Gay Patriot Header Image

How “Free Speech” Works According to SJW’s

Posted by V the K at 7:37 am - May 2, 2016.
Filed under: Coalition of the Oppressed

One of Trigglypuff’s fellow Socialist Juicebox Wankers was “triggered” by the media attention spawned when their deranged screaming, obscenity shouting, and bingo-wing flapping was made public. The SJW wrote a very long email threatening a website that made her feel “unsafe” by publishing things she actually said on her Facebook account. By reading her letter, we can gain an insight into the concept of “Free Speech” as it is understood by Juicebox Wankers.

  • Free Speech is protected by law, but those laws don’t apply to “hate speech.”
  • “Hate speech” is defined as speech that makes any LGBT, a Muslim, hypersensitive left-wing feminist, or member of a designated protected racial minority victim group  feel “unsafe.”
  • Determining what is and what is not “Hate Speech” is the exclusive province of LGBTs, hypersensitive feminists, and selected members of designated racial minority and victim groups.
  • White males can be made to feel unsafe because SJW’s have designated them as members of the White Supremacist Patriarchy
  • Hate Speech, as defined above, may be banned from college campuses; if anyone dares express it anyway, it is okay for SJW’s to harass, threaten, and disrupt them because harassment, threats, and disruption are acceptable forms of “free speech.”

After labeling opposing opinion as “hate speech,” proudly admitting that she and her cohorts actively sought to shut down opposing opinion through disruption, threats of violence, and threats of legal action, she actually says this:

I wonder why UMass Republicans care so much about protecting free speech, but only when it aligns with their views — and when it doesn’t, I wonder why they think it’s okay to publicly harass and bully and humiliate dissenters such as myself. 

Imagine my shocked face.

State of the Nation

Posted by V the K at 8:21 am - April 13, 2016.
Filed under: Coalition of the Oppressed


H/T: Townhall

H/T Bookworm via AoSHQ ONT

I eventually realized that the reason I was struggling was because my Leftist friends don’t have moral standards; instead, they have victim standards. This isn’t to say that they’re not good people.  It’s just that they don’t have a sense of abstract morality.  In its place is an up/down sense of victim status (something I’ve written about at length before, at American Thinker).  This viewpoint comes straight from Marx himself:

Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary re-constitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes.

This Marxist view says that, if you ally yourself with the oppressed, you’re always in the right. You’re not necessarily moral, but you’re definitely taking the correct side in every debate.  That arc of history will eventually bend your way.  (Incidentally, isn’t there an Orwellian beauty to the fact that the Left acts oppressively and justifies its conduct by characterizing itself as the oppressed?)  This distinction, between the Judeo-Christian abstract morality and the Leftist habit of saying you’re right because you’ve designated yourself as one of the good guys, makes it very difficult for people committed to morality to argue with people committed to Leftism.

Why Global Warming Is a Racist Conspiracy and Black Lives Really Don’t Matter

Posted by V the K at 9:46 am - February 16, 2016.
Filed under: Coalition of the Oppressed

At their core, the Climate Change Cult, the gay marriage movement, the feminists, La Raza, the #BlackLivesMatter…. the primary purpose of all these groups is to rally people to advance a progressive socialist agenda. Gays, Climate, Blacks, Illegal Immigrants… these are just targeted advertising for the leftist agenda; Like those web-ads that pop-up that say “Drivers In [Insert your state here] can save $200 with this one weird trick.” Only it’s, “You can get back at the Christians/white people/people more economically successful than you with this one weird trick.” Where the “weird trick” is embracing the leftist agenda.

In that spirit, a leader in the #BlackLivesMatter movement says that Climate Change is a racial issue because Global Warming is a conspiracy to oppress people of color: I am not making this up.

Climate change, also, is a form of “global anti-blackness” according to (#BlackLivesMatter co-founder) Opal Tometti because six out of the 10 countries that ranked highest on the “climate change vulnerability index” are in Africa, according to a study she referenced.

By the way, according to the leadership of #BlackLivesMatter, crime that minorities commit against other minorities doesn’t… um… matter.

