Gay Patriot Header Image

Who Could Have Seen This Coming?

Posted by V the K at 8:45 am - September 19, 2017.
Filed under: Progressive immorality

Poster seen at Melbourne University in Australia.

In related news, the gay mayor of Seattle WA (I was there last week, and it is a surprisingly dirty city) was forced to resign after a fifth victim of his sexual predation on juveniles came forward. This one was a cousin who was molested by the mayor at the age of 13 apparently.

And in the entirely-Democrat-run state of California, the legislature just passed a law to take child rapists and child pornographers off the sexual predator lists. They should have called it the “Harvey Milk – Larry Brinkin Act.” The bill was introduced by a gay state senator from San Francisco.

Share

60 Comments

  1. Michael Savage was right.

    Comment by Niall — September 19, 2017 @ 10:31 am - September 19, 2017

  2. After children it will be legalized sex with animals -Leftist -> love knows no species – picture of blue guy with pink girl goat.

    Comment by Sandra — September 19, 2017 @ 10:53 am - September 19, 2017

  3. For the ages they could have used two adults like 52 and 31. However they specifically made it a point to use a minor age. Sick.

    Comment by CH — September 19, 2017 @ 11:49 am - September 19, 2017

  4. When do we get to say “I told you so”? At this rate, they’ll have pedophilia legal somewhere in ten years.

    Comment by Clifford — September 19, 2017 @ 12:03 pm - September 19, 2017

  5. What?? …No sheep?

    Comment by Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — September 19, 2017 @ 12:35 pm - September 19, 2017

  6. @ 1, Niall, what was Michael Savage right about?

    Comment by James — September 19, 2017 @ 1:48 pm - September 19, 2017

  7. Pedophilia is already legal in Europe. If a Muslim man has an underage child bride they are allowed to keep thechild bride and “visit” her in the childrens area alone.

    This is why the Leftists are so pro-Islam to use it as a wedge via culture with squeals of diversity or racism if you object to using children for sex.

    Comment by Sandra — September 19, 2017 @ 1:51 pm - September 19, 2017

  8. 10?? Seriously? They must be testing the waters; otherwise they would have started with 16, and worked their way down gradually to, well, whatever their ultimate target age might be. That said, the way this poster is written, can there even be a lower limit? Why not 48 and 2, if “Not Age” is to be taken at face value? These are the same liberals who argue that schools must provide free breakfast as well as lunch because we have to take care of the children.

    Comment by Conservative guy — September 19, 2017 @ 2:12 pm - September 19, 2017

  9. I don’t have any particular objection to there being a route off of the sex offender list.

    But then, I’m an advocate of .45 caliber lobotomies for rapists, so.

    Comment by Aerinyes — September 19, 2017 @ 2:16 pm - September 19, 2017

  10. Until we can verify this, I will take it with a grain of salt.

    Australia is in the midst of a “postal survey” to determine whether same sex marriage will be become legal.

    https://www.lifehacker.com.au/2017/08/australian-same-sex-marriage-vote-everything-you-need-to-know/

    We all know the power of Photoshop.

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — September 19, 2017 @ 2:42 pm - September 19, 2017

  11. In all honesty, the sex offender list system could use some reforms. It is ridiculous to put a 15 year old kid on the list because a 14 year old kid sexted a pic of their genitalia. However, the progressive left bill apparently doesn’t link the opportunity for removal to the severity of the underlying offense.

    Sorry, but if an adult molests a kid, he deserves to have lifelong stigma attached to that. But, apparently, the progressive left thinks child molesters are suitable to be the mayors of large cities like Seattle.

    Comment by V the K — September 19, 2017 @ 2:55 pm - September 19, 2017

  12. #11,

    What was the classic line? Something like ‘I don’t care if Slick Willie is a molester or a rapist, as long as he supports womyn’s rights and abortion, I’ll drop to my knees and suck him off right there?’

    I remember reading that somewhere – obviously i have it paraphrased here.

    Comment by aerinyes — September 19, 2017 @ 3:14 pm - September 19, 2017

  13. #12 — Democrat Media Operative Nina Burleigh said that. At the time she was objectively and fairly covering Bill Clinton for Time magazine.

    “I would be happy to give him a blowjob just to thank him for keeping abortion legal. I think American women should be lining up with their Presidential kneepads on to show their gratitude for keeping the theocracy off our backs.”

