Gay Patriot Header Image

Manphobia hits new lows

In left-wing Berlin, Germany, we now have a crackdown on advertising that would dare to depict women as “nurturing, happy to do housework, beautiful, addicted to shopping” or men as “rational, aggressive, technologically gifted”.

Get it? Ads must feature unpleasant, unattractive, angry feminists disposing of pathetically weak and foolish men.

Boys must not be shown as “liking sports, the colour blue, and playing with technology”. According to these German feminists(!), girls are so stupid and deficient by nature that when they “see images of heterosexual housewives, the consequence is that they cannot imagine themselves outside this framework.”

Meanwhile in Madrid, they banned ‘manspreading’. Because God Forfend that a man on a bus should sit a bit comfortably. Crowder explains it to women and gets some to admit to the existence of female privilege.

Miserable Puritans Have Better Sex Lives than Free-Spirited Snowflake Children

Posted by V the K at 8:20 pm - September 6, 2016.
Filed under: Sex Difference

First of all, the leftist writer admits she is ignorant, lives in a bubble, and takes left-wing stereotypes as facts.

Based on the sexual hangups their political affiliation tries to force on the rest of us, it seemed obvious to me that Republicans must be having a terrible time in bed. I don’t know any people on the Right, personally, so I imagined they just felt crippling anxiety any time they thought about having sex in a “normal” way and thus acted out by having sex in insane, criminal ways, which certainly don’t seem very satisfying.

So, when confronted with research showing that conservatives have more fulfilled sex lives than leftists, she really doesn’t process this information well. She seeks out explanations that still reaffirm the superiority of left-wing people, e.g. “People on the left have higher standards for sexual gratification, and we’re unsatisfied when the sex doesn’t measure up.” Alternately, “We’re more aware of the world and all its troubles, and this makes us unhappier generally than those dumb conservatives who think everything is OK.”

Or, on the other hand.

Leftism is a narcissistic, materialist ideology, and selfish sex in which the flesh is treated merely as flesh is almost always unsatisfying. Sex that is giving, concerned with the other person, and treats the body it ought to be, which is as a symbol of the soul, is far more gratifying.

Yeah, I can sort of see that.

More Progressive Sex Ed Follies

Posted by V the K at 9:43 pm - June 2, 2015.
Filed under: Progressive immorality,Sex Difference

Some middle school kids in Minnesota were taken to a sex shop on a field trip.

Director Starri Hedges, who also teaches the school’s sex education class, said she wanted to provide a safe and welcoming environment for students to learn about human sexual behavior.

“What I saw happening on our trip, I thought it was beautiful because kids could talk to these sex educators without any shame, without any fear,” Hedges said Monday.

And isn’t that how we want teenagers to be? Completely open and willing to explore their sexual impulses without any imhibition or restraint?

Anyway, some parents are upset, which shows how stupid they are because, you know, the parents really should have expected this kind of thing, considering they chose to send their kids to this school.

Gaia is a K-12 school with a motto promising academic freedom, youth empowerment and democratic education. Parents say the school has about 25 students, including several described by administrators as transgender.

If you send your kids to educated by commie-hippies, don’t be surprised if the hippies take them to a sex shop.

Social Extremists Move to Shut Down Porn Industry in California

Posted by V the K at 8:32 pm - May 28, 2015.
Filed under: Sex Difference

Just this morning, some idiot in the AOSHQ commments claimed that “Socon theocrats” wanted to outlaw pornography. New laws in California may have the effect of shutting down the porn industry (or forcing it to relocate to states not run by busybody fun-suckers), but it isn’t the socons that are pushing the legislation.

Porn stars may soon be forced to wear goggles along with condoms as part of a stricter set of rules for adult film sets.

According to a proposed set of regulations in California, published on Thursday by the state Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board, goggles could soon be introduced as a way of preventing the spread of STDs.

In other news, socialist hero Bernie Sanders wrote an article back in the 1970’s in which he stated that women liked to fantasize about being gang-raped.

Well, all right then.

I am sure his apologists will excuse his statements, because “it was the 70’s, you know.” “He was just a kid when he wrote that… a 31 year old kid.”