(#BlackLivesMatter co-founder) AliciaGarza noted that “she wishes to retire” the phrase “black-on-black crime,” preferring to focus on “the violence of the state” as “not all violence is created equal.”

It’s not about helping blacks. It’s not about helping gays. It’s not about helping Muslims. It’s not about cleaning up the environment. It’s about dismantling capitalism, tearing down Western Civilization* and getting back at Christianity.

Everything else is marketing.


Escaping the Democrat Plantation

Posted by V the K at 3:04 pm - February 6, 2016.
Filed under: Coalition of the Oppressed

The New York Times opines that Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are not real Latinos. “Real Hispanics”… like “real Blacks” and “real gays” are leftists who vote in lockstep with the Democrat Party.

Neither Mr. Cruz nor Mr. Rubio meets conventional expectations of how Latino politicians are supposed to behave.

Neither of these candidates claims to speak for the Hispanic population or derive a crucial portion of their support from Hispanics, and neither bases much of his political identity on being a Latino.

In other words, they are not steeped in leftist identity politics like Democrats Jose Serrano, Luis Guttierez, or Loretta and Linda Sanchez — the Duras sisters of the US Congress.

Curious, isn’t it, that the only minority figures that the old leftist white people who run the media recognize as “legitimate” representatives of their communities are those whose politics align precisely with those of the old leftist white people who run the media.

Anyway, doing taxes has put me in a bad mood, so I am going to kickback with some Rifftrax. In lieu of content, please accept this song about suicide by a gay dude that somehow manages not to suck.


2015: The Year of the Hissy Fit

[Language Warning]

YouTube Preview Image

The shrieking harpy in this video was upset because the gentleman in the video sent an email in which he expressed an opinion that it really wasn’t the university’s business to regulate how students should dress up for Halloween.

2015 was the year every college campus (seemingly) became Berkeley. College students at the University of Missouri threw a massive hissy fit (led by the privileged black son of a millionaire father) because they didn’t think their solidly-left-wing president expressed sufficient solidarity with students upset over racial incidents of dubious providence occurring on or near campus. Students at Oberlin College in Ohio threw an end year tantrum because cafeteria food was servedin a manner deemed insufficiently culturally sensitive.

In Baltimore, #BlackLivesMatter activists (and the people they claim to represent) burned out their own neighborhoods and killed each other some 343 times so far in order to teach the White Power Structure a lesson; the White Power Structure in this case being a city run by a black mayor, a majority black city council and a majority black police force led by a black police chief. Activists in Oakland CA and Ferguson MO made their feelings known in a similar matter. Other activists took on the white power structure by shutting down shopping malls and highways and by staring at white liberals eating Sunday brunch.

Viewers of the entertainment industry’s annual Orgy of Self-Celebration And Repugnant Smugness (OSCARS) were treated to the spectacle of a millionaire actress whining about income inequality. Another mentally ill feminist spent two years dragging a mattress around a college campus because university officials refused to prosecute a boy for refusing her sexual advances after accepting her sexual advances. In Oregon, a student was allegedly banned from campus because he resembled a boy a mentally ill feminist had had an unhappy sexual encounter with.

Other feminists showed their outrage at being objectified as sexual objects by joining in Slut-Walks and parading around half-naked.

There was also the Mohammedan woman who became a hero to the cry-bully left when she threw a tantrum because a flight attendant didn’t give her a full can of soda (which nobody gets in the Age of the Flying Cattle Car).

Black activists, spoiled college brats, and feminists were joined in 2015 by science fiction writers… of all people. The Hugo awards were effectively sabotaged by Social Justice Warriors, who decided if awards couldn’t be given on the basis of Victim-Group Identity, they would rather give no awards at all.

And it wasn’t all on the social justice left. Some of the most epic tantrums came from the Republican Establishment as they realized their plans for a Bush sequel were being shot down by vulgarian with a ridiculous hairdo.

