So, let me get this straight… (as it were)…

Obama’s FBI interviewed the Muslim Democrat terrorist three times on suspicions that he was involved in terrorist activity, but let him go each time.

Florida Law Enforcement gave the Muslim Democrat terrorist a license to work as an armed security guard despite a history of domestic violence and erratic behavior.

Orlando Police waited outside the nightclub for three hours while the Muslim Democrat terrorist murdered people on the inside.

And the response of the Gay Community is to demand that *we* be disarmed and trust the Government to protect us?

[And, of course, to blame Christian Conservatives for the actions of a Muslim Democrat.]

WTF is wrong with people?

To hell with that.

Buy yourself a gun before the Gay Community makes any other bright decisions for you.

I feel microaggressed that the stories the social left is using to indoctrinate children into the LGBT agenda are called ‘Fairy’ Tales.

I have some more ideas for gay-themed Children Books:

1. George Michael and the Magic Glory Hole.
2. Snow White and the Seven Genders
3. The Three Little Pigs and the Harsh Dominant Dungeon-Master
4. Alice B. Toklas in Wonderland
5. Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Hair Day
6. The Lion, the Witch and the Fabulous Wardrobe
7. Where the Wild Things Are: A Tale of San Francisco in the 1970′s
8. And to think that I saw it on Folsom Street

Went to the range with my son yesterday. It was the usual place; a public range, and it was a little busier than usual. There were three adult-but-teenage guys next to us with a Mosin Nagant, a Hi-Point pistol, and a couple of rifles. One of the guy was not into guns, but his buddies were, so he went to the range with them. We have never gone to a shooting range together and not engaged in friendly conversation with other people who were there. People like to ask what kind of gun you have, do you like it, is it any good? People let other people handle and fire their weapons. (Note: Democrats want to make this illegal. Handing your gun to someone at a firing range so they can check it out would be a felony under the system of “Universal Background Checks” Democrats are so eager to impose.)  It’s a very friendly, accepting atmosphere at the range. (One of the adult-but-teenaged guys mentioned he was saving up because he wanted to buy an AR15 “before Hillary is elected and makes them illegal”).

In contrast, gay social scenes in my experience have been insular, cliquish, and… if not openly hostile to outsiders, at least not welcoming. Has anyone else observed that?

Anyway, you’ve heard about Katie Couric deceptively editing her little anti-gun documentary to make Supporters of the Human Right of Self-Defense look as if they had no counter-argument to an anti-gun leftist talking point? I guess this is why leftists hate it when conservative speakers come to college campuses; the left only wants to have “debates” where their allies in the media can control the message.

Not to be outdone by the BBC documentary wherein a “Transgender Teen” describes the unfairness and bigotry of normal boys who aren’t into his penis, the rival Channel 4 Network broadcasts an in-depth exploration of  the world of “Pup Play.” 

Secret life of the ‘human pups’: Weird world of the grown men who enjoy dressing up as DOGS in roleplay craze sweeping the nation

As long as “Pup Play” remains a harmless private fetish, and men who identify as dogs don’t demand that society redefine itself to accommodate their fetish, I have no problem with it.

Its probably something that won’t last long after Britain becomes part of the Islamic Caliphate. Mohammedans hate dogs. And submission to Mohammedans is another popular fetish of the British (and American) left.

(more…)

Everything must serve the agenda.  Also, children must be sexualized at the youngest possible age.

Fans of the Disney film “Frozen” are now trying to hijack the popular kids movie by petitioning for Elsa to have a female love interest in the sequel.

The hashtag #GiveElsaAGirlfriend began trending on Twitter in support of having a gay character paired with the Disney princess.

Are LGBT people so pathetically insecure that they require constant, unending, enthusiastic validation by every vessel of the popular culture?

Apparently so.

Joanna Robinson, a tiresome leftist hack, hacks tiresomely at the new Captain America.

So while Marvel was likely never going to make the homoerotic subtext of Cap and Bucky into text, would it really have hurt to keep their relationship more ambiguous? As if to put the nail in the coffin of speculation, Bucky and Cap paused for a moment in the middle of snowy Siberia to reminisce about their days chasing skirts in pre-War Brooklyn. It’s a sweet, human bonding moment but one that also bristles with heterosexual virility. If Disney isn’t inclined to give audiences a gay superhero, couldn’t they have at least left us the dream of Bucky and Cap?

There can be no entertainment on the left; only propaganda for the agenda.

