GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

Powered by Genesis

No Winners in This Story

January 22, 2017 by V the K

Old leftist “hag” Nasty Woman gets kicked off a plane for harassing Trump supporters.

It sucks that you lost your father-in-law, lady. But that doesn’t give you the right to harass other people on an airplane. You demand everyone around you… including the flight crew… cater to your feelings, while completely disrespecting everyone else’s.

Typical.

And this isn’t like those “A guy in a Trump hat called me the n-word. There aren’t any witnesses, but I swear it happened,” things. There’s video.

Filed Under: Civil Discourse, Unhinged Liberals

Comments

  1. CrayCrayPatriot says

    January 22, 2017 at 7:38 pm - January 22, 2017

    There’s so excuse for the behaviour. But can you just point it out wihhout the “hag” part.

    She acted horribly. But, um, yeah, it’s best to just have empathy while making your point.

    I know no consevatlve would ever act irrationally when confronted with a grave loss. But we’re all only human.

    Again, I don’t take exception to pointing out what has transpired. But, hag? Um, yeah, no. Unnecessary for these particular circumstances, where it would be fine in just about any other. I think this is the line being crossed. P

    Just my two cents which are worth about zero in these parts.

  2. Bastiat Fan says

    January 22, 2017 at 7:52 pm - January 22, 2017

    Oh, but there ARE winners in this story: the other, NORMAL people on the plane who were rid of this insufferable “progressive.”

  3. Lobogris says

    January 22, 2017 at 7:55 pm - January 22, 2017

    I would use another word to describe the “hag”. How’s that?

  4. Peter Hughes says

    January 22, 2017 at 8:27 pm - January 22, 2017

    Better put some ice on that, al-Cray-da. (As Bill Clinton told Kathleen Willey.)

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  5. CrayCrayPatriot says

    January 22, 2017 at 8:49 pm - January 22, 2017

    VtK, I was disagreeing with its use here and from the original article at the Chicks On the Right.

    Fine if people want to point it out, but “hag” seems unnecessary. Her behaviour speaks for itself. No sense in kicking a dog when it is down (and has been kicked off the plane). The woman is mourning, acted erratically, and embarrassed herself and her husband in the process. She has done enough damage to herself. Calling her a hag seems unnecessary. I think and hope the lesson has been learned on her part.

    I just feel bad for her that she acted a fool in a vulnerable moment.

    But that’s just me. I don’t take pleasure in these things.

  6. tnnsne1 says

    January 22, 2017 at 8:59 pm - January 22, 2017

    And cray expresses no empathy for the victim. Only empathy for the unhinged hag perpetrator. You can tell by the look on the husband’s face that this is not a one of incident. He had the “Here we go again” look on his face.

    Also, notice the excuse of the dead mother in law. Judging by the age of the husband, the mother in law has been dead many years. The women is a typical middle school mentality liberal.. someone cray can identify with.

  7. David in N.O. says

    January 22, 2017 at 9:01 pm - January 22, 2017

    Makes me grateful we are able to fly first class. This kind of crap only seems to occur in coach.

  8. David in N.O. says

    January 22, 2017 at 9:03 pm - January 22, 2017

    Yeah Tnn, I felt sorry for the poor husband. He looks to be afraid of that harridan he married.

  9. CrayCrayPatriot says

    January 22, 2017 at 9:21 pm - January 22, 2017

    Didn’t the victim upgrade? I didn’t realise it was coach.

    At any rate, I hope the woman reflects on the matter and finds the humility to apologise to the victim. It would be an encouraging end to an unfortunate story.

  10. tnnsne1 says

    January 22, 2017 at 9:42 pm - January 22, 2017

    “Unfortunate story”.. if this were the other way around it would be an indictment of the entire conservative population and would be on all the MSN channels wall-to-wall. Another moronic statement from cry cry… Oops.

  11. CrayCrayPatriot says

    January 22, 2017 at 10:13 pm - January 22, 2017

    Tnnsne1> try as you might to distort my words and beliefs into something they’re not, I stand by them. It appears you can’t register their meaning, nor handle their implications. It’s easier for you to place me in a box and label me. I get it. You can’t juggle two opposing ideas at the same time. It’s okay. You have good company at GP that reinforce your views. Not everyone. But a lot.

  12. tnnsne1 says

    January 22, 2017 at 10:21 pm - January 22, 2017

    I get it perfectly. You empathize with the angry hag and have no empathy for the victim. You wish the angry hag well but no such happy wished for the victim. You actually come very close to victim blaming.

