GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

Powered by Genesis

Once Again, I Have Questions

July 11, 2017 by V the K

If this is from the “Women in Literary Art,” why isn’t “woman” one of the gender options?

And why is “Women in Literary Art” (Link to their website, which is just too precious for words) even collecting this data? Probably because being alternately gendered is super-trendy among soft-handed people who write poetry and also super easy. Just make up some fake gender and claim you identify as it. Bonus points for connecting it to a non-western people of some kind.

Filed Under: Liberalism Run Amok

Comments

  1. Cyril says

    July 11, 2017 at 10:12 pm - July 11, 2017

    Actually, “woman” = “femme” (in french)

    But it’s so much fancier to use the french word.

    They’ve swallowed the resentful, divisive, postmodern, neo marxist bs hook, line, and sinker — hating the natural society they “grew up” in (I know, quite a stretch) so much, by now, that they refuse to use the proper noun (and spelling) of their own gender in their own first language.

  2. Cyril says

    July 11, 2017 at 10:33 pm - July 11, 2017

    They have become so easily deconstructible, it’s getting boring, here — only their crass ignorance and ever-renewed sheer stupidity may keep you in awe of their societal and individual “progress”.

    Soon enough, they may start to wait after their great do-gooding sorcerers to open dead fish and read to them which badges, pins, and symbols on (either all colorful, all red, or all black) flags their sorcerers’ social justice expects them to wear when they jump off the cliff — preferably after ruining the non-deranged everybody else’s property, lives, or both.

  3. Ted B. (Charging Rhino) says

    July 11, 2017 at 11:32 pm - July 11, 2017

    Oh hell, I give up. It’s too-easy…

    My preffered pronoun; “…yes Mi’lord, a thousand pardons Mi’lord. Of course Mi’lord, this way Mi’lord.”

    Failure to comply will result in your being severely-thrashed to within a inch of your worthless pultroon-hide by my servants, then expelled from the Estate.

  4. Conservative Guy says

    July 12, 2017 at 1:46 am - July 12, 2017

    Our preferred pronouns are Your Majesty, Your Majesty’s, His Majesty, and His Majesty’s. When speaking in the first person about Ourself, We use the Royal We. Examples:

    “Yes, of course, Your Majesty.”

    “We are not amused.”

  5. Cas says

    July 12, 2017 at 2:07 am - July 12, 2017

    Wow–that is a lot of distinctions. Reminds me of the way Christianity splintered after the Protestant Reformation…

  6. TheQuietMan says

    July 12, 2017 at 2:24 am - July 12, 2017

    I see how Cyril gets femme (#1), but wouldn’t cisgender also fit for woman?

    However, I still think “gender” should only be a term in grammar or a genteel way of saying “sex”, as in male or female of the species. I am not a fan of this brave new world’s meaning. But then, I learned my main points of English grammar during the moon shot years.

  7. TAD says

    July 12, 2017 at 3:20 am - July 12, 2017

    It’s amazing how for thousands of years we’ve had only 2 genders, and now, suddenly, in the last ten or so we have 26+

  8. Craig Smith says

    July 12, 2017 at 4:14 am - July 12, 2017

    I’m just waiting for this nonsense to fall out of fashion, so we can talk about a mass gender extinction.

  9. Cyril says

    July 12, 2017 at 4:22 am - July 12, 2017

    @7

    “Amazing”, there, kinda feel as weak a qualifier as the odds for a sloth to survive a 3 mile-wide meteor landing in walking distance of the tree he was (considering) to leave.

  10. Cyril says

    July 12, 2017 at 4:46 am - July 12, 2017

    @7 That’s cool, at this pace, we’ll have as many gender as there will be of homo freestuff-o-tantrumus-maximus-no-sapiens dwelling around, by ~ 2087 (*)

    The only big logistic challenge (fun time for mathematicians specializing in topology theory) will be:

    how to arrange all these new bathrooms?

    (* assuming they only allow themselves to keep breeding somehow up to an improbable 10 billions, even with Africa’s brave efforts to counterbalance a zealous planned parenthood’s “healthcare” services, likely under direct supervision of the U.N., by then)

  11. Ted B. (Charging Rhino) says

    July 12, 2017 at 8:34 am - July 12, 2017

    Soon there will be a SJW campaign to end calling our species homo sapiens. Personally, I have my doubts about the sapiens-part.

    Homo non compos mentis is more accurate these days…

  12. Rex says

    July 12, 2017 at 9:17 am - July 12, 2017

    I don’t see the “idiot in need of a severe bitch slap” category.

  13. V the K says

    July 12, 2017 at 9:18 am - July 12, 2017

    I don’t see the “idiot in need of a severe bitch slap” category.

    LOL. That encompasses all of them.

  14. KCRob says

    July 12, 2017 at 6:26 pm - July 12, 2017

    I guess “No Labels” isn’t a thing anymore.

  15. Asphenaz says

    July 13, 2017 at 11:26 am - July 13, 2017

    I think this is the only blog where I can say this:

    I’ve decided to choose my pronouns based on my perception of reality. If someone has a penis, I will use “he.” If someone has a vagina, I will use “she.” I am not required to change my reality in order to be sensitive to someone else’s. I’m also going to call cats “cats” and trees “trees.”

    I think that bathrooms should be designated based on urinary systems. Instead of men’s and women’s bathrooms, there should be “penis-friendly” bathrooms and “urethra-friendly” bathrooms. It doesn’t matter what gender you have between your ears–it only matters what urinary system you have between your legs.

    We could use the Leaning Tower of Pisa for one bathroom, and a Georgia O’Keefe flower painting for the other.

Categories

Archives