Even though the appeal/entertainment value of drag shows has always eluded me, this is a curious development

An LGBT pride march in Scotland has banned “cis” drag queens from marching out of the fear that it could offend transgender people.

Free Pride Glasgow is scheduled to take place in August, and bills itself as an alternative to the city’s main Pride event, which has allegedly become too commercialized.

“It was felt by the group within the Trans/Non Binary Caucus that some drag performance, particularly cis drag, hinges on the social view of gender and making it into a joke, however transgender individuals do not feel as though their gender identity is a joke,” organizers said in a statement.

I know the story is almost a year old, but given the current insanity over transgendered potty rights, it’s worth bringing up again.

I bet all of you people who watched ‘To Wong Fu, Thanks for Everything’ or  ‘RuPaul’s Drag Race’ had no idea you were participating in a Hate Crime.

I didn’t realize there was a massive Lesbian Festival in the California Desert every year.

It’s a surreal experience: for a few days the world is turned upside down, the minority is suddenly the majority. Everywhere you look, lesbians are smiling, drinking, dancing, kissing. There are a few men around – staff working the event and guys who have been dragged along by lesbian friends – but they are hard to spot. It’s basically entirely queer women in attendance.

I feel sorry for those guys, on so many levels.

I can’t lie, it’s nice being in a predominantly female space for a few days. There’s a feeling of comfortable camaraderie; a sense of suddenly being a first-class citizen. But I feel like that comes more from the queerness rather than the femaleness. No one at the Dinah wishes a plague on all men. Despite the stereotype of the man-hating dyke, most lesbians really like men (we need them around to ensure we don’t get too distracted). The Dinah isn’t about separatism; it’s about celebration.

You realize, of course, men would never be allowed to have something like this. It would be denounced as “non-inclusive,” lawsuits would be filed insisting that women must not only be allowed to attend but must also be given roles in the management of the organization. Because “fairness.”

”Thug Lives (Are the Only Ones That) Matter will be the Grand Marshals at San Francisco’s Gay Pride Parade.

According to an email sent last night by SF Pride, they’ve already picked their first three Grand Marshals for 2016: Meditation and mindfullness teacher Larry Yang will be their Community Grand Marshal, while “Afro-American trans woman, healer and facilitator” Janetta Johnson has been named the “Member’s Choice for Community Grand Marshal.” And this year’s Organizational Grand Marshal? Black Lives Matter.

Yes, that’s the same Black Lives Matter that police officers at the San Francisco Police Department’s Taraval Station recently posted an article decrying, with phrases like “the Black Lives Matter movement has convinced Democrats and progressives that there is an epidemic of racist white police officers killing young black men,” highlighted, the Ex reported last month.

This echoes the sentiments of Alicia Garza, a San Francisco Pride Community Grand Marshal from 2015, who last year told the Bay Area Reporter that “the Black Lives Matter uprising across the country in recent years has been the best Pride she could ask for.”

In 2012, Garza authored a Facebook post ending in the three words that mobilized a nation around police violence against the black community. Garza’s initial post that proclaimed “Black Lives Matter” was a response to the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the murder of Trayvon Martin.

That’s right, the Gay Left in San Francisco is honoring a movement that celebrates a young black thug who tried to beat a man to death possibly because he thought he was going to make a gay pass at him.

Of all the people they could have honored and recognized, they chose a Hate Group that honors violent young men and tells white people they should kill themselves.

This is why I have no use for the gay left.

H/T: Joe

Is it wrong for me to wonder … if anti-gay violence is so rampant and pervasive in our society, why do the gay activists have to fake so many hate crimes?

A gay Central Michigan University professor has pleaded guilty for falsely claiming that a random guy at a Toby Keith concert called her a “cross-dressing fag,” punched her in the face and spat on her.

The professor, Mari Poindexter, had alleged that the man approached her at the Aug. 19 concert at the Soaring Eagle Casino and Resort in Mount Pleasant, Mich., reports The Morning Sun, a local newspaper.

The man began hurling a rich tapestry of obscene slurs at Poindexter, she told police.

Later that night, the professor said, the same man ambushed her in the parking lot of The Cabin — a local bar. The man thumped Poindexter in the eye, she said, and spat on her.

Is it because drama queens crave attention and being a victim gets you attention in our society? Is it because society affords moral superiority to people who claim victim status? Does it enhance the political agenda of the social left to claim that those who oppose them are violent and must be suppressed by the state?

All of the above, actually.