But at least he’s not like that crazy Rick Santorum with his belief in abstinence and monogamy.

Anyway, feminists are too busy losing their sh-t over statues to care much about a Democrat presidential candidate with a fondness for BDSM and rape fantasies.

Man with Murse Miffed

Posted by V the K at 4:58 pm - April 4, 2015.
Filed under: Sex Difference

I knew a gay dude in college who carried a purse everywhere. Upon meeting someone he would always say, “I carry a purse, does that bother you.” One day I passed him on the quad and said, “What’s up, purse-boy.” And he got really offended by that.

I was reminded of that guy (What was his name? Paul? Pretty sure it was Paul, but then it might just be because Purse-Boy Paul is so irresistibly alliterative) when I read about this special snowflake getting all miffed up because he wasn’t allowed to bring his manpurse into the cinema. (Naturally, this happened in Florida)

Zac Adams told Bay News 9 he was banned from bringing in his bag because he’s a man. He secretly captured his discussion with a theater staffer on his cell phone camera.

“Because ladies carry big bags, that’s the normal thing for ladies to do,” a female manager tells Adams.

So he was already recording this when it happened? Sounds like a bit of a set-up.  But maybe some gay left hate group should burn the theater down, just to be sure.


The State of the Sexes

Posted by V the K at 10:00 am - March 16, 2015.
Filed under: Sex Difference


John Bailey and Brenna Harvey, graduate students at Rutgers University in New Jersey, are showing a group – an even mix of men and women, mostly in their 30s, mostly graduate students studying gender – the fruits of their research into bronies: men who like My Little Pony. They have been studying a particularly extreme subset of bronies, they explain. Men who fetishise the ponies. The pair bring up a screengrab. One brony has posted a picture of a My Little Pony wearing sunglasses and drinking lemonade by a pool. In the comments beneath, the poster has made the fatal mistake, at least within this community, of admitting that he lost his “wizard eligibility 26 years ago” – has had sex with a person – and that he does not “clop” – that is, masturbate – to the images. Another brony had responded immediately: “Go be normal somewhere else, faggot.”


This portrait of the delicate female bears a striking resemblance to that 50′s ideal my mother and other women of her generation fought so hard to leave behind. They didn’t like her passivity, her wide-eyed innocence. They didn’t like the fact that she was perpetually offended by sexual innuendo. They didn’t like her excessive need for protection. She represented personal, social and intellectual possibilities collapsed, and they worked and marched, shouted and wrote to make her irrelevant for their daughters. But here she is again, with her pure intentions and her wide eyes. Only this time it is the feminists themselves who are breathing new life into her.

Is this dysfunction really pervasive in society? Or is it only progressives and SJW’s who are this effed up?

Alpha Female Seeks Beta Male

Posted by V the K at 7:53 pm - January 5, 2015.
Filed under: Sex Difference

So even though “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle,” sometimes, a fish just wants a bicycle; especially after the fish gets into her thirties and all of the other fish have gotten their bicycles, and the remaining bicycles are rapidly losing interest. A feminist has written an article advising feminists how to find a man who doesn’t mind being in a relationship where he is regarded as inferior and non-essential.

Lisa Bonos (@lisabonos) has published a column headlined “How to find a feminist boyfriend” that reads like an Onion parody:
“I find it really attractive how successful you are,” my date said, leaning in for a kiss.
Sure, it sounds like a line. But it also sounds like feminism. . . .

(No, it’s a line. Trust me.)

Anyway. I think I found her one o’ them male feminists.


Hell Yes There’s a War on Men, So Why Aren’t We Fighting Back?


This article at Breitbart is spot on about how America and Europe are essentially countries under Amazonian occupation; feminists dominate the institutions of law, academia, and Government and are using their positions of power to degrade and ultimately destroy masculinity.

Marriage is dead. Divorce means you’re screwed for life. Women have given up on monogamy, which makes them uninteresting to us for any serious relationship or raising a family. That’s just the way it is. Even if we take the risk, chances are the kids won’t be ours. In France, we even have to pay for the kids a wife has through adulterous affairs.