    Comment by V the K — September 19, 2017 @ 3:33 pm - September 19, 2017

  14. The left never ceases to amaze with their innovation power.

    And there you have it — now for a whole new meaning to the phrase…

    … “poster child”.

    Comment by Cyril — September 19, 2017 @ 3:36 pm - September 19, 2017

  15. I’m guessing that 10 was chosen because it was the age of one of Mohammed’s wives. Or was it 9?

    Comment by MikeyParks — September 19, 2017 @ 4:34 pm - September 19, 2017

  16. I can confirm that every single person I know here does not agree with that poster, which is an outlier. Also, it’s a hoax started to stir things up. It’s not sourced. And the actual poster itself is at least 15 months old, which predates the upcoming survey. Do your homework.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 19, 2017 @ 5:37 pm - September 19, 2017

  17. *poster design

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 19, 2017 @ 5:38 pm - September 19, 2017

  18. One could also say it would follow that since Jimmy gay-married, he endorses gay marriage, and thereby also believes it’s a slippery slope to subjecting children to marry adults, and endorses it. What a gross way of trying to have your cake and eat it too.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 19, 2017 @ 5:42 pm - September 19, 2017

  19. At James: Savage has been saying for years that the left wants to lower age of consent laws

    Comment by Niall — September 19, 2017 @ 5:46 pm - September 19, 2017

  20. Also, 30,000 people showed up last week in Sydney to support something that Jimmy currently enjoys in the United States. He’s free to try to find one person from that crowd who was there to support adults marrying children. I was also there showing my support, just as I was in 2008 when I marched the streets of West Hollywood after the election to protest the passing of Prop 8.

    Did you march Jimmy for your gay marriage? Or did you just conveniently take it when it was made available?

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 19, 2017 @ 5:50 pm - September 19, 2017

  21. Whether this particular poster is a hoax or not, you don’t have to search the Internet for very long to find actual progressive voices advocating lowering the age of consent.

    Comment by Conservative guy — September 19, 2017 @ 6:07 pm - September 19, 2017

  22. Am I reading the source article correctly? Is the law to allow people that prey on minors a way off the sex-offender registry while leaving those that prey on adults on the list indefinitely?

    That would mean that a drunk 18-yo male fooling around with a drunk 18-yo female could earn a lifetime spot on the registry when the female sobers up(*) and files charges while an 18-yo fooling around with a 10-yo only gets a 20 year spot on the list?

    I have no words.

    (*) While men and women are equal in every way with no differences of any significance it’s also a fact that a drunk woman cannot be held responsible for anything while a drunk man is on the hook no matter what.

    Comment by KCRob — September 19, 2017 @ 6:17 pm - September 19, 2017

  23. I’m commenting on the pic Jimmy used to open his post in the context of a very contentious time in Australia right now. I’m free to pass judgment on his ignorance while the rest of you discuss the 0.08% of the Australian population who are pushing for child-brides. Australians having nothing to do with that @sshat of a former Seattle mayor.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 19, 2017 @ 6:18 pm - September 19, 2017

  24. And, it is a hoax. There is no “whether or not.” That poster is being recycled by someone on the “no” side, or someone who is just a troublemaker. If there are people here who are hoping for gay marriage to clear the way for child-brides, they are outliers in a very tiny minority. Jimmy is free to try to find one to interview if he really thinks it’s something that will become a thing.

    But, again, I go back to my point of Jimmy wanting his cake and eating it too, while anonymously doing so behind his keyboard like a coward. To equate pushing for gay marriage as a way of pushing for child brides while you yourself are gay married is problematic to say the least. That’s what should be discussed here. But, unsurprisingly, it’s not.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 19, 2017 @ 6:23 pm - September 19, 2017

  25. btw, Jimmy, from that poster, just curious … how old was your husband when you were 36?

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 19, 2017 @ 7:10 pm - September 19, 2017

  26. CCP, perhaps you should keep posting the same thing over and over and over again. What is the saying about the Lady protesting too much?