“The Community” is, of course, supporting her and goes so far as to say that the fact that she faked a hate crime makes her almost even *more* deserving of “compassion.” (“Compassion” in the leftist sense of “affirming and rewarding bad behavior.”)

While facing mental health challenges does not absolve Mari of accountability, it helps us understand why our offering compassion rather than judgement (sic) and isolation is so important.

And, of course, this is actually The Patriarchy’s fault, because there are still some people who aren’t on board with celebrating the Gay Leftist Agenda.

While this incident in particular was not a physical assault, an overall environment of anti-LGBTQ sentiment, policies and violence contributed to its fruition. It is critical to consider how facing oppression impacts one’s mental health over a lifetime.

So, this nutjob clocked herself in the face so she could complain about a “hate crime” that never happened… and all society must rearrange itself to accommodate her. That, franks and beans, is the Tyranny of the Mentally Ill.

A gay entrepreneur has launched a business setting up gang bangs. Apparently, this helps gay men get in touch with their inner selves. Also, chlamydia.

Three years before becoming a proud American small business owner, Daniel organized a one-off group session on a lark for a friend’s birthday. But when word of the event’s success got around, he was approached by someone who wanted to try the experience, too—and they were willing to pay for it. So Daniel found his first prospective client. Then another. And another. “What surprised me more than anything is how many people have this fantasy,” Daniel told me. A waiting list developed with clients clamoring for priority, and some events overflowed with willing tops. Eventually, Daniel had to develop a business model simply to organize the chaos.

But lest you find this whole thing sleazy, rest assured that there is scholarly research on the subject that assures us that receiving multiple DNA samples in one’s rectal cavity is a perfectly natural… nay… laudatory and empowering activity for a gay man.

In his article “Breeding Culture: Barebacking, Bugchasing, Giftgiving,” humanities scholar and author Tim Dean discusses the deep, primal needs that might be at work in a gang bang—particularly in a bareback (i.e. condomless) context. At first, Dean’s assessment dovetails with Daniel’s in that both see the “multiply penetrated bottom as achieving an elevated status” because he alone enjoys all the men in the room, and through skin-to-skin contact establishes a corporeal connection between the tops, “a kind of bodily community.” The bottom is adored as the vessel that makes the moment work.

Obviously, this is an activity that needs to be brought up into the mainstream, normalized, and taught to middle schoolers as part of a well-rounded Sex Ed curriculum. It would be intolerant to leave such activities in the shadowy provinces of private relationships. Perhaps, gang bangs should be covered under Obamacare for their psychological benefits. And If you disagree with any of this, you hate gay people and want them burned in camps.

San Francisco gay persons are angry because heterosexuals are moving into their ‘gayborhoods.’

Cleve Jones, a gay activist, saw something that “shocked him” in his local gay bar. “The tech bros had taken over The Mix. They commanded the pool table and the patio. These big, loud, butch guys. It was scary,” he said.

“I’m not heterophobic, but I don’t want to go to a gay bar and buy some guy a drink and have him smirk and tell me he’s straight,” he said.

And…

Amy Sueyoshi, the associate dean of the College of Ethnic Studies at San Francisco State University, claims she feels “less safe” because of the increase in heterosexual people in her neighborhood.

Sueyoshi went so far to say: “I do like to go to places in and around the Castro for Happy Hour or a snack and I’ve noticed more straight people making out at these places where I go deliberately to NOT feel like I am oppressed by heterosexuality. Really, straight people do you HAVE to make out in the Castro as well? Good Lord.”

The University of California will be hosting a forum on the importance of safe spaces for fat gay men.

To help students learn more about the issue, Whitesel “delves into the world of Girth & Mirth, a nationally known social club dedicated to big gay men,” which the description later states “has long been a refuge and ‘safe space’ for such men.”

Although not a member of the group himself, Whitesel is “a partial insider as a gay man,” and “offers an insider’s critique of the gay movement, questioning whether the social consequences of the failure to be height-weight proportionate should be so extreme in the gay community.”

I imagine it will go something like this:

I’ve been sitting on this story for a couple of days. It’s a story out of Las Vegas and concerns (yet another) case of a teacher sexually abusing a student. I tell you, those public schoolteachers make Catholic Priests look like, um, Catholic Priests. Although none of the early news stories revealed the sex of the student that was abused… I correctly guessed the sex of the student that had been abused. Mainly, because the mugshot of the perp played into some stereotypes we’re supposed to have been indoctrinated into believing are invalid.