Social commentators, journalists, academics, scientists and young men themselves have all spotted the trend: among men of about 15 to 30 years old, ever-increasing numbers are checking out of society altogether, giving up on women, sex and relationships and retreating into pornography, sexual fetishes, chemical addictions, video games and, in some cases, boorish lad culture, all of which insulate them from a hostile, debilitating social environment created, some argue, by the modern feminist movement.

In schools today across Britain and America, boys are relentlessly pathologised, as academics were warning as long ago as 2001. Boyishness and boisterousness have come to be seen as “problematic,” with girls’ behaviour a gold standard against which these defective boys are measured. … Boys are falling behind girls academically, perhaps because relentless and well-funded focus has been placed on girls’ achievement in the past few decades and little to none on the boys who are now achieving lower grades, fewer honors, fewer degrees and less marketable information economy skills. Boys’ literacy, in particular, is in crisis throughout the West. We’ve been obsessing so much over girls, we haven’t noticed that boys have slipped into serious academic trouble.

But why are we, as men, letting this happen? Why is there a phenomenon of men withdrawing into videogames and pornography instead of fighting back?

My Crazy Conspiracy Theory

The Feminist Left is promoting a ‘Narrative’ (cough… Big Lie … cough) that college and university campuses are basically Rape Zones where wild-eyed men rape women constantly in a mad frenzy of rapey rapiness (because… The Patriarchy!). In fact, the Narrative is so powerful that a feminist journalist can publish articles about gang rapes without any proof that they actually happened and universities will respond by punishing the men that didn’t commit the rapes that didn’t happen even after the feminist journalist pretty much admits there’s no proof that they happened, but it doesn’t matter anyway because… ‘The Narrative.’

The ‘Narrative’ is being used as justification for university officials to strip men accused of sexual misconduct of their Constitutional protections and, in some cases, to damage their careers and reputations.

So, is it crazy to think that the goal of the militant feminist left is to turn institutions of higher education into environments that are so hostile to heterosexual men that even larger numbers of them will forgo college educations. Meaning that women will receive an even more disproportionate number of degrees and thus making the sisterhood dominant in positions of power and influence in society?

I know, it’s a crazy idea… but on the other hand, the left are crazy (and malevolent) people.

Just to be clear, I am not saying that I believe that this is a feminist conspiracy, just using that language as a launching point for further discussion

Just to be clear, I am not saying that I believe that this is a feminist conspiracy, just using that language as a launching point for further discussion

Women Are Too Emotionally Fragile to do Men’s Work say Feminists

Posted by V the K at 1:30 pm - November 16, 2014.
Filed under: Sex Difference,Social Issues

According to the New Feminism, women are delicate and fragile creatures, so ruled by their emotions that the slightest offense will cause them to crumple and wither like a cut flower, if we are to believe such feminists as Rose Eveleth and Janet Stemwedel.

In support of this hypothesis, let us consider recent occasions in which feminists have made the case that the delicate sensibilities of women must be protected from anything that might give them the vapors.

One must conclude that if the feminists are correct, then women are simply too emotionally fragile to participate in most aspects of modern life, and perhaps should stay home with the doors locked and the curtains drawn and let the menfolk handle the heavy stuff.


California Liberals Eagerly Welcome Government into Their Bedrooms

California Governor Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown signed into law a bill requiring explicit state-approved consent before college students can have sex with each other.

Under this standard, a sex act can only be presumed as consensual if both participants have explicitly consented. Even if no overt objections are raised at the time, if no explicit consent is obtained a sexual encounter may be defined as rape.

Henceforth, male students within California’s system of higher ed are advised to make their partners sign consent forms before each and every sexual activity; thus to please the misandrist puritans of the modern left.

So much for the fine art of seduction. That a woman should not immediately agree to a man’s sexual overtures has been quite customary throughout history; seduction has been a key ingredient in the sexual cocktail.  No more, though. If a woman doesn’t immediately consent, I suppose the man is supposed to just walk away and never breach the subject again. Leave it to the left to turn sex into a bureaucratically-managed activity subject to strict oversight by the state… like everything else.

Progressive Left: “On Second Thought, We Actually Do Want Government in the Bedroom.”

In California, natch,

A newly amended bill from a California lawmaker would require college students to stop in the heat of passion and establish verbal or written consent before having sex anywhere on campus, reports L.A. Weekly.

