On April 8, Cernovich Media claimed that National Security Advisor “H. R. McMaster [is] Manipulating Intelligence Reports to Trump, Wants 150,000 Ground Soldiers in Syria”.
Today, Eli Lake at Bloomberg confirms that McMaster wants to send up to 50,000 ground troops to Syria. And “has been quietly pressing his colleagues to question the underlying assumptions of a draft war plan against the Islamic State that would maintain only a light U.S. ground troop presence in Syria…to facilitate a better interagency process to develop Trump’s new strategy to defeat [ISIS].”
The real news is that Trump has said no to McMaster – at least for the time being. Kudos to those GP commenters who advised me, more or less, that Trump is his own man and wouldn’ t automatically go with McMaster.
As to the rest: it sounds like Cernovich dropped the nuances and exaggerated what was left, but still got much of the essence. And ahead of Bloomberg. Here’s a similar example, this one with Judge Napolitano.
In March, Napolitano claimed that, in spying on Trump, Obama went around U.S. laws that would restrict such spying by having a British intelligence agency access the U.S. NSA surveillance databases, then pass along findings. Obama and the British denied it vehemently.
Today, CNN confirms that “British intelligence passed Trump associates’ communications with Russians on to US counterparts.” CNN suggests that the British did the surveilling themselves, a difference from Napolitano’s story. Still, the British did it under intelligence-sharing agreements and to me, it sounds like Napolitano was in the ballpark.
The real news is that CNN still has no substantive Russian collusion to report against Trump.
Cernovich may or may not be exaggerating. If you want 150,000 troops in Syria, it makes more sense to ask for 50k and then later go back for 100k more once you say that the mission requires it. Asking up front for 150k troops is a much harder sell.
Quite hilarious
http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/12/right-wing-blogger-threatens-legal-action-over-berkeley-instructors-vile-insults/
Indeed. 🙂 He’s out to make the Left play by its own rules.
How does Syria rate 150,000 troops on-the-ground? What’s the compelling interest? We already have too-many troops on the ground in Iraq, and in Afghanistan. …And for too-long. Kill Dr. al-Assad, and let the Arabs, Turks, Kurds and Persians fight over the scraps…
Why are we still straight-jacked by the Sykes-Picot Agreement and still defending the unitary-sovereignty of Syria and Iraq?