How much do you wanna bet she drives a Subaru?

My angle on this isn’t that all lesbians are child abusers, or that all lesbians correspond to the bull-dyke stereotype. We know neither of these things are true. But it kind of caroms off a discussion I was having the other night about someone’s experience with his “Gay Straight Alliance” in college, Often, when someone new came into the group the loud and brassy lesbians who ran it would say, “I *knew* you were gay.” And my friend could tell this made a lot of newcomers uncomfortable. The last thing a lot of people coming to terms with their sexuality want to hear is, “I could tell you were gay.”

My friend thought this was because some people, especially college age noobs, have religious issues or family issues that make them want to remain closeted or discreet. I think my friend overlooked another factor: To a lot of people, it’s simply embarrassing to be identified with Gay Culture.

When people use the expression, “That’s gay,” as a pejorative, they’re not attack gay people, but really all of the bullsh-t that attaches to Gay Culture. Not everybody enjoys campy entertainment, wants to adopt shrill leftism as the default political setting, squees with delight over every genderbending perversion that comes down the pike, hates ‘organized religion.’ or thinks the Folsom Street Fair is wholesome family entertainment. The Onion satirized this brilliantly over a decade ago. Family Guy, the only show on TV that gets away with it, also nailed it. I take, “That’s so gay,” to mean, “That’s so silly and frivolous,” which is how I feel about the things Gay Culture celebrates.

To sum, I can’t blame anyone who doesn’t want to be associated with Gay Culture. And for that matter, Gay Culture isn’t a very accepting place for those who don’t fit into its rather tight parameters for entertainment, politics, faith, and behavior.

So, this post is written by Jeff; but I may say we/us/our in the following, meaning that I’m pretty sure that other GP authors would agree with me.

From time to time, trolls show up in GayPatriot’s comments section: people who are here not to provide new info or discuss anything for real, but only to throw accusations. They are usually left-wing. It’s fun, because they so often provide evidence for our points about how the Left thinks (or rather, doesn’t think).

You can tell a troll because his accusations are illogical. He usually shows little understanding of our viewpoints as the writers of GP, which may differ among us on some issues, but which are always rooted in our respect for human life including liberty (human freedom).

For example, if you understood anything about our viewpoints, you would know that we condemn violence^^ against gays and lesbians. And against women. And against black people or any minority. We condemn physical violence against anybody who isn’t a perpetrator of physical violence, because we condemn all physical violence that isn’t necessary for self-defense. No peaceful citizen should have to live in fear for his or her physical safety.

Likewise, we condemn anyone who -calls for- violence^^ against gays and lesbians, against women, or against anybody else who hasn’t committed criminal violence. To our way of thinking, we shouldn’t have to say the preceding, because it should be SO OBVIOUS that it flows from our principles. But if it’s important to you that we say it: there it is. Easy to say. Done.

It’s an example of something so basic that we would expect any commenter on GP who wants to be taken seriously to feel the same way. A similar example of something basic would be condemning violence against children – including the sexual exploitation of minors, such as child pornography or pedophilia**.

Rejecting the sexual exploitation of minors is so obvious and basic to being a decent human being that a person should not normally be asked to condemn pedophilia – but, if she is asked to, it should be quite easy for her to say “Of course I condemn it – Done.”

The thing is: When it comes to the Gay Left, and because the Gay Left sometimes tolerates NAMBLA or promotes certain individuals who do condone sex with minors, it may be legitimate to ask the person to condemn it. And when they condemn it, that’s good. You got your answer, and you move on to other topics.

At this point, a gay leftie might say “But then we’re right to ask you if you condemn violence against gays!! Because you tolerate or associate with Christians, and Christians promote or condone violence against gays!!!1!11!1!”

And the answer is: No, Christians don’t. Of course you can find some crazy/fringe person who happens to call themselves “Christian” and calls for violence against lesbians or gays; but the key words there are “crazy” and “fringe”. The words apply because the real world is different. In the real world, all major denominations of Christianity reject violence against gays.

But, sadly, it is not equally true that all major Gay Left groups, Pride parades, etc. shun NAMBLA and condemn anyone who has sex with teenage boys. Sadly, no.

All this came up in a recent GP thread. A leftie commenter asked me if I condemn violence against gays, and/or anyone calling for violence against gays. I replied readily that I do. Thinking that I was throwing the guy a softball, I said, now you can reciprocate my example by condemning pedophilia, right? He couldn’t or wouldn’t. Instead, he claimed that Christian leaders typically call for violence against gays. I demanded contemporary examples – and the one example that he provided (after some stalling and further hand-waving) was just a fringe nutcase, a worthless example.

