Sometimes I feel like I’m Captain Picard, and the SJW’s are Cardassian Torturers trying to get me to say “There are 57 Genders.”
[youtube]https://youtu.be/3kmG7KXxShM[/youtube]
It is imperative for the Left to get people to deny self-evident truths; it is the only way the Left can prevail.
[youtube]https://youtu.be/K7uqCZCgRKU[/youtube]
I don’t see any genders because gender is an abstract concept that refers to the way some languages are constructed. I see the outward manifestations of sexes, however, and there are two of them.
If you bring this gender confusion issue to the attention of local, regional Democrat doyennes & patrons, they laugh it off. As if it’s merely a harmless peccadillo of one of the Left’s factions. Even though they’re all complicit in either their strategic silence or promotion. Perhaps normal Democrat men & women hope that they’ll be elected to their their building’s commissar, with sights set on the position of block committee chairman – if they applaud this twisted support of mental illness.
I hope that the psychiatric world is preparing itself for consequences of all this, when the pigeons come home to roost.
Human children, without exception, are born from the union of sperm and egg. Sperm comes from a males, egg from a female. Being able to mingle the DNA of two females still requires the sperm of a male. All human children, without exception, are born from the union of male and female. That truth is self-evident and undeniable.
It has been so for hundreds of thousands of years and generations.
Child psychologists will tell you, and numerous studies have been done confirming this, that children grow best in a family with a father and a mother. Lack of one or the other increases the chances of problems occurring. It is therefore in the best interest of society and its future, to promote, defend, and help heal, traditional families.
Attempts to blur the lines of gender, to accept as equally valid, any other arrangement and call it a family, is to tear at the very cornerstone of society.
We do so at our peril.
Being one that gives regard to science (here being focused on biology), I find myself with the phase that keeps coming to me with this need of the regressive left’s new science of genderism; There are two genders, and three sexual orientations with all the diversity we need in this reality.
As to the rest – when this madness has run its course, there will be so many destroyed lives requiring the services of professional to try, and make good lives wreaked by this gnostic ‘gospel’.
Actually, a LOT longer than that — even self-fertilizing hermaphrodites need to combine a sperm and egg (not a sperm and a sperm or an egg and an egg) to make a baby.
You have to go out of the animal kingdom entirely to find sexually-reproducing species (certain algae and fungi, for example) that do away with the sperm/egg distinction entirely. Mind you, they have to combine two sex-cells to reproduce, but each gamete is “unisex” — I suppose you might call them “speggs,” by analogy with “spork.” đ And yet their reproduction is still “hetero”, in some sense, since the “speggs” come in different strains — say, A, B, C, and D — and two speggs from the same strain cannot fuse. So A+B, A+C, and A+D can “make a baby,” but not A+A or C+C.
This is what a feminist looks like
Stop Violence Against Women
Don’t worry, Sir Patrick is wants to be a US citizen in order to fix us. He must have a high opinion of his abilities.
@7 – CCP: help me out. Being fabulously wealthy and holding a sign helps women how, exactly?
Women in Muslim cultures (Malmö, Sweden for example) tend to get victimized yet we dare not notice. A lot of women that are subject to domestic violence tend to be shacked-up with ne’er-do-well men but marriage is just a useless piece of paper (or it was until it become a gay civil right).
Lesbian relationships tend to be more prone to violence:
http://www.advocate.com/crime/2014/09/04/2-studies-prove-domestic-violence-lgbt-issue
And then there’s the problem of women attracted to (and staying with) partners that like to beat them up. But, of course, women are simply victims with no agency or power to change their situation.
Anecdote: a friend of mine used to work with a women regularly beaten by her man (but she “loved” him and wouldn’t leave). Every time she was roughed up, the other gals took up a collection. He never donated.
Finally, one of the gals asked him why he was such a scrooge. He replied that 1) she wouldn’t leave him and 2) he’d be more than happy to donate a cast iron skillet if she’d promise to use it on the jerk (coupled with leaving, an ideal solution, IMHO).
What does make sense is this: There are people with guy parts who wish they had gal parts, and there are people with gal parts who wish they had guy parts. The others are completely undefinable, and so untestable.
(WARNING: Article includes an adorable picture of Stewart in a Lobster costume)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82eGHYsP0FE
Psst…. Cray…. Let me help you out here.
VtK said “sometimes I feel like Captain Picard”, not “sometimes I feel like Patrick Stewart”.
There are times I’ve felt like King Lear, but that doesn’t mean I have felt like any of the myriad actors who have portrayed the character.