The really scary part of this is look at the video again. The target of that deranged woman was forced to resign. Also, the president of the University of Missouri was forced to resign. And Oberlin officials apologized for serving ethnic food in a culturally insensitive manner and promised to do better in the future. The tantrum-throwers are winning. So, it’s only going to get worse.

Men Are Such Loathesome Brutes

Posted by V the K at 12:48 pm - July 24, 2015.
Filed under: Coalition of the Oppressed

Whatever else feminism may be, it is always in large measure a sadistic revenge fantasy whose strongest appeal is to women of unlimited cruelty. If any man doesn’t like her “feminist perspective,” his disagreement proves he’s a “whiny piss baby,” and she will celebrate by drinking your tears.

Read the whole thing.

I was down with feminism when it was just about equal pay for equal work; but it lost me once it became the Cult of Bitter, Unhinged Man-Hatred. I don’t hate men, and I think masculinity is a wonderful characteristic.

But apparently, there are some epsilon-males who relish their subservient roles in the Matriarchy, such as this sad little feminist man who is happy to let his wife cuckold him, and this other poor epsilon who is consumed with self-loathing because he enjoys grilling, and that’s just too manly for him.

Jews and Their Confederates

Posted by V the K at 9:51 pm - July 5, 2015.
Filed under: Coalition of the Oppressed

Doing the jobs Americans won’t do.

A group of Orthodox Jews hired Mexican day laborers to dress in traditional Jewish garb and protest against the New York City gay pride parade Sunday.

A New York Times reporter noticed a group of men wearing the fringed Jewish prayer garments and holding up anti­gay signs in a barricade by the parade. Although the men were holding signs reading “Judaism prohibits homosexuality” with the logo of the Jewish Political Action Committee, the men were plainly Hispanic.

So, a group of orthodox New York Jew hire a group of Mexicans to protest at a gay pride parade. You know who’s responsible for this? Southern White Christians.

Time to Pop the Corns

Posted by V the K at 8:05 pm - June 28, 2015.
Filed under: Coalition of the Oppressed

A Gay Pride Parade in Chicago (cough, silly anachronism, cough) was disrupted by #BlackLivesMatter protesters; who are angry that teh gheys get what they want, but nobody’s agreed to disband the police or cough up slavery reparations yet.

The Progressive Left Still Hates Chik-Fil-A More Than ISIS

Posted by V the K at 7:03 pm - April 24, 2015.
Filed under: Coalition of the Oppressed

Johns Hopkins University is barring Chik-Fil-A from campus, because of the possible hurt feelings of special gay snowflakes.

In an 18-8 vote, the Student Government Association at Johns Hopkins voted not to “support the proposal of a Chick-fil-A, in a current or future sense, particularly on any location that is central to student life.”

The anti-Chick-fil-A bill listed seven main reasons why the restaurant should be banned from campus. The first is that “the Student Government Association of Johns Hopkins University aims to provide a safe, supportive environment for all university affiliates now and in the future.”

The fourth is that “visiting prospective and current students, staff, faculty, and other visitors who are members of the LGBTQ+ community or are allies would be subjected to the microaggression of supporting current or future Chick-fil-A development plans.”

Of course, this isn’t really about “microaggressions” (i.e. “things that don’t bother normal people but send neurotic liberals to the fainting couches”), this is about the gay left telling businesses “If you don’t support and celebrate our agenda, we will crush you.”

Because that’s what fascists do.

A Non-Fascist would say, “I don’t like the policies of your company, so I’m not going to eat there.” (Which is why I don’t eat at Buffalo Wild Wings or Sonic, for example.) But a fascist is a different animal entirely. It’s not enough for the fascist to decide not to patronize a business whose policies are disagreeable to him. The fascist has to deny others the choice of using that business as well, and, ideally, punish the business owner for daring to disagree with him.

Paedophilia Seems Like Not Such a Big Deal to the Social Left

The BBC not only covered up the serial child molestations of host Jimmy Savile, BBC Management has actively punished the people who blew the whistle on Jimmy Savile.

And now they’re presenting a gay rights film narrated by the guy who founded Britain’s equivalent of NAMBLA.

The documentary is presented by Ian Dunn, one of the founders of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), which campaigned to legalise sex with children.
The 30-minute documentary – Glad To Be Gay? – portrays Dunn as a legitimate gay rights activist.

Similarly, one of the American founders of NAMBLA — Mr. Harry Hay — is considered a hero to the LGBT activist community in the United States.

You would think there would be some gay people outraged by this, people saying, “Hey, don’t show that documentary with that guy in it. We don’t want people to think that’s what we’re about.” But, so far, all the outrage seems to come from people who are more culturally conservative.

I sometimes feel like the left really doesn’t think molesting children is a big deal. Partly because the left is obsessed with sex, they believe that sex is the most important thing in the world, and therefore how can sex *ever* be a bad thing unless a Republican does it? (But they’re also obsessed with “rape culture,” which is kind of a paradox until you realize most of the things the left calls rape don’t actually involve sex, and “rape culture” is just another rhetorical gimmick like “racism.”)

Then again, the left is equally enamored of brutal murderers.  Which would suggest that so long as one subscribes to a socialist progressive ideology, one can be forgiven of both rape and murder.

Seems a Bit Unstable

The Coalition of the Left was thrilled when New Hampshire voters elected “the first openly transgendered legislator” to the statehouse because … unless one is conservative… victim-group status trumps qualifications every time.  So how did this triumph of identity politics work out?

Not so well.

Stacie Laughton, the state’s first openly transgender legislator who was elected to the House of Representatives and then withdrew her candidacy days later, said Thursday that she is the person responsible for calling in a hoax bomb threat at a local hospital.

After spending two weeks receiving treatment at a Vermont hospital for bipolar disorder, Laughton walked into the Nashua Police Department at noon on Thursday and turned herself in on a warrant for the Feb. 27 incident.

Gee, who would have thought being estranged from the biological reality of one’s existence might be connected to mental illness?

Reading on — and noting that the press accounts avoid any mention of party affiliation, I had to go to wikipedia to confirm he’s a Democrat — it seems this individual had a few felonious contacts with the criminal justice system relating to credit fraud.

A mentally ill leftist with a history of fraud? Surely there’s a place for him in some blue state’s congressional delegation.

Cue the music…


Another Fake Gay SJW “Hate Crime”

Posted by V the K at 10:04 pm - March 3, 2015.
Filed under: Coalition of the Oppressed

Another sad drama queen, another desperate plea for attention.

An LGBT rights advocate in Ohio was charged Tuesday with making false statements after he posted on social media that he was being abducted, a Greene Township police official told BuzzFeed News.

Adam Hoover, the Co-President of Marriage Equality Ohio, posted on Twitter and Facebook on Monday evening

I am guessing that his lie is okay because it illuminated a larger narrative or something. When there’s no real oppression left to victimize you, I guess you gotta stage it yourself.


It Should Be Much Easier to Achieve Social Justice with Fewer Capitalist Oppressors Around

Posted by V the K at 7:29 pm - August 31, 2014.
Filed under: Coalition of the Oppressed

The company that owns the iconic QT convenience store that was torched on the first night of the riots in Ferguson, MO has no plans to re-open the store.

A QuikTrip official told The Gateway Pundit the company has no plans on rebuilding in Ferguson and that the looted store was barely breaking even.

You go, social justice seekers! Drive all the businesses out of your hood. That’ll show those racist cops.


By the way, some cops in Ottawa, Kansas shot an unarmed white kid to death last week. Oddly enough, the citizenry did not respond by burning and looting local businesses.

Many Animals Evoke Racist Thoughts

Students at the University of Minnesota in St. Thomas wanted to bring a camel onto campus to acknowledge “hump” day (not to be confused with “Sex Week.“)  But the event was canceled after some students — I am not making this up – objected because the presence of a camel might offend students from the Middle East.

Students took to Facebook to proclaim their concerns. The students said they were concerned about the money spent on bringing the camel to campus—around $500—and the implication that it would be racially insensitive to Middle Eastern cultures.

So, if the sight of a camel is said to offend Middle Easterners… what other types of animals are too offensive to have on a college campus?

