A Bill Too Radical for Moonbeam?
Apparently, there is such a thing. The California legislature passed a bill that would have required religious organizations to bow down before the leftist state. Governor Jerry Brown vetoed it.
AB 569 “would have prohibited churches, religious colleges, religious non-profit organizations, and pro-life pregnancy care centers from having faith-based codes of conduct with regard to abortion and sexual behavior.”
Remember when the progressive left used to be against “legislating morality?” Doesn’t seem like that long ago, does it?
8 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
It boggles the mind that, by California standards, Jerry Brown is a voice of reason.
Comment by Southern Man — October 16, 2017 @ 5:41 pm - October 16, 2017
He vetoes this bill AND the campus sexual assault bill because it violates due process. Did the man have a stroke? Is there a Republican wearing a Jerry Brown Halloween mask around the CA capital building? Is the apocalypse coming? What is going on.
Comment by J- — October 16, 2017 @ 5:44 pm - October 16, 2017
The Left has *always* been about legislating morality as practised by the Church of Secular Humanism. You make a good point. Perhaps Progressives should be reminded of it. Often.
Comment by Blair Ivey — October 16, 2017 @ 9:07 pm - October 16, 2017
You’d think one would be more supportive of Gov. Brown’s decision in their language.
Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — October 16, 2017 @ 10:18 pm - October 16, 2017
So a guy does 99,999 things wrong and we should praise him for one thing right? Does it matter if he does the right thing for the wrong reason?
Comment by TnnsNe1 — October 16, 2017 @ 10:49 pm - October 16, 2017
#4 – Hey, al-Cray-da: Adolf Hitler was a vegetarian who loved puppies and painted splendid artwork. Should we be more supportive of him?
Checkmate.
Regards,
Peter H.
Comment by Peter Hughes — October 17, 2017 @ 9:52 am - October 17, 2017
#6 wins the thread!!
Comment by David — October 17, 2017 @ 11:54 am - October 17, 2017
He knew Gorsuch would have been vote #5 in overturning it. That’s the only reason he vetoed it.
Comment by Paul — October 22, 2017 @ 1:33 am - October 22, 2017