Would anyone be interested in a gay sex robot with a bionic penis?
To me, these things are still on the outskirts of the Uncanny Valley. They still look kind of fake and rubbery, but not quite as creepy as CGI Peter Cushing in ‘Rogue One.’ If you don’t mind that, I guess it’s an alternative.
I wonder if they make any that look like Carson Wentz (asking for a friend).
On a related note, the Feminist Left says people who won’t date trannies are bigots. Rubbery sex robots still look more realistic than most of the trannies.
[youtube]https://youtu.be/9ev1ec0Z0GI[/youtube]
A mechanical arm tearing apart one’s rectum and beyond is exactly where this is going, far worse than a Howard Wallowicz moment. Idiots will be idiots, most likely dead idiots.
Could one build a low-cost version? Say a blow-up doll with a vibrating penis attached? Sorry, I prefer the real thing.
Are you aware that the comments section redirects you to a Facebook/spam website?
Until they can get them pass the gagged houseboy-test and can pickup my laundry, clean the bathroom and kitchen and “…Please sir, may I have another” convincingly, I’ll prefer the real-thang.
I was not, but I have alerted The Management.
It doesn’t look like it’s self cleaning. that would be a deal-breaker. Not that I’m a germaphobe of any kind but rubber is porous.
That Blaire White’s response has >2x views means there’s hope for the Internet.
People who prefer not to date bald men are bald-ots.
@2 Sure, no problem: one only needs to ask Elon Musk and wait until a little later — say, after a decade or so, along with a couple billion $$$ of tax payer money (yearly) spent in subsidies for that n-th planned societal change — Why you ask?
@8 People who prefer not to date** french postmodernists are self-preservation-instinct-ots.
** (or have anything to do with those, for that matter)
Personally, those gay males giving all aid and support for trannies need to be directed to date them, and not ‘cruise’ cis men.
People who don’t want to have sex with robots are technophobes.
Um, aren’t robot penises called “dildos”?
“But think of the sheep…”
[/sarcasm?]
@12 Alternate spelling / synonym:
tech-nots.
Side note.
With women leaving them in droves, you wonder when the Feminist Left will get their first clue as to how much irrelevant they have already become —
well, besides under your average 50 or 60-something super-undersexed commie teacher whose only hope to keep their academic tenure is to have their administration survive them long enough, with or without unions around … that is.
OT — although, maybe not-so-much;
Ah. Fiinally, someone made that documentary for the masses — leaving the elites to their rotten and rotting hobbies with or without cybernetic sextoys:
Truth in the Time of Chaos
https://youtu.be/EjqXXengN1s
Enjoy.
Why are we not talking about the tears people are crying over Oprah’s speech last night and their chants for her to be president…I am much more afraid of that than sex bots
@18 :)_)
If the female-version is a “Fembot”, what shall we call the male version? “Toyboy” “houseboy” and “Rentboy” are already aculturated into the syllabary.
And shall we differentiate between the hetero-normative-usage version and the gay-usage version of male-bots? Top-bots vs bottom-bots?
…And what about the disturbing “Puppy-bots”?
“Data Entry Points”?