An LGBT Activist burned himself to death to protest Global Warmies. Now, that’s showing commitment!
Archives for April 2018
A writer at the New Yorker (and presumably, the editorial staff agrees), is horrified at the arrival and growth of Chik-Fil-A restaurants in New York City. Mainly because of the icky Christianity and niceness.
“Chick-fil-A’s arrival in New York City feels like an infiltration, in no small part because of its pervasive Christian traditionalism,” Dan Piepenbring wrote in an article that reads more like parody than journalism.
In the piece, Piepenbring condemns “creepy” Chick-fil-A over its owners’ Christian faith, the company’s charitable contributions, and its popular ad campaign featuring cows encouraging patrons to “Eat Mor Chikin.”
The writer also noted disdain for the fact that the walls of the restaurant’s Atlanta headquarters are “adorned with Bible verses” and at the center of campus there is a “statue of Jesus washing a disciple’s feet.”
But forcing schoolchildren to recite “There is no God but Allah,” not a problem.
Stupid feminist website lists the 4 reasons LGGBDTTTIQQAAPP are better than normal parents. Do you wanna know what they are? Do you want to know that the four revolutionary things are that no parent ever did before the LGGBDTTTIQQAAPP started doing them. OK, here they are:
1. They don’t hide the hard stuff from their kids—they keep it real.
2. They teach their kids that their bodies belong to them.
3. They expose their kids to diversities in race, gender, and sexuality.
4. They create a community around their children.
As if no normal heterosexual parent ever teaches their kids to deal with reality, teaches them that their bodies belong to them, teaches them to treat people of other ethnicities with decency, or create communities around their children.
It’s like these idiot queer feminists think they invented parenting.
BTW: The Left-wing queers translate “They don’t hide the hard stuff from their kids—they keep it real” as “We teach our kids to hate Trump, the police, white people, and Republicans. (I am not making that up. It’s in the frigging article.)
USA Today lists the most politically incorrect songs of all time, includes ‘Ebony and Ivory’ because… “their message of ‘people are the same, there’s good and bad in everyone,’ so let’s just get along would be interpreted as hilariously naive by the more woke factions of today’s cultural discourse.”
Because, today, of course, being ‘woke’ means believing that people of different races and cultures need to be at each other’s throats constantly in a zero-sum game of rabid identity politics.
What was the epitome of woke in 1982 is now “cringeworthy,” because political correctness is such fleeting thing. Most of the songs on the list are terrible. Some are kind of fun (“Kung-Fu Fighting”). But it is typical of the social left that these songs are deemed bad not because they are bad songs, but because they reflect what the social left views as “Bad Politics.” Lou Reed’s “Walk on the Wild Side” and Aerosmith’s “Dude Looks Like a Lady” make the cut not because they say anything mean about transgendereds, but because the author thinks they don’t cheerlead transgendereds enough.
Here’s one I am surprised they missed. Maybe too obscure for the editors. It would probably make their teeny socially conscious heads explode. And what about this one (going out to you, Senator Elizabeth Warren.)
Would you ever let a leftist choose your playlist? I know I wouldn’t. Gawd, it would be mostly the Decemberists and Macklemore.
Here’s a Korean band doing a funk song called ‘Sugar Daddy.’ Is that ‘problematic’? Deal with it.
At the Senate confirmation hearings for PDT’s pick to be Secretary of State, the Democrats… at least the most show-boaty one… seemed far more interested in the nominee’s views on gay marriage and gay sex than on his credentials and beliefs about international relations.
During a Senate confirmation hearing Thursday, Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) pushed Pompeo on his previous comments, particularly his suggestion that homosexuality was a “perversion.”
Booker: “Is being gay a perversion?”
Pompeo: “Senator, when I was a politician, I had a very clear view on whether it was appropriate for two same-sex persons to marry. I stand by that.”
Booker: “So, you do not believe that it’s appropriate for two gay people to marry?”
Pompeo: “Senator, I continue to hold that view.”
The left simpers, “How will he stand up o countries that don’t respect gay rights.” To which I respond, Shut Up, Skippy. Concern about Gay Rights in foreign countries didn’t stop BO and company from giving billions upon billions of dollars to a regime that hangs gay people from cranes in the public square.
