Gay Patriot Header Image

Challenge accepted

Posted by V the K at 5:26 pm - October 31, 2017.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

“There’s an old Mexican proverb that says “Tell me with whom you walk, and I will tell you who you are.” – Hillary Clinton

 

Share

19 Comments

  1. Hi V the K,
    You can always check out: http://guestofaguest.com/new-york/nightclubs/photo-of-the-day-the-trumps-and-the-weinsteins
    Just saying …

    Comment by Cas — October 31, 2017 @ 7:34 pm - October 31, 2017

  2. You forgot the the Weiner man.

    Hey Cas, the Hill has slept with a rapist for decades. She is a pervert magnet. Will she run again? If not, who will run for your side?

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — October 31, 2017 @ 8:21 pm - October 31, 2017

  3. Did Trump ever fly down to Pedo Island with Jeff Epstein in his private jet?

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/13/flight-logs-show-bill-clinton-flew-on-sex-offenders-jet-much-more-than-previously-known.html

    Comment by V the K — October 31, 2017 @ 8:26 pm - October 31, 2017

  4. Trump, to my knowledge, has never applied for sainthood. https://www.amazon.com/Magazine-HILLARY-RODHAM-CLINTON-Politics/dp/B005Y1JU8S One of Alinsky’s rules is to require adherence to professed standards. Just sayin’.

    Comment by Ignatius — October 31, 2017 @ 9:13 pm - October 31, 2017

  5. Hi TnnsNe1,
    Given your comment it does not appear that you actually checked out the link. Is that right?

    Hi V the K,
    I don’t know! Has Hilary ever grabbed a woman’s external genitalia and bragged about it?

    Hi Ignatius,
    Yes, I agree and he certainly doesn’t care for the things that saints apparently do. By all means show me where Hilary has made that claim, even if Mr. Kelly smugly dubs her that in the article you link to. Check out this for a slightly different view from Mr. Lerner.
    Just sayinG

    Comment by Cas — November 1, 2017 @ 12:07 am - November 1, 2017

  6. Hey Cas, just how long are going to perpetrate that lie about Trump.

    Comment by Juan — November 1, 2017 @ 12:47 am - November 1, 2017

  7. I recall him talking like a sailor, but I don’t remember him actually saying he touched anyone…am I wrong about that?

    Comment by TAD — November 1, 2017 @ 1:18 am - November 1, 2017

  8. Hi Juan,
    What lie are you referring to? Because we have the President on tape bragging about grabbing the external genitalia of women. So, what are you saying? Do you want to add in the women who testified to his unwanted sexual advances for good measure?

    And TAD,

    “I’m automatically attracted to beautiful [women]—I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star they let you do it. You can do anything … Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.”

    Comment by Cas — November 1, 2017 @ 1:40 am - November 1, 2017

  9. Again Cas proves the Progressive Pig Support Theory. A false equivalency is support. So sad that Case supports rapists and pedophiles. Morally bankrupt Progressives still wonder why the Progressive Pervert Magnet lost. Very sad indeed.

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — November 1, 2017 @ 2:25 am - November 1, 2017

  10. Yes Cas, you take a single quote out of context and blow it up all out of proportion, ignoring the original intent and dark humor. Tell the whole truth, not the lies made out of half-assed facts.

    Comment by Juan — November 1, 2017 @ 9:31 am - November 1, 2017

  11. Donald Trump talked about groping women, yet there’s no evidence that the groping actually happened. The alleged victims who came out of the woodwork prior to the election suddenly went into a de facto witness protection program after the election and haven’t been heard from since. Why is that? Were they intimidated into not going forward with the allegations, or was it a case of there being “no there there”? Why has The Resistance perpetuated all sorts of Russian hacking of the election claims (without discernible proof) and yet all the “Donald Trump Is A Pig” evidence is from outtakes of an entertainment program from over a decade ago. Surely if he is such a horrible person, there must be legions of victims with horror stories to tell. Where are they?

    Meanwhile, a now-former president actually settled multiple abuse and harassment claims (which means that they really never happened, as his wife now claims). And multiple persons associated with the same ex-president and his wife have been accused (and in some cases, convicted) of similar and worse types of abuse. Yet POTUS 45 is the horrible person. Any reasonable person should be able to see the incongruity in these two scenarios.

    Has Hilary [sic] ever grabbed a woman’s external genitalia and bragged about it?

    Probably not. But in the larger scheme of things, it matters not. Hillary Clinton is a serial enabler. In my view this is worse than being a perpetrator in the sense that perpetrators can be singled out and isolated for who they are. Enablers gain one’s trust, if they don’t already have it, and convince you that what you saw or experienced with your own eyes and other senses didn’t actually happen, or at the very least, was something else than what you thought it was.

    Those who are warned about perpetrators are told things like “Don’t go to his hotel room if invited.” Enablers say things like “Oh, go ahead, it’ll be okay.” Enablers constantly make excuses for bad behavior, or in some cases, blame the actual victims (“Those women are trash”). Enablers tout their own positive attributes in being advocates for those in difficult situations, and yet behind the scenes they assist the perpetrators in committing their acts. Perpetrators are pretty blatant in their actions; enablers operate under stealth and denial of reality. Perpetrators usually eventually receive the appropriate reward for their actions, while enablers are almost never punished for their actions.

