Gay Patriot Header Image

George Takei Also Spoke Approvingly of Pederasty

Posted by V the K at 1:22 pm - February 21, 2017.
Filed under: Gay Culture

It’s OK when a left-winger does it.

George proceeded to recall that he was 13 at the time, and he was with “an experienced” counselor who was in his late-teens. When George recalled his counselor’s “blond forearm,” Artie insisted he was still comfortable sitting next to him. George went on to say his counselor came to his cabin while he was alone, and the two began kissing before exchanging “hand jobs.”

And he never lost a job or an endorsement deal over it. Ain’t that something?

Share

32 Comments

  1. Have American Conservatives rejected George Takei and stopped eating at Taco Bell?

    I only ask because:

    IF Left rejects MY-Low for being a Nasty Pedophile Enabler AND American Conservatives reject him as well,

    and

    V the K argues that Left is hypocritical because it didn’t reject Sulu ten years ago for being a Nasty Pedophile Enabler,

    how is it that American Conservatives get off Scotty-free?

    Was it not the Reagan Battalion that cracked this case wide open (or just shifted the spotlight to the videos that have been lying around in plain site all this time)? Where is the outrage from American Conservatives concerning Sulu’s fond memories of his guidance councillor’s blond arm hair?

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — February 21, 2017 @ 1:49 pm - February 21, 2017

  2. Vince just pounded that sucker to wood pulp.

    No, actually, I drew a logical conclusion. And then you pounded on the table and covered your ears.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — February 21, 2017 @ 2:04 pm - February 21, 2017

  3. Alinsky’s fourth rule: Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.

    Takei doesn’t count, because the left doesn’t have the same set of rules that the right does, regarding minors, etc.

    Yiannopoulos counts because the right has a different set of standards than the left, regarding minors, etc.

    Comment by Ellen — February 21, 2017 @ 2:14 pm - February 21, 2017

  4. The only logical conclusion is that George Takei got a pass because his defense of pederasty couldn’t be used as a cudgel to beat up the right.

    That doesn’t explain why the Reagan Battalion broke the story. Why would American Conservatives throw Milo, a Dangerous F@ggot under the bus? Like Trump, he was just saying what was on his mind, free speech, etc.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — February 21, 2017 @ 2:23 pm - February 21, 2017

  5. Ok so Vince is making less sense than usual. Of course to understand the entire issue requires honesty and ethics. So I understand why he’s confused.

    Comment by The_Livewire — February 21, 2017 @ 2:26 pm - February 21, 2017

  6. Again, craycray, displays ignorance regarding Freedom of Speech. Another moronic statement.

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — February 21, 2017 @ 2:27 pm - February 21, 2017

  7. Vince, I was pretty sure that we were in agreement here that the Reagan Battalion was at least partially politically motivated.

    Comment by Sean L — February 21, 2017 @ 2:28 pm - February 21, 2017

  8. And now it appears that the Reagan Battalion is a front for a group of Democrats.

    http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/reagan-battalion-milo-yiannopoulos-never-trump/

    Interesting read.

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — February 21, 2017 @ 2:34 pm - February 21, 2017

  9. Nobody even knows who this ‘Reagan Battalion’ is.

    Twitter account started December 2015:

    Your source for news, information, commentary, from a conservative perspective.

    But, I guess it wasn’t American Conservatives who started it. It was dem bloody Libtards. Always is.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — February 21, 2017 @ 2:36 pm - February 21, 2017

  10. For someone who was supposedly going to fix dinner for the past couple of hours, al-Cray-da sure is being a nuisance here today. SMH…

    Regards,
    Peter H.

    Comment by Peter Hughes — February 21, 2017 @ 2:38 pm - February 21, 2017

  11. Again, craycray, displays complete ignorance.

    “It was on the interwebs so it has to be true”

    Any fool can create any website and post anything on it.

    I guess that goes along with the “logic” that anyone can be any gender they think they are (for the day).

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — February 21, 2017 @ 2:41 pm - February 21, 2017

  12. @6 what makes you think the Reagan battalion is on the right?

