Gay Patriot Header Image

Oh Noes! Moar Gun Violences!

Posted by V the K at 12:15 pm - March 28, 2017.
Filed under: Gun Control

Just curious, is it the actual position of liberal anti-gun types that we would be better off as a society if these three thugs were still alive after successfully burglarizing this residence? Just asking.

Sheriff’s spokesman Deputy Nick Mahoney said the suspects entered the home through a glass back door with the intent to burglarize it. It was not immediately clear why they picked that home.

Mahoney said the suspects encountered the homeowner’s 19-year-old son, who opened fire (with an AR-15) after an exchange of words. Two of the suspects died in the home’s kitchen while a third was found in the driveway.

This home was defended with the exact weapons liberals want to ban. (And would have succeeded in banning if Hillary were in the White House and Merrick Garland on the Supreme Court). And in states like Maryland, you can be prosecuted for defending your home against home invaders.

Follow up. Will the three dead thugs be counted as “Gun deaths” when the liberals are rounding up their anti-gun talking points.

Update: How the BBC is covering it: Three teenagers who broke into a home in Oklahoma were killed by the homeowner’s son firing an assault-style AR-15. They describe the dead thugs as “teens” or “teenagers” six eight times, and “intruders” once. They also bring up “stand your ground laws” even though they have no relevance to this case (but they are another things liberals oppose because they side with the thugs).

Share

13 Comments

  1. More likely “child victims of gun violence”.

    Comment by Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — March 28, 2017 @ 12:26 pm - March 28, 2017

  2. Just curious, is it the actual position of liberal anti-gun types that we would be better off as a society if these three thugs were still alive after successfully burglarizing this residence?

    Give ’em a break; they’re just looking after their constituents.

    Comment by Ilíon — March 28, 2017 @ 12:50 pm - March 28, 2017

  3. This story makes me glad to live in Texas. No grand jury in the entire state would indict anyone from defending their home with deadly force. Period.

    “How about them apples, boy!” (firing clip until empty) 🙂

    Regards,
    Peter H.

    Comment by Peter Hughes — March 28, 2017 @ 1:23 pm - March 28, 2017

  4. Looks like you and I were sharing a brain today.

    https://thelibertyzone.us/2017/03/28/no-one-needs-an-ar-15/

    Comment by Nicki — March 28, 2017 @ 1:41 pm - March 28, 2017

  5. Next time, they’ll think twice before feeeeeeeeeling entitled to someone else’s property.

    Oh, wait. They won’t. They failed to notice the sign,

    http://i.imgur.com/b5D07kN.jpg

    Oops.

    Comment by Cyril — March 28, 2017 @ 2:21 pm - March 28, 2017

  6. They should be nominated for the Darwin Awards. How stupid do you have to be to break into a home without knowing exactly who or what may be inside—in Oklahoma? Odds are you’re not going to like what or who is inside…

    Comment by RSG — March 28, 2017 @ 2:59 pm - March 28, 2017

  7. 1. Yes, it is the Left’s position that we would be better off as a society if the thugs were still alive, even if they were committing more crimes. “If that deplorable, privileged white male had not been armed, those poor kids would still be alive!” And, very likely, the unarmed resident would now be dead. But, to SJW’s, a life is a life. The death of an innocent person is no more tragic than the death of a vicious criminal. And the deaths of three criminals are three times as tragic.

    2. Yes, the thugs will be counted in the SJWs’ statistics as “victims of gun violence.” Along with Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin, Philando Castile, Abdul Artan, Tashfeen Malik, Syed Farook, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, John Dillinger, Baby Face Nelson, Clyde Barrow, Bonnie Parker, Billy “the Kid” Bonney, Billy Clanton, and the Dalton Brothers.

    3. Whether it’s the BBC or the American news media (MSDNC and the Clinton News Network), any criminal who gets shot will be portrayed as an innocent child.

    4. True, “Stand Your Ground Laws” vs. “Duty to Retreat Laws” are irrelevant in this case. AFAIK, only 19 states have a legal duty to retreat, and most of those only apply it to public places, where one person has as much right to be as another. That is, even if you would be required to retreat from a mugger on the street, you could still stand your ground against an intruder in your own home. (I am NOT giving legal advice here. Ask your lawyer and/or your local law enforcement agency about laws governing justifiable use-of-force in your state.)

    But then, both the prosecution and the defense in the Saint Skittles case said that Stand Your Ground was irrelevant. But Representative Sheila Jackson Lee still introduced a bill to cut federal aid to states that had SYG laws, and she said it was “because of what happened to Trayvon.” Of course, she’s the same congressperson who visited the JPL and asked NASA if the Mars Rover had photographed the flag planted by Neil Armstrong.

    Comment by Tom — March 28, 2017 @ 4:52 pm - March 28, 2017

  8. It looks like the perps were white.

    So the Beeb needn’t have bothered.

    (Note to burglars of any color: entering an occupied house, masked and armed, is very bad decision-making.)

    Comment by KCRob — March 28, 2017 @ 8:50 pm - March 28, 2017

  9. Just curious, is it the actual position of liberal anti-gun types that we would be better off as a society if these three thugs were still alive after successfully burglarizing this residence?

    How else is he gonna get his money?

    Comment by Craig Smith — March 28, 2017 @ 10:14 pm - March 28, 2017

  10. How stupid do you have to be to break into a home without knowing exactly who or what may be inside—in Oklahoma?

    Interesting development, RSG, it’s looking like the getaway driver, who turned herself in and is being charged, may have indeed known what/who was inside. It’s not real clear if the kids she got killed were just Rent-a-Thugs she picked up at Home Depot, or if something more was going on.

    Comment by Sathar — March 28, 2017 @ 10:57 pm - March 28, 2017

  11. Why do I get the feeling that if a zombie apocalypse happened tomorrow, that a lot of liberals would try to make it illegal to shoot zombies on the rationale that it would be “ex-human murder”?

    Comment by Sean L — March 29, 2017 @ 6:18 am - March 29, 2017

  12. What the heck is a “assault”style Ar 15?

    Comment by Matthew the Oilman — March 29, 2017 @ 6:55 am - March 29, 2017

  13. Sean L — of course! You’re talking about one of their core constituencies, there. Someone smarter than me identified a bunch of them as “Obama zombies,” though the hordes are comprised of more numerous and diverse packs.

    What the heck is a “assault”style Ar 15?

    That would be, for example, the full size M-16 or the more compact M4, both of which are capable of “selective” (i.e. automatic) fire. The firearm in this incident is reported as a “semi-automatic”, therefore it would be inappropriate to call it an Assault Rifle.

    Comment by Sathar — March 29, 2017 @ 2:10 pm - March 29, 2017

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.