    Comment by RSG — November 1, 2017 @ 11:36 am - November 1, 2017

  12. Cas, Mrs. Clinton is a rolling crime wave. If her actions are often against the letter of the law, they are against the spirit of the law. Her family’s foundation is a prime example of how the Clintons operate. Interview questions posed to her are pre-screened so she can give canned answers and appear ‘brilliant.’ Debate questions are given to her ahead of time so she can give canned answers and appear ‘brilliant.’ You may recall “It Takes a Village” in addition to other proverbs she cites in newspaper columns, multi-thousand dollar speeches, etc.; she has long cultivated a persona of virtue, connectedness, being fully woke, treading a careful line between leftist dog whistles and the centrist policies to which she and her husband pay lip service because power is power. This, like everything about her, is calculated, geared to appearing above the fray of politics and if she has to get down and dirty occasionally, she’s given a pass because she has had to work so much harder than the men in her field. She’s a complete fraud. Most of us can see that. Your mileage may vary but Trump, for all his obvious faults, has never operated at this level of conniving manipulation. He’s an easy target for those who have no imagination — especially those who rely on dubious compare/contrast to troll blog sites. Just sayin’.

    Comment by Ignatius — November 1, 2017 @ 12:22 pm - November 1, 2017

  13. Hi Juan,
    Taken out of context? Really? How do you figure that? “Dark humour”? Hmm… yes, that is how DT would have characterized it, after being called on it

    RSG,
    Yes, we only have the man’s words for it. And witnesses–he said – she said, agreed, and unlikely to be enough to get a conviction or judgement (especially given his status and resources). But how much of the current Hollywood and spreading controversy is of exactly the same ilk? And we don’t even have the words. Only witness accounts–mostly he said – she said. Yet these are more believable to you than the witness accounts against Trump? Why? Is it because the accused acknowledged what happened in some way? Why didn’t they use the same techniques as DT did? It is not because I think DT is innocent. I do not. I think those accused felt shame. This is not an emotion I think that DT understands or feels. I believe that he would think that “shame” is a weakness that interferes with what he wants to accomplish. It serves no useful purpose in his thinking. It serves him well in these situations.

    Comment by Cas — November 1, 2017 @ 1:57 pm - November 1, 2017

  14. We judge Progressives by Progressive Standards.

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — November 1, 2017 @ 2:24 pm - November 1, 2017

  15. So, debating with Cas is pigeon chess.

    Comment by Juan — November 1, 2017 @ 5:32 pm - November 1, 2017

  16. Hi Ignatius,
    So we are agreed that HC never claimed to be a saint. She pre-screens. Who can blame her? She has been crucified by the press for years. Not just your rightwing mob, but your supposedly progressive NYTimes. A good place to start is the Daily Howler by Bob Somerby, who goes into great depth explaining the stupidity that the regular press indulges in when it comes to Hillary Clinton, whilst regularly castigating them from a rational perspective, focusing on how badly they misreport things and draw unwarranted conclusions. And as for DT and his rambling and at times incoherent manner in answering questions… well, you may like it, and I might just lack the imagination to piece together the brilliance you see in it, but it smacks of early stage dementia to me. Just SayinG

    And TnnsNe1,
    If you actually ever work out what “Progressive Standards” are, that would be OK. Please share. But it seems rather naive to assert that “Progressives” subscribes to exactly the same thing, or “Standard”–you know like me suggesting that “Conservatives” subscribe to a “Standard Size One Fit For All” belief unless, you think that there is a “Conservative Standard,” fixed and unchanging, for all time. Well, do you, TnnsNe1?

    And Juan,
    1. e4 c5
    Grazie

    Comment by Cas — November 1, 2017 @ 11:43 pm - November 1, 2017

  17. Cas, you know the Progressive Standard. You defend it, you support it and you hold it dear.

    Know how we know that? Your words. And who you support.

    As your fellow Progressive, CCP, has stated numerous times, “I have discussed that in a previous thread.”

    Comment by TnnsNe1 — November 2, 2017 @ 6:35 am - November 2, 2017

  18. TnnsNe1!
    You are such a tease! OK, link me to the comment where you outlined the “Progressive Standard.” I want to understand what you think. At the moment, its dribs and drabs. I would like to understand you coherent philosophy, and I am excited to hear your point of view. Don’t forget about the Conservative views question I asked you above. I find that issue very interesting. I especially like the way you leave open the door to the reader the possibility that you don’t really know what you are talking about. Adds a certain air of mystery to you–will he or won’t he …? I wait on tenterhooks! 🙂

    Comment by Cas — November 2, 2017 @ 5:06 pm - November 2, 2017

  19. […] Challenge accepted […]

    Pingback by Br Andrew's Muses — November 5, 2017 @ 12:49 am - November 5, 2017

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.