    You condone Madonna and her threats against Trump, you confirmed CNN calling for someone to kill Trump, you condone the bullying of a 10 year old boy, you condone the vulgar incest reference of AJ and you condone the harassment of innocent people on airplanes. We get you. You are a vile, moronic shell of a human being who sold what little soul you had to the DNC. You made your pig sty.. sleep in it.

  13. CrayCrayPatriot says

    January 22, 2017 at 10:23 pm - January 22, 2017

    V the K> liberals don’t take responsibility for planting bombs at rallies. It’s the fault of gravity. If there was no gravity, they wouldn’t explode where they’re intended to do damage.

    /sarcasm (didn’t wish I had to write that, but people here would think I was serious if i didn’t. Oh h3ll who am I kidding. Most of you think I’m a independant gun-owner hating commie who wants to sh!t on your places of worship.)

  14. CrayCrayPatriot says

    January 22, 2017 at 10:26 pm - January 22, 2017

    Tnnsen1> it’s sad that you believe what you wrote. It’s not true just because you keep repeating it, honey.

  15. CrayCrayPatriot says

    January 22, 2017 at 10:28 pm - January 22, 2017

    And by the way, I’ve made recent comments on GP that contradict you’re accussations.

    You’re starting to sound like ND30.

  16. tnnsne1 says

    January 23, 2017 at 6:51 am - January 23, 2017

    Cray..No you haven’t. You make statements that skirt around condemnation of those things. You think Trump should be killed and you think his 10 year old son deserves to be mocked. Just like you thought it was funny when a late night comedian made jokes about Mrs. Palin’s daughters being sexually assaulted. You think people on planes should be confronted and humiliated because they disagree with you.

  17. Paul in N. AL says

    January 23, 2017 at 9:48 am - January 23, 2017

    I think Cray is right in that “hag” should be changed to dog.

  18. Peter Hughes says

    January 23, 2017 at 10:23 am - January 23, 2017

    Most of you think I’m a independent gun-owner hating commie who wants to sh!t on your places of worship.

    Well, if the shoe fits, then frickin’ WEAR IT, Imelda.

    *Drops mic*

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  19. CrayCrayPatriot says

    January 23, 2017 at 4:30 pm - January 23, 2017

    Cray..No you haven’t. You make statements that skirt around condemnation of those things.

    You really need to learn how to read.

    No, I do want to see any attempts on Trump’s life made. I’ve been very clear about that.

    And, no, I completely disagree with making comments on his youngest kid and wish people would leave him alone.

    And, you’re also wrong about the rest of the stuff.

    It sounds like you are going to ignore what I actually write and you’re going to continue to be obtuse about this.

  20. RSG says

    January 24, 2017 at 10:39 am - January 24, 2017

    Honestly, I don’t think the death of an in-law had anything to do with her behavior.

    I have yet to see the video but I can predict with 90% accuracy what it contains based on the reports I saw. Her behavior may have been triggered by a life-altering event, but it was only a trigger. And many events are triggers in her life. Being shorted change by a clerk at an “evil, monopolistic, capitalist corporation”. Encountering a billboard with a picture of a fetus and the phrase “Love them all”. And the current biggie producing a Grand Mal seizure type of reaction: anything pro-Trump related.

    This is the type of person who, if on the right side of the spectrum, would be called a perpetual scold. Anything that doesn’t fit into the confines of what she deems to be acceptable is improper and therefore shouldn’t be allowed. Unfettered marijuana use is okay; any type of gun ownership is not. The only reason this became news is because this incident doesn’t fit the commonly-perpetuated stereotype of the kind, tolerant left—particularly from the over-50 side of the equation.

    America’s Newsroom on FNC a moment ago had Mr Kotesky [sp] on via phone for his comments; they asked the question I was wondering but hadn’t heard confirmed: was he wearing/displaying anything that would give an indication of being a Trump supporter? He claims he was not; she simply assumed he was a yahoo from his appearance and his failure to denounce was confirmation. Fortunately, Alaska Airlines has released a statement affirming their employees’ decision to remove the harridan and her husband from the flight.

    As for the H-word usage, Twitchy was charitable enough to not use that term or another potentially sexist one in their relating of the incident, yet any discerning reader could come up with their own description of what this person might be and it would likely be far more unflattering than the three-letter word mentioned in the blog written by other women who are pointing out that the phrase “nasty woman” is a real thing, and not just a mocking term used by opponents of the current President.

Categories

Archives