Gay Patriot Header Image

Sane People Not Welcome

Rush Limbaugh did a piece this week on how the impetus of the Democrat Left is to force society to accept dysfunction as normal. He has a point.

A transgender activist (oh, boy, you see those two words together and you know you’re about to hit high Octane crazy)  named Zinnia Jones went on a Twitter tear attacking straight men who don’t want to date chicks with dicks.

“I don’t see a problem with telling straight guys who are exclusionary of trans women partners that they should try to work through that.

Being exclusionary of trans women partners should be an outlier and marginal position for straight men, not some commonplace expectation.

I also don’t believe the blanket claim of ‘straight men don’t want to be with someone who has a dick!’

There’s some baseline rate for that as an actual true preference. But it’s artificially inflated by social stigma and biases.

It’s subject to the effect of *incredible* numbers of straight men who want us but refuse to ever admit to it, and cover it with transphobia.

Do the majority straight men really secretly lust for chicks with dicks, and its only society’s stigma that keeps them from dating “trans women?” Because Zinnia Jones really believes that.

Question for you homos: Would any of you be into dating a “Trans Man?” Do you agree with Zinnia Jones that “All genitals are sort of funny looking. It’s just flesh. You can probably deal with it.”? (Thus reducing all the complexities of sexuality to matters of genital anatomy.)

It this type of pure deranged, completely-out-of-touch with reality, delusional rant that is now the norm on the left. And the 21st Century Democrat Party would rather align itself with Zinnia Jones than with the working class normal people of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, or Ohio (the “bitter clingers, as Barack Obama called them). The Democrat Party has become obsessed with social justice virtue signaling to the exclusion of the practical functions of Government. It’s a fairly easy thesis to demonstrate. Democrat-run Illinois is losing population and jobs, but just initiated a massive tax increase. Democrat-Run California, too, just enacted a massive tax increase and is continuing to pour billions into a railroad project that is neither needed nor wanted by the public, but Party Elites need to signal their virtue with regard to the (increasingly discredited) theory of human-caused global warmening.  Democrats insist that the tax increases are necessary, but the low tax states of Texas and Florida seem to be doing OK. Oh, and New York City’s Democrat mayor skipped out on his mayoral duties in order to join Antifa in protesting Donald Trump at the G-20 because that kind of empty symbolism and common cause with violent hate groups is what the party is all about. Democrat policies seem to be designed particularly to drive normal, reasonable people out of the jurisdictions they control.

Indeed, Democrat strategist Mark Penn wrote an Op-Ed suggesting that the Democrat Party might want to maybe refocus on the economic and practical concerns of the middle and working class, and was promptly slammed for it by the party’s virtue-signaling activist base. (Mostly, middle-aged divorced women, or women that never found a man in the first place and are super bitter about it and the type of beta males drawn to leftist politics.)

Donald Trump made a speech in Poland defending the west’s values of pluralistic democracy and basic human rights. The Democrat Left attacked him as a fascist. And then they pushed a fake news story that the first lady of Poland refused to shake hands with him.

Share

31 Comments

  1. I am loudly and proudly vaginophobic.

    Comment by BigJ — July 8, 2017 @ 12:08 pm - July 8, 2017

  2. I believe the phrase Rush used was ‘Defining Deviancy Down’.

    Comment by Craig Smith — July 8, 2017 @ 12:19 pm - July 8, 2017

  3. As a gay male, plumbing DOES matter!

    Comment by LB GUY — July 8, 2017 @ 12:19 pm - July 8, 2017

  4. Zinnia demands other respect zer sexual preferences or else – yet has no problem trying to force straight men to Fck zer (no repect for their preferences but hostility they do not do what zhe demands).

    In some societies that would be considered sexual harassment at a minimum and 1:1 it would be attempted rape if zhe kept pushing it.

    On another note genetic women needs to start fighting back as this is another example of men (trans) trying to exert control over all aspects of women (soon trans will be demanding womens wombs in addition to their taking over genetic womens/girls sports and private spaces) and straight men (bow down to your betters and do what we want says the Leftist a-hole always)

    Comment by Sandra — July 8, 2017 @ 12:26 pm - July 8, 2017

  5. On another note – should lebians be forced to have sex with trans women as that is also what Zinnia is implying. Just ignore the male parts and do what the Leftist demands.

