What the Hill Is Wrong with Her?
Not to beat on a dead (alcoholic, brain-damaged, deeply corrupt, in-bed-with-the-Saudis) horse, but some video footage has ’emerged’ of Hillary Rodham just casually walking down the street in New York City enjoying a shopping day with some friends. What is fascinating to me about the video footage is that the camera operator is always perfectly positioned to capture her ‘casual stroll,’ and is able to keep her constantly framed, and tracks her perfectly… as though the camera operator knew exactly where she would be moving at all times. There’s even a spot in the video where Hillary stops momentarily to look in a store window, and the camera pauses precisely at the moment she does.
This casual stroll was blocked and stage-managed better than last year’s horrible Ghostbusters movie. (You really need to check out Plinkett’s brutal review.)
I get that except for a few embarrassingly deranged and obsessed dead-enders like Peter Daou and Lena Dunham, most people recognize that Hillary is over. It’s not about sticking another fork in the old bag, it’s… what … psychologically speaking… is her deal? First it was the ‘spontaneous meeting’ in the woods with a ‘neighbor’ who turned out to be a Hillary 2016 campaign worker. And now, it’s this ‘casual stroll’ in New York City carefully documented by a professional videographer.
First of all, what is the source of this psychological need to present herself as a normal person? Real, normal people don’t obsess over being perceived as real normal people. Second, why is the vehicle for her portraying herself as a normal person… carefully choreographed and stage-managed ‘spontaneous events?’ that are professionally documented and provided to the press.
I honestly don’t understand this psychological phenomenon. I feel like Lt. Commander Data watching Commander Riker pick up an alien bimbo and having no comprehension of human behavior.
24 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Um, just watching the video, there is a water mark in the upper right hand corner. . .Probe-Media for Daily Mail. Kinda explains the positioning of the paparazzi
Comment by rusty — August 10, 2017 @ 7:42 pm - August 10, 2017
Hillary, like John McCain, is one of many on an ever-growing list of people I wish would just go away.
Why can’t these people just exit the stage, quietly, when they’re done? Not a chance they’re flaming narcissists so it must be something else.
Comment by KCRob — August 10, 2017 @ 7:56 pm - August 10, 2017
Hilary Clinton behaves as much as “a normal person” as your average SJW turn him/her/xe/ze/schnurtz-self to be “tolerant” and “cool”.
As for the look…
Never mind.
Comment by Cyril — August 10, 2017 @ 8:27 pm - August 10, 2017
She’s chumming. Throwing herself out there as bait to see if there are any bites & squeals. She so badly doesn’t want to play the role of big loser forever & is itching to become a voice in a party that doesn’t have a voice at all. It’s an addiction, she doesn’t know when to give up. The problem is, when you’ve lost an election your opponents have the instinctual reaction to kill another head of the hydra until it’s truly dead & gone.
Corrupt Hillary has quite a few debts to pay & staying home with her bottle isn’t a choice unless she can show that’s her only choice. I’m sure there was a minivan with a hospital bed in it following her at a discreet distance. I’m just amazed that she’s still ambulatory. I must say, she’s the best functioning alcoholic I’ve ever seen!
Comment by Hanover — August 10, 2017 @ 9:15 pm - August 10, 2017
It is a compulsive character disorder. She is addicted to who she “rightfully” should be.
Comment by Heliotrope — August 10, 2017 @ 9:26 pm - August 10, 2017
Btw, I had to blink and rub my eyes to check I hadn’t hit The Onion or Babylonbee URL;
but, that was just Fox News;
She’s considering to become a preacher:
http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/08/10/hillary-clinton-considers-becoming-methodist-preacher
I wonder; who really need to go see standup comedians, in 2017?
Comment by Cyril — August 10, 2017 @ 9:47 pm - August 10, 2017
She looks good.
It’s pretty standard practice for celebrities to tip off the paps when they “want’ to be seen, or orchestrate something themselves. This is hardly surprising. This has been happening in Hollywood for decades. It’s also unsurprising that a part of her likes the attention. Mission accomplished!
Celebrities enjoy controlling and crafting their own narrative. Most anyone in the limelight does. They want to be perceived a certain way. So, they take actions to try to achieve that. Her most ardent fans don’t care. They just like seeing her out and about.
There were a lot of bad films last year: Independence Day and Zoolander 2, London Has Fallen, Alice Through the Looking Glass. But, yes, this is one that starred four ladies. Imagine if had starred four men! You would have thrown it in the heap with the rest and forgotten it by now.
You enjoy your privacy. You actually wrote about this recently. Other people like varying degrees of attention. And they seek it out accordingly. Everyone is different.
Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — August 11, 2017 @ 12:03 am - August 11, 2017
Funny post title, though, Jimmy. Kudos.
Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — August 11, 2017 @ 12:19 am - August 11, 2017
Actually, I was thinking of Norma Desmond descending any staircase…
Comment by Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — August 11, 2017 @ 12:33 am - August 11, 2017
“I *am* BIG. It’s the electoral votes that got small.”
Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — August 11, 2017 @ 12:55 am - August 11, 2017
Her “friends” don’t seem to get to talk much when she is around, especially the brunette.
Comment by TAD — August 11, 2017 @ 2:36 am - August 11, 2017
Good one, CCP. Just as good as the title. Props!
Comment by RSG — August 11, 2017 @ 3:47 am - August 11, 2017
This explains it perfectly, IMHO. She lost the biggest race of her life for the position she was born to serve in. Just what do you do now? Be appointed an adjunct instructor at an Ivy League school? Wait for the right officeholder to nominate you to the Supreme Court? How demeaning. Sometimes I seriously wonder about her mental health going forward. Unless she gets rid of her addiction/s, it will not end well for her. In many respects, she is the political equivalent of Norma Desmond.
Comment by RSG — August 11, 2017 @ 4:00 am - August 11, 2017
Perhaps the alien lizard invaders are trying a new robot under the Hillary skin?
Comment by Juan — August 11, 2017 @ 8:34 am - August 11, 2017
FWIW, the Plinkett review goes fairly easy on the Ghostbusters cast and mainly goes after the terrible script and incompetent direction.
Comment by V the K — August 11, 2017 @ 8:37 am - August 11, 2017
I like the Norma Desmond ref., she just refuses to acknowledge she’s over. “I’m ready for my close up, Mr. DeMille.” That may be the way it all ends, herself being led away kindly by the men in white jackets.”But, but, I’m ready to play Sister Aimee”………..
Comment by Rex — August 11, 2017 @ 12:15 pm - August 11, 2017
16.I like the Norma Desmond ref., she just refuses to acknowledge she’s over. “I’m ready for my close up, Mr. DeMille.”
So, who’s floating dead in the pool? Huma? Bobby Mook? Bill? Peter Daou?
Comment by V the K — August 11, 2017 @ 12:56 pm - August 11, 2017
Ah, but there are still those useful idiot sychophants who are still trying to prop her side of beef of a dead carcass up like a concrete bollard. Check this out, her “Pastor” compares her electoral loss to the Crucifixion, I kid you not! Only the Romans have been replaced by those pesky Russians, I suppose…
http://freebeacon.com/politics/clintons-pastor-compared-her-election-loss-death-jesus/
Comment by runningrn — August 11, 2017 @ 1:01 pm - August 11, 2017
It still can’t beat the video (11 Sept 2016) of Hillary being tossed into the back of a van like a side of beef.
Nothing will beat that one!
https://youtu.be/thNjxRMYOII
(Because I just know you want to see it again and again and again …)
Comment by Julie the Jarhead — August 11, 2017 @ 2:45 pm - August 11, 2017
@19 and there’s that one, too:
http://imgur.com/a/EXBXD
Comment by Cyril — August 11, 2017 @ 4:02 pm - August 11, 2017
So, I avoided the new Ghostbusters, but hearing that Plinkett reviewed it, I’m wondering if it’s worth the time to devote to watching it, just to fully enjoy the reivew? His take down of the Star Wars pre-quels was epic.
Comment by windbag — August 12, 2017 @ 10:31 am - August 12, 2017
Re: Hillary’s outing. I think Milo said something like: If you have to say it….that is, if you have to do carefully staged media profiles about how natural and normal you are, then…
But it was the Left who made us *not* forget about Ghostbusters. Remember, this was what cost Milo his Twitter account.
He did some honest reviewing and tweeting: saying how bad it was; defending Leslie Jones somewhat (ironically) by saying she would make an attractive black dude, and also that he wished the movie producers would let her do a normal character rather than a stereotyped “black urban” character. What happened next? Kind of like James Damore at Google: Misunderstanding, misrepresentation and frenzy. How DARE Milo dislike/knock this movie that, according to the SJWs, we all SHOULD like!
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — August 13, 2017 @ 12:53 am - August 13, 2017
[…] What the Hill Is Wrong with Her? […]
Pingback by The Weekly Headlines – August 12th – posted 13 August – Br Andrew's Muses — August 13, 2017 @ 2:03 am - August 13, 2017
Actually, the film made history in another way. The Ghostbusters trailer (starring four ladies) hit a record number of dislikes on YouTube before the Milo/Leslie incident. You can read about it here. Again, had the film starred four dudes like the original, we wouldn’t even be having this conservation. It would be a forgotten dud that barely would have made a blip.
Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — August 13, 2017 @ 2:16 am - August 13, 2017