GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

Dangerous Faggot

by

I have unblocked the word “faggot” in our comments section. It was past time, for 2 reasons:

  • South Park “The F Word” made “fag” OK in 2009.
  • Milo – it’s impossible to cover him without mentioning his “Dangerous Faggot” lecture tour.

As to Milo, he has re-launched. (He appears around 58:45 in the video.) Highlights:

  • He has raised $12 million for a new media and book-publishing company that will be dedicated to ending political correctness and “making the lives of journalists, professors, politicians, feminists, Black Lives Matter activists and other professional victims a living hell.”
  • He will be suing Simon & Schuster (presumably for breach of contract?), asking another $10 million.
  • He is still planning MILO’S FREE SPEECH WEEK (no dates on it).

I saw this coming, after the Left’s coordinated attack on him in February. He’s not one to stay down and out.

By the way, Vanity Fair hates him. And if you’re thinking “pedophilia”, Milo had a few words for you back in February: “I do not support pedophilia. Period. It is a vile and disgusting crime, perhaps the very worst.” We at GayPatriot agree.

Comments

  2. It’s probably a bad idea to sue Simon & Schuster. It may not have been the correct decision, but it seems reasonable to cancel his book in light of negative publicity. He wasn’t harmed (he got to keep the $1M advance and gets to self-publish, which might even put more money into his pocket)…

  5. I am delighted that Milo is coming back in full “dangerous” mode.

    Roger Simon looks at political correctness as a form of narcissism:

    Moral Narcissism—the almost schizophrenic divide between intentions and results now pervading our culture—is the new method for feeling good about yourself. It no longer matters how anything turns out as long as your intentions were good, that you were “moral.” And, just as importantly, the only determinant of those intentions, the only one who defines that morality, is you.

    So long as the popular culture insists on wandering in the forest of adaptive morality and situation ethics, the loudest narcissists will always outshout any common sense and common decency which rains on their garden party.

    Milo stands tall as the minion most obligated to political correctness and tells the social justice piety warriors to stuff it and why. He may be making a career of it, but in no way is he merely putting on an act.

  6. I just watched the people on Big Bang Theory make a bunch of Catholic school girl jokes.

    I believe the episode is five years old. Waiting for the outrage.

  8. A continuation of the internecine war between the 2%er communists/national socialists aka 2%er progressives/libertarians. As the majority, we refuse to be pulled into any gay barfight of those struggling to retain any semblance of political relevance after being rendered politically and economically impotent in November 2016. I still maintain that you all have a screw loose if a 2%er paedophile/ephebophile is representative of the “conservative” movement within the 2%er Orwellian world of “liberals/conservatives” aka communists/national socialists within the 2%er homosexual/bisexual/GID population.

  12. rjligier – Not feigning anything. Your comment refers to some things that simply aren’t so; thus, it’s difficult to relate it to the real world. Plus the jargon.

  13. @ ILC: Yes, the Left started it, but there were plenty on the Right who have it in for Milo who ran with the story and/or dropped him like a hot potato.

  15. Sean – True. It doesn’t matter, in the sense that Milo’s destiny is in his own hands. If he keeps fighting political correctness (and persuasively so), then he will be a major public personality. And if not, then not.

    rusty – Good one. Hadn’t heard of them. Google turns up some interesting stuff.

  17. Which has been superseded by this: http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/02/21/full-remarks-milo-delivers-speech-press-conference-amid-video-scandal/

    My experiences as a victim [of sexual abuse] led me to believe I could say anything I wanted to on this subject, no matter how outrageous…But I understand that my usual blend of British sarcasm, provocation and gallows humor might have come across as flippancy, a lack of care for other victims or, worse, ‘advocacy.’ I am horrified by that impression…

    I would like to restate my disgust at adults who sexually abuse minors. I am horrified by pedophilia and I have devoted large portions of my career as a journalist to exposing child abusers…I’ve outed three of them, in fact — three more than most of my critics…

    [In approving of cross-generation relationships among consenting MEN,] I shouldn’t have used the word “boy” — which gay men often do to describe young men of consenting age — instead of “young man.” That was an error…

    Anyone who suggests I turn a blind eye to illegal activity or to the abuse of minors is unequivocally wrong. I am implacably opposed to the normalization of pedophilia and I will continue to report and speak accordingly. To repeat: I do not support pedophilia. It is a disgusting crime of which I have personally been a victim…

    RTWT.

    To be clear: I am 100% opposed to pedophilia AND ephebophilia. I disagree with Milo in the following way: while he says that 16 is “about right” as a legal age of consent, I think it should be raised to 18. (And I myself am attracted only to guys who are at least 25 or 30+.) Even so: when I see people trying call Milo a pedophile or whatever, I’m struck by their lack of honesty. I can keep re-pasting Milo’s comments on the subject until Kingdom Come; I mean, it’s easy.

  19. rjligier @ #8:

    the 2%er communists/national socialists aka 2%er progressives/libertarians

    I do not see how communists/national socialists are also known as progressives/libertarians. How can libertarians be equated to either communists or national socialists?

    We, the members of the Libertarian Party, challenge the cult of the omnipotent state and defend the rights of the individual.

    We hold that all individuals have the right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives, and have the right to live in whatever manner they choose, so long as they do not forcibly interfere with the equal right of others to live in whatever manner they choose. (Link)

    I have no idea what the “2%er” is meant to imply in terms of being a qualifier.

    As the majority, we refuse to be pulled into any gay barfight of those struggling to retain any semblance of political relevance after being rendered politically and economically impotent in November 2016.

    Was the majority rendered impotent or was it “those gays struggling to retain any semblance of political relevance” who were rendered politically and economically impotent? And who are the communists/national socialists also known as progressives/libertarians in this puddle of political and economic impotency?

    I still maintain that you all have a screw loose if a 2%er paedophile/ephebophile is representative of the “conservative” movement within the 2%er Orwellian world of “liberals/conservatives” aka communists/national socialists within the 2%er homosexual/bisexual/GID population.

    I take “you all have a screw loose” to mean everyone at GayPatriot except rjligier.

    I take it that the “2%er paedophile/ephebophile is representative of the ‘conservative’ movement” is Milo Yiannopoulos. I further take it that Milo is both a molester of little boys and an adult who is sexually attracted to adolescents who has been made a “representative” of the conservative movement.

    I really don’t know what proof there is of connecting Milo with being an active paedophile/ephebophile. Such proof has not been established. Nor do I know how Milo became a “representative” of the conservative movement.

    What I do know, is that Milo has taken Gay Pride in all of its most outrageous feathery adornments to the stage and in high gay dungeon has peed all over political correctness, victim signaling, and social justice wahooism while calling himself the Dangerous Faggot.

    For that, I support him along with a whole bunch of conservatives who admire his brass balls. He is so up in the faces of Jon Stewart, Bill Maher, Stephan Colbert, et al that they are reduced to letting the thugs shut him up.

    When I reached the part about “within the 2%er Orwellian world of “liberals/conservatives” aka communists/national socialists within the 2%er homosexual/bisexual/GID population”, I admit I went into utter confusion and am unable to find the thread.

    This, of course, is not to imply that my mental chaos in deciphering the comment is representative of any other person or that I deserve a special education explanation.