Gay Patriot Header Image

Huma Abedin Will Live in the White House with Hillary

Posted by V the K at 11:46 pm - July 8, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

So reports Page Six.

If the phone rings at 3 a.m. in the Hillary Clinton White House, the person answering reportedly will be Huma Abedin, her “body woman.”

“Huma’s influence is so pervasive, and Hillary’s dependence on her so total, that it is expected she will have her own bedroom upstairs in the White House,” a Clinton associate told OrbMagazine’s Richard Turley

.

And if the White House thing doesn’t work out, they can always open a dog grooming business.

The Case for President Hillary

Posted by V the K at 5:39 pm - June 16, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

An interesting article on how problematic the Hillary candidacy is for the Democrat Left. “There’s a poorly kept secret in the media and on the progressive Left heading into 2016: They don’t want Hillary Clinton.” Apparently, even someone as far left as Hillary Clinton isn’t nearly radical enough for the Obama base.

None of which matters. No one… let me allcap that… NO ONE is going to vote for Hillary based on qualifications, or even ideology. Even her supporters admit this.

47% of the country would vote for a sea sponge if it had a D next to its name. It also helps that Hillary and the LIV’s want to vote for another “historic first” “because it’s about time we had a woman president” and then go back to cooing over whatever Celebrity Culture has vomited up this week. Also, a substantial part of the Democrat base is insulated from the economic consequences of social Democratic rule on the basis of wealth, dependence on welfare, or employment in the government bureaucracy. The Democrat base has enough bread and circuses to keep it from having too much curiosity about the outside world, and no friggin’ clue about anything important that’s happening.

What Democrats actually believe...

What Democrats actually believe…

The “informed voters” of the Democrat Left and the Democrat center-left will line-up behind Hillary because even if she isn’t as radical as they would like, and even though she reeks of corruption like the smell of a house with 267 cats in it, they will decide that she will be a reliable enough caretaker of Obama’s legacy with the potential to appoint enough SCOTUS Justices to tip the balance and create a leftist court amenable to gun control and censorship of political speech.

Hillary Takes Money from Gay-Hating Church

The Clinton Global Initiative has taken between $1Million and $10Million from a church in Africa what hate The Gheys.

Hillary Clinton’s charity accepted a substantial donation from an anti-gay African church which has likened homosexuals to the Devil, Daily Mail Online can reveal.

The 2016 Presidential candidate took money for her sprawling health nonprofit from the Cameroon Baptist Convention whose official policy is that being gay ‘contradicts God’s purpose for human sexuality’.

The devout Christian organization has in the past compared being gay to committing incest and human trafficking. Its leaders have also railed against US attempts to promote gay rights in Cameroon

Is this a problem for any of you gay Democrat Hillary supporters out there? Or would this only be a problem if Rick Santorum, Ted Cruz, or Mike Huckabee had taken money from a gay-bashing church.

Hillary’s Vagenda: More Lawlessness

Posted by V the K at 6:31 pm - May 6, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

[Because the majority of Hillary supporters support her entirely or primarily because she is a woman, sort of. the list of things she intends to do in office will henceforth be referred to as ‘The Vagenda.’]

Recently, Hillary has assured that when she is president, the lawlessness of the Obama presidency will go into turbo mode.

The president’s lawless, unconstitutional amnesty decree will be expanded so that more illegal immigrants will become Democrat voters.

And she will end ‘mass incarceration’ presumably by ordering prisons to release thousands of criminals and cops and prosecutors to stop arresting criminals; who will then be registered to vote Democrat.

She is making a big play for the lawless #BlackLivesMatter voting bloc, the people who demand that police should be “tolerant of lawbreaking.” Considering that Hillary’s influence peddling would have landed her in Federal Prison if she weren’t a Democrat, she couldn’t agree more.

More Clinton Corruption That Doesn’t Matter Because the Left Are Mind-Numbed Robots and Parasites

Posted by V the K at 10:37 am - April 23, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

For those keeping score, here’s more of what the hundreds of millions of dollars that poured into the Clinton Family Global Initiative bought for them.

So, Mitt Romney made a fortune from investing in businesses and creating jobs, and that made him greedy and evil. The Clintons have made an equally large fortune peddling political influence, and they’re America’s saviors? #ThatDoesn’tSeemRight

But the left have already decided, it doesn’t matter how corrupt Bill and Hillary Clinton are.  The media and the leftist elites want a president with a uterus, and Hillary will do. And the Democrat 47% base cares about nothing as long as they get more free sh-t from the government; and Hillary is all about that.

get

Programming the Hillary Unit for Burrito Consumption

Posted by V the K at 1:58 pm - April 17, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

The actress playing Hillary is about forty years too young, but aside from that… purty funny.

YouTube Preview Image

Madame Hillary’s Accomplishments

Posted by V the K at 9:51 pm - April 12, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

Well, Hillary made official today what everyone has known since about 1993. Her on-line presidential announcement was delayed by technical problems; but you know how hard it is for elderly people to use the internet. She will be running a campaign based on the fresh, hot new premise that “Democrats are the party of working families, and Republicans favor the wealthy.” Gee, why didn’t anyone think of *that* before.