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — September 19, 2017 @ 8:56 pm - September 19, 2017

  27. Nice defensive spin but the silent one, but no cigar. I enjoy sexual relations with those in my age bracket, thanks.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 19, 2017 @ 9:07 pm - September 19, 2017

  28. “spin for the silent one”

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 19, 2017 @ 9:07 pm - September 19, 2017

  29. Age is like gender, completely in the mind of the person. If you think you are 10, then 10 is okay right?

    Funny how some Progressives demand that some outliers define the whole while other outliers define the fringe. Progressives are a mixed up nutty lot.

    http://lotswife.com.au/2013/10/09/sex-and-the-modern-child-lowering-the-age-of-consent/

    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-uni-adopts-law-courses-pushing-for-sharia-law-in-australian-legal-system/news-story/2a7fc86e24920b10164945b50e5ed5ae

    “THE most prestigious law school in Australia has two courses which call for elements of sharia law to be recognised in the mainstream legal system — including allowances for polygamy and lowering the age of consent.”

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — September 19, 2017 @ 9:25 pm - September 19, 2017

  30. @ James & Niall, Dr. Savage has also said that Liberalism is a mental disorder.

    Comment by pawfurbehr — September 19, 2017 @ 9:27 pm - September 19, 2017

  31. This reaching and paranoia is hilarious and sad. Hilarious because it’s ridiculous that grown people believe that Australia is this socialist nightmare on the road to being some amalgam of some Sharia-infested-child-bride-gay-married Venezuela and Syria. Not sure how that’s possible. But, I imagine that continuing to point to the most insignificant of details to make your argument will be your answer.

    You’re kind of dense if you don’t see the hypocrisy in Jimmy even bringing up a poster endorsing the 10/36 age split in the context of his relationship.

    You’re kind of dense if you don’t see the hypocrisy of Jimmy pointing to endorsing gay marriage as a slippery slope to child brides, when he’s gay-married.

    You’re just kind of … dense …

    *shrug*

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 19, 2017 @ 9:39 pm - September 19, 2017

  32. Nice use of the Alinsky rules.

    One of the top legal schools in Australia advocates for child brides. But hey, I am dense.

    The left is totally about the slippery slope. I live in a liberal state this is what we heard.

    “Adding sexual orientation to descrimination laws will not lead to domestic partner recognition”

    “Domestic partnerships will not lead to SSM marriage”

    “SSM will not lead to recognition of triads”

    We were also told the ACA was not the slippery slope to national health care.

    So, Jimmy is married to a 10yo? Or do you equate a 10 to 20 year age gap between adults with a 10yo + 36yo? If so, logic dictates you think a 10yo is capable of giving consent to marry. (I have no idea of the age gap between Jimmy and his husband)

    BTW, the “protesting” I was referring to was not you wanting to marry a 10yo but you having a serious crush on Jimmy (jealousy). Thank you for proving the axiom that Progressives are crazy nut case.

    Definition of dense : moving from a country with the 1st and 2nd Amendments to a country that has neither.

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — September 19, 2017 @ 10:13 pm - September 19, 2017

  33. Interesting comments on the Ed Murray resignation at gay left Tolweroad. e.g.

    The gratitude is just overwhelming, isn’t it? This guy works to get anti-discrimination laws in his state, and a domestic partnership law, and this is the thanks he gets.

    I have learned from this trajectory to be compassionate toward other sex criminals, rather than delight in throwing them under the bus that used to come for me.

    Queerty hasn’t apparently covered the resignation. They mentioned the accusations when they surfaced… and attacked the accuser; calling him a crackhead, and saying that sex between men and boys is no big deal.

    Here in Brazil this would not happen. Our law allows sex between adults and minors who are over 14 years old. It doesn’t matter if it is a male or a female. As long as it is consensual, it is no big deal.

    Comment by V the K — September 19, 2017 @ 10:30 pm - September 19, 2017

  34. I am dense.

    But, you are Blanche. If you can’t even see Jimmy’s hypocrisy (who can’t be bothered either).

    you having a serious crush on Jimmy

    But, I don’t. More a fascination into how he sticks his head in the sand.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 19, 2017 @ 10:57 pm - September 19, 2017

  35. Again, just so we’re clear … This was a post that opened with a pic representing a hoax. From a person who is gay married to someone much younger than him criticising gay marriage and how it’s a slippery slope to marriage between adults and children.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 19, 2017 @ 10:59 pm - September 19, 2017

  36. CrayCray, you’re the one making this post about gay marriage. In the picture of the fake poster the 10-36 couple is circled. This is followed by articles and comments having to do with pedophilia and its seemingly being accepted by progressives. The circled couple and the linked articles refer to pedophilia, and make points about the acceptance of pedophilia…you are the one equating it with gay marriage, which I do not see the person who posted the photo and links saying anything about at all. The other parts of the poster are superfluous to his point, and since the poster in the picture is fake, and not made by him, you are totally missing the point

    Comment by TAD — September 20, 2017 @ 2:12 am - September 20, 2017

  37. Nice try, TAD. The main picture is in relation to gay marriage in Australia. Jimmy (the author of the post) is using the poster as something being pushed in Australia as “real” and “valid” to the left, which it is not, and then connecting it to this Seattle mayor and progressives. And he’s forcing the “slippery slope” argument onto gay marriage in Australia. Jimmy is gay married.

