Gay Patriot Header Image

“Nobody Wants to Take Your Guns”

Posted by V the K at 11:53 am - November 14, 2017.
Filed under: Gun Control

This Boston Globe editor apparently did not get the memo. Democrats are supposed to deny that they want to confiscate guns from law-abiding people… until they’ve put in place a national gun registry, outlawed semi-automatic weapons, outlawed magazines of greater than five rounds, require “universal background checks” so you can be sent to Federal PMITA Prison for loaning your daughter a handgun so she can protect herself from a crazy stalker ex-boyfriend, made it illegal to purchase ammunition without a state-issued license … only then can they admit that these were all incremental steps toward outlawing citizen ownership of firearms.

But here’s this guy giving away the game.

Ultimately, if gun-control advocates really want to stanch the blood, there’s no way around it: They’ll have to persuade more people of the need to confiscate millions of those firearms, as radical as that idea may now seem.

Share

14 Comments »

  1. One significant “cure” for mass-shooting would be damnatio memoriae; just as we do not speak of a rape victim’s name in the press, so to with these “mass-shooters”. Many ultimately are motivated by the notoriety, or to advance some manifesto or cause. Deny them the publicity, drop them down a rabbit-hole. Deny them the airing of their grievances, forbid the showing of their faces, they cease to exist in the Public Mind.

    How many HOURS of air-time have been devoted to them?
    How many line-inches of print examining in the public Forum their every foible and slight?
    Everyone knows their names….

    Deny them the stage, …and the “glory”.

    Comment by Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — November 14, 2017 @ 1:04 pm - November 14, 2017

  2. I have heard that said before. It’s worth a try, but how do you get a progressive news media to go along

    Comment by Matthew the Oilman — November 14, 2017 @ 1:29 pm - November 14, 2017

  3. The one thing that would do more than anything else to reduce “gun violence” would be to crack down on straw purchases, illegal gun sales, and illegal possession of firearms by felons.

    But this would mean going after Young Urban Males; and if you start cracking down on Young Urban Males than Old Suburban Liberals and community organizers will attack you for feeing the “School-to-Prison” pipeline and “Mass Incarceration.”

    Much politically easier to push for making it harder for decent, law-abiding people to acquire firearms.

    Comment by V the K — November 14, 2017 @ 1:50 pm - November 14, 2017

  4. Hi Ted B.,

    Deny them the publicity

    Actually, I made that point with ILoveCapitalism earlier this year, but he insisted on repeating the name of a shooter. But, yes, I agree. By not flashing their name, you deny them any kind of fame they may seek.

    Hi V the K,
    UPDATE: No one is taking away your guns and it won’t be happening. And the majority of Americans who support gun control do not want to take your guns away. You might want to get your paranoia checked out.

    Cheers,
    CCP

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — November 14, 2017 @ 4:49 pm - November 14, 2017

  5. No one is trying to outlaw tampons, deport American citizens of Hispanic ancestry, or subject gay people to electric shock treatment. But that doesn’t stop the leftists from whining about how Trump is worse than Hitler.

    Comment by Tom — November 14, 2017 @ 8:10 pm - November 14, 2017

  6. Tom, the difference is you don’t see Republicans saying “We don’t want to institute ‘The Handmaind’s Tale'” while simultaneously introducing legislation calling for mandatory bonnets on women.

    Comment by V the K — November 14, 2017 @ 9:06 pm - November 14, 2017

  7. UPDATE: No one is taking away your guns and it won’t be happening. And the majority of Americans who support gun control do not want to take your guns away.

    The problem is the Progressives and the Leftists know they can’t take our guns,
    …but they do want to.

    “Shiny, shiny. My precious…”

    Comment by Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — November 15, 2017 @ 6:30 am - November 15, 2017

  8. Hi Ted B.,

    The problem is the Progressives and the Leftists know they can’t take our guns,
    …but they do want to.

    Then, I fail to see the threat, and all it is is something nonsensical to b!tch about and stir people up over nothing.

    *shrug*

    Cheers,
    CCP

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — November 15, 2017 @ 9:20 am - November 15, 2017

  9. The Boston Globe should be called Boston Dope. A washed up old rag that’s irrelevant and just a paper for yuppies and hipsters.

    Comment by Pawfurbehr — November 15, 2017 @ 12:13 pm - November 15, 2017

  10. Apparently CrayCray missed his fellow Democrat and Democrat spokesperson Mikey’s diatribe about how Democrats not only want to confiscate and ban guns, but repeal the Second Amendment to boot.

    http://www.gaypatriot.net/2017/11/14/other-news-things-that-are-happening/#comment-1228476

    Mikey represents Democrat thought and the Democrat Party platform. CrayCray is just repeating the Democrat lie that they don’t want to confiscate and ban guns and repeal the Second Amendment.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — November 15, 2017 @ 2:39 pm - November 15, 2017

  11. Then, I fail to see the threat, and all it is is something nonsensical to bitch about and stir people up over nothing.

    …Only through constant vigilance can we maintain the Constitution, and our Rights as free men.

    Comment by Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — November 15, 2017 @ 3:33 pm - November 15, 2017

  12. Hi V the K,

    the difference is you don’t see Republicans saying “We don’t want to institute ‘The Handmaind’s Tale’” while simultaneously introducing legislation calling for mandatory bonnets on women.

    Perhaps it’s The Left’s version of:

    constant vigilance

    For those with defunct irony detectors, that was a joke. But, alas, I doubt few will appreciate it, let alone even get it. Sad!

    Cheers,
    CCP

    Comment by CrayCrayPatriot — November 15, 2017 @ 7:03 pm - November 15, 2017

  13. Except, mike, the Democrats know that banning guns anti guns anti-second Amendment is all a non-starter especially at the election polls. Your little authoritarian pushes to take away our rights to defend ourselves from a government that might become overwhelmingly dictatorial, will not stand. We will defend ourselves at any cost. I do mean that, at any cost.

    Comment by Hanover — November 15, 2017 @ 9:24 pm - November 15, 2017

  14. It’s bemusing to watch as some people proclaim that only highly trained people such as police officers are qualified to carry firearms…

    Then in practically the next breath excoriate cops as poorly trained, uneducated racists who became cops because they wanted to exercise power over others.

    The reality is that most police officers barely train with their firearms.

    Its not difficult for a civilian to attain a higher degreemof combat traing than the majority of cops.

    The thing for me…if one honestly believes cops.are evil, that the government now in power is two heartbeats from a handmaids tale, and that all men are rapists…why on godsgreen earth would you dismiss a firce equalizer like a cz75b, an fns-9, or a ruger lcp? Much less anlong arm as easy to use as an Ar-15 platform?

    Comment by Aerinyes — November 16, 2017 @ 12:24 am - November 16, 2017

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

**Note: Your first comment will be held for moderation. Avoid profanity, avoid personal attacks on fellow commenters, and avoid complaining about personal attacks (even on you). Feel free to disagree with anyone, but focus on their ideas; give us the information that you think they overlooked.**

Live preview of comment