<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GayPatriot &#187; (Gay) Male Sexuality &amp; the Monogamous Ideal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/category/gay-male-sexuality-the-monogamous-ideal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>On Anthony Weiner &amp; Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2011/06/07/on-anthony-weiner-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2011/06/07/on-anthony-weiner-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=36981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I drove cross country in 2007, I had a conversation with a friend who, had since I left the DC-area in 1999, married his partner in a church ceremony.  Until he met his husband, my friend refrained from sexual activity, doing his part to set an example of the &#8220;responsible&#8221; single homosexual and not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2011/06/07/on-anthony-weiner-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>239</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is monogamy really a challenge?</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2011/03/23/is-monogamy-really-a-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2011/03/23/is-monogamy-really-a-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=34817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Commenting my post yesterday on civility and monogamy, Sonicfrog offers an interesting and insightful rejoinder to my acknowledgment of the challenges of monogamy: Living monogamous isn’t that difficult. It comes down to making a relationship a priority over getting your rocks off with a stranger. Granted, the latter can be fun, but the former is, to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2011/03/23/is-monogamy-really-a-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, Mr. Savage, it is possible to promote gay relationships without being nasty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2011/03/22/yes-dan-it-is-possible-to-promote-gay-marriage-without-being-nasty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2011/03/22/yes-dan-it-is-possible-to-promote-gay-marriage-without-being-nasty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=34756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps, the editors of Newsweek and Time really don&#8217;t want to see state recognition of same-sex marriage.  Given that fact that each magazine has now promoted a man who wears his contempt for Christianity on his sleeve, it seems their editors are little interested in changing the minds of the overwhelming majority of Americans who [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2011/03/22/yes-dan-it-is-possible-to-promote-gay-marriage-without-being-nasty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>90</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Sex, Faith &amp; Happiness</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2011/03/10/on-sex-faith-happiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2011/03/10/on-sex-faith-happiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=34538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While completing work on my dissertation last fall, I found my mind sometimes wandering as I pondered two great issues, those of sex and of happiness.  As to the former, I continued my ongoing (and long-running) internal dialogue on where was the appropriate place for a single man to draw the line on sexual activity. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2011/03/10/on-sex-faith-happiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Casual sex for single gay men: barrier to finding LTR?</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/07/01/casual-sex-for-single-gay-men-barrier-to-finding-ltr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/07/01/casual-sex-for-single-gay-men-barrier-to-finding-ltr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 07:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=27278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A friend recently sent me a text which I found it difficult to answer from my cell phone.  Indeed, can&#8217;t really give him an answer even now.  At one point in my life, I would have offered a quick and easy answer, but now I&#8217;m not so sure how to address his question without relating [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/07/01/casual-sex-for-single-gay-men-barrier-to-finding-ltr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Men, Marriage &amp; Friendship</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/06/25/gay-men-marriage-friendship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/06/25/gay-men-marriage-friendship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friendship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mythology and the real world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=27155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One reason I have a great deal of difficulty taking seriously most (but not all) gay marriage activists (particularly those of my sex) is that they are loath to discuss the emotional significance/meaning of the institution.  And as I study male psychology, I wonder that it often takes a woman (or a child, or combination [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/06/25/gay-men-marriage-friendship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pill, the Sexual Revolution &amp; Gay Sex</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/05/09/the-pill-the-sexual-revolution-gay-sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/05/09/the-pill-the-sexual-revolution-gay-sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 16:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality (General)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=26046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning, in honor of the 50th anniversary of the birth control pill, Glenn links two posts, the first by 1970s bombshell Raquel Welch who observes: In stark contrast, a lack of sexual inhibitions, or as some call it, &#8220;sexual freedom,&#8221; has taken the caution and discernment out of choosing a sexual partner, which used [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/05/09/the-pill-the-sexual-revolution-gay-sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On monogamy &amp; marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/01/on-monogamy-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/01/on-monogamy-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the recent discussion on this blog (notably in the comment thread to my post on Joy Behar) about whether monogamy is essential to marriage, let me draw your attention to a post Glenn Reynolds linked today on a site that is hardly at the vanguard of the marriage movement.  Among her &#8220;Secrets to a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/01/on-monogamy-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay People are Capable of Monogamy</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/01/gay-people-are-capable-of-monogamy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/01/gay-people-are-capable-of-monogamy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For well over a year now, I have stopped paying attention to the left-wing blogs which distort my views and seek to cast me as something I am not.  It&#8217;s just not worth my time to attempt to engage with people more interested in belittling conservatives than in understanding&#8211;and countering&#8211;our arguments. When, however, a blogger, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/02/01/gay-people-are-capable-of-monogamy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joy Behar: Gays Unable to Fulfill Obligations of MatrimonyGay Groups Silent</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/01/31/joy-behar-challenges-ability-of-gay-people-to-fulfill-obligations-of-matrimony-gay-groups-silent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/01/31/joy-behar-challenges-ability-of-gay-people-to-fulfill-obligations-of-matrimony-gay-groups-silent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annoying Celebrities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the main reasons I find it difficult to embrace the gay marriage, er, marriage equality movement, is that its proponents seem more interested in the abstract notion of &#8220;equality&#8221; than in the real institution of marriage. Its advocates are less interested in promoting marriage than in winning, to borrow an expression from my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/01/31/joy-behar-challenges-ability-of-gay-people-to-fulfill-obligations-of-matrimony-gay-groups-silent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Gay&#8221; Pashtuns, or Social Acceptance of Homosexual Behavior</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/01/30/gay-pashtuns-or-social-acceptance-of-homosexual-behavior/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/01/30/gay-pashtuns-or-social-acceptance-of-homosexual-behavior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality (General)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=22026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome Instapundit Readers!!! Maybe I shouldn&#8217;t read Instapundit on days when I oversleep.   