    Comment by salg — February 21, 2017 @ 2:41 pm - February 21, 2017

  13. “It was dem bloody Libtards. Always is.”

    For once, you might actually be correct.

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — February 21, 2017 @ 2:42 pm - February 21, 2017

  14. So, in December 2015, a group of liberals (or one) had the foresight to brand themselves a conservative domain with the intent of some day passing themselves off as conservative (to appear more legitimate) to systematically attempt to take down one or more conservatives? And the first person they set their sights on was little known MY-Low Whine who was about to begin his Dangerous F@ggot tour. Over a year in advance, they were like, he’s the one. He’s already gone on extensive record with pro-pederasty views, he’s building a conservative audience, he’s going to be huge, and right as he reaches the apex of his career, we’re going to slam him down and stick it to the Right. Because, when My-Low falls it’s going to do SO MUCH DAMAGE to the conservative cause. Do I have that right? Was that the plan?

    :smdh:

    Vince, I was pretty sure that we were in agreement here that the Reagan Battalion was at least partially politically motivated.

    I’m not sure where we had this interaction. I’ve searched for it twice and can’t find it. Can you please point it out. Thanks.

    So Vince cannot let that be the focus.

    It’s the focus because you made it the focus. But the premise is faulty. I’m pointing out the flaws.

    For someone who was supposedly going to fix dinner for the past couple of hours

    All always drop everything for you, darling. And, I mean everything.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — February 21, 2017 @ 3:04 pm - February 21, 2017

  15. The ‘Reagan Battalion’ has been attacking Trump since its inception.

    That doesn’t change the fact that AMERICAN CONSERVATIVES HIM DOWN–the supposed new bastion of Free Speech. NOT THE LIBERALS. They sat their and watched. What? Did you expect them to come to MY-low’s defence because they still eat Taco Bell?

    I was hoping I could submit the following for review to The Obama Legacy Organising Committee:

    https://www.queerty.com/canadian-man-blocked-us-customs-read-scruff-profile-20170221?utm_source=notification&utm_medium=push&utm_campaign=onesignal

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — February 21, 2017 @ 3:21 pm - February 21, 2017

  16. *TOOK HIM DOWN

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — February 21, 2017 @ 3:31 pm - February 21, 2017

  17. *there not their

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — February 21, 2017 @ 3:31 pm - February 21, 2017

  18. “AMERICAN CONSERVATIVES [took] him down”

    Name them…

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — February 21, 2017 @ 3:39 pm - February 21, 2017

  19. CrayCray, that is an Obama legacy as I understand it. Proposed summer of 2016, entered implementation early december. Nothing to do with Trump, other than it being just about in time to explode in his face.

    Comment by aerinyes — February 21, 2017 @ 3:45 pm - February 21, 2017

  20. We know the Reagan Battalion is a front group for ISIS. Just watch their behavior of what they do and do not do.

    Comment by Paul in N. AL — February 21, 2017 @ 3:55 pm - February 21, 2017

  21. The Reagan Battalion is AARP. They’re really p!ssed that All in the Family isn’t still on the air. #BringBackMeathead

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — February 21, 2017 @ 4:06 pm - February 21, 2017

  22. Naturally, George got a free-pass that a Milo has not gotten here. Milo is dead-on correct that America has a free-speech problem. And there are elements within both the left and the right that neither understands free-speech nor likes free-speech. In addition, too many people today are so poorly educated that almost anything pass either/or is quite completely impossible to follow.

    Sad day, but – by all means – let the whining and argument continue.

    Comment by Martel's son — February 21, 2017 @ 4:26 pm - February 21, 2017

  23. Well, well, well….The Reagan Battalion are McMuffinites. How interesting.

    Comment by RSG — February 21, 2017 @ 5:15 pm - February 21, 2017

  24. “The Reagan Battalion is AARP”

    Yes.. the Clintons, Soros, Warren, Pelosi and Sanders.. old people.