    Comment by Sandra — July 8, 2017 @ 12:29 pm - July 8, 2017

  6. So a gay man who couldn’t get gay men to date them wonders why straight men won’t date them?

    This is so bizarre. Why don’t these people date each other?

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — July 8, 2017 @ 12:31 pm - July 8, 2017

  7. I do believe that Democrats have no thought as to what is normal & are too busy with the business of signing into law things which they have added to their platform & mindset. Meaning, they’re too focused on being elected or remaining in power to worry about what is normal or how they appear to normal people. Normal people being those that get up, have breakfast, have their day, get home, have their amusements & go to bed. I explain normal because there seems to be so many who immediately pounce on the word, which really doesn’t need defending.

    Comment by Hanover — July 8, 2017 @ 12:37 pm - July 8, 2017

  8. Meh. If I met a good-looking “guy” who I liked and things got hot and heavy and “he” dropped trow and there was a certain something missing… who knows. Won’t say “absolutely yes,” but also won’t say “absolutely no.” Of course, I’m like that on a lot of things- more “potentially interesting escapade” than “integral part of my sexual desires”. It’s the “different”-ness of the encounter, I guess, same as wanting to get with a guy with a different hair color/significant height difference/ethnicity/etc. The thought of getting it on with a woman has crossed my mind from time to time, but nothing that would put me above a Kinsey Scale 6 – idle curiosity, not actionable desire. Maybe it’s more an aversion to female secondary sex characterstics, rather than primary? Throbert, we need your expertise!

    I think young people are more willing to experiment with their sexual preferences than previous generations. Once fooled around with a guy who identified as straight into his mid-20s, then got a wild hair about guys and switched to a KS 5. Have a male coworker who’s a 3, a female coworker who’s a 2.

    Comment by Sean L — July 8, 2017 @ 12:42 pm - July 8, 2017

  9. The point of “being gay” is that romantic-sexual attractions can’t be faked; you love what you love; so long as you love consenting adults outside your immediate family, society can tolerate you and no one should tell you a thing about whom you “should” love.

    So, Zinnia Jones can take a hike. I don’t get into dating self-mutilated approximations of the real thing. I just don’t. That’s my personal “wiring” and I have a right to it. And straight men get to have their wiring (and, say, reject me).

    Let Zinnia find someone who does get into her. Or go without – as I’ve done before; as civil, mature, moral, freedom-respecting grownups must do sometimes.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — July 8, 2017 @ 12:43 pm - July 8, 2017

  10. On another note genetic women needs to start fighting back as this is another example of men (trans) trying to exert control

    Yes, there is something deeply misogynistic about MTF trans. They remain XY, while reducing womanhood to a performance, or an act of surgery. And, as we see today, they systematically invade real-female spaces.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — July 8, 2017 @ 12:56 pm - July 8, 2017

  11. @ ILC: By the same token, are FTM trans misandristic?

    Comment by Sean L — July 8, 2017 @ 1:13 pm - July 8, 2017

  12. Im starting to see transgender profiles on Growlr, and it ain’t too pretty.

    Comment by Pawfurbehr — July 8, 2017 @ 1:14 pm - July 8, 2017

  13. The Democrat Party has become obsessed with social justice virtue signaling to the exclusion of the practical functions of Government. It’s a fairly easy thesis to demonstrate.

    Yes, illustrating the thesis is about all we can do.

    The basic question to be asked is “why?” Why has the Democrat Party become obsessed with (1.) social justice virtue signaling (2.) to the exclusion of the (3.) “practical” functions of government.

    So, in fact, there are actually three basic questions being posited.

    1. “Social justice virtue signaling” is not possible to discuss in traditional terms because it is not language with established definitions. So, for the moment, I will skip over #1.

    2. Why would the Democrat Party prefer the miasma of #1. to the exclusion of #3.? Thus, I have to skip over #2. and deal with #3.

    3. “Practical” functions of government includes the qualifier of “practical” as opposed to the whole universe of unlimited government. Therein lies the key to the “conundrum.”

    The Democrat Party prefers a gelatinous, sprawling government blob that oozes into every corner of people’s lives and organizes them into a perfect statist society in which peace and harmony will be effected according to the statist rules and definitions.

