In a Jan. 5 email to The Hill, Vincent Tolliver, a former House candidate in Arkansas, said that (Democrat Congressman) Keith Ellison, the first Muslim elected to Congress, should not be chairman because of Islamic positions on homosexuality.
“His being a Muslim is precisely why DNC voters should not vote for him,” Tolliver wrote. “Muslims discriminate against gays. Islamic law is clear on the subject, and being gay is a direct violation of it. In some Muslim countries, being gay is a crime punishable by death.”
And the Democrat National Committee informed him that criticizing Islam for being anti-gay was not allowed in the Democrat Party.
Since the Democrats are going balls-to-the-wall in opposition to screening migrants from countries that are at high risk from Islamic Supremacist Terror Groups, I think there is a very good chance that the next DNC chairhumanoid will be a Mohammedan with ties to Louis Farakkhan and a mosque that teaches (what the left previously would have called) hate against gay people.
Sorry LGBT’s, you’re not the Democrats’ Shiny New Thing anymore. Mohammedans are the Shiny New Thing.
Let me get some popcorn, this is going to be good.
well looks like the gays are going to get the jew treatment from liberal America, sold out to a larger demographic. if they can get more muslim votes by opposing “gay rights” then the hell with “gay rights.” they never cared about your “rights” anyway all they cared about was your votes.
Oh yes, this is going to be fun to watch. Imagine if it had gone down this way:
“His being Christian is precisely why DNC voters should not vote for him. Christians discriminate against gays. The Bible is clear on the subject, and Christians believe being gay is a direct violation of the Bible. In some evangelical churches, being gay is….”
For the dense ones – more will yet be needed before they understand that they are only worker ants to the Democrats, and that they are worthless. Islam is the new love interest.
Too bad someone won’t share this with TV ads and such….
I’m guessing, but I do think the momentum in the DNC is towards picking Ellison. In their minds, separate from reality & the American people at large, the little Farrakhan acolyte is the perfect choice. Hey, why not alienate the rest of those that identify as white males in their disintegrating clown car party. Yes, p!ss off most blacks who think Farrakhan is “not a good idea”. Go for it, Libs. At this point, they’re not listening to those cheering on their bad decisions. The focus through their tears is myopic.
A few more steps towards the Sharia and the HRC, the Victory Fund and their Dhimmicratish gay fellow-travelers will discover to their horror that being thrown out of the Party involves an open window on the 8th-floor and a paved plaza below.
Does one wear the pink Pussy-Hat under — or over — the mandated-not-to-offend Hijab? A Feminist in a Hijab is a contradiction in terms — or a Democrat.
Sad!
I wonder… if Democratic mayors started closing gay bars and outlawing pride parades to “accommodate the sensibilities” of Muslim immigrants, would GLAAD call them homophobic? Ah, I forgot, you can only be homophobic if you’re a Christian baker who declines to cater a same-sex wedding.
If being gay pisses off the radical Islamists, how does being a married gay couple sit with them?
Well, it looks like Democrats are finally getting religion. It’s not really surprising they chose and intolerant authoritarian one.
You would think that after the Orlando massacre, LGBTQWERTY would wise up to the fact that they are no longer atop the Left’s oppression pyramid. Even after the blatant Islamaniacal carnage unabashedly unleashed on gays (during Gay Pride weekend no less) the Left’s immediate reaction was to protect the feeling of Muslims. I can’t be alone in my belief that Orlando was a turning point for many members of the gay community, probably even more so than Stonewall. I could be wrong. What do I know?
@3: right on. Only Christianity disqualifies someone from a DNC leadership position.
Heck, I wouldn’t be surprised if Ellison is the nominee in 2020. The Left has claimed to tolerate all but the intolerant. It’s just that the Right’s intolerance to Muslim intolerance is the worst kind.
When an identity group gets firmly attached to the governmental teet no amount of truth will get them to let go.
Witness how decades of Democratic rule in cities is never seen as the reason the city goes in the dumper.
Witness despite trillions poured into the War On Poverty there are just as many poor people as before.
So too here, despite evidence that Muslim extremists are targetting gays in particular, they lie to themselves that the Pulse shooter was secretly gay and this was all a revenge killing.
If (when) Ellison becomes the DNC chair, how will he deal with the Dems oft stated support of non-Islam beliefs? It will be interesting to watch the Dems tear themselves apart.
But watch the gays that always think they are victims cheer this DNC ruling. they have the brains of a retard.
8.If being gay pisses off the radical Islamists, how does being a married gay couple sit with them?
Probably better than knowing there is more than one gay out there who has burned a koran. Boy was I surprised to find out KoranBurningFaggot was already trademarked.
I guess this means Andrew Tobias will not be returning as DNC Treasurer.
He’s been oddly quiet about Ellison’s “qualifications”.