When pressed on how he would treat gay couples within the State Department, Pompeo replied that he treated all couples within the CIA “with the exact same set of rights.”
I am sort of missing the connection between the Cookie Monster and knife crime. Or is it just leftist instinct to infantilize everything?
Really, would you ever see anything like this in a society run by reasoning adults, except as satire?
And only cowards carry screwdrivers? WTAF.
Once again, the progressive left is battling reality with hashtags; because they’re idiots.
Yes. The above is from an actual Airstrip One media campaign to
reduce knife violence give jobs to soyboys and soygirls in the graphic arts community.
That is, without a doubt, the stupidest thing happening on Airstrip One this week. But this is a damned close second.
A Pride event in Glasgow has banned drag queens from performing, after committee members decided acts could offend trans people.
Free Pride Glasgow, which bills itself as an anti-commercialist alternative to the Scottish city’s main Pride event, said trans and non-binary committee members were “uncomfortable with having drag performances“.
The organisation said in a statement that it hopes to create a safe space for all members of the LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, intersex, asexual) community, and that while the decision may “disappoint” some people “the needs of the most marginalised groups within our community come first.”
It went on to stress that attendees can wear “what they want” and “express their gender how they please”, but that “self-described drag acts” would not be allowed to perform.
I guess this is why I could never be a leftist. I’m not stupid enough to think that hashtags are the solution to everything (“#BringBackOurGirls”) or obsessively fret about people who are so into drama that not offending them is simply unpossible.
A school district in Pennsylvania has come up with a unique response to the Parkland shooting. The district spent about $1,800 to arm all of its teachers with miniature baseball bats.
We really do not deserve to survive as a culture.
So, why is it OK for Facebook to ban conservative opinion such as Diamond and Silk, but not OK for a Christian baker/florist/photographer to decline to participate in a gay wedding?
Leftist: “Well, Facebook is a private company.”
And what branch of Government is a Christian-owned bakery.
Leftist: “Baking a cake isn’t free speech.”
But y’all say burning the flag is.
Leftist: “It’s different because LGBTTQQFAGPBDSM are a legally protected class and conservatives aren’t”
Ah, now, we’re getting closer to the truth. It’s not really about “equality” then, is it? It’s about giving certain groups privileges at the expense of other people’s basic rights.
Leftism is not a coherent political philosophy. Leftism is a cult of bitter losers who lust for Government power so they can use it to bully people they don’t like. It is nothing other.
The Feminists behind the “Women’s March” are all angry and mad because a website that facilitated and promoted sex trafficking and child prostitution has been shut down by the Government. I am not making this up.
So, all sex with men is rape, unless it’s prostitution sex, which is OK even if the prostitute is a 12-year-old seems to be the general gist of Feminism these days.
Airstrip One 1920: In the interest of public safety, all firearm owners must be licensed.
Airstrip One 1937 – Personal defence is no longer a valid reason for a firearms license. “Firearms cannot be regarded as a suitable means of protection and may be a source of danger” (Which I believe is the IngSoc equivalent of “No one needs an AR-15.”)
Airstrip One 1968 – All rifles and pistols must be registered with the Government in the interest of public safety.
Airstrip One 1988 – For the good of public safety, semi-automatic rifles are banned. Shotguns must be registered.
Airstrip One 1997 – Thank you for registering your guns. Now turn them in or go to prison, for the good of public safety.
Airstrip One 2018 – Knife violence is out of control. “No excuses: there is never a reason to carry a knife. Anyone who does will be caught, and they will feel the full force of the law.”
I am told the slippery slope is a fallacy, but damb if it doesn’t look like our British cousins slid right down one.
So, what’s next? Outlaw hammers and bottles? Outlaw sharp pointy sticks? Outlaw rocks? Outlaw weightlifting because big strong men are intimidating?
Note to leftists; this is why no one believes you when you claim you don’t want to confiscate guns.
P.S. With London’s crime rate now exceeding New York City’s, the Metropolitan Police Department is tasking nearly 1,000 officers to investigate people who make politically incorrect comments in social media.