To summarize.

1. We (authors at Gay Patriot) condemn violence^^ against gays. (and always have)
2. We condemn anyone who promotes or calls for violence^^ against gays. (and we always have)
3. We condemn pedophilia**. (and always have)
4. We find these things easy to say, when we are challenged about it.
5. We think that any decent person should find these things easy to say, if they are challenged.
6. We do NOT normally want people to be challenged on these things, in GP comments. (Why not? For staying on topic, for goodwill / presumption of innocence, etc.)
7. But, if a troll is going to make challenges on these things, then he or she may expect to be challenged back – and had better come up with the right answers. As we do.
8. In the future, when we are challenged, we may simply refer the troll back to this post.

(^^Violence meaning: real violence, which of course is physical violence.)

(**Pedophilia broadly also including hebephilia/ephebophilia, the sexual exploitation of teenagers or of any/all minors.)

From the comments at AoSHQ, for purposes of provoking discussion. On the topic of, maybe sexuality is not necessarily a matter of “Born this way.”

My hubby’s former boss is super duper prog man, to the max. His kid went to school. Wifey insisted he go to boarding school. So he has a gay experience and announces he is gay. Family appears delighted by said announcement. A year later the kid is talking about bringing a girl home. The prog Dad says, “I thought you were gay?”

Prog son says, “Dad I was only 15, what did I know?”

And…

My super-progressive cousin did this with her painfully shy son – she kept telling him “It’s OK if you’re gay, I’ll love you no matter what, do you want to take a boy to prom? etc.”

Finally his older sister screamed at her, “He’s not gay, mom, he’s just SHY!”

Stories like these make me think that real-life is not as simple as the gay left social narrative makes it out to be.  Maybe it’s not just a matter of genetics, and sexual orientation being fixed at birth. Maybe people do respond to social cuing, and emulate what’s trendy.

I kind of wonder if, twenty years hence, the current mania for celebrating “transgenders” will be seen as a silly fad like coonskin caps and goldfish swallowing.

That kid from ‘Who’s the Boss’ who surprised no one by coming out as gay has just come out as HIV positive, and now he wants to be “a beacon of light” to other gay people.

“It was terrifying, and there was a sense of relief,” he says. “It’s backwards. You’ve spent so much time terrified that you’re going to get it, and then you have it. You don’t have to be terrified anymore.”

“What I want my community to realize is we need to take better care of ourselves,” he says.

And what message is he going to be conveying? “Don’t be an idiot like me who used crystal meth and got infected with HIV through promiscuous unprotected sex?” Or, “If you use crystal meth and get HIV through unprotected anonymous sex, the LGBT Community will make you a hero and praise you for having the exquisite courage of a butterfly flying against the wind?”

Gaydar is not real, and if you think it is, you’re a homophobe.

According to the University of Wisconsin’s study, which was published in the Journal of Sex Research, gaydar is not real. William Cox, an assistant scientist in the Department of Psychology and the lead author, chose to do this study in order to dispel the stereotype that some people might have gaydar and thus can determine who is gay and who isn’t.

In the press release Cox said, “Most people think of stereotyping as inappropriate. But if you’re not calling it ‘stereotyping,’ if you’re giving it this other label and camouflaging it as ‘gaydar,’ it appears to be more socially and personally acceptable.”

The running joke about me is that I have Soviet Era gaydar; anybody less obvious than, say, Paul Lynde or Janet Napolitano goes right by. Story though. Once, I gave my son and a couple of his friends a ride home after a high school dance. And there was one kid who just wouldn’t shut up about his involvement in the Gay-Straight Alliance and how excited he was about the upcoming Spring musical that he was in. I mean, Obama’s Safe School Czar totally would have sent this kid to a bus station.

A few months later, he stole my son’s girlfriend and last I heard they were married.

Profits from the sales of Gay Doritos go to hatemonger Dan Savage’s “Anti-Bullying” project.

Question, if a Christian storeowner declines to sell Gay Doritos, can they be driven out of business in the name of tolerance?

Sometimes, I think being a leftist means nothing more than being hostile to all things normal and good and coming up with convoluted ways to explain it.

Seriously, how mental do you have to be to embrace this lunacy?

HT: The Political Hat