A pretty accurate summation, right?
The FBI’s “evidence” of Russian involvement is laughable. Short version: asically they say the Russians were involved because they found OnionDuke malware and Russians are known to use OnionDuke. OnionDuke is well known and any hacker, anywhere in the world could have been responsible. This is idiotic even for Obama.
Not to mention, the source of the DNC leaks says no Russian involvement; the leaker was a disgruntled DNC employee.
So much for Hillary’s “reset” button.
BHO manages to sour relations between our allies (Silky Pony Trudeau being an exception) while cozying up to regimes (like Iran) that hate our guts.
It’s difficult to like Putin but BHO makes it less difficult.
The Russkies are certainly quaking in their boots (not to mention that their cyber-warriors can do some serious damage if they want to – so has BHO ignited a cyberwar?).
As VtK notes, the leaked emails reveal the truth – much of which a useful media could have (and should have) uncovered long ago.
I’ve had confrontations about this on Twitter. It’s a no win argument because Libs want to only see one component of the whole thing, namely the hack into the DNC which they don’t get completely correct & won’t believe that someone, the Russians maybe tried to also get into the RNC but couldn’t. Then there is the denial of any importance about what the emails revealed. None of which was a hack into our national system, the election or anything else.
Bongo & company think it’s the Russians, it doesn’t matter, that’s their personal fight. Russia is neither friend or foe & Trump has implied as much in the past couple weeks, publicly hoping that we don’t have to go down an “alternative path”.
It’s the Left civilians that don’t want to see the whole picture & who are ranting that it’s either an impeachable offense, whatever that means, or a reason why Trump’s win isn’t legit.
Whether it’s the cops, gay discrimination bakery cakes or Russia. It’s not a good idea to put one’s eggs in one basket. The overall is; it’s important to support law & order, support (especially as people who happen to be gay) reasonable existing anti-discrimination laws & realize that Russia is always going to be an unknown factor (which has one only laughable naval carrier group).
I do notice that Neocon imbeciles McCain & Graham want to bring the Cold War back into full gear, just for Russia’s supposed meddling.
just keep talking about what was in the e-mails, that is what cost Hillary the election.
A gay friend of mine told me that in Russia, police are allowed to beat the crap out of gays. I know Putin isn’t exactly crazy about the gays, but I don’t believe that law enforcement are allowed to beat up on gays!
Only until January 20. Trump can clean up zeros crap quickly.
Let me preface this comment with the observation that I have no evidence whatsoever that would confirm my suspicion but there are a few data points that can be connected.
Most of the voting machine companies in the U.S. belong to international corporations. I’ve seen rumor that George Soros owns as much as 80% of the companies. Many have feared that Soros & company would use these to “adjust” the vote tally during the election.
One can presume that the plan was to slowly add Hillary votes during the course of election day to ensure a Hillary victory. Let’s assume that the “hack” somehow interrupted this plan. Somehow, the networks were blocked and the fake Hillary votes were never added.
Julian Assange has repeatedly stated the DNC e-mails were leaked, not hacked. If the e-mails could be leaked, so could the plans for altering the voting machine tallies. My guess is that the phony Hillary votes were to come from a foreign server over the Internet into the various state election servers. If the plans were known, any sufficiently facile hacker mount a denial of service attack on the network.
The Democrats certainly cannot admit to this plan. They are absolutely livid that it didn’t work. Who could have done such a thing? Moreover, who can they get away with blaming?
Who could have done such a thing. Just about anyone could have done this hack. The bigger question is who had the motive?
Hillary’s personal e-mail server was notoriously insecure. There is evidence that numerous intelligence agencies had accessed her server. Putin would have preferred a Hillary administration because Hillary had a reputation for selling everything and anything. Failing that, there was ample material to blackmail Hillary. The Russians are many things; stupid they are not.
Why blame Russia? The Democrats are blaming Russia rather than accepting their own incompetence in losing the election. It is true that Russia could have done it but they had ample reason to leave Hillary’s election alone. They wanted President Hillary.
The media dumps hacks, leaks and phishing all in one bucket.
You would think a medium that depends on words and their meaning would distinguish the 3.
Also, this is nothing more than a pathetic attempt to discredit Trump and to raise tension between Trump and Russia.
So Obama is needlessly antagonizing Russia to save face and try to conceal the fact that Hillary Clinton lost because of an insurrection within the Democratic Party. Great. January 20th can’t come fast enough.
I still think that the disgruntled DNC employee is the one that was found “mysteriously killed” but wasn’t robbed of his Rolex and wallet.
Sounds like Arkancide to me. Just sayin’ is all.
And the commenter above had it spot-on: Russia didn’t hack the election, they hacked John Podesta’s e-mail account. There’s a difference, folks.
Besides, if the chair of your campaign can’t distinguish between spam and legit e-mails, then you’re in deep ca-ca to begin with. Period.
Regards,
Peter H.
Oh my you guys are using an amazing amount of illogic.
Look:
The weak minded right was so gullible you believed every piece of lie/false proganda Putins team could churn out. And you cheared while he selectively released info on Clinton
Want an example? ;Look no further than comment #5:
“I’ve seen rumor that George Soros owns as much as 80% of the companies.”
This is unequivocally false. But since the Russians told you so via its mouth peice Daily Caller and Zerohedge you buy it without thinking critically about it.
But now that the right’s total duplicity has been exposed what do you do? You do nothing but make illogical arguments.
Face it. You were duped. So now you should be asking yourselves “why did the Russians fear Dems and want Trump?”
The answer found in Trumps proposed cabinet. Are you going to let him stack the gov with Russian stooges?
I’m starting to suspect that the true agenda of the powers that be who picked up this african village commie idiot in 2008 was to make a laughing stock out of this country.
A stray dog has more common sense than this fraud in flesh and bones — and the same stray dog will not try so hard to shove anti-constitutional “common sense legislation” up your you know what.
Once again for the Fascist Dunce in the room…were the emails real or not mikey?
The reason the RNC didn’t get hacked is because unlike John Podesta, Reince Priebus is smart enough not to give out his password to a phishing scheme.
Consider this: Obama never retaliated against China for hacking millions of personnel files (including mine) in the OPM hack. Only when “hacking” revealed the corruption and incompetence of Democrats did he dexude it was a national security issue.
“The reason the RNC didn’t get hacked is because unlike John Podesta, Reince Priebus is smart enough not to give out his password to a phishing scheme.”
Not only that… when the RNC received the warning from the FBI, they beefed up their cyber security. The DNC ignored it.
Also, most competent cyber security people know how to apply filters to keep phishing emails out of their employees emails. Heck, I do that for my boss. The RNC had this filter installed long before the FBI warning.
Isn’t Podesta supposed to be a cyber security expert?
Why is the right incapable of self reflection?
#16 – Why is the left incapable of honesty?
Checkmate.
Regards,
Peter H.
Is mike incapable of telling the whole truth and must always prevaricate by using outliers and incomplete facts?
littlelettermikey, the fascist deserves to be edumacated by the master. Therefore, I turn to David Burge, better known as Iowahawk, and his recent Twitter feed: