Gay Patriot Header Image

Democrats Are Middle-Schoolers with Car Keys, Part LXXVII

Posted by V the K at 9:31 pm - March 19, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton thinks there should be Summer Fun Camps for Grown-Ups, because the Democrats are running out of free sh-t they can promise people.

“As I have gotten older, I have decided we really need camps for adults,” she said to laughter.
“I think we have a huge fun deficit in America. And we need to figure it out how to fill that fun deficit.”

Somehow, I really don’t find the notion of Hillary Clinton putting people in camps entirely implausible.

The “Hillary Was Right to Break the Law Because Republicans Are Mean” Defense

This should go well with Low Information Voters and the rest of the Democrat Identity Cult.

From Reptilian Overlord James Carville:

I suspect she didn’t want [Republican congressman] Louie Gohmert rifling through her emails, which seems to me to be a kind of reasonable position for someone to take.

From Democrat Shilling USA Today:

If your name is Clinton, and you’re a high-ranking public official in one of the most politically polarized moments in U.S. history, it would be impossibly naive not to assume that conflict would arise and that, even if you were cunningly circumspect in your e-mails, that something damaging would not slip through.

Palace Intrigues

Posted by V the K at 11:09 pm - March 12, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

There is some suggestion that the Obama White House was the instigator of the Hillary Clinton email scandal.

Obama and Jarrett are determined to deny Clinton a shot at the White House, Klein said.

Klein claimed that his White House sources — unnamed — told him that Clinton is now the target of “not one but six different investigations prompted by the White House.”

According to Klein’s State Department sources — also unnamed, “tons of documents [are] being wheeled through the corridors from Clinton’s old offices, and they’re going through these looking for problems on her expense account, on her dealings with foreign leaders,” Klein told Clayton Morris.

“All of this, I’m told, is prompted by Valerie Jarrett and the president, who do not want to see Hillary Clinton president of the United States.” Klein said, because the White House feels Clinton is too “centrist” to carry on the Obama legacy.

President Jarrett and Obama despise the Clintons, and would prefer that Obama by succeeded by Elizabeth Warren; who, like Obama was in 2007, is a radical left-wing one-term senator with a sketchy history. Not to mention, first Native American in the White House, who could serve her guests her famous Mayonnaise Crab Dip… a traditional food among the Plains Indians from whom she descends. She would also continue his legacy of socializing the economy through regulation, expanding the welfare underclass, and diminishing America’s standing in the world.

What Is Hillary’s Appeal, Anyway?

Posted by V the K at 8:36 pm - March 12, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

So, why is Hillary so appealing to so many people? She is a deeply unpleasant individual who leaves a trail of scandal wherever she goes. She has no real accomplishments, and her only credential for senator, Secretary of State, and president is that she’s Bill Clinton’s wife.

I try to get into the headspace of a Low Information Voter (the people who decide modern elections) to try and understand that place where “I get free stuff from the Government” meets “Historic First.” I don’t quite get why that arrow still points to Hillary; but I get the love for Liz Warren… who not only promises All The Free Things but would also be the first woman AND first Native American president; a point Republicans should make often.

I guess the idea of electing Hillary president just because she’s a woman, and because we haven’t had a woman president yet isn’t any more stupid than the idea of a President who denies Islamic Extremism exists negotiating a Nuke deal with a country run by Islamic Extremists.

This Is What Privilege Looks Like

Posted by V the K at 8:51 pm - March 11, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

And no one on the left has a problem with this.


Eight More Years of Democrats Hiding Behind Victim Status

Posted by V the K at 9:40 pm - March 10, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

So, we’re six years into this experience of having a black president no one is allowed to criticize because all criticism of a black president is racist. And now, the Democrats are preparing to follow up with ‘all criticism of a woman president is sexist.’

Very first question directed at a corrupt 67-year-old woman with a lifelong history of lying and unethical behavior who has lusted for the presidency of the United State since pre-school, and who is currently under suspicion for illegally using a private email account for official Government business, was as follows: “If you were a man, would all this fuss being made?” 

Instead of answering honestly, “Yes, of course, any time a politician with presidential ambitions is caught in a scandal it makes the news regardless of sex,” the Democrat front runner unleashed a horrible, Nichteinmenschlich cackle, and replied, “Well, I will — I will leave that to others to answer.”

Yes, and I am sure ‘others’… (cough… Rachel Maddow…) will be only too happy to answer on her behalf.



Thank you Sondra.

The gender pay gap: a myth?

Like others, I don’t care much about the Oscars. But I understand that Patricia Arquette made a stir on Sunday night, with her speech about “All women deserve equal pay”.

Let’s be clear: Women and men absolutely deserve equal pay, when we’re talking about equal work. That is: work of the same category and experience level, that either a woman or man could do, done with equally good results, under equally good (or bad) conditions.

The point of contention is: Are left-wing feminists really talking about that? Are they correct to claim a large gender gap exists? And are left-wing politicians correct, when they claim to be the answer?

Powerline reminds us of research from 2011 about the gender gap being a myth. And also how, on the surface at least, Hillary and Obama are hypocrites – for example, Hillary has paid her women 72 cents on the dollar (compared to her men). While left-wing hypocrisy is a delightfully inexhaustible subject, the first piece is most interesting for the points it makes.

Basically, research supports the idea that men *on average* tend to choose more dangerous (or less popular) careers; more stressful specializations within the same career; and more uncomfortable and undesirable work locations. And tend (on average) to work longer hours including more nights and weekends, and to take fewer lengthy mid-career breaks. When adjusted for such factors, the gender pay gap disappears – or even turns slightly in favor of women.

If you disagree, please feel free to post your facts/logic in the comments.

UPDATE: Peter Schiff makes a good point, that if he *could* pay a woman less for the same work, women would have a competitive advantage. He “would be an idiot to hire a man” – and would gladly hire nothing but women. He doesn’t, because it just isn’t so. (At least in financial services. Maybe, over in show business, George Clooney’s career will indeed age better than Patricia Arquette’s.)

UPDATE: At the same link, Schiff adds, “in adult entertainment [as opposed to Arquette/Hollywood] women are paid much more…this disparity has nothing to do with discrimination…The porn audience cares about the female stars…So pay rates reflect market forces…I wonder if at the next Adult Video News awards a male winner will demand equal pay during his acceptance speech?”

Hillary: When I Said Businesses Didn’t Create Jobs, I Meant Businesses Create Jobs

Posted by V the K at 10:56 pm - October 27, 2014.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

According to the Heiress Apparent, ““Don’t let anybody tell you that it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs” is actually “shorthand” for “Corporations and businesses create jobs.”

“Trickle down economics has failed. I short-handed this point the other day, so let me be absolutely clear about what I’ve been saying for a couple of decades,” she said. “Our economy grows when businesses and entrepreneurs create good-paying jobs here in America and workers and families are empowered to build from the bottom up and the middle out — not when we hand out tax breaks for corporations that outsource jobs or stash their profits overseas.”

Yeah, whatever, you old Communist hag.

I’m sorry. Was that uncivil?

Hillary Clinton’s Radical, Extremist Ideology

You have heard by now that, at a Democrat rally in Massachusetts, the woman Democrats wish to anoint as president in 2017 demonstrated her understanding of economics by saying this:

Don’t let anybody tell you it’s corporations and businesses create jobs.”

So, basically, any of you who have jobs in the private sector are technically unemployed according to the Democrats’ most favoritest politician. (The one who “misplaced” $6 Billion taxpayer dollars while running the Department of State, Oops.)

What you may not have heard is that statement is just one link in a rather long chain of HRC expressing her contempt for private enterprise and the free market, and supporting socialist collectivism. (Hat Tip: Oregon Muse)

1) “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.” – Hillary Clinton 6/29/2004
2) “It’s time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few… And to replace it with shared responsibility, for shared prosperity.”- Hillary Clinton 5/29/2007
3) “(We)…..can’t just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people.” – Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
4) “We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own … in order to create this common ground.” – Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
5) “I certainly think the free-market has failed.” – Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007

In the age of Obama and Elizabeth Warren (the hard-left Democrat Senator who supports a $22-an-hour minimum wage and lied about being an American Indian so she could become an Affirmative Action hire at Harvard), the Democrat Party is gradually coming out of the closet as full-bore socialists. The State may not technically own all businesses, but given the heavy regulation and blatant targeting of companies like Gibson Guitars and regulatory attacks like Operation Choke Point against legal gun dealers … it’s become an increasingly semantic distinction. Call it ‘Regulatory Socialism.’

Monica Lewinsky Blames the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy

Posted by V the K at 7:15 am - October 21, 2014.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

Monica Lewinsky — the woman true blue Democrats believe is the only woman Bill ever cheated on Hillary with — has returned from wherever Democrats have been hiding her for the last 16 years, and is sharing her wisdom with the world.

In 1998, as you can imagine, there was a media frenzy. Even though it was pre-Google, (that’s right, pre-Google). The World Wide Web (as we called it back then) was already a big part of life.

Overnight, I went from being a completely private figure to a publicly humiliated one. I was Patient Zero.

The first person to have their reputation completely destroyed worldwide via the Internet. There was no Facebook, Twitter or Instagram back then. But there were gossip, news and entertainment websites replete with comment sections and emails could be forwarded.