Ban Buffalo –Might offend American Indians

Ban Elephants — Might offend Africans

Ban Pandas — Might offend Asians

Ban Siamese Cats — Might offend Thais.

Ban Turkeys — Might offend the Turkish

Ban Moose — Might offend Canadians

Below the jump is the response of the college administration; notable mainly for its tone of “Oh, you guys are so great and all of opinions are valid and you’re all special snowflakes whose opinions really matter a lot.” Calling out stupid, ignorant people on their ignorance and stupidity is just not done.


Texas A&M to Give Special Gay and Transgendered Snowflakes Their Very Own Super Special Graduation Ceremony

Because Texas A&M wants to give extra-special recognition for the amazing achievement of being gay or confused about gender identity.

With the spring semester winding down, Texas A&M is set to host its inaugural “Lavender Graduation” celebrating the commencement of its LGBT students.

The mid-April event is sponsored by the university’s GLBT Resource Center which falls within the university’s Offices of the Dean of Student Life. According to its website, the resource center is “dedicated to providing a safe and affirming location on campus for all students regardless of sexual orientation and gender identity or expression.”

Because it just isn’t enough to just accept people’s gayness, you have to celebrate it, dammit! Celebrate it at every opportunity. And if you don’t celebrate gayness every moment of every day, then you obviously hate gay people and want them to suffer and be miserable.

The Crazy Is Strong with This One

Man-Hating Radical Feminist Dingbat says all sex is rape.

Intercourse is the very means through which men oppress us, from which we are not allowed to escape, yet some instances of or PIV [Ed: penis in vagina] and intercourse may be chosen and free? That makes no sense at all.

First, well intercourse is NEVER sex for women. Only men experience rape as sexual and define it as such. Sex for men is the unilateral penetration of their penis into a woman (or anything else replacing and symbolising the female orifice) whether she thinks she wants it or not – which is the definition of rape: that he will to do it anyway and that he uses her and treats her as a receptacle, in all circumstances – it makes no difference to him experiencing it as sexual. That is, at the very least, men use women as useful objects and instruments for penetration, and women are dehumanised by this act.

I am betting that the chances she makes a decent sammitch are nil.

And if you’re saying, “Surely I am excluded from her lunacy because I am a ghey,” sorry. She’s says teh buttsecks is bad too because it SYMBOLIZES the immoral penetration of a vajayjay. Masturbation … also wrong. In fact, anything that could possible make a man feel happy in any way is wrong because men suck.

She does have advice for men who want to repent of their evil rapist ways: Become a eunuch and give up all of your possessions, property, money, and rights away to women. (Check the link, I did not make that up.) Note, don’t expect forgiveness, much less gratitude, if you do give up everything you own to The Sisterhood. She will still hate you because you’re a hated penis-bearer.

But remember, to the left, what she proposes is not lunacy. Fiscally responsible and Constitutionally restrained Government as advocated by the Tea Party… *that* is considered lunacy.

Hat Tip: Jawa by way of Ace

Today’s Appalling Facebook Meme

Wow, just wow, is about all I can say in response to this piece of leftist rationalization which I saw today on Facebook.  It goes without saying that we’d be hearing something VERY DIFFERENT from this fellow if there was a Republican president.

The message here boils down to: freedom doesn’t matter, liberty doesn’t matter, rights don’t matter, and the most important role for government is to stand for “social justice.”  Here’s the link, but I’ve quoted the whole thing in its appalling entirety below:

Things I’m more worried about than my phone being tapped:
Global warming. The richest 1% controlling more wealth than the bottom 50%. Homelessness. Gutting the food stamp program. The rich hiding several Trillion untaxed dollars. Secretaries paying more in taxes than billionaires. Politicians being bought and sold. Malaria and starvation. More people per capita in prison than any other country. The “war” on drugs. More black men in prison than in college. Rising cost of education and health care. The rise of extremism. The continued oppression of women. The general lack of compassion in the world. The degree to which we all blame our problems on others and close our eyes to our own irrationality.
That more people are outraged by a small loss of privacy than any of these other issues.

