’s side hired paid trolls to bully online. You don’t hear much about that.

Yesterday, by no coincidence, Huffington Post, Salon, and Daily Kos all published similar-sounding hit pieces on me, presumably to lower my influence. (That reason, plus jealousy, are the only reasons writers write about other writers.)

Joe Biden said he wanted to take Trump behind the bleachers and beat him up. No one on Clinton’s side disavowed that call to violence because, I assume, they consider it justified hyperbole.

Team Clinton has succeeded in perpetuating one of the greatest evils I have seen in my lifetime. Her side has branded Trump supporters (40%+ of voters) as Nazis, sexists, homophobes, racists, and a few other fighting words. Their argument is built on confirmation bias and persuasion. But facts don’t matter because facts never matter in politics. What matters is that Clinton’s framing of Trump provides moral cover for any bullying behavior online or in person. No one can be a bad person for opposing Hitler, right?

Case in point: Mike Pence’s dog passed away recently. People with normal levels of compassion know how tough the loss of a pet is. But to the Hillary-Supporting Democrat-Left, it was just another opportunity to mock and ridicule.

That the Democrat Left is bullies all the way down is nothing we didn’t already know (much like the previous post). But I want to address why there is so much hatred and bullying on the Democrat Left and I think it amounts to a couple of things.

One is that Democrat-Left politics are emotion-driven and hate is an emotion that is cheap to make and easy to harness. It is very easy to gin up hatred based on envy/resentment of others. The Democrat-Media-Academic complex are like a vast industry, working three-shifts to gin up resentment and hatred … telling their dumb but emotional followers that rich people have all the money and aren’t sharing it and that’s why they have nice houses and you have to scrape by; telling their dumb but emotional followers that white businessmen have all the power and that’s why you live in the ghetto; telling their dumb but emotional followers that Christians are the reason gay people are miserable. Hate works.

[But, but, but… some Democrat Left troll will argue… isn’t that just what your hero Donald Trump is doing? 1. Making this argument is proving my point about the left. 2. Concerns about Muslims committing terrorism and illegal immigrants causing hardship to the working class have documented evidence to support them. Whereas “white privilege” and all the rest of the left’s scary talk is nonsense ginned up by the left’s Product Design Bureaus in Academia and the Media.]

The other is that if you are a person who is already predispositioned toward hate, the Democrat Left provides an environment where hate is embraced and encouraged. If you pathologically hate men, the Third Wave Feminist movement will give you a nice warm spot where you can rant about male genocide and your unshorn sisters of the apocalypse will give you a heart “Right On.” Suppose you pathologically hate white people? #BlackLivesMatter will sign you right up. Do you pathologically hate Christians? Welcome brother.

Those are my thoughts? What do you think.

TnnsNE1 adds anther factor: Immaturity, many leftists are still emotionally 7th graders.

I think it all boils down to maturity levels. Liberals (for the most part) are stuck in middle school. They weren’t picked for kickball, they went to school dances without dates, etc. They don’t seem to be able to move past that needing approval from others stage. I find this especially prevalent with liberal gay folks.

“Democrat-Media Complex” Isn’t Just a Sarcastic Term Coined by a Handsome, Clever Blogger

Posted by V the K at 8:44 am - October 28, 2016.
Filed under: Media Bias

The Democrat-Media Complex is a real thing. Wikileaks has exposed that when the Hillary Campaign wants to put a narrative out that favors their candidate, they have a reliable network of Democrat Operatives posing as journalists and reporters to push their propaganda for them.

[D]ocuments listed those whom the campaign regarded as their most reliable “surrogates” — such as CNN’s Hilary Rosen and Donna Brazile, as well as Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden — but then also listed operatives whom they believed were either good “progressive helpers” or more potentially friendly media figures who might be worth targeting with messaging.

The names of those whom the Hillary campaign listed as reliable operatives won’t contain any surprises. Among them are Rachel Maddow, Andrea Mitchell, Chris Hayes, and Mike Brezinski (all of NBC News); George Stephanopoulus (ABC News); David Brooks (the alleged Republican at the New York Times); Eugene Robinson, Dana Milbank, and EJ Dionne at the Washington Post; Mara Liasson (NPR) … it’s a pretty long list at the link.

This same sh-t happened back in 2008, too, for Obama. Remember “Journolist?” And that media operation was also exposed by a leak; not by “reporters” honestly admitting “Hey, before you read this story, you should know I coordinated with other reporters to make sure it advanced the Obama/Democrat narrative.”

And advancing the Democrat Narrative is precisely what have seen the media do throughout this every election cycle.

In 2016 — rather than talking about the five wars we’re in and how badly we’re faring in all of them, or the 1% “growth” economy (where 2.5-3% is needed just to keep pace with population expansion),and the rigging of the FBI itself, and Obamacare blowing up like a Samsung battery made entirely of Space-Age Kerosene, and the murderers’ row at the VA, and the graft and corruption, and on and on and on — Hillary has decided that the only issue in this campaign is Trump’s Moral Failings, and wouldn’t you know it, the media has agreed.

Isn’t it funny that every campaign is fought on the precise battlefield the Democrats have adjudged to be most advantageous for them, and every campaign cycle, the media conducts an encircling action around the Republican to guarantee he can only fight on that unfavorable field.