While I was eating my breakfast, I kept chancing upon posts which inspired me to pen three of my own (including this one). This morning, Glenn linked an article that addresses an issue that has long fascinated me, particularly as it relates [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/01/30/gay-pashtuns-or-social-acceptance-of-homosexual-behavior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lindsay Wagner Approach to Gay Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/01/25/the-lindsay-wagner-case-for-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/01/25/the-lindsay-wagner-case-for-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identity Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=21795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To understand the decline in quality of the debate on gay marriage from its early potential to its current name-calling, you can start by reading two pieces by Andrew Sullivan 19 years apart.  In the first, &#8220;Here Comes the Groom,&#8221; he outlines a solid argument on the merits of extending the institution of marriage to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2010/01/25/the-lindsay-wagner-case-for-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Should Public School Teachers Handle Gay Kids?</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/17/how-should-public-school-teachers-handle-gay-kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/17/how-should-public-school-teachers-handle-gay-kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Discourse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=20359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes the best questions our readers ask are the most basic ones. In response to my post calling &#8220;abstinence only&#8221; sex education anachronistic, DRH asked, &#8220;Now for a real tough question. How should sex ed. handle gay &#38; lesbian students?&#8221; It is a great question.  And the answer is not as simple as partisans on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/17/how-should-public-school-teachers-handle-gay-kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kevin Jennings &amp; the Prevailing Gay Sexual Ethos</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/09/20024/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/09/20024/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=20024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I think some of the coverage on conservative blogs about the latest Kevin Jennings hullabaloo (James Taranto might call it a kerfuffle) a bit overheated, I have not yet found any cause to rescind my earlier call for his resignation.  Simply put, he is not the kind of man who should be supervising a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/09/20024/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Abstinence Only&#8221; Sex Education Belongs to a Long Bygone Era*</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/08/what-abstinence-only-sex-education-is-outdated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/08/what-abstinence-only-sex-education-is-outdated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Discourse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies, TV & Pop Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=20012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Generally, if I post on a matter where I indicate that I share even the slightest bit of common ground with social conservatives, critics will come in as if out of the woodwork, making allegations about my views both at odds with my actual opinions and even (on occasion) at odds with things I actually [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/08/what-abstinence-only-sex-education-is-outdated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leave Tiger Woods Alone</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/03/leave-tiger-woods-alone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/03/leave-tiger-woods-alone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies, TV & Pop Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=19834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know that I&#8217;m not just whistling in the wind with this post, but whistling in a typhoon. First of all, I believe Tiger Woods behaved badly in cheating on his wife.  He betrayed his marriage vows and hurt someone to whom he had pledged fidelity.  And while, by dint of his athletic success and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/12/03/leave-tiger-woods-alone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the notion of &#8220;marriage equality&#8221; at odds with the natural sciences?</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/07/is-the-notion-of-marriage-equality-at-odds-with-the-natural-sciences/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/07/is-the-notion-of-marriage-equality-at-odds-with-the-natural-sciences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Difference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I research the idea of male aggression for the chapter in my dissertation on why men need the goddess Athena, I encounter reams of evidence, from the social as well as the natural sciences, which provide substance to my &#8220;gut&#8221; suspicion of the term, &#8220;marriage equality.&#8221; In their 1989 book, Brain Sex: The Real [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/07/is-the-notion-of-marriage-equality-at-odds-with-the-natural-sciences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reflections on Celibacy and Safe Sex</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/15/reflections-on-celibacy-and-safe-sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/15/reflections-on-celibacy-and-safe-sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=17911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been well over a year since I ended a vow of celibacy I undertook just over three years ago.  I wanted to see what it was like not to have sex for a period of time.  Fortunately, I was single (as I am now), so didn&#8217;t have to disappoint a boyfriend.  :-) One thing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/15/reflections-on-celibacy-and-safe-sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On marriage &amp; the &#8220;gray&#8221; areas of sexual expression</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/04/on-the-gray-areas-of-sexual-expression-and-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/04/on-the-gray-areas-of-sexual-expression-and-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Difference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=17319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I may or may not blog again on the case of Kevin Jennings.  I do have another post in my mind, but it&#8217;s basically just an expansion on a point I made in my last post on the topic. I hope the readers who brought up the issue of &#8220;gray areas&#8221; in this case appreciate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/04/on-the-gray-areas-of-sexual-expression-and-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defend Marriage as an Institution to Avoid Slippery Slopes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/07/30/defending-marriage-as-an-institution-to-avoid-slippery-slopes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/07/30/defending-marriage-as-an-institution-to-avoid-slippery-slopes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriotWest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[(Gay) Male Sexuality & the Monogamous Ideal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=14280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As those who read this blog know all too well, I find it difficult to take seriously many advocates of gay marriage because they make the case for marriage as a right without defending it as a social institution. No wonder many opponents of gay marriage believe state recognition of gay marriage would put us [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/07/30/defending-marriage-as-an-institution-to-avoid-slippery-slopes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