SB 967, amended last week by state Sen. Kevin de Leon (D-Los Angeles), would mandate that college students obtain “an affirmative, unambiguous, and conscious decision by each participant to engage in mutually agreed-upon sexual activity.”

It’s not necessarily a bad idea for a young college horndog to get signed consent before banging college women who’ve been raised on a steady diet of “feminist empowerment” since grade school. Especially, now that rape has redefined to include, “Woman consents to have sex with a guy and then changes her mind days or weeks later, files a sexual assault complaint and destroys his life.”

A really smart one will get it notarized.

Update:  I thought that name was familiar. Kevin de Leon is the same genius progressive hairpiece that a few months ago warned about dangerous assault weapons that fire “30 magazine clips in half a second.” And they should be outlawed, of course.

No, Ma’am

Posted by V the K at 12:38 pm - January 2, 2014.
Filed under: Sex Difference

Men are not women.

Let that sink in, because there are a lot of feminists and Pajamaboy Gamma Males that don’t get that. One of them is Lisa Wade of Salon. (Ms Wade is also a is a professor of sociology at Occidental College, the institution of higher learning that Barack Obama may have attended, although there is no available public documentation to confirm it). Ms Wade thinks men need to have more friends that they can share their feelers with, because men will be happier if they act like women, so goes what passes for feminist logic.

Bill McMorris at The Federalist disagrees.

“To be close friends, men need to be willing to confess their insecurities, be kind to others, have empathy and sometimes sacrifice their own self-interest,” Wade says.

Bill Cosby addressed this very issue in his Thanksgiving Comedy Central special this year. His car broke down at 2:45 a.m. while returning home from a trip. He called two people: his friiieeend Ed and his wife. Mrs. Cosby shared her insecurities about Mr. Cosby’s substandard auto maintenance. Ed hopped in his car.

Wade laments that men talk about things, rather than feelings. But it’s not just talk—we do things for one another. Men don’t demonstrate the strength of their bond by saying, “I consider you an intimate friend,” though that may be enough for women. They hop in their cars. The act itself is the expression of friendship, just as the salute conveys respect of rank in the military without verbal confirmation that a superior officer is present.

It doesn’t occur to Ms. Wade that men don’t form friendships so we can bond emotionally with each other, men form friendships so we can do things together … hunt, fish, build catapults, game, play hockey … and we bond over that. We don’t bond over crying about how our women don’t understand us.

I had a girlfriend in college who chastised me because when she came to me with her problems, I actually wanted to fix them, when all she really wanted was for me to commisserate with her. Like most men, I’m just not wired that way. I want problems to be fixed so I don’t have to deal with them any more, and just talking about how I “feel” about them doesn’t accomplish that.

Long story short: Men don’t need to be more like women, we need to be more like men.


Does Pat Robertson understand what marriage is for?

Just caught Erin Burnett on CNN talking about something I had noticed earlier today as trending on Yahoo!

Screen shot 2013-05-16 at 6.45.32 PM

Yup, that’s right, number one above.* On his “700 Club” television show yesterday, his co-host Kristi Watts read a letter from a woman having trouble forgiving a cheating husband. Watts called infidelity “one of the ultimate betrayals“, but Robertson said the woman should “stop talking about the cheating.” After asking some good questions which get at the heart of what it means to be good husband, he otherwise seems to miss the point, dismissing the problem of infidelity — and failing to understand the full meaning of marriage, particularly the marital vows:

He cheated on you. Well, he’s a man, okay, so, what you do is begin to focus on why you married him in the first place, on what he does good.

. . . .

But recognize also, like it or not, males have a tendency to wander a little bit. And what you want to do is make the home so wonderful that he doesn’t want to wander. But, think of the temptations that are out there. The Internet is filled with pornography. Magazines are filled with pictures, salacious pictures of women. Anywhere you turn around, there is some solicitation to the sense to entice a man. And so what you have to do is say, “My husband was captured and I want to get him free.”

Yes, Mr. Robertson is right; males do have a tendency to wander, but marriage vows exist to restrain that tendency, to remind a man that he has, to borrow a term many social conservatives like, made a covenant with a woman, forging a bond more important that the momentary gratification a dalliance with another women might offer.