Let’s stick with the subject, shall we?
I realize people have varied sexual tastes, and that’s fine. But that, in and of itself, is not gender. But this stuff has been in the works for a while, now.
After my transition to male back in ’01 and going to the local LGBT clinic for an appointment, the attending doctor would ask me upon check-in what my identity was, and I sat there, confused. I said, “Well… I just went through all this to become a guy. What other choices are there after becoming a guy?”
He looked at me shocked, like I was from some other universe. How dare I question their perfect questionnaire on gender???
Well thats what they get for coming into a gay mans window at night
https://www.18karatreggae.com/2016/10/07/2-burglars-sodomized-breaking-rapist-house/
Classic liberal: when in doubt, spam links. It’s fast, easy, and doesn’t require you to come up with your own arguments.
I wouldn’t classify regular GP commenter Steve as a liberal, but each to their own.
Oh look.. moron craycray is trying desperately to be cute and snide. Pathetic is what it is.
Oh ladies!
Life is short. Take that stick outta yo’ @ss!
xoxo
Well, Vince, I guess Pinochet would have a hard time distinguishing a Nazi like Steve and a liberal like you…
It’s a bit nutty that a lot of you ladies at AW have me pegged as a far leftist. Not all, but a lot. It almost resembles a far right version of “virtue signalling.”
It’s actually mind-blowing, as a lot of you ladies are quite smart and articulate. But I guess I’ve just gotten desensitised to this rather extreme and distorted perception. It’s pretty shocking when one considers the substance of a lot of my arguments on GP throughout the years.
But, I get it. Most of you dislike me and would prefer I left (as you might with any centrist who leans left or maybe even right). Some of you are more open-minded. But, considering the time and effort I’ve invested in GP, the return on investment in drilling through that hardened exterior many of you sport has been pretty low.
Sad.
*GP not AW
That’s because Vince is not a Leftist. He’s a troll.
How does that make one a far-leftist?
Yes, her delivery was. You can be objective about delivery removed of content, can you? Or can’t you? It sounds like you can’t.
Yeah, so? They’re all “far-leftists”?
“Every other left-wing activist group.” Yeah, where’s the evidence of this constant barrage of support for an assortment of such groups?
Oh, yeah, because “pure capitalism” hasn’t been given a chance in the American marketplace. Because that will fix everything. And I guess you’re calling for an end to all entitlements and socialised government programs, is that right?
Have I ever seriously championed a bakery being shut down for not making a gay wedding cake? (I’ve actually made comments about radicals going too far here)
P!ssy is a stretch. Befuddled more accurate. And, again, the term I used was “far leftist.”
Are you the Juan that wrote on here that the repeal of DADT was rooted in the gay left’s obsession with military pornography? Or are you a different Juan? And, your definition of “troll” is a bit overly inclusive. Better check your bias and take your blinders off.
I am not that Juan. I am another Juan.
And. “In Internet slang, a troll (/ËtroÊl/, /ËtrÉl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion, often for the troll’s amusement.”
I think that covers what you attempt to do pretty much.
Fun fact – whenever Patrick Stewart is on a discussion panel that is in any way sci-fi related, he’ll almost always do the “four lights” line for the crowd.
Juan > For those with reading comprehension skills and no bias who have paid any attention to my comments over the last seven years on GP can discern for themselves just how much my contributions here have been valid discourse and how much has been trollish behaviour. I’m no saint, but I’m also not entirely the far leftist troll a lot of you have convinced yourself of. In fact, I’m much less the latter these days.
Simply because you and others believe it, doesn’t make it so.
:::Saying so, doesn’t make it so::: only applies to the Leftist [unnamed] & not to anyone on the Right on gaypatriot. After all, incantations & fantasy are all the Leftists really have going for them now. It would be a shame for [you] to assign your only workable [sometimes & only when bleating to the chorus] formula, to others. Phony baloney mistake. Conservatives & other denizens on the Right have no need to make anything up. It’s not we who are unnatural & experimental.
However much I’d like to stick to the actual definition of a troll, it’s broad use by every commie jerk on the Left has rendered it meaningless. That’s called throwing you a bone, #29. I don’t expect gratitude.
I’ve never rested on “saying so makes it so.” I’ve taken my lumps. I’ve relented when I’ve gotten in over my head. You’re f*cking delusional like tnnsne1. Try sticking to the definition of getting your facts f*cking straight.
âHow Many Genders Do You See?â
I see zero “genders” … but I do see two sexes