    If you can’t break down the hypocrisy and the unintended implications of what he’s trying to do, then that’s on you, not me. You’re the one who is missing the point.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 20, 2017 @ 3:52 am - September 20, 2017

  38. I don’t often see multiple serial posts from someone who is not being incredibly defensive.

    Interesting.

    Anyways, I have no particular doubt that any one poster is a hoax – especially that one, it’s kind of blatant.

    However, this does not disprove the existence of organizations such as NAMBLA, the posts and articles at progressive left wing publications such as Salon and Jezebel defending pedophiles and pedophilia (Before you go looking, the articles have been deleted), and the odd push for under-18 yearolds to be able to vote, while at the same time infantilizing them more by making it more and more necessary to rely on parents for support. (Really? Stay on parent’s insurance until 26?)

    I seem to remember getting laughed at and mocked derisively when I suggested that SSM might lead to polygamy, people trying to marry computers/robots/what have you. And yet.

    Let’s also point out the spirited defense of – or outright refusal to cover – people such as Roman Polanski, Lena Dunham, and George Takei…all of whom promoted pedophilia or practiced it or both.

    Honestly the thing I found really interesting was the ties between By Any Means Necessary (And from them to Antifa) and NAMBLA.

    Eileen Scheff, a founder of BAMN:

    “I call on all progressive people in the lesbian/gay community, in the women’s movement, and in the community at large to defend NAMBLA and its right to advocate for consensual sex regardless of age, and to unite our forces to make a fight for the real solutions to sexual coercion and abuse,”

    http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/28/documents-tie-berkeley-riot-organizers-to-pro-pedophilia-group-nambla/

    NAMBLA is pretty firmly linked to the gays, to marxism, and to progressivism.

    It may be a slippery slope argument – and that can be a logical fallacy – but when so many slopes have already been slipped, well…people start expecting it. We’ve gone from tolerance to acceptance to -forced-, obligatory, active participation.

    Comment by aerinyes — September 20, 2017 @ 5:41 am - September 20, 2017

  39. I didn’t try to disprove NAMBLA or other outliers. But, if you think NAMBLA-type mindsets are the end of the slippery slope of gay marriage, it only exposes your homophobic mindset that normalising and gentrifying two adults of the same sex being together by encouraging them to participate in more traditional institutions is somehow more of a threat to children than not, well, I’ll leave that for you to sort out.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 20, 2017 @ 8:00 am - September 20, 2017

  40. “two adults of the same sex being together by encouraging them to participate in more traditional institutions ”

    Except of course, an overwhelming number of long term (together 3+ years) gay/lesbian couples never get married. Once they got the toy, they didn’t want to play with it (much like my brothers and I fighting over Matchbox cars).

    An overwhelming number of gay married couples do not have a “traditional” marriage. We have yet to meet a long term gay couple, married or otherwise, that has a monogamous relationship. The hubby and I get looked down upon by gay couples because we are faithful to each other. This is the reason we have stopped looking for gay couples to socialize with.

    The idea that access to marriage will change the sexual attitudes towards underage sex is a “dense” statement. Didn’t Australia just lower the age for consensual anal sex (gay sex) from 18 to 16? So, if SSM marriages are approved in Australia, the age of consent for gay sex will increase?

    Age 14 – Albania, Andorra, Austria, Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Liechtenstein, Macedonia, Montenegro, Portugal, San Marino, Serbia

    Age 15 – Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Greece, Iceland, Monaco, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden

    Age 16 – Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Finland, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Moldova, Netherlands, Northern Cyprus, Norway, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom

    “For instance, the minimum age for marriage without permission is 21 in the Philippines. But the law makes an exception for Muslims–Muslim girls can be married at puberty, and Muslim boys at 15.”