That’s right, it’s all the fault of the internet, Monica. And there is absolutely no one else to blame. Nope, no one at all. Absolutely no one who made any bad decisions that could have resulted in your … ahem… “reputation”… being destroyed.

Gawdam Internets, always  causing trouble for innocent women and old married dudes.


But where was Hillary in all this?

Leon Panetta, former top Clinton staffer and Obama CIA director, is out there serving the Clintons by taking shots at President Obama…errrr, excuse me, out there promoting his new book:

For Bill Clinton, history will remember that he “always kept fighting back” to get things done…“Whether it was Democrats or Republicans, you know, he found a way to be able to do some things, to be able to accomplish some things that were important.”

He makes a similar observation about Hillary Clinton, saying she would be a “great” president. “One thing about the Clintons is, they want to get it done,” he says, in words that draw an implicit contrast with Obama…

And Barack Obama’s legacy?

“We are at a point where I think the jury is still out,” Panetta says. “For the first four years, and the time I spent there, I thought he was a strong leader on security issues. … But these last two years I think he kind of lost his way.

“These last two years” – translation, since the indispensable, brilliant Hillary left – so no, nothing happening now is her fault.

But let’s get down to specifics, Mr. Panetta. How has Obama lost his way? From Politico:

Panetta’s criticisms of the Obama administration are similar to the criticisms former Defense Secretary Robert Gates laid out in his own memoir: that those inside the White House sometimes put politics first on matters of war and peace.

Panetta describes efforts to reach a deal with Iraq to allow U.S. troops to remain in the country in the runup to the December 2011 expiration of the status-of-forces agreement — a deal Obama has said he couldn’t achieve because Iraqi leaders wanted U.S. troops gone. “Privately, the various leadership factions in Iraq all confided that they wanted some U.S. forces to remain as a bulwark against sectarian violence,” Panetta writes…

“I privately and publicly advocated for a residual force that could provide training and security for Iraq’s military…But the president’s team at the White House pushed back…”

2011…isn’t that more like three years ago?

So, let’s see. Panetta, Gates, and the Joint Chiefs all pushed in 2011 for a residual U.S. force in Iraq, that would have prevented today’s crisis with ISIS. (Sorry for the rhyme.) They even did so publicly. Did Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton? Perhaps a little, but not very much. From Jennifer Rubin in June 2014:

Clinton’s failure to impress upon the president the importance of a significant force and to negotiate a deal with Iraq under whatever circumstances existed represents a key failure – one that has directly contributed to the rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and the collapse of the Iraqi military.

So for “PBS NewsHour” Clinton tried out a new tale: “Certainly when President Obama had to make the decision about what to do, he was deciding based on what the Bush administration had already determined, because they were the ones who said troops have to be out by the end of 2011.”

This is patently untrue. The Bush team had always intended that there be a follow-up to the SOFA [Status of Forces Agreement]…The game plan for the Bush team and the Obama team was to conclude a deal [to leave a residual force]; Clinton and her boss failed to do so.

For Hillary to claim that the Bushies planned on having all troops out by 2011 is itself a potshot at Obama. If true, it would mean that Obama hardly did anything to “end the war” – he only followed a Bush plan.

But what does all of this add up to? Well, Clinton Central has evidently decided that the way to get elected in 2016 is:

  1. Keep playing the “Blame Bush” card when possible. And if it isn’t possible,
  2. Blame Obama.

As always, we should expect the Clintons to tell a mixture of truth and falsehoods to get what they want, which is: Power.

Translating Hillary

Posted by V the K at 8:36 pm - September 6, 2014.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

What she said:

“Climate change is the most consequential, urgent, sweeping collection of challenges we face. The threat is real, and so is the opportunity… if we make the hard choices.”

What she meant:

Screw coal miners. I don’t need to win West Virginia or Kentucky to be elected president, so they can suck it. And those environmental “non-profits” have a lot more money to throw around than a bunch of dirt-kickers in coal country, and I’m a get me some o’ that!

Hillary’s Fashion Sense

Posted by V the K at 9:48 pm - July 30, 2014.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

How many school bus seats were skinned to make that overcoat?

Indisputably Accurate Bumper Sticker Provokes Leftist Outrage

Our counterparts on the left — who literally laugh off the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi — are in paroxyms of outrage over this bumper sticker.


Not to quibble, but apart from being Monica Lewinsky’s Ex-boyfriend’s wife, does Hillary have any other accomplishments to speak of? Has she achieved anything in her life that was not a direct consequence of being Monica Lewinsky’s Ex-boyfriend’s wife?

Hat Tip: Legal Insurrection


Who’s the Real Grifter?