    The Democrat Party has only Marx, Engels, Leninism, Stalinism, Trotskyism, Maoism, Dengism, and Titoism as their source of basic principles. Supposedly, once Utopia is attained, government withers and disappears. But that only happens after all the heavy lifting by government of herding the sheeple into the Elysian Fields.

    How the heck does a political party “virtue signal” this kind of “social justice” in a way that makes every citizen demand to be part of the destruction of life as they know it and completely trust this new and unknown god force? You start with those who have nothing to lose and are too dumb or lazy to be skeptical of the pandering. Then you pick up those who can pander efficiently and realize a personal advantage for doing so. Then you build a bureaucracy which thrives on scavenging the existing order and bloats itself into morbid obesity and thrives on corruption, ideology, lying and polarization.

    “Limited” government becomes the enemy of the people because “limited” government is anti-Jabba The Hutt. “Limited” government wants the sick to die, the chilruns to starve, women forced to raise chilruns created by rape and incest, old people eating dog food, rich people charging $200 for half an aspirin and blah, blah, blah. And that feeds and pleases Jabba the Hutt and makes him grow.

    “Pratical” functions of government is an argument for limited government.

    The Democrat Party has become the DemonizingRats because they are wedded to Statism. They are Marxists. They believe that the efficacy of socialism is within their clever reach. They will not tolerate a discussion of “less” government because it is antithetical to everything they stand for.

    If you try to address “social justice virtue signaling” you are going to be hit head on by the Polarizing Express.” You are adjudged to be a “useless” idiot and therefore, totally in need of being “expended.” No time need be wasted on your Neanderthal inability to see the light, let alone appreciate it.

    Soon enough, all Marxists march their foes off to reeducation camps where most people die or cause themselves to be “exterminated.”

    Oh, wait, Heliotrope, now you have gone too far. Really? Show me the Marxist fueled society where the gulag doesn’t exist.

    So, some sober minded Democrat Party folks are looking at the likes of Al Franken, Maxine Waters, Chuck Schumer and they don’t see anything resembling the first 250 years of the United States in them. They want to go back to working within the framework of the Constitution. They want to argue ideas on their merits and return to common decency.

    But, they have a badly corrupted press, badly corrupted popular culture and a crippled underclass dependent of government entitlements to confront.

    I think it is more likely that the Democrat Party will crumble and a new party will arise which pays heed to the wishes of limited government liberals and moderates. The socialist-Marxists will still be out there, but highly discredited. The Republican Party will have to gel and stand for something.

    Comment by Heliotrope — July 8, 2017 @ 1:19 pm - July 8, 2017

  14. Let’s see, from the Journal of Anecdotal Sociology —

    From age 14 to 29, my “preferred” intimate/sexual partners were anatomically/physiologically female (and generally identified as such).

    From 29 to 32, I went through an “asexual” phase. I was dissatisfied with my experiences with females, but was not emotionally prepared to engage with males. Like many of my peers, I had my internal “Top 10” list of features I found desirable in a mate, and was quick to point out that genital location did not make the list.

    From 33 to present, I have sought out exclusively males for physical intimacy. To be honest, I’ve been slipping back into that asexual mode. Still, while on occasion I may note that a given female is attractive, there is nothing more that I generally would like to do with her. Males on the other hand, still definitely get a rise 🙂

    That’s it in a nutshell. At this point, while officially physiologic genitalia is not a make or break issue for me, functionally my interest in an anatomic female is effectively zero. As I age, even many males are failing to be “worth the bother”, as my strong emotional intimacy with a number of my friends (of both primary genders) grows ever more important than the physical intimacy of a single mate.

    One more side-note: As I searched for a man to share my life with I would often lament, again anecdotally, how hard it seemed to be to find one emotionally/psychologically “stable” (perhaps “compatible” is a safer word). Gender dysmorphia issues aside, pretty much anyone with the word “Activist” in their self-bio would probably have a tough time clearing that bar.

    Comment by Sathar — July 8, 2017 @ 1:23 pm - July 8, 2017

  15. And, after clicking Submit on my long-winded, soul-searching reply, I realize that except for my last paragraph I didn’t answer the question V actually asked.

    I suppose the quick answer there is that the physical self-mutilation is pound-for-pound less important than the mental and emotional self-mutilation that often precedes and co-exists with it.

