Gay Patriot Header Image

The Hatred of Love

Posted by V the K at 8:53 am - February 14, 2018.
Filed under: Ideas & Trends

I always figured that the thing that drew the Progressive Left and Islamic Supremacists together was their mutual hatred of Christianity and their desire for authoritarian political power to impose their morality. But someone has pondered how both Progressives and Islamic Supremacists hate Valentine’s Day and come up with an interesting hypothesis.

The core issue at the foundation of this phenomenon is that Islam and the Left both revile the notion of private love, a non-tangible and divine entity that draws individuals to each other and, therefore, distracts them from submitting themselves to a secular deity.

The highest objective of both Islam and the Left is clear: to shatter the sacred intimacy that a man and a woman can share with one another, for such a bond is inaccessible to the order. History, therefore, demonstrates how Islam, like Communism, wages a ferocious war on any kind of private and unregulated love. In the case of Islam, the reality is epitomized in its monstrous structures of gender apartheid and the terror that keeps it in place. As we are well aware, female sexuality and freedom are demonized and, therefore, forced veiling, forced marriage, female genital mutilation, honor killings and other misogynist monstrosities become mandatory parts of the sadistic paradigm.

Read the linked article in its entirety.

When you think about it, a hatred and distrust of intimate personal connections is something the Progressive Left and the Islamic Supremacists share. The Right reveres and celebrates the traditional family as the epitome of love. The left reviles it as an instrument of patriarchal oppression. In contrast, the Left celebrates the Slut Walk, the bath house, the abortion mill —  all symbols of sexuality divorced from intimacy.

The aversion to intimate connections between individuals is rooted emotionally, perhaps, in resentment. The people most feverishly committed to extremist authoritarian ideologies are often those who seem incapable of forming intimate connections.  It is easier to dismiss love as a frivolous distraction from the important work of building social justice or the Caliphate.

Valentine’s Day is a “shameful day” for the Muslim world and for the Left. It is shameful because private love is considered obscene, since it threatens the highest of values: the need for a totalitarian order to attract the complete and undivided attention, allegiance and veneration of every citizen. Love serves as the most lethal threat to the tyrants seeking to build Sharia and a classless utopia on earth, and so these tyrants yearn for the annihilation of every ingredient in man that smacks of anything that it means to be human.

“Love is love” was never anything more than an advertising slogan to sell a social-left agenda. It’s very banality indicates how little regard the Left ever had for love.



  1. Interesting hypothesis. And it remains compatible with the more general assessment it makes:

    and so these tyrants yearn for the annihilation of every ingredient in man that smacks of anything that it means to be human

    “every ingredient in man”, as in,

    free will, free speech, free trade, self-reliance, individual responsibility, introspection, etc, you name it.

    In this country, I suspect the full enumeration could be obtained simply by looking at pretty much every single thing that the laws pushed by the Domcrats (aka commies) pretend to “fix”.

    Comment by Cyril J. — February 14, 2018 @ 10:04 am - February 14, 2018

  2. The hierarchy and corruption of the (ancient) types of love are in stark contrast, Right and Left: agape, eros, philia, storge. Also, that love is an idea as well as an emotion, a desire vs. a necessity, i.e. that one corresponds to the other. Private property has always been the enemy of the submissive authoritarian; the individual’s inner life — his soul, heart, mind, his loves and ideals — can be corrupted but not entirely controlled. If he is still a man, that is. I think this is how totalitarianism is ultimately undone: appealing to man’s ability to love (to appreciate himself, his own mind) even in such circumstances. Two fictional examples come to mind, We The Living and The Lives of Others. Tiananmen Square is but one of many real examples.

    Comment by Ignatius — February 14, 2018 @ 10:39 am - February 14, 2018

  3. as far as communism goes you could substitute family for love and it would be the same thing,

    Comment by salg — February 14, 2018 @ 11:31 am - February 14, 2018

  4. @3

    Because they hate themselves, they hate people.

    And “people” is you and me included.

    That’s the only catch.

    Comment by Cyril J. — February 14, 2018 @ 11:43 am - February 14, 2018

  5. “Because they hate themselves, they hate people.”

    Contrast to “Love thy neighbor as thyself. I AM the LORD.”

    Interesting to note: I have NEVER heard of anything from Islamic writings that indicates that Islam brings anyone to love. It only says it means “submission.” That results in FEAR. That’s what authoritarian ideologies are about. Nothing else matters to them.

    By contrast, “Whoever doesn’t love is not of God; for God is love.”

    Love overcomes Fear: the inner reason the Iron Curtain was brought down and the Soviet Union collapsed was that people loved themselves, their families and their countries in such a way they hated to watch them being afraid of such an evil foreign power. One of the first words of Karol Woytyla (John Paul II) to the world was “Be not afraid.” His people, the Polish, heard it loud and clear. That was the beginning of the end for Communism in Europe. In the end, Russians themselves loved their families more than the Supreme Soviet ever could – and tossed them all out, as Lenin statues were brought down.

    Comment by theduchessofkitty — February 15, 2018 @ 3:01 pm - February 15, 2018

  6. Re: Ideas and Trends

    People are Leaving These States in Record Numbers

    (red: outbound, blue: inbound)


    Comment by Cyril J. — February 19, 2018 @ 1:51 am - February 19, 2018

  7. The Regressive Left only likes gays as long as they can cheapen us and drag us down to the same level as the worst heterosexuals, never to elevate and celebrate our love and show us at our best, and never to reward those of us who are willing to forsake all others. They are secretly anti-gay because they are anti-love.

    Comment by Matthew — February 20, 2018 @ 11:21 am - February 20, 2018

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.