Turns out the father of Omar Mateen (the mass shooter the national media have forgotten about because his ethnicity is inconvenient to too many narratives) was an FBI informant for over a decade.
Could that be the reason the FBI twice interviewed Omar Mateen and twice determined he was good to go?
Could that be the reason the FBI twice interviewed Omar Mateen and twice determined he was good to go?
Yes.
Regards,
Peter H.
Just might be – like also all the overlook of the anti-gay inam preaching at the family mosque… We must conform to the narrative, Or else.
Why do we even HAVE an FBI?
it shows how corrupted government agencies can be when you have a communist regime.
Ever notice how many strange intersections there are these days?
A guy who’s an FBI informant and gets a seat behind HRC at a rally happens to have a son that’s a terrorist?
The Florida school murderer is known to the feebs (I’ve seen that term used on a cop blog as a derisive term for the feds) and the locals yet pulls off a school massacre while LE stands around outside.
Still know nothing about the Las Vegas shooter.
I don’t think it’s a conspiracy; it’s incompetence. We’re nose-deep in it.
Speaking of cops with courage – this guy gets the prize. He had to know that, given the proclivities of angry Mohammedans, his chances were poor but he went in anyway. France has lost one of its best. May he rest in peace and may his friends and family take some solace in that M. Beltrane died a real hero.
http://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la-fg-french-officer-20180324-story.html?outputType=amp
@5 “I don’t think it’s a conspiracy: it’s in competence.” hiring less competent is the purpose of affirmative action.
I enjoy the spy movies that are well done. But I don’t believe them.
I believe the Whitey Bulger story will all the amateur crap which the FBI pulled. I also believe that Robert Mueller had to be in on the FBI scheme or he had to be the worst U.S. Attorney ever.
This is from the May 24, 2002 New York Times:
I find it particularly aggravating that if you lie to the FBI you are automatically guilty of a “process crime” and if the FBI lies to us as they shield crooks going about their crooked stuff, it somehow becomes the case that “two wrongs” do equal a “right.”
Robert Mueller’s “white hat” is a fiction. Corruption weak people who gain enormous power are easily eaten by the cancer of powerful corruption. They can always find stooges who will go along for the ride. Here, I am thinking Comey, McCabe, Meuller, Obama, Lynch, Strzok, Baker, Yates, Ohr, Carlin, Steele, Simpson, Jacoby and Hillary.
As Warren Buffet says, “there is never just one cockroach in the kitchen.”
So, the FBI was engaging the father of Omar Mateen in deep state stuff and they gave Omar a pass because of some “greater good” because “the ends justify the means.” Wow. Sure does stand English Common Law and ethics on its head.
In The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli never wrote: “The ends justify the means.” This is what he wrote:
Read that carefully. Machiavelli is telling the truth about the politics of power in the hands of an autocrat/authoritarian. Mueller ignores ethics. He operates on the basis of “what can I get away with in the name of the law?”
It is no accident that Mueller has stacked his team with aggressive authoritarians.
The “Pulse” investigation by the FBI is badly tainted by the facts of the alliance between the FBI and Mateen’s father. Comey was Mueller’s understudy. And Whitey Bulger was part of Mueller’s “education.”
It turns out that Attorney General Jeff Sessions does have a grand jury or grand juries impanelled. He likely shopped the locations for places where the juries would not be rabidly partisan. Sessions has been following the slow and steady process of secretly investigating the characters named above and others we do not know about. The proof of this is that some of the documents requested by Congress are being withheld on the basis of the lawyer-client privilege that would be violated if information in sealed indictments were prematurely released.
Sessions has been battered by many who want to see more fireworks. He is following the law and doing his job.
From The Hill today:
The Comey FBI has a lot of ‘splainin’ to do.
@Heliotrope: The current accusation against Russia and the ‘poisoned’ Russian and daughter were part of the Hussein swap I think it was 2012.
Hussein sent them to the UK.
It was not Russia who tried to get rid of this guy and his daughter. It most likely was the MI6.
It involved the Steele dossier that he wanted to clear up because the MI6 helped Hussein and Hillary to frame Trump.
The guy became a problem and exposing the MI6 directly working to frame Trump needed to remain hush hush.
All he wanted to do is testify and go home to Russia alas the MI6 needing to get rid of that risk of exposure.
cali, that would be fluster cluck of MOAB size. We will have wait for the facts begin to surface on this one.
Nothing will surface. …Just a random, unconnected series of accidents, unfortunate muggings and the occasional fatal walk in the woods. Sound familiar?
The Deep State learned from the 1975 Church Committee Hearings.
…James Hacker: How am I going to explain the missing documents to “The Mail”?
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Well, this is what we normally do in circumstnces like these.
James Hacker: [reads memo] This file contains the complete set of papers, except for a number of secret documents, a few others which are part of still active files, some correspondence lost in the floods of 1967…
James Hacker: Was 1967 a particularly bad winter?
Sir Humphrey Appleby: No, a marvellous winter. We lost no end of embarrassing files.
James Hacker: [reads] Some records which went astray in the move to London and others when the War Office was incorporated in the Ministry of Defence, and the normal withdrawal of papers whose publication could give grounds for an action for libel or breach of confidence or cause embarrassment to friendly governments.
James Hacker: That’s pretty comprehensive. How many does that normally leave for them to look at?
James Hacker: How many does it actually leave? About a hundred?… Fifty?… Ten?… Five?… Four?… Three?… Two?… One?… *Zero?*
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Yes, Minister.