    Comment by Sathar — July 8, 2017 @ 1:30 pm - July 8, 2017

  16. Craig Smith (@2) Rush is borrowing “defining deviancy down” from the late Senator (and former ambassador as well) Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who had a way with words.

    To all I recommend reading his speech in the UN after the infamous “Zionism is Racism” resolution back in the ’70s. Masterful construction,and should be a model of how words and arguments can be used.

    Comment by TheQuietMan — July 8, 2017 @ 1:35 pm - July 8, 2017

  17. @ ILC: By the same token, are FTM trans misandristic?

    Sean – Possibly; but (not to get too Freudian) I have a hunch that FTM trans could may be about envy.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — July 8, 2017 @ 1:37 pm - July 8, 2017

  18. TheQuietMan, thanks. I had forgotten that until you reminded me.

    My response to transsexuals who expect me to date them is simply this: I am under NO obligation, whatsoever, to validate your image of yourself. None. And neither is anyone else. You can get over yourself.

    Comment by Craig Smith — July 8, 2017 @ 1:40 pm - July 8, 2017

  19. We moved from all truths being valid to the dismissal of any objective truths. While some people got hung up over the ramifications of that on a theological and philosophical level, the idiots on the left applied it to tangible targets: language, math, economics, art, science, and particularly traditional Western civilization.

    Suddenly, language no longer means anything. People get fired for using a word like niggardly, because some uninformed moron thinks it’s a racist term. MSM eggheads hear “dog whistles” when they hear terms like golf, food stamps, and states rights, instead of processing the phrases at face value. The author no longer has authority to explain the meaning of his words, but the listener has the final say in the meaning, and if he is offended, then God help the author for his hate speech.

    Numbers no longer mean anything. Forget that we have a finite amount of wealth (currently, I don’t think it’s a zero-sum game, as we can generate more wealth in the future), and we cannot tax the rich enough to pay for everyone to live in luxury. The OWS crowd thinks–demands–that we can storm the castle, overthrow our oppressors, squander the loot, and somehow have something to live on next year, and the year after that.

    Art no longer means anything. Throw elephant dung on a canvas and sell it for a million bucks. Immerse anything holy (Christian only) in anything profane (preferably something scatological), call it art, and sell it for a million bucks.

    And now, biology means nothing. Regardless of whatever body parts you lop off or glue to your body, archaeologists will dig up your bones in 10,000 years, examine your DNA and label you male or female. They may puzzle over why or how you chose to adorn yourself with a smorgasbord of genitalia, but they will use science to categorize you.

    We are so doomed.

    Comment by windbag — July 8, 2017 @ 2:32 pm - July 8, 2017

  20. Maybe we shouldn’t have to “submit” on GayPatriot. //…just a thought//

    Enlighten?
    Elucidate?
    Pontificate?
    Illuminate?

    “Share” is too cis-liberal heteronormative commie.

    Comment by Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — July 8, 2017 @ 2:41 pm - July 8, 2017

  21. As a gay man, I have always been of the opinion that those who scream the loudest are the most ashamed of who they are. This is why they allow themselves to become caricatures rather than real people. Being gay or straight or whatever is not something that should lend itself to being characterized by specific activities or outward tendencies. Those who feel that it does are doing so because they do not feel good about themselves. So, all of those gay-activists who act over-the-top and make fools of themselves by prancing about in skimpy outfits and leather dog collars in the name of gay-rights are not doing it to show their love for themselves, but to show the world how much they hate themselves. Then, receiving the accolades they get for their self-destructive behavior, their opinions of themselves and their inner-turmoil at not being the normal they believe they are fighting against, are validated, and somehow they feel empowered…empowered to live their lives in a stereotypical world that feeds their self-hatred.

    I want a man to be a man and a woman to be a woman and being gay or straight or insane doesn’t define what that means. As the little boy said very eloquently in the movie Kindergarten Cop, “boys have a penis and girls have a vagina,” and frankly, that’s all that should matter.

    Comment by TAD — July 8, 2017 @ 3:09 pm - July 8, 2017

  22. If you’re a gay man who claims that “Trans Men” are real men, but you won’t date one… what does that make you? Aren’t you tacitly admitting that to you, the transgendered are really just doing cross-gender cosplay?