    “In Trinidad and Tobago, the legal age for civil and Christian marriage is 18 for men and women. But the law allows Muslim men to marry at 16 and Muslim women at 12, and Hindu men to marry at 18 and Hindu women at 14.”

    “Six countries–South Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Equatorial Guinea, Gambia, Somalia and Yemen–have no legal restrictions on a minimum age for marriage.”

    So, we can see access to marriage has nothing to do with wanting to have sex with young people. Geez, do your homework.

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — September 20, 2017 @ 10:26 am - September 20, 2017

  41. I…don’t think I said that?

    But sure, fine.

    I think that, down the line, some people – in the mindset of NAMBLA – will use this as a crack to insert more leverage in order to gain traction on things that are near and dear to their hearts.

    The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step and all that. Yup. Totally homophobic here.

    Comment by Aerinyes — September 20, 2017 @ 10:28 am - September 20, 2017

  42. #39 Cray Cray, I love you, but you are becoming irrational, which is not normal for you. The only person who has connected pedophilia with gay marriage here is you…I still refer you to the fact that the original fake poster has a circle around the 10-36 couple, which is actually male/female in orientation. You are assuming that this equates gay marriage with pedophilia, but you are the only one doing that. No other commentary here has been made in reference to that. The poster having the particular couple highlighted, along with the articles referencing pedophilia are for the sake of pointing out that liberals are supporting a deplorable act. You are the ONLY one bringing up gay marriage.

    Comment by TAD — September 20, 2017 @ 10:38 am - September 20, 2017

  43. #40: what you said about gay marriage and being looked down upon is why I don’t date or imagine that I will ever find a man with whom I can spend my life. As a gay man who believes in monotony, waiting until marriage, and not really thinking anal sex is all that great or sanitary, I am anathema in the gay community.

    Comment by TAD — September 20, 2017 @ 11:13 am - September 20, 2017

  44. TAD, I count my blessings everyday that I met my guy 35 years ago. We had/have the same outlook on relationships, you know the ones modeled by our parents.

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — September 20, 2017 @ 11:31 am - September 20, 2017

  45. I don’t date or imagine that I will ever find a man with whom I can spend my life. As a gay man who believes in monotony, waiting until marriage, and not really thinking anal sex is all that great or sanitary, I am anathema in the gay community.

    Throbert McGee is with you on at least some of those things.

    Comment by V the K — September 20, 2017 @ 11:34 am - September 20, 2017

  46. Y’know. I keep seeing Vince say ‘it’s a hoax’ but I don’t see any source confirming it as a hoax (unless the original link has been updated).

    I don’t see any independent confirmation either, but there’s right now, more evidence available that it is not a hoax than there is that it’s a hoax.

    Comment by The_Livewire — September 20, 2017 @ 3:13 pm - September 20, 2017

  47. TAD, did you ever stop to think why the 10/36 split couple is on a poster promoting promoting gay marriage? Can you at least rub two brain cells together and try to make the connection?

    Yes, the poster is a hoax, because you can’t prove a gay marriage proponent put the poster up any more than I can prove a gay marriage opponent put this poster up.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 20, 2017 @ 3:21 pm - September 20, 2017

  48. Cray is so far out in the weeds, there is no way back. Poor thing is lost in cyber-space. “Danger, Will Robinson!”

    Cray says, “If you can’t agree with my point you are a stupid, dense moron without functioning brain cells.”

    Please see the GIF in one of the previous posts.

    “Yes, the poster is a hoax, because you can’t prove a gay marriage proponent put the poster up”

    and

    “Also, 30,000 people showed up last week in Sydney to support something that Jimmy currently enjoys in the United States. He’s free to try to find one person from that crowd who was there to support adults marrying children.”

    These two statements are about as dense and nonsensical as they come.

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — September 20, 2017 @ 3:39 pm - September 20, 2017

  49. Why? Because, for years, Jimmy has spoken out against the left’s march towards gay marriage, and now he is gay married?

    Or because he uses a poster that is supposed to represent “the left’s mindset’s” demands that their want for gay marriage means they’re steamrolling towards marriage between 10 and 36-year-olds when he is married to someone who was 13 when he was 36?

    Pray tell, TnnsNe1. Thrill me with your acumen.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 20, 2017 @ 3:56 pm - September 20, 2017

  50. Simple, your attacks on Jimmy are disturbing. His husband was not 13 when they got married was he? So that little rant is completely mindless. I posted the counties with ever lowering ages of consent.

