GayPatriot

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.gaypatriot.net/2012/11/18/the-most-important-question-about-benghazi/trackback/

  1. WE, the People, already know Obama LIED, Bruce. WE now need to pursue Obama’s ‘tick-tock’ during the entire time of the 09/11/2012 Benghazi events. IOW . . What the hell was Obama doing to save the lives of Benghazi4 ? ?

    Comment by Joe Hilger (@JoeHilgerman) — November 18, 2012 @ 6:35 pm - November 18, 2012

  2. I don’t think that question will ever get answered.

    Comment by Just Me — November 18, 2012 @ 6:50 pm - November 18, 2012

  3. What a vile racist question.

    Comment by Richard Bell — November 18, 2012 @ 7:05 pm - November 18, 2012

  4. He knew everything right away or else he is a totally lazy, incompetent idiot. Obviously he had to obfuscate the truth because he had an election to win. An election here he was touting his foreign policy street creds over that idiot Mormon, Romney. Remembr how many times the Democrats bragged that Obama killed Osama, and Al Qaeda ison the run.

    Comment by rumningrn — November 18, 2012 @ 7:18 pm - November 18, 2012

  5. Hell will freeze over if we ever hear the real answer to that question.

    Comment by Charles — November 18, 2012 @ 8:10 pm - November 18, 2012

  6. An even bigger question is how could obama or anyone on his staff watch in real time the attack and murder of 4 Americans, and the possible deaths of 20-30 people. Do not think for a second that they didn’t know what was going on, and that the retired Navy Seals were asking for permission to engage. Doesn’t matter if he admits it or not, the slimy bastard was hip deep in the $hit.

    But, what does it matter. No one has the balls to call him or his cohorts out on the events of that night. We only have 4 years and about 2 months left of this nightmare.

    Comment by mixitup — November 18, 2012 @ 8:56 pm - November 18, 2012

  7. Ehh… We know why He lied about it for two weeks: to get elected.

    The question is, will he ever be honestly investigated?

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — November 18, 2012 @ 10:07 pm - November 18, 2012

  8. Who authorized the apology tweets from the State Dept. in Cairo blaming the video before the attack on Cairo US embassy? Who gave the Morsi gov’t the link to the YouTube video so they could translate it into Arabic 2 weeks before the attacks? Who ordered the video to be blamed for Benghazi? What was Amb. Stevens’ mission in Libya? Who did he cross that he was left unprotected for months and ignored when attacked? Why did the Turkish Ambassador keep mum about the terrorist checkpoints he had to have passed on leaving his meeting with Amb. Stevens?
    Hillary, Obama and all lying for them have got to go.

    Comment by Richard Weinfeld — November 18, 2012 @ 10:32 pm - November 18, 2012

  9. Elections have consequences. And Obama won (by any means necessary) so there won’t be any official investigation on note.

    – On Benghazi…and the false smokescreen using Amb. Rice as useful dupe.
    – On the Petraeus Scandal’s suppression ’til AFTER the elections.
    – On the rampant voting irregularities in Philadelphia, Chicago and other battle-ground state urban Democratic strongholds.

    And that’s just mid-Oct through mid-Nov 2012.

    Comment by Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — November 18, 2012 @ 11:14 pm - November 18, 2012

  10. 1) Everything. He knew everything

    2) To get re-elected and give him four years to dodge and bury it and avoid facing justice for what he did.

    There is no dodging justice in the afterlife. This was at best a horrid screwup that he didn’t have the balls to take responsibility for, and at worst… go to your bible and look up “Uriah and David”, IOW there were things in Benghazi best not revealed, incl. possibly Amb. Stevens’ business there, and the price of glossing them over was to let the Islamists overrun the whole works and jerks and kill everyone. Bet they’re pissed about the sixty dead and probably more injured they got doing it.

    Comment by perturbed — November 19, 2012 @ 4:42 am - November 19, 2012

  11. He doesn’t know how to tell the truth – especially if it makes him look bad. So, basically, he has to lie about this, and everything else. His whole life is based on lies, and false narratives. He knows no other way.

    Comment by LesbianNeoCon — November 19, 2012 @ 7:16 am - November 19, 2012

  12. 2weeks? 2 MONTHS, you mean…..

    Comment by Courage — November 19, 2012 @ 7:19 am - November 19, 2012

  13. Benghazi was just four bumps is the road and al Qaeda is still decimated and on the run and the Arab Spring is bringing democracy and good times to the Middle East and no oil was drilled in the process.

    Also, we saved trillions by not getting involved. It is now time to take those saved trillions and spread them around where it will do some good. We can start by giving some to the Twinkie bakers who find themselves suddenly unemployed.

    Comment by heliotrope — November 19, 2012 @ 8:30 am - November 19, 2012

  14. When Obama gets all indignant and acts upset because some one implies that he was golfing or watching movies
    while our men in Libya were murdered, it makes my stomach turn.
    He makes decisions based on how it will effect HIM, not whether it will save American lives. It’s sad, so sad.

    Comment by Gene in Pennsylvania — November 19, 2012 @ 10:54 am - November 19, 2012

  15. Why assume an Obama life has a predictable shelf life?

    Comment by Ignatius — November 19, 2012 @ 11:18 am - November 19, 2012

  16. Obama *lie*, I meant.

    Comment by Ignatius — November 19, 2012 @ 11:18 am - November 19, 2012

  17. With the corrupt MSM, we will never know; it’s up to the alternative media to get the truth out.

    Comment by Sebastian Shaw — November 19, 2012 @ 11:28 am - November 19, 2012

  18. He lies about everything, so why not about an ambassador killed in Libya.

    Comment by Leah — November 19, 2012 @ 11:32 am - November 19, 2012

  19. MY question is WHY WON’T THE GOP IMPEACH THE BASTARD???

    Comment by Erinyes — November 19, 2012 @ 7:05 pm - November 19, 2012

  20. If only ambassador Stevens had been a delightful Hostess snack cake. Then maybe the media would have cared about his demise.

    Comment by V the K — November 20, 2012 @ 11:05 am - November 20, 2012

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

**Note: Your first comment is held for moderation. Avoid profanity, avoid personal attacks on fellow commenters, and avoid complaining about personal attacks (even on you). Feel free to disagree with anyone, but focus on their ideas; give us the information that you think they overlooked.**


Live preview of comment

Close this window.

0.102 Powered by Wordpress