    Comment by V the K — July 8, 2017 @ 5:09 pm - July 8, 2017

  23. @#22 it makes you a hypocrite, which for a leftist, is par for the course

    Comment by TAD — July 8, 2017 @ 5:14 pm - July 8, 2017

  24. My thoughts : Being gay isn’t “special” anymore. If the hubby and I can dance the Cha Cha to rock band in biker bar and not only not get beat up but people actually talk and mingle with us, being gay is no longer “special”. This has caused all those people who crave “special” to become trans.

    Comment by tnnsne1 — July 8, 2017 @ 5:34 pm - July 8, 2017

  25. Im starting to see transgender profiles on Growlr, and it ain’t too pretty.

    This was a comment I was going to make on V’s first question. Tranny profiles are popping up on all the social network sites; in some cases, it’s those masquerading as chicks and in other cases it’s FTM/transmen–some of whom look more butch than the self-proclaimed ‘butch’ guys. I have mixed feelings about it, since in a way it reduces such sites to another version of Match.com or eHarmony [which, of course, was forced to violate its slightly closeted Christian principles and admit same-gender relationship seekers]. When everyone is special, no one is special. Likewise, when everyone is admitted without identity qualification, why not start admitting those who are seeking opposite-gender partners of interest? OTOH, there are those who are not self-mutilated (to use the conservative phraseology) but who have indeterminate or underdeveloped parts and who identify as predominantly male. Is it really that different from a hyper-masculine male-born-male who might have otherwise below-average genitalia?

    The real issue, once again, is that transgender issues are very different from the traditional same-gender-oriented or bisexual issues. The larger transgender community needs to branch out on its own and separate from the rest of the alphabet soup sexual minority communities and spread its wings. The traditional sexual minority communities also need to let them go and stop using them as the new cash cow for their continual self-perpetuation. The backlash to the crazy on the tranny side of the equation is coming and it won’t be pretty. The worst part about that is the backlash will also affect those who are perceived to be aligned with the crazy.

    Comment by RSG — July 8, 2017 @ 5:39 pm - July 8, 2017

  26. […] the transgendered are really just doing cross-gender cosplay

    As I see more and more tranny profiles and presence online, this is really what it seems like. It reminds me of the old line about the difference between involvement and commitment using the roles of the chicken and pig in breakfast. Most of the playas in the tranny games might be doing pharma therapy but they still have all the OEM parts and seem to have no desire to complete The Transition. In fact, I’m noticing more and more who are “bathroom activists”: whatever gender they are is what they say they are and fcuk you if you try to suggest otherwise. I’m sorry, but if you’re only self-defining without any background support, it’s really no different than me buying out a candy store, putting on a costume, and claiming I’m Willy Wonka.

    Comment by RSG — July 8, 2017 @ 6:01 pm - July 8, 2017

  27. This has caused all those people who crave “special” to become trans.

    Or just more weirdly gay…

    Comment by RSG — July 8, 2017 @ 6:03 pm - July 8, 2017

  28. How can one be otre when everything is accepted?

    Comment by Juan — July 8, 2017 @ 6:16 pm - July 8, 2017

  29. …gay isn’t “special” anymore. If the hubby and I can dance the Cha Cha to rock band in biker bar and not only not get beat up but people actually talk and mingle with us, being gay is no longer “special”.

    Nearly 60% of London’s gay venues have closed in the last 10-years. Similar numbers have closed in the major US cities, and most of the clubs in smaller American cities and town are gone.

    http://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/more-half-london-s-gay-pubs-clubs-have-closed-last-n780601

    Comment by Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — July 8, 2017 @ 7:19 pm - July 8, 2017

  30. “I don’t see a problem with telling straight guys who are exclusionary of trans women partners that they should try to work through that.”

    Would they also say that every gay man should “work through that” and be forced to marry a woman? Isn’t that was “gay conversion therapy” was?

    That’s one of the problems with fascists – they don’t see themselves as fascists.

    Comment by charles — July 9, 2017 @ 11:23 am - July 9, 2017

  31. Washington Post opinion piece calls Trump’s Poland speech a dog whistle for white nationalism. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2017/07/06/trumps-white-nationalist-dog-whistles-in-warsaw/?utm_term=.bfc4d88614b7

    Comment by Ignatius — July 9, 2017 @ 11:53 am - July 9, 2017

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.