Gay Patriot Header Image

If It Weren’t for Double Standards

Amazing, isn’t it, how willingly the Democrat Media Complex accepts a denial from a Democrat as sufficient evidence to dismiss a scandal.

Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.

What were they expecting, a signed receipt? The Clintons received money explicitly for the purpose of greasing the skids for the Uranium One Deal, Andrew McCarthy has laid out the irrefutable case for this.

Note that, despite zero evidence, these are the same people proclaiming that Donald Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.

Share

7 Comments

  1. Liberals live in their own zeitgeist bubble. They intuitively know “right from wrong” and only their ethereal concept of the moment applies.

    Liberals do no wrong. Other people victimize them and that is a greater wrong than any mere transgression being pointed out on their part.

    The Clintoons are “good” people who are dedicated to doing “good” in the world and they deserve a bit of the money for their altruistic efforts and profound love of humanity and making the world a “better” place.

    So, when you attack the Clintoons, you are rooting for evil, decay, disease, violence, mayhem, degradation, racism, sexism, homophobia and caste systems.

    Trump and all Republicans are predators who steal from the poor in order to make themselves obscenely rich. Only Democrats like Jon Corzine, John Kerry and the Kennedys are permitted to enjoy luxury in an awful, awful world.

    There are no double standards. There are Democrats= Right and Republicans = Wrong.

    It is not a hard equation to understand. Some people just refuse to accept the facts.

    Here is the smartest, bestest, simplest formula possible:

    State socialism must be established and all money of every source must pass through the hands of the state. Those who collect the handling fees off the top of the socialist economy deserve to live an elitist life. They are our lords and masters in the socialist fiefdom and that is how things work. What’s not to understand? Democrats do.

    Comment by Heliorope — October 23, 2017 @ 5:46 pm - October 23, 2017

  2. The Clintons are so virtuous that it’s absurd to think they can be swayed and influenced by something as coarse and déclassé and millions of dollars. They’re practically saints.

    For shame.

    Comment by KCRob — October 23, 2017 @ 8:07 pm - October 23, 2017

  3. The other 145 million dollars the Hillary family slush fund/foundation made selling 20% of US owned uranium directly to Putin was routed into their bank via the Renssaise Bank – also Putin owned.
    More money from that sale was routed via Canadian charity where laws protect donation contribution and who gave them. Pretty slick no?
    I wager that Hillary and her family would be in prison for tax fraud if we had an honest political leadership. Alas they are all protecting each other.

    Comment by cali — October 24, 2017 @ 8:10 am - October 24, 2017

  4. Also in the News-

    An actress is accusing retired-President, Bush Sr., of [sexual assault].
    In her claims, she said, that on one day- he “told a dirty joke”, and [possibly grabbed her backside, twice].

    So now, the Democrat-leaning press has put her on the [stand-up against men who did sexual assault bandwagon].

    Very well, fair’s fair, in these problems.

    So now: I open the opportunity for ALL of the Democrats in the Federal government, and all Democrats in the congress, and all Democrats in the press:

    To do the SAME, STAND UP AGAINST the men accused of sexual crimes-

    and stand up against Ex-president BILL CLINTON, for his [suspected] sexual crimes and/or sexual assault against FIVE women.

    Five women have accused Bill Clinton of sexual crimes, and one has accused him of rape. Those claims should be investigated, to make sure that justice is done, and that these accusations are taken seriously.

    So, I’m opening the door-
    for the Main-stream press/Democrat-leaning press to investigate and cover Bill Clinton’s [suspected sexual assaults],

    just as strongly as they are covering the other people [in the news, who are being accused of sexual assault, and sexual crimes].

    Please. Start your reporting, and your investigating, now.

    Comment by TR — October 25, 2017 @ 12:58 pm - October 25, 2017

  5. Five women have accused Bill Clinton of sexual crimes, and one has accused him of rape. Those claims should be investigated, to make sure that justice is done, and that these accusations are taken seriously.

    All of those have already been litigated and are old news. It means that they never really happened. How do I know this? Hillary told me so herself, via an interview with the BBC last week.

    Besides, as she has previously said, those women are trash. Now, let’s get back to the Trump-Russia collusion to hack the 2016 election.

    Comment by RSG — October 25, 2017 @ 2:47 pm - October 25, 2017

  6. Hi RSG,

    I think you’re being ironic in your reply.

    But should we think that Bill Clinton did sexual assaults, sexual harassment[s], and [the very, serious crime of] rape], even if these events were from…long, long ago?

    Before has gone to a trial, or any trials- the film producer, Harvey Weinstein has been accused of rape, and accused of other sexual crimes.
    Not one crime has been proven, as of yet-

    But Weinstein’s name and reputation have already been scandalized, and destroyed, in the press, and in the public eye.

    Likely, in response to the allegations against Weinstein, he has: been expelled from two honored awards councils…including the Oscars[R] film awards’ council, and he has been removed from an entertainment-worker’s Union. I don’t think the Union does that, lightly.

    Do the crimes + accusations have to be recent, to have any worth?

    Actor, Gwyneth Paltrow, it has been said, was sexually harassed by Weinstein, in 1995.
    Is 22 years “too long ago”, for this claim to be important? Is that “just yesterday’s news”?

    But, I suppose, that these are the ways of the US culture in 2017-

    If [your alleged crime] happened “too long ago”, or if your accusation of a crime was from “too many years ago”, then the media decides that they’re not important.

    A person I know of- had been held up, with a weapon, and forced to do sexual acts- as in sexual crimes were done to her.

    These events happened decades ago, to this woman.

    These events, I believe…happened, but I can’t take reports of these events to the police, since I don’t anything that [I can use as evidence for an arrest, or to use in a court as legal evidence], since these crimes were done decades ago.

    Should we ignore this woman’s claim, since it was “too long ago”, and she has no evidence that can be used by a judge, or by the police?

    But, so it appears, if you are [ an ex-President, and a Democrat, you need both of those…it seems], then accusations against you [don’t matter]. They’re just dismissed.

    I guess the response is: sorry, person…Mr. Clinton is just too popular, and and too powerful, for you to make accusations against him, and be believed.

    In the society that we’re trying to make, I believe, we cannot hear criminal-accusations against one ex-President, and totally believe them, and then [totally ignore the criminal-accusations against another ex-President], because [the second ex-President] is too popular, and belongs to the “right” political party, and therefore is too powerful to be accused of such crimes.

    Sorry, I can’t hold one ex-President accountable for his bad actions, and then [let similar…or the same, bad actions] be dismissed when they are leveled at another ex-President.

    I believe that is how justice works- if we don’t ask for justice for every, single person in our country, then- justice does not totally exist in our country.

    [As a footnote- I do not know what crimes, and other bad actions, were done by Mr. Anthony Weinstein.

    However- with the number of women and other people who are accusing him of sexual crimes-

    I certainly think it is worth it for police and the courts in the U.S., to investigate these suspected crimes, and to have each of these crimes brought to trail, if the police and court-workers decide there are crimes to be tried in the courts of law].

    Comment by TR — October 25, 2017 @ 10:37 pm - October 25, 2017

  7. @6

    A correction to my comment, comment number 6: The film producer’s name is Harvey Weinstein, and I put down an incorrect name for H.W., in my comment.

    Comment by TR — October 25, 2017 @ 10:43 pm - October 25, 2017

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.