I don’t believe this story is real. I was reliably told by the media and the Democrats repeatedly and emphatically that the sale of aborted baby parts was a myth made up by the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy as part of the ‘War on Womenfolk.’

The Orange County District Attorney’s Office has obtained a $7.8 million settlement in a civil lawsuit against two Yorba Linda medical companies accused of illegally profiting from the sale fetal tissue and stem cells.

 

Prosecutors said the companies collected fetal tissue donated by abortion providers and then advertised and sold hundreds of units of tissue and stem cells to research facilities around the world, collecting hundreds of thousands of dollars each year in revenue.

Slate lays out the case for infanticide.

[W]hen circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … [W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child. Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.

[I]n order for a harm to occur, it is necessary that someone is in the condition of experiencing that harm. If a potential person, like a fetus and a newborn, does not become an actual person, like you and us, then there is neither an actual nor a future person who can be harmed, which means that there is no harm at all. … In these cases, since non-persons have no moral rights to life, there are no reasons for banning after-birth abortions. … Indeed, however weak the interests of actual people can be, they will always trump the alleged interest of potential people to become actual ones, because this latter interest amounts to zero.

A Texas Democrat wants to fine men for masturbating, and require them to be anally probed before vasectomies. Not because there is any scientific or medical reason to do so, but because she’s an insane bint who wants to draw some deranged moral equivalence between spewing man-juice into a Kleenex tissue and dismembering a living, breathing creature with a heartbeat and vital organs.

And rather than just making her stupid “satirical” point via an editorial or something, she’s actually propounding this nonsense in the legislature as an asinine publicity stunt. But that seems to be all that Democrats have left these days. No ideas. No solutions. Just pointless gestures of “resistance.” They’re all Ashley Judd now, and they keep telling themselves how cool they are.

Trump and the Republicans may be continuously tripping over their own nut snacks, but at least they are taking on actual challenges like health care, border security, and economic reform.

The fashion gurus of Europe have decided that men should dress like ladies.

More from this horror show at the Zuckerberg Personal Data Aggregator.

Feminists are perpetually upset, of course, but today they were upset because President Trump signed an Executive Order forbidding the USA from spending taxpayer dollars overseas to about babies. The feminist left loves abortion, it’s practically a sacrament to them. So, of course, they went nanners; like a nasty old woman on a plane seated next to a Trump supporter.

I don’t personally discount the fundamental immorality of abortion, but leaving it aside for the sake of argument, what business is it of the Federal Government to be spending American taxpayers dollars on abortions for foreign women? That doesn’t seem like a legitimate function of Government in the sense of “an activity for which there is no viable private alternative.” The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, or the Zuckerberg Foundation, or George Soros have plenty of money to put into providing abortions overseas. It doesn’t even have to be a moral issue, it’s an “is this any of the Government’s business” issue.

Democrats say that more abortions among undesirables will improve the quality of the race.

I actually believe that in the end by repealing the Hyde Amendment we will actually save this country money, because rather than having all kinds of unwanted pregnancies, there will be able to be the ability for women to have greater choice over their bodies no matter what their income level is. That’s the importance of repealing the Hyde Amendment

Good point: If women can’t be “forced” to become mothers, why should men be “forced” to become fathers?

Expectant fathers in Sweden should have the right to ‘legally abort’ their unborn child up until the 18th week of pregnancy, the youth wing of the country’s Liberal Party has proposed.

Swedish Liberal Youth argues that men should be given an equal say in whether or not they wish to become a parent, and be granted the option to cut any lawful responsibilities.

The suggested ‘legal abortion’ would be irreversible and would see the man renounce all parental duties and rights to see the child once it has been born.

This completely at odds with the position of the American Feminist Left which is that men should be forced to provide child support even for children that are proven to be someone else’s

By the way, this same group of Swedish Progressives is pushing for legalized necrophilia and sibling incest. Hey, whatever, “Love is Love.”