GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

The Neverending Tantrum

by

So, the first weekend of Trump’s presidency was marked by women throwing tantrums over — actually, I defy you to find a coherent concern in their message. Seriously, if you can stand to watch Puffy Judd’s screeching speech, there’s really nothing substantive in it. Trump is not going around grabbing women by the cooch, and there’s nothing in his administration, so far, to suggest that abortion and birth control are going to be illegal. It was basically a big tantrum because Hillary lost.

And the this weekend, leftists turned out to protest against the notion that people entering the USA from high-risk terror states should receive more screening (which they called a “Muslim Ban”). Seriously, this rather reasonable proposition is ostensibly what the left (and virtue-signaling celebrities) were tantruming about. (I still think it’s still about Hillary losing.)

If you want to know what the tantrums next weekend will be about…. well…. Trump is reportedly going to name his Supreme Court nominee. I can already predict that no matter who he, or she, is… the pick will be described as “out of the mainstream,” “extremist,” and “a threat to the gains made by women, LGBT, and minorities.” Doesn’t matter who it is; the editorials have already been written with a black space for the name.

And that’s going to be a big “Hillary lost” tantrum because the left thought they almost had completely their absolute takeover of Government with five solid leftist votes. (And maybe a couple more under Hillary.) Democrat presidents do not appoint swing votes. (Who is the David Souter of the left? The Anthony Kennedy? The Justice whose vote on any matter cannot be predicted.)

The next four years are going to be non-stop leftists-behaving-like-spoiled-brats-in-the-toy-aisle-of-Wal-Mart, and nobody will have the guts to smack them.

Comments

  2. There is absolutely no reason for the Trump administration to make concessions to the 2%er marxist Senators of the Republican and Democrat Party in the US Senate. Strict constructionists/textualists only.

  3. “Conservatives have a much worse track record”

    Thats because conservatives consider anything less than absolute unthinking obedience to the latest right wing ideology as liberal. Whereas liberals regard nuance and moderate thought a positive quality

  4. #3 – Gee, project much, little-letter-and-d!ck mikey? For you liberals, it’s party over country – much like the National Socialists circa 1933.

    Checkmate.

    Regards,
    Peter H.

  5. “Whereas liberals regard nuance and moderate thought a positive quality”

    haha.. Madonna and bl0wj0bs is nuance and moderate?

    Cher… uck fuews is nuance and moderate?

    What a moron!!!

  6. “nobody will have the guts to smack them.”

    We don’t want anyone to smack them… The only people who are agree with them are the 20% of so that are solidly left wing nut jobs. The rest of America thinks they are idiots.

    “Never interrupt your enemy while they are making a mistake.”

    Let the games continue…

  10. #9.. refresh our memory..

    Which celeb on the right offered sexual favors while the ACA was being contested in court?

    Which right wing news anchors called for the assassination of Judge Roberts?

    Which right wing organization had marches filled with violence, trash, rants of incest after the ACA decision was handed down?

    You are a moron with a broken moral compass. Shame on you…