Posted by V the K at 3:54 pm - July 6, 2014.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton,Sarah Palin

Of all the insults deranged leftists hurl at Sarah Palin, {“c*nt” “quitter” “pig” “world class idiot (and consumer of human feces)“} the one I have always found most baffling is “grifter.” The implication being that Palin is a con artist of some kind; that the money she has earned since being sued out of the Alaska governorship by vindictive leftists on phony, trumped-up ethics charges has somehow been earned illegitimately. That she has somehow swindled people out of the money she has made since leaving public office.

Yet, these same leftists hardly blink at all when Hillary Clinton is making speeches at universities at $200,000+ a pop, even as these same universities are constantly raising the costs of tuition and related student debt. And they accept, without question, Mrs. Clinton’s claim that the proceeds are all donated “to charity.” As it turns out, the “charity” is her own “Clinton Global Initiative,” from which she, her husband, and her daughter all draw hefty salaries and enjoy lavish, globe-trotting perks.

Seems like a pretty lucrative con to me. But none of those lefties would ever call Hillary a grifter; that would be sexist.

Hillary Says Her Nine-Figure Fortune Doesn’t Make Her “Well-Off”

Posted by V the K at 11:48 am - June 23, 2014.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

Only a Democrat could get away with this kind of nonsense:

“They don’t see me as part of the problem,” Clinton said of Americans who are upset about income inequality, adding, “Because we pay ordinary income tax, unlike a lot of people who are truly well off, not to name names; and we’ve done it through dint of hard work.”

Hillary and Bill sit on a fortune of over $1ooM. She gets paid $200,000 for a single speech (I guess that what she means by “hard work.”) She got an $8M advance for her “autobiography” (which coincided with the time she claimed to be “dead broke.”)

And yet, the press has not attacked her the way they attacked Mitt Romney for his wealth and success. The Left-Wing press isn’t tearing Hillary apart for being too wealthy to understand the problems of working Americans; not the way they tore apart Sarah Palin, who actually does come from a real, working-class background and made her own (considerably smaller than the Clinton’s) fortune.

To raise criticisms of Hillary far more legitimate than the left’s attacks on Sarah Palin would be sexist, I suppose.



Hillary: “We cannot let a minority of people… hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people.”

Posted by V the K at 9:52 pm - June 17, 2014.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

Unfortunately, she was referring to people who oppose gun control, not the Gaystapo.

Hillary Squirms on Gay Marriage Question

Posted by V the K at 6:21 pm - June 12, 2014.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

Hillary was asked a straightforward question: You used to oppose gay marriage, now you favor it. Did you change your mind on the issue, or was your previous position just a politically expedient calculation at a time when gay marriage was less popular?

The exchange is here.  Long story short, Hillary dodged the question, and then went off on the host: “I think you are trying to say that I used to be opposed and now I am in favor and I did it for political reasons. And that’s just flat wrong.

Some people can’t handle the truth very well.

Ace analyzes:

Hillary’s calculating, dishonest nature keeps her from answering this question straight — even if she lies about it straight.

She won’t say she changed her mind – because that would make her a Gay H8r at some point in the past.

She obviously won’t admit that she always had the same opinion and just lied about it.

She tries to have it both ways — she both always believed in gay marriage, but also didn’t lie when she said she didn’t.

I think what she really means is, “What difference does it make?”


Posted by V the K at 1:45 pm - June 12, 2014.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton


Actually had someone say to me that the problem with this country was that “old people are running it and screwing up everything,” as he professed support for a 68 year old woman for president.

Hillary Feels Your Pain, Middle America

Posted by V the K at 9:52 am - June 10, 2014.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton wants all of you middle class peckerwoods in flyover country whining about your lost jobs, declining income, and skyrocket food and energy prices under Obama that she can totes relate to your hardship.

Hillary Clinton, who recently raked in $5 million dollars in speaking fees in 15 months, recounted to Diane Sawyer the sad tale of her former destitution, telling her, “We came out of the White House not only dead broke but in debt.” According to Clinton, she and her husband, who has made over $100 million since leaving the White House, “struggled to, you know, piece together the resources for mortgages for houses, for Chelsea’s education, you know, it was not easy.”

So, you see, she is just like the coal miner who lost his job due to Obama’s EPA regulations. or the construction worker who’s been replaced by an illegal who lives in a house-trailer with thirty-five other illegals. Just like you, she left the White House with nothing to her name but an $8 Million book deal, a $200,000 annual pension, a $188,000 senator’s salary, and a multi-million dollar house in New York. And her other multi-million home in DC. But aside from that they had nothin’. Nothin’ I tell ya! Why, they were so poor, they actually had to steal furniture from the White House just to get by. That’s how bad it was. So, you see, middle America, Hillary knows what hardship is. So, stop your whining and vote for her already.