Should I add “People who write in sentence fragments” to his list of outrages more “worrisome” than a government which spends all its time monitoring its people, or is that just my pet peeve?

Not surprisingly, the best responses to this kind of thing date to the founding of the Republic.  We’ve always got the classic from Benjamin Franklin: “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

But in this context, where the message is to sacrifice liberty for “social justice,” I think Sam Adams might be better, though trying to choose just one passage that is appropriate is rather like an embarrassment of riches.  I have long admired this one:

If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.

Perhaps this one is better: “If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.”

And just in case the Obamalaise is getting to you, here’s one worth repeating regularly: “Nil desperandum, — Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it.”

Gay Groups Capitulate To Obama… Again

Let’s file this under the category: “If This Nominee Was President Bush’s…”

OutServe-SLDN Statement on Hagel Apology

(Washington, DC) Army veteran and OutServe-SLDN Executive Director Allyson Robinson released the following statement in reaction to an aplogy issued today by former Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel for remarks made in 1998. The apology was reported by Washington Post.

“We are pleased that Senator Hagel recognized the importance of retracting his previous statement about Ambassador Hormel and affirming his commitment to Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell repeal and LGBT military families. We look forward to learning more about his commitment to full LGBT military equality as this nomination and confirmation process unfolds,” she said.

The hypocrisy of gay groups and their lickspittle use of kneepads when it comes to anything-Obama is more than revolting at this point.

-Bruce (@GayPatriot)

Lesbians Charged With “Hate Crime” For Beating Up…. A Gay Guy

Now I’ve seen everything…

Three women identified by their lawyers as lesbians were arraigned yesterday on a hate crime charge for allegedly beating a gay man at the Forest Hills T station in an unusual case that experts say exposes the law’s flawed logic. (emphasis added)

“My guess is that no sane jury would convict them under those circumstances, but what this really demonstrates is the idiocy of the hate-crime legislation,” said civil liberties lawyer Harvey Silverglate. “If you beat someone up, you’re guilty of assault and battery of a human being. Period. The idea of trying to break down human beings into categories is doomed to failure.”

Prosecutors and the ACLU of Massachusetts said no matter the defendants’ sexual orientation, they can still face the crime of assault and battery with intent to intimidate, which carries up to a 10-year prison sentence, by using hateful language.

Are you KIDDING me?!?

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

Hiding Israel’s record on gays behind the “pinkwashing” slogan

In a letter to the New York Times explaining why Israeli Prime Minister Binnyamin Netanyahu “respectfully declined” to write an op-ed piece for the old gray lady, his senior advisor Ron Dermer provides his correspondent with many examples of the paper’s bias, including this one:

Yet instead of trying to balance these views with a different opinion, it would seem as if the surest way to get an op-ed published in the New York Times these days, no matter how obscure the writer or the viewpoint, is to attack Israel. Even so, the recent piece on “Pinkwashing,” in which Israel is vilified for having the temerity to champion its record on gay-rights, set a new bar that will be hard for you to lower in the future.

Pinkwashing, as Matthew Ackerman reported last month

. . . refers to the efforts by the state of Israel and Israel advocacy organizations to promote Israel’s liberal treatment of its gay population, which is certainly the freest, by an extreme long shot, in its region and perhaps in the entire Western world, where even San Francisco may not be as welcoming to gays as Tel Aviv.

The attractiveness of this kind of argument is easy to see. Because Israel is seen most harshly in the West by the left, it is the “progressive” case for Israel that must be made. (Evangelicals and conservatives, presumably, will go on loving the Jewish state no matter how large or, shall we say, exuberant, the Tel Aviv gay pride parade becomes.) Since the left today reflexively voices its concern over gay rights, the thinking goes, highlight sexual freedom in Israel.

Despite the facts on the ground, many “progressive” voices, including those otherwise sympathetic to gay causes, bend over backwards to fault Israel, even creating the term “pinkwashing” to fault those who would highlight the rights openly gay people enjoy in the Jewish State, freedoms denied them in most nations in the Middle East. (more…)