Gay Patriot Header Image

Bitter, Party of One, Your Table is Ready

Posted by V the K at 7:56 pm - March 9, 2017.
Filed under: Unhinged Liberals

This feminist seems to really, really resent women who found husbands.

Once, I went to a “Female Founder’s” conference for female entrepreneurs and one of the main speakers addressed the audience: “Don’t be afraid to found with your husband. Most female founders I know have founded with their husbands.” Her words filled with me rage, but what she was saying was true; many successful female entrepreneurs I knew did indeed found with their husbands.

Trying to found a company as a woman with a successful male partner is much easier than trying to found a company as a woman with a female partner, a woman with no partner, or a woman with a less successful male partner. This is a highly insidious, type of patriarchy as women are denied access to success on their own and are reliant on their husbands. This crops up all over the place; could a woman who hadn’t been married to a previous president realistically be running right now?

She’s sort of tacitly admitting that Hillary was nothing without Bill.

Update: Is it just me, or do “woke” feminist men look like 1970’s porn actors.

Update: Maybe that should be a table for two. (Summary: Another diatribe from a smug blue state leftist proclaims how blue states (cities) are superior to red states because they have all the hedge fund managers, opinion journalists, and marketing consultants; whereas the red states are just a bunch of dumb farmers, mechanics, and trades people.)

It’s Never About Fixing the Problem, It’s About the Language

Posted by V the K at 6:11 pm - March 9, 2017.
Filed under: Political Correctness

Near the end of this very detailed article on the national epidemic of opioid addiction is this telling little detail.

The director of a Midwestern state’s mental health programs emailed a chart called “‘Watch What You Call Me’: The Changing Language of Addiction and Mental Illness,” compiled by the Boston University doctor Richard Saltz. It is a document so Orwellian that one’s first reaction is to suspect it is a parody, or some kind of “fake news” dreamed up on a cynical website. We are not supposed to say “drug abuse”; use “substance use disorder” instead. To say that an addict’s urine sample is “clean” is to use “words that wound”; better to say he had a “negative drug test.” “Binge drinking” is out—“heavy alcohol use” is what you should say. Bizarrely, “attempted suicide” is deemed unacceptable; we need to call it an “unsuccessful suicide.” These terms are periphrastic and antiscientific. Imprecision is their goal. Some of them (like the concept of a “successful suicide”) are downright insane. This habit of euphemism and propaganda is not merely widespread. It is official. In January 2017, less than two weeks before the end of the last presidential administration, drug office head Michael Botticelli issued a memo called “Changing the Language of Addiction,” a similarly fussy list of officially approved euphemisms.

The people coming up with these rules are by and large not affected personally by the opioid epidemic except to the degree that they draw a paycheck from the Government response to it.  They have the luxury of lecturing non-drug addicts on the politically correct language so as not to hurt the delicate feelings of someone who just “recycled” her own urine to get another high off the drugs she had unprotected sex with a dealer to procure.

Them and Us

Posted by V the K at 11:59 am - March 9, 2017.
Filed under: Liberals

C6cpdSEU4AAfY1a

SJW’s Discover Something Else to Be Furious About

Posted by V the K at 8:48 am - March 9, 2017.
Filed under: Post 9-11 America

They are really, really furious about Mohammedan child-rape, violent illegal immigrant gangs like MS-13 that use rape as an initiation ritual, and the culture of human trafficking and sex slavery that left-wing illegal immigration and Sanctuary Cities policies allow to thrive.

Nope, just kidding. They’re mad because white girls are wearing hoop earrings.

I am not making this up.

“We wonder, why should white girls be able to take part in this culture (wearing hoop earrings just being one case of it) and be seen as cute/aesthetic/ethnic,” Martinez continued. “White people have actually exploited the culture and made it into fashion.”
Then, because just one of these e-mails was apparently not enough, another student replied to the thread with an e-mail demanding that all white girls remove their hoops immediately: “If you didn’t create the culture as a coping mechanism for marginalization, take off those hoops, if your feminism isn’t intersectional take off those hoops, if you try to wear mi cultura when the creators can no longer afford it, take off those hoops, if you are incapable of using a search engine and expect other people to educate you, take off those hoops, if you can’t pronounce my name or spell it . . . take off those hoops / I use ‘those’ instead of ‘your’ because hoops were never ‘yours’ to begin with,” Jacquelyn Aguilera wrote.

Obviously, this is far worse than child-rape or sex slavery.

Priorities.

key_2011-04-03T23-54-56Z--640x360

It’s Not the Patriarchy, Stupids

Posted by V the K at 8:43 am - March 9, 2017.
Filed under: Donald Trump,Hillary Clinton

There is a conceit on the Left that Hillary lost because she’s a woman; and not because she is a corrupt, decrepit, dishonest left-wing politician with the charm of an IRS audit, the engaging demeanor of a Soviet bureaucrat, and the sincerity of a used car salesman who furthermore represented a continuation of the failed, warmed over socialism policies of Barack Obama.

So, as an experiment intended to demonstrate that Hillary was biased against on account of her sex, an NYU professor decided to restage a Hillary-Trump presidential debate with a woman reciting Trump’s lines and a man reciting Hillary’s. This would demonstrate, so the designers of the experiment thought, that the audience was biased to give Trump (as a man) more credit than Hillary (as a woman).

In fact, it demonstrated the opposite.

