RSS feed for comments on this post.

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

  1. Reporting to Big Brother is not really reporting at all. Trades by government employees need to be reported to the people.

    I’ll enjoy the peace and quiet on this thread. It isn’t about a social issue, so the social responsible conservatives, or the Realists, or whatever they’re calling themselves today, will stay off of it.

    Comment by Lori Heine — April 15, 2013 @ 2:37 pm - April 15, 2013

  2. Right you are Lori. ILC, for me this is infuriating. I can’t sneeze without a regulator getting in my face. I can’t use yellow highlite or hand write a big X to indicate where to sign a form without violating a rule, yet these pissant politicians and their sycophants can get away with what what put Ivan in jail!!

    Comment by mixitup — April 15, 2013 @ 4:36 pm - April 15, 2013

  3. I watched the Boston Marathon coverage and the NBC commentator was already implying the blasts were the work of a ‘home-grown source’. (The NY Post is reporting that the suspect is a Saudi national.)

    Comment by Ignatius — April 15, 2013 @ 5:17 pm - April 15, 2013

  4. Congress should not be able to exempt themselves from laws they inflict on the rest of us. Insider trading is how so many of them become wealthy on a congressional salary. They should have to live with social security, Medicare and the horror of Obamacare. They are not our rulers although they sure act like they are nobility.

    Comment by Texann — April 15, 2013 @ 6:07 pm - April 15, 2013

  5. Trades by government employees political appointees need to be reported to the people.

    Personally that is how I would re-write that. Regular federal employees should have the same right as anyone else not to have their personal financial information posted on a public website, beyond their obvious salary data commensurate with their grade. (Assuming those of us in the private sector have that right as well.)

    Political appointees, OTOH, can suck it. You want that power, that should be part of the price you pay. And I second Texann’s comment re: congressional exemptions.

    Comment by Neptune — April 15, 2013 @ 10:13 pm - April 15, 2013

  6. Neptune: I see your point. However, it is still possible for the average government employee to have access to “inside info” and trade on it. What do we do about that?

    I don’t have a ready answer. I haven’t thought it through, as to what is the right degree of exposure or the right line to draw. That said, there is a reason it is called “public service”; it should come with some sort of expectation that the gov’t employee is not going to be corrupt, and as well, some means for ordinary taxpayers to monitor (at their initiative) for corruption.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — April 15, 2013 @ 10:52 pm - April 15, 2013

  7. ILC, I think that’s the harder question, and I completely understand your concern. I wish I had a good answer. There are rules against it, at least in the acquisition community where contracting personnel have ready access to what would be considered “material, non-public information”. But other employees who know those things? Not sure where the right balance is.

    Comment by Neptune — April 16, 2013 @ 9:45 am - April 16, 2013

  8. I just want to plug the idea that it is taxpayers who should be watching the government. Enough of government watching the taxpayers.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — April 16, 2013 @ 10:42 am - April 16, 2013

  9. Now that, good sir, is an idea I fully support. ;)

    Comment by Neptune — April 16, 2013 @ 11:01 am - April 16, 2013

  10. I just heard about this duplicitous crap today on NPR. I wish I could say I am surprised, but I guess I’m surprised that it took this long for them to find away around STOCK.

    Comment by Sonicfrog — April 16, 2013 @ 8:48 pm - April 16, 2013

  11. In fairness, there is one legitimate reason to keep this information private. There are some online brokerage accounts where the password reset procedure asks which securities in the account. I’d be very reluctant to disclose such information. Even if it only helps with the easiest part of a complex illegal act.

    Comment by Ckassically Liberal Dave — April 19, 2013 @ 7:32 am - April 19, 2013

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

**Note: Your first comment is held for moderation. Avoid profanity, avoid personal attacks on fellow commenters, and avoid complaining about personal attacks (even on you). Feel free to disagree with anyone, but focus on their ideas; give us the information that you think they overlooked.**

Live preview of comment

Close this window.

0.080 Powered by Wordpress