    You want people to prove a negative. Nearly impossible.

    TAD started a comment with “Cray Cray, I love you,” and you bashed his brains in.

    Your obsession with this is nuts. The poster, which I assumed to be a hoax, says nothing about marriage. It is about love. You made the leap to marriage. Obviously, you have some pent up jealousy towards Jimmy and his husband. You don’t look good in green.

    Now, if you deny the Progressive Slippery Slope Method of Achieving a Goal, you live your life with blinders on and you lose what little credibility you have here.

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — September 20, 2017 @ 4:11 pm - September 20, 2017

  51. From the first link above the embedded photo

    ‼️ #Australia: These posters are at #Melbourne University! The “Yes” campaign supports “CHILD BRIDES”.

    The “Yes” campaign is about the Australian gay marriage movement

    Comment by rusty — September 20, 2017 @ 4:23 pm - September 20, 2017

  52. Um, no. No jealousy. And, NO THANKS! I don’t need to diddle someone 23 years younger than me.

    But, the spirit of the argument seems to be lost on you too.

    But, certainly, go after my treatment of TAD. What a hero you are. And, what a big meanie I am.

    Jimmy is trying to use the “love is love” poster during a period where gay marriage is very much on the table in Oz. But, it sounds like you could stand to rub two brain cells together yourself. Or, maybe you’re just trying to slither your way out on a technicality. Wouldn’t be the first time.

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 20, 2017 @ 4:24 pm - September 20, 2017

  53. Um, I was the one who posted that perhaps the poster was a hoax.

    You are missing the real meaning of this thread – the slippery slope of Progressives. People use all kinds of symbolism to prove a point.

    Do you deny the Progressive Slippery Slope exists?

    Funny, I never mentioned exactly what I thought you were jealous of. You are the one who keeps insisting you are not jealous of younger partner (but way to be judgemental. Careful, you might lose your Progressive membership card). Perhaps, you are jealous because you moved to a country without SSM. Or perhaps you are jealous that you don’t have someone who will marry you once SSM is approved. I don’t know, but your obsession is certainly based in jealousy. Only you know what form that takes. Again, the Lady protesting too much and all that.

    I have been delighted to provide you with a shovel to dig your hole deeper. Shall we continue?

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — September 20, 2017 @ 4:53 pm - September 20, 2017

  54. It is worth noting that NAMBLA was welcome in the gay rights community throughout the 1970s. Nancy Pelosi marched alongside it’s founders in a pride parade. NAMBLA only became excluded because of criticism from the Right; not because gay activists were morally appalled by them.

    Comment by V the K — September 20, 2017 @ 5:01 pm - September 20, 2017

  55. Craycray why are you off on a gay marriage tangent when the poster does not show two men/boys with the age difference but a 10 year old girl and a 36 year old man. This to me is an obvious reference to Muslim underage marriages.

    Comment by Sandra — September 20, 2017 @ 5:14 pm - September 20, 2017

  56. “The Progressive Slippery Slope.”

    lmao

    The paranoia is REAL.

    I have been delighted to provide you with a shovel to dig your hole deeper.

    I’m actually trying to shovel your head out of the sand. But, fine, I’ll leave it there.

    G’day mate!

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 20, 2017 @ 5:23 pm - September 20, 2017

  57. I gave a clear cut example of the Progressive Slippery Slope that happened in my state.

    Prove their isn’t a slippery slope.

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — September 20, 2017 @ 5:27 pm - September 20, 2017

  58. I don’t love you anymore, CrayCray. You have insulted me and I was trying to be nice while disagreeing with you. It’s unfortunate that you felt the need to become uncivil.

    Oh, and my other post was not supposed to read as monotony…it was supposed to say monogamy…my voice recognition doesn’t recognize my voice

    Comment by TAD — September 20, 2017 @ 7:37 pm - September 20, 2017

  59. I don’t love you anymore, CrayCray. You have insulted me and I was trying to be nice while disagreeing with you. It’s unfortunate that you felt the need to become uncivil.

    Well, it’s not like CCP ever complains about personal attacks.

    Comment by V the K — September 20, 2017 @ 7:42 pm - September 20, 2017

  60. atp, I’ve gotten used to it. So …

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — September 20, 2017 @ 11:02 pm - September 20, 2017

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.