What this man did was wrong and to earn forgiveness, he should first admit that.

Marriage has evolved for a great many reasons, one of them to control that tendency to wander.  Mr. Robertson should have said as much.  He should have said that what the cheating husband did was wrong — and criticized him for violating his vows.  And for causing pain to a woman to whom he had sworn fidelity. (more…)

Falling birthrates

Why do some nations’ birthrates fall? And can Big Government boost them?

[Germany] spends some €200 billion ($270 billion) on promoting children and families per year…But its birth rate, at 1.39 births per woman aged 15 to 49, remains among the lowest in Europe…

…The web of benefits is so complex that even experts don’t fully grasp it: There’s a “child supplement,” “parental benefit,” an “allowance for single parents,” a “married person’s supplement,” a “sibling bonus,” “orphan money” and “child education supplement,” not to forget the “child education supplementary supplement.”

The article suggests that the reason that German women don’t have kids is because the government isn’t funding enough daycare and preschools to make it easy for them.

I have a different theory. My guess is that birthrates fall:

  1. because living standards rise. (Kids stop being a help on the farm; start being expensive.)
  2. and because the Welfare State gives people the illusion that government will take care of them in old age.

My second point would mean that Big Government measures won’t, over time and on average, raise a nation’s birthrates. The more the State does – the more it hands out benefits and asserts its dominance in citizens’ lives – the less urgent its citizens will feel about procreating. Agree/disagree?

Profiling mass shooters

Posted by Jeff (ILoveCapitalism) at 12:25 pm - January 31, 2013.
Filed under: Second Amendment,Sex Difference

Via Andy at Ace and Wired, comes this report from DHS (New Jersey branch) on the commonalities of mass shooters. A few key ones:

  • Male between the ages of 17 and 48. (Fits with Dan’s earlier post.)
  • Usually no prior military service. (Goes against a stereotype favored by some on the Left, of the rampaging psycho ex-soldier.)
  • Usually acts alone. (Columbine was an exception.)
  • Usually uses a semi-automatic handgun. (So, the banning of so-called “assault rifles” would accomplish… ?)
  • Usually “no pattern or method to the selection of victims.”
  • But, nearly half of the shootings (13 of 29) were at a workplace and done by an employee or ex-employee. Warning signs would be a sudden increase in the employee’s: absenteeism, drug/alcohol use, poor hygiene, depression, withdrawal, resistance to change, mood swings, angry outbursts, suicidal comments, comments about “putting things in order”, comments about problems at home, comments empathizing with previous mass shooters and other criminals.

The shooters include whites and non-whites (I did not see any obvious racial pattern).

The report states that “Most of the active shooters took their own lives or were shot by responding police officers.” But it also indicates that it takes 10-15 minutes, typically, for police to get there; during which time people are sitting ducks.

The report is not useful for drawing conclusions about the role of armed civilians. First, it looks at only “the 29 deadliest” of mass shootings in recent years. Almost by definition, those would be the ones where an armed civilian did not quickly stop the shooter. (The ones where an armed civilian did, would tend to have lower casualty counts.) Second, the report simply does not discuss the role of armed civilians, one way or the other. Whereas we know that, in at least a few shootings, armed civilians slowed the shooter, or occasioned his thinking “game over” and taking his own life.

“Why is it that mass murderers are almost always young men?”

Posted by B. Daniel Blatt at 4:42 am - December 19, 2012.
Filed under: Sex Difference

In the conversations and articles I have seen in the wake of the horror in Connecticut, I am pleased that at least some people are breaking from the narrative the media are trying to create about the need to control guns and considering other issues behind last week’s shooting.

Blogging law professor  ask if the cultural War on Young Men contribute to mass murders.  He  excerpts 22 Stats That Prove That There Is Something Seriously Wrong With Young Men In America:

When are we finally going to admit that we have a very serious problem with this generation of young men in America? We have failed them so dramatically that it is hard to put it into words.

We have raised an entire generation of young males that don’t know how to be men, and many of them feel completely lost. Sometimes they feel so lost that they “snap” in very destructive ways. Adam Lanza and James Holmes are two names that come to mind.

