To the left, it’s perfectly normal for a person with a meat and two veg between its legs to claim to be a woman and be entitled to be treated as a woman. It’s also perfectly normal for a person with a vajayjay to claim to be a man and be celebrated as a male pregnancy. It’s also totally normal for a man claiming to be a woman to win prizes for beating up other women. Also, it’s OK to be a serial abuser of women as long as it’s OK with your wife; Right Mr. Clinton?
So what does the left consider weird? A guy who respects his wife enough not to put himself in potential compromising situations with other women. A guy who thinks that a stay-at-home mother is more responsive to her children’s emotional needs than a minimum wage child care worker.
Apparently, Mike Pence doesn’t believe that women can balance the demands of life, careers, and kids. Pence wrote a letter to the Indianapolis Star in 1997, in which he warned that women “can have it all” but that their children will get “the short end of the emotional stick.”
The guy was never a pregnant man. He still had a uterus and ovaries. It is biologically impossible for a man with real male parts to get pregnant. Just because he took hormones did not mean he was a man having a baby. Anyone who says otherwise has lost touch with reality and science. Period.
I consider myself liberal-minded (at least left of centre), for better or worse. Any child is lucky who has one parent who can stay at home and take on the lion’s share of raising. It doesn’t matter the sex of the parent to dictate how lucky that child is. It’s about flexibility between the parents and being on the same page before they start their family.
I’m not really sure what is so controversial about this thinking.
*shrug*
“I’m not really sure what is so controversial about this thinking.”
Simple.. Pence said it. That is all it takes for deranged liberals to howl at the moon.
They hated Mrs. Palin because she had a stay at home husband who could manage family duties just fine (unlike the “can’t do anything other than make hot chocolate” beta males liberal women have children with).
Pence didn’t write that. I did.
CCP.. No kidding.. You really shouldn’t comment on people’s reading comprehension.
Let’s see if you can follow …
I wrote what I wrote, which was not in synch with what Pence wrote (he differentialed by sex; I didn’t).
You quoted “I’m not really sure what is so controversial about this thinking.” My “controversial” line was in reference to what I wrote (which diverged from what Pence said).
You responded after the quote, “Simple.. Pence said it.” As in, it was controversial because he said it. Yet, if he had said what I wrote, the reaction would have been different and non-controversial. It would have been actual surprise, because liberals couldn’t tear down a man who made such a blatant statement of equality in parenting.
I’ll stop when you learn how to f*cking read.
“Yet, if he had said what I wrote, the reaction would have been different and non-controversial. It would have been actual surprise, because liberals couldn’t tear down a man who made such a blatant statement of equality in parenting.”
Oh, you were serious. Wait, let me laugh even harder.
Your bullshit false equivalence and denial of reality would be astounding, if I thought you actually believed a single word you say.
I know exactly what I believe and I expressed it. Make a valid point or GFY.
In other words, show me an example of liberals expressing outrage and tearing down a conservative with a progressive social platform.
Dumb-@ss.
I really don’t understand you guys. I write something in plain English and you still have a way of twisting it into something it’s not.
I’ll repeat: If Mike Pence (a Republican) expressed a progressive social platform in a statement (as in, he said a child suffers when one parent isn’t at home to raise the child–regardless of sex), how on earth would there be the “outrage” expressed as his comments as they were?
You’re f*cking delusional. Certainly, attack me if I’m out-of-line. But, just to take a shot just reveals your utter stupidity. No wonder you prefer Trump over Clinton in the White House. Your intellects match perfectly.
*Looks at the enormous mountain of historical evidence of the left hating the right even when the right agrees with them 100%, which is increasing exponentially every day*
Nah, an eyeroll is all you’re worth.
Considering your lack of reading comprehension, your eye-roll is pretty worthless. But, go ahead and pat yourself on the back for … no reason.