If you are like most Americans and don’t watch CNN, you have no idea that the network has become a constant stream of anti-Trump propaganda. (The network did a story and an analysis about how Trump has two scoops of ice cream when everyone else gets one. Remember that? Pepperidge Farm remembers).
CNN’s absolute malevolence against Donald Trump is illustrated well by this series of, for real, headlines from their website.
Does anyone want to try and make the case that there’s no such thing as a Democrat-Media Complex?
Just to make sure this wasn’t fake news, I checked it with Google and screencapped the results (without any Tentacle Hentai Tabs) and it’s legit.
The left is made of adult bodies governed by spoiled brat kid brains solely driven by an overbloated hypothalamus.
Amazingly enough, they’re still allowed to vote, and even worse, to legislate.
Hi V the K (and Cyril),
Its an opinion piece, right? So, do we get to cheer the NYTimes and call them pro-President Trump when they publish an op-ed supportive of the President?
Oh, and by the way, “Editor’s Note: Vanessa Brown Calder is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute, where she focuses on social welfare, housing and urban policy. The views expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.”
Cato Institute–hotbed of Progressive radicalism…. If you read the piece, you might like it, given your values.
1. Hillary Clinton tweets “Happy Mother’s Day.”
2. CNN: Mother’s Day is wonderful.
3. Trump tweets “Happy Mother’s Day.”
4. CNN: Mother’s Day perpetuates stereotypical gender roles and oppresses women.
Rinse. Repeat.
There was also the MSM’s about-face on the No-Fly List. When it was first implemented, under Bush, the media denounced it (and with considerable justification). Editorials and articles in The Atlantic and New York Times complained about the lack of due process and the lack of any objective standards. They pointed out that anyone could be put on the list, for no reason, and with no evidence. They also noted that names remained on the list even after the suspects had been investigated and exonerated.
Then, after the San Bernardino massacre (in a designated gun-free zone, in a blue state with strict anti-gun laws), the Obama administration proposed prohibiting the sale of guns to people on the No-Fly List. The Atlantic and NYT supported it. Their articles and editorials started complaining that “even suspected terrorists on the No-Fly List can buy guns.” With Obama in office, the MSM suddenly learned to Stop Worrying and Love the List.
BTW, the killers in San Bernardino (one a Muslim anchor baby who visited the ME before returning to the US, the other a Muslim immigrant who had posted pro-jihad comments on social media before obtaining a visa) were never on the No-Fly List, or any other anti-terror watch list. (Not surprising, since Barry and Hillary had ordered the FBI and DHS not to spy on Muslims.) Which means the “No Fly, No Buy” idea would not have prevented the tragedy. A “Muslim ban” would have.