GayPatriot

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.gaypatriot.net/2012/11/12/obamas-deficits-the-restraining-influence-of-a-republican-congress/trackback/

  1. Worth repeating that FY2009 belongs to Obama because His signature is on it, not Bush’s. The Democrat Congress held it back from Bush’s signature, so that Obama could increase the spending, when He took office in early 2009.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — November 12, 2012 @ 1:06 pm - November 12, 2012

  2. ILC is exactly right. It was so duplicitous for Democrats to claim credit for whatever good the stimulus did yet blame the 2009 deficit on Bush. And even when they appropriately did not assign the stimulus to Bush, they still blamed the 2009 budget on him.

    Since Democrats are so obsessed with the Clinton years and point out that tax rates were higher under Clinton, how about we restore the Clinton tax rates while at the same time restoring Clinton era spending levels? That seems fair to me. But Democrats would never agree to that, since their commitment to raise tax rates, no matter how strong, is exceeded by their desire to spend, spend, spend.

    Comment by chad — November 12, 2012 @ 1:28 pm - November 12, 2012

  3. Even if Obama hadn’t of signed the FY2009 budget, he’d still be to blame for it. He came into office with his party controlling both Houses of Congress. If he had wanted to he could have revised that budget and gotten the revisions passed through, but he didn’t. No, he owns that budget even if he’ll never be held accountable for it. He’s had 4 years and hasn’t done squat to get the deficit under control and there’s nothing to indicate that he’ll do anything better during his second term.

    Comment by JohnAGJ — November 12, 2012 @ 2:27 pm - November 12, 2012

  4. It’s amazing how congresses only get blamed when they’re Republican controlled. Could have something to do with the media not being Republican controlled.

    Comment by chad — November 12, 2012 @ 2:56 pm - November 12, 2012

  5. chad, great point. The Democrats have said in effect, “We take credit for the stimulus – but the fact that it cost money is all Bush’s fault.”

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — November 12, 2012 @ 3:08 pm - November 12, 2012

  6. Since Democrats are so obsessed with the Clinton years and point out that tax rates were higher under Clinton, how about we restore the Clinton tax rates while at the same time restoring Clinton era spending levels? That seems fair to me.

    I would not call it “fair”, but perhaps “necessary”: shrinking the government to Clinton levels (never thought I would type that sentence) is needed to restore American prosperity and living standards. Though the tax hikes would harm the economy, they’d be outweighed by the other good.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — November 12, 2012 @ 3:12 pm - November 12, 2012

  7. 2009 also has the distinction of being the last budget the senate has passed, and yet Reid and Obama blame the stalemate in congress on the GOP house.

    Although I am not certain I want to see a budget the DNC controlled senate would produce.

    Comment by Just Me — November 12, 2012 @ 3:27 pm - November 12, 2012

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

**Note: Your first comment is held for moderation. Avoid profanity, avoid personal attacks on fellow commenters, and avoid complaining about personal attacks (even on you). Feel free to disagree with anyone, but focus on their ideas; give us the information that you think they overlooked.**


Live preview of comment

Close this window.

0.096 Powered by Wordpress