Why is it that mass murderers are almost always young men?

(Jacobson via Instapundit.)  Yes, that is the real question.  One which should be asking.  Not just about mental illness, but about young, mentally unstable young men who commit mass murders and other atrocities.

Bear in mind as well that in many (but not all) hero myths, the young hero is frequently violent and often proud.  In short, some of the questions we’re asking aren’t new ones, just ones that we human beings need to keep considering.

Lesbians more likely to wed than gay men

“Men,” writes David K. Li in the New York Post, “have to be dragged kicking and screaming to the altar – whether they’re straight or gay.

While several studies have suggested that there are more gay men than lesbians, there have been more lesbian marriages than gay (male) ones by a margin of 3-to-2.  Since the Nutmeg State, for example, recognized same-sex marriages, “3,252 lesbian couples have wed . . . compared with just 2,053 gay guys.”

It does seem women seek to “nest” more than do men.  Guess some of our male fellows just prefer being the lone wolf.

(This is not the first time I’ve noted this phenomenon, but as I came across the (relatively recent) article while surfing the web, thought I would share it with y’all.)

The Left Hand of Darkness & the Human Tendency to Dualism

I am finally getting around to reading Ursula Le Guin’s science fiction classic, The Left Hand of Darkness, a book that over the years, numerous friends and acquaintances have encouraged me to read, largely because she explores a topic that has long fascinated me — sexual difference.*

About half-way through the book, I find it at once the most brilliant work of science fiction I have ever read  — and among the most frustrating.  Brilliant because of Le Guin’s insights into how human sexual difference has defined our culture — the book is set on a planet where the humanoids are hermaphroditic.  Frustrating because, at times, it seems less a story than a reflection on sexual difference via conversations with and character sketches of some leading figures on the Planet Gethen (also called Winter), the setting for this novel.

What really got me thinking (and there is much in this book to get one thinking) was this paragraph in the chapter on “The Question of Sex”:

Consider: There is no division of humanity into strong and weak halves, protective/protected, dominant/submissive, owner/chattel, active/passive.   In fact, the whole tendency to dualism that pervades human thinking may be found to be lessened, or changed, on Winter.

Perhaps, it is serendipitous that at the moment I read this book I am watching some lectures of Joseph Campbell on DVD.  That great scholar of myth is constantly talking about the images of difference which recur in mythological narratives and artwork (i.e,. the ying and the yang).  Carl Jung, one of Campbell’s mentors once wrote, “there is no energy unless there is a tension of opposites“.  Without sex difference, Gethenian culture would necessarily lack such tension. (more…)

Does “equality” rhetoric prevent gays from understanding our difference?

Posted by B. Daniel Blatt at 6:07 pm - March 2, 2011.
Filed under: Random Thoughts,Science,Sex Difference

In the course of researching my dissertation, as I sought to show that Achilles’s rage represented an archetypal aspect of male behavior, I read many scientific studies on sexual difference as well as books considering those studies in the context of current cultural debates.   In their book Brain Sex: The Real Difference Between Men and Women, geneticist Anne Moir and journalist David Jessel articulate the essence of this tension between sound science and politically-correct attitudes:

Recent decades have witnessed two contradictory processes; the development of scientific research into the differences between the sexes, and the political denial that such differences exist.

They write that if the reality of these differences make women angry,

. . . it is not because science has set at naught their hard won struggle towards equality; their wrath should rather be directed at those who have sought to misdirect and deny them of their very essence.  Many women in the last thirty or forty years have been brought up to believe that they are, or should be, ‘as good as the next man’, and in the process they have endured acute and unnecessary pain, frustration and disappointment.

Those passages came to mind earlier today when I was reading Christina Hoff Sommers’s, The WAR AGAINST BOYS: How Misguided Feminism Is Harming Our Young Men.  That feminist scholar offered an argument similar to that put forward by Moir and Jessel:

I would argue that turning a blind eye to real differences and dogmatically insisting that masculinity and femininity are “created by culture” pose even more serious dangers of their own.

Science has shown that differences between men and women derive not from social construction, but our very biology.   (more…)