GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

Leftist Priorities

by

Left-Wing Icon Stephen Colbert lost his two brothers and fathers in an airplane crash.  But he says that Hillary losing the election was harder on him.

This is what Mr. Colbert had planned as part of his election Night Hillary Victory Show:

“We hired a series of very fit naked men, with high, tight butts. We were going to bring them out if Hillary won,” Colbert explained. “And painted on their asses was going to be [one letter on each behind] ‘I’m with her.’ And then very early on the evening, we were like, ‘You can let those guys go.'”

Not being able to have naked men celebrate Hillary’s victory … less awful to Stephen Colbert than losing family members in a horrible plane crash.

Comments

  6. And yet these people laugh and point at Christians for worshiping their sky god.

    If you wonder how people end up worshiping the likes of Kim Il-sung, Mao, Castro, Hitler, et. al., wonder no further.

    Divine right of kings and all that. The Founders are spinning.

  7. The Millennial cream puffs are so risk adverse and soft that they will just melt when a real tragedy transpires. What will happen to these snowflakes when one of their parents die, a sibling has cancer, a friend has a life threatening illness? They will melt like a snowflake on mild concrete. Heaven help us when these people are the leaders of America.

  8. OT…I called it. The Obama’s have bought a house in CA. Watch for Michelle to run for Senate… Then run for the WH…. Sound familiar… I bet they will even start a foundation. There will be an opening in 2018… Ms. Feinstein will not seek re-election.

  9. Then run for the WH….

    I keep hearing this, but I think for the most part it’s just a Democrat wet dream. It’s not a huge secret that the former Ms Robinson was unhappy in the fish bowl of the White House and the constant scrutiny of her actions as well as those of her husband irritated her. But at least she had her kids and mother to console & be consoled by and to occupy some of her time. What would happen if she ran and were successful? She would be picked apart even more than before and have a bored husband (practically a professional narcissist) who would constantly upstage her.

    I think this is a largely underreported problem of having a female president with an active spouse; not everyone can be a Denis Thatcher, and most of the likely American equivalents are not accustomed to taking a back seat behind someone else with power in the household (HRC’s moments of alleged tantrums not withstanding). She would also have to differentiate herself identifiably from her husband, and I don’t think he would let her do that. He, for example, would want her to reinstate/reestablish Obamacare or similar other policies and the memory of the American public isn’t that feeble that the stench associated with it would have passed by the time of her ascent.

  10. Errr… How can the Obama’s afford to purchase TWO homes in pricey prime real estate markets and lease a third? Sweetheart financing? Under the table book advances? He’s still a sitting President — and wasn’t wealthy man before running for President. Their Chicago home was only affordable through dubious real estate transactions and shadow-financing.

    What was the “quid” for the “quo pro”? What’s the bidding-price for a Presidential Pardon these days??

  11. Cyril,
    re: the “Yet, you’re still around” one, a Canadian blogger says ting like this in response to the constant leftist lies about a deliberate genocide against the Indians, “If there was a genocide, why can I still hear you whining?”

  12. @Ilíon I am not informed enough about what exactly happened to the native americans.

    I am very informed however on the tactics of the left to revisit, twist, and infect history with their lies.

    The left right divide is their invention. Of course one can argue that humans have often fell for fallacious antagonistic dichotomies. E.g., faith or atheism, mono or poly theism, natives and foreigners, etc you name it.

    However, the evil genius of the left is in pushing this nonsense to the extreme and entitle themselves to be the only legitimate guardians of the very set of ideologies that is entirely based on group antagonism for the only purpose of obliterating individual rights.

    The evil is pure lie.

    Pretense to care about civil or personal liberties, by lip service, but in fact do everything to destroy them, thanks to the lever of abstract groups and then group membership / labelling.

    Pretense to go after conspiracies of alleged ruling classes (of wealth, faith, or culture) but in fact do everything to impose their own, by endless semantic re-routing bs.

    Everything is a lie to conjure reality under the crushing boots of *their* abstractions and their use of arbitrary force. Just like gangsters and mafias. “We’re here to protect you in the neighborhood, so here are the rules, or else…”

  13. Jesus is the way I strive follow, here. And miserably fail more often that not.

    For us Christians who know our greatness thru him as much as the misery of our condition thru human flaws he is the light to save ourselves by saying “No!” to the enslavement of men by other men, which is what Satan wants us to do to insult God.

    “Knowing God without knowing our own wretchedness makes for Pride.

    Knowing our own wretchedness without knowing God makes for Despair.

    Knowing Jesus Christ strikes the balance because he shows us both God and our own wretchedness.”

    — Blaise Pascal

  14. Ask a decent man what is most important in his life, and he will say, his family or in some cases his partner. Only a trashy moron would say the most important thing in his life is his car, his house, his record collection, his movie collection, and etc. Now, those are nice things to have, but they cannot be the center of life.