    Comment by tnnsne1 — February 21, 2017 @ 5:22 pm - February 21, 2017

  25. I’m no expert on Citizens United and the (deliberately) complex ins and outs of political funding but we’re being overrun by various groups (and that includes groups of one or two people in some office somewhere) with strings being pulled by persons-unknown.

    These groups always have benign names like “Reagan Battalion” or Citizens Against Toxic Energy (I made that up – it would be run by the likes of Solyndra), etc. It’s just one more thing that points out the gov’t has way too much to sell.

    Now where do I sign up for The Obama Organizing Committee.

    Not knowing Milo and not having ever been in the same state as Milo, I can’t know whether or not he’s actually in favor of pederasty or even if he’s ambivalent about it. Having read a transcript of what he said, he comes off as ambivalent (applying benefit of the doubt). He will certainly need to do penance to rehabilitate himself.

    That said, the outrage from the left is (as always) disingenuous given the record of many, many prominent lefties (what’s that plane Bubba likes to fly on? The Lolita Express?). And Milo has certainly never lectured anyone on sexual propriety.

    He screwed up. It happens. (I’m assuming that there’s no more fire under all the smoke.)

    I’ll still buy his book it someone publishes it just to make lefties sad.

    Comment by KCRob — February 21, 2017 @ 7:06 pm - February 21, 2017

  26. I’ve seen tweets from the Reagan Battalion in the past. They’ve been threatening to resist Trump at every step of the way. I assumed it was saber-rattling. Apparently not.

    It seemed like the #NeverTrump camp was willing to sit down and give Trump a chance. But the timing of the revelations about Milo, considering the fact that the video had apparently been around for weeks, I’m starting to wonder whether or not the Trump Right needs to give the Old Right another political smackdown.

    Comment by Sean L — February 21, 2017 @ 8:10 pm - February 21, 2017

  27. […] George proceeded to recall that he was 13 at the time, and he was with “an experienced” counselor who was in his late-teens. When George recalled his counselor’s “blond forearm,” Artie insisted he was still comfortable sitting next to him. George went on to say his counselor came to his cabin while he was alone, and the two began kissing before exchanging “hand jobs.” (Gay Patriot) […]

    Pingback by My Thoughts on Milo Yiannopoulos | Religio-Political Talk (RPT) — February 21, 2017 @ 8:45 pm - February 21, 2017

  28. When I think unapologetic gleeful child molester (and probably her dog too) that is the Lefts princess, the person I think of is Lena Dunham. George with his blonde arm hair story pales in comparison to the disgusting things Lena did to her baby sister and then had the audacity to write about it as though she should be rewarded that her sister grew up to be a lesbian (implied by Lena due to her introducing Grace to the joys of girl girl experiences ie molestation).

    Milo told a flip joke. And is crucified practically where as Lena shouted her child molestation to the world with pride.

    Comment by Sandra — February 21, 2017 @ 9:23 pm - February 21, 2017

  29. The Reagan Battalion have come out against George Takei’s comments and equated them to MY-Low’s three hours ago FYI.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — February 22, 2017 @ 12:50 am - February 22, 2017

  30. And now Bill Maher. http://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2017/02/22/uh-oh-video-surfaces-of-bill-maher-condoning-sex-between-an-adult-and-a-14-year-old/

    Comment by Annie — February 22, 2017 @ 11:12 am - February 22, 2017

  31. I’m good with Milo. He hasn’t engaged in or condoned paedophilia. He said a couple of dumb things that he owned up to. In the recent times, I had an issue with Milo using the podium to bully and name-call those who had an opposing POV and was beginning to think the fame has gone to his head. This fall may not be such a bad thing for him — setbacks can help if one looks for learnings. I hope it is temporary and he will go back to his original style and substance that was far more compelling. it was dirty what they did to him. The best way to counter is to help his book sales.

    Comment by Jane Austen — February 22, 2017 @ 11:27 am - February 22, 2017

  32. The hypocrisy is deafening.

    Comment by Sigma256 — February 24, 2017 @ 12:31 pm - February 24, 2017

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.