Many were shocked to find that they couldn’t seem to find in (the actor playing Male Hillary) what they had admired in Hillary Clinton–or that (the actress playing female Donald Trump)’s clever tactics seemed to shine in moments where they’d remembered Donald Trump flailing or lashing out. For those Clinton voters trying to make sense of the loss, it was by turns bewildering and instructive, raising as many questions about gender performance and effects of sexism as it answered…

We heard a lot of “now I understand how this happened” — meaning how Trump won the election. People got upset. There was a guy two rows in front of me who was literally holding his head in his hands, and the person with him was rubbing his back. The simplicity of Trump’s message became easier for people to hear when it was coming from a woman–that was a theme. One person said, “I’m just so struck by how precise Trump’s technique is.

No matter who said Hillary’s lines, they came across as robotic, prepackaged, pablum.  (Because they were.) Whereas Trump’s lines came across as sharp. It was not because she was a woman.

Conservatives have never had trouble with women politicians. Margaret Thatcher was a conservative hero. But conservatives don’t embrace the idea that someone deserves to win just because she is a woman. Leftists believe that. And they believe you’re a misogynist for not also believing that.

“Let Them In,” They Said

Posted by V the K at 8:29 am - March 9, 2017.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace,War On Terror

Democrat Senators Chuck Schumer and Dippy Blond Seat-Warmer Kirsten Gillibrand went to the wall — with assistance from a Democrat Mayor and a leftist middle-school teacher — to help a Mohammedan child rapist gain entry to the United States.

When Tanveer Hussain and Abid Khan weren’t allowed into the United States, they blamed President Trump. So did the media outlets that covered the story. The controversial Democrat mayor of Saranac Lake reached out to fellow New York party members Senator Charles Schumer and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand. They leaned on the local embassy and Hussain and Khan were waved through.

“Still a country that welcomes athletes from across the globe,” Senator Schumer’s statement read. The statement, shared on Hussain’s Facebook page, declared, “So proud of the town of Saranac Lake for their efforts and their open hearts.”

Later Hussain’s brother would explain one difference between Saranac Lake and Kashmir. “In Kashmir, we have a tradition of showing love to children,” he said. Kashmir’s idea of showing love to children was very different than that of Saranac Lake. Tanveer Hussain would be charged with molesting a 12-year-old girl who was a student at the school.

At the time, Chuck and Kirstie were keen to “stand up to Donald Trump” by getting unvetted Mohammedans into the country. I guess they really showed him. Too bad it led to a little girl getting raped, though. Although apparently, many of the people who worked to bring the child molester into the country think it was a small price to pay for their virtue-signaling. Besides, rape is only wrong when it’s committed by white, upper-middle class college students, or so it would seem.

Not only that, but one of the “refugees” that somehow got through Obama’s “thorough vetting process” (“It takes over a year, you guys. We ask them lots and lots of times if they’re terrorists.”)  turns out to be an ISIS-affiliated terrorist. (“Oopsie!”)

Federal lawmakers are investigating how a former Iraqi insurgent fighter was able to lie about his identity and still get through America’s ‘extreme’ vetting process.

The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee has asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions to find out why the terror suspect’s pending arrest was allegedly spiked just over a week before the election. [Oh, I think we can guess why – V]

U.S. officials said earlier this week that nearly a third of the FBI’S 1,000 ongoing domestic terrorism investigations involve those admitted to the U.S. as refugees.

Remember when Barack Obama characterized the refugees he was swarming into the country as “widows and orphans?” That was a lie to placate you while he ushered in terrorists and child rapists.

In perhaps the most glaring example of Iraqi terrorists getting into the U.S, two Iraqi refugees living in Bowling Green, Ky., were convicted in 2013 of plotting to help Al Qaeda. The men were also hit with additional charges after their fingerprints matched ones found on IEDs used in Iraq to kill U.S. soldiers

Wait, I thought that never happened and Kellyanne Conway made it up. That’s what the media said, anyway.

The Red Scare in Perspective

Posted by V the K at 8:20 am - March 9, 2017.
Filed under: Socialism in America

Democrats have been trying to hype the New Red Scare ever since Hillary lost, warning us that because Trump’s National Security Advisor had a conversation with his Russian Counterpart and his Attorney-General met with the Russian ambassador while a senator that this was proof… PROOF… that Trump was about to hand control over to the Kremlin and we’d all be forced to eat borscht and work in shoe factories for our new Soviet Overlords.

Well, comrades, it seems the Democrats were not at all concerned that President Obama’s right-hand advisor (the rat-faced slumlord Valerie Jarrett) for eight years was an Iranian-born hardcore Soviet Communist.

According to Judicial Watch, Jarrett’s father, Dr. James E. Bowman, a pathologist and geneticist, “had extensive ties to Communist associations and individuals.” The FBI files obtained by Judicial Watch show that “in 1950, Bowman was in communication with a paid Soviet agent Alfred Stern, who fled to Prague after getting charged with espionage.”

Valerie Jarrett’s father-in-law, Vernon Jarrett (1917-2004), “was also another big-time Chicago Communist,” according to FBI files obtained by Judicial Watch. “For a period of time Vernon Jarrett appeared on the FBI’s Security Index and was considered a potential Communist saboteur who was to be arrested in the event of a conflict with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR),” reported Judicial Watch.

According to the FBI documents, Vernon Jarrett’s job was to “write propaganda for a Communist Party front group in Chicago that would ‘disseminate the Communist Party line among … the middle class.”

“Faithful to her roots, [Valerie Jarrett] still has connections to many Communist and extremist groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood,” said Judicial Watch. “Jarrett and her family also had strong ties to Frank Marshall Davis, a big Obama mentor and Communist Party member with an extensive FBI file.”