Anyway, there is a criticism out there among racist, sexist, cis-gendered, heteronormative right wing nutjobs that Hillary doesn’t have any actual accomplishments. Sure, she was a Senator, and Secretary of State… but both of those were solely because she was married to Bill Clinton; and it is said that in each of those positions, she accomplished Jack Squat.

I take issue with that. I can point to several accomplishments by our new distinguished Democrat front-runner.

Anyway, those are the accomplishments I could think of. What have you got?

Democrats Are Middle-Schoolers with Car Keys, Part LXXVII

Posted by V the K at 9:31 pm - March 19, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton thinks there should be Summer Fun Camps for Grown-Ups, because the Democrats are running out of free sh-t they can promise people.

“As I have gotten older, I have decided we really need camps for adults,” she said to laughter.
“I think we have a huge fun deficit in America. And we need to figure it out how to fill that fun deficit.”

Somehow, I really don’t find the notion of Hillary Clinton putting people in camps entirely implausible.

The “Hillary Was Right to Break the Law Because Republicans Are Mean” Defense

This should go well with Low Information Voters and the rest of the Democrat Identity Cult.

From Reptilian Overlord James Carville:

I suspect she didn’t want [Republican congressman] Louie Gohmert rifling through her emails, which seems to me to be a kind of reasonable position for someone to take.

From Democrat Shilling USA Today:

If your name is Clinton, and you’re a high-ranking public official in one of the most politically polarized moments in U.S. history, it would be impossibly naive not to assume that conflict would arise and that, even if you were cunningly circumspect in your e-mails, that something damaging would not slip through.

Palace Intrigues

Posted by V the K at 11:09 pm - March 12, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

There is some suggestion that the Obama White House was the instigator of the Hillary Clinton email scandal.

Obama and Jarrett are determined to deny Clinton a shot at the White House, Klein said.

Klein claimed that his White House sources — unnamed — told him that Clinton is now the target of “not one but six different investigations prompted by the White House.”

According to Klein’s State Department sources — also unnamed, “tons of documents [are] being wheeled through the corridors from Clinton’s old offices, and they’re going through these looking for problems on her expense account, on her dealings with foreign leaders,” Klein told Clayton Morris.

“All of this, I’m told, is prompted by Valerie Jarrett and the president, who do not want to see Hillary Clinton president of the United States.” Klein said, because the White House feels Clinton is too “centrist” to carry on the Obama legacy.

President Jarrett and Obama despise the Clintons, and would prefer that Obama by succeeded by Elizabeth Warren; who, like Obama was in 2007, is a radical left-wing one-term senator with a sketchy history. Not to mention, first Native American in the White House, who could serve her guests her famous Mayonnaise Crab Dip… a traditional food among the Plains Indians from whom she descends. She would also continue his legacy of socializing the economy through regulation, expanding the welfare underclass, and diminishing America’s standing in the world.

What Is Hillary’s Appeal, Anyway?

Posted by V the K at 8:36 pm - March 12, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

So, why is Hillary so appealing to so many people? She is a deeply unpleasant individual who leaves a trail of scandal wherever she goes. She has no real accomplishments, and her only credential for senator, Secretary of State, and president is that she’s Bill Clinton’s wife.

I try to get into the headspace of a Low Information Voter (the people who decide modern elections) to try and understand that place where “I get free stuff from the Government” meets “Historic First.” I don’t quite get why that arrow still points to Hillary; but I get the love for Liz Warren… who not only promises All The Free Things but would also be the first woman AND first Native American president; a point Republicans should make often.

I guess the idea of electing Hillary president just because she’s a woman, and because we haven’t had a woman president yet isn’t any more stupid than the idea of a President who denies Islamic Extremism exists negotiating a Nuke deal with a country run by Islamic Extremists.

This Is What Privilege Looks Like

Posted by V the K at 8:51 pm - March 11, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

And no one on the left has a problem with this.

10429424_916765991708854_2309361410695318082_n

Eight More Years of Democrats Hiding Behind Victim Status

Posted by V the K at 9:40 pm - March 10, 2015.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

So, we’re six years into this experience of having a black president no one is allowed to criticize because all criticism of a black president is racist. And now, the Democrats are preparing to follow up with ‘all criticism of a woman president is sexist.’

Very first question directed at a corrupt 67-year-old woman with a lifelong history of lying and unethical behavior who has lusted for the presidency of the United State since pre-school, and who is currently under suspicion for illegally using a private email account for official Government business, was as follows: “If you were a man, would all this fuss being made?” 

Instead of answering honestly, “Yes, of course, any time a politician with presidential ambitions is caught in a scandal it makes the news regardless of sex,” the Democrat front runner unleashed a horrible, Nichteinmenschlich cackle, and replied, “Well, I will — I will leave that to others to answer.”

Yes, and I am sure ‘others’… (cough… Rachel Maddow…) will be only too happy to answer on her behalf.

mad-hillary

 

Thank you Sondra.

The gender pay gap: a myth?

Like others, I don’t care much about the Oscars. But I understand that Patricia Arquette made a stir on Sunday night, with her speech about “All women deserve equal pay”.

Let’s be clear: Women and men absolutely deserve equal pay, when we’re talking about equal work. That is: work of the same category and experience level, that either a woman or man could do, done with equally good results, under equally good (or bad) conditions.

The point of contention is: Are left-wing feminists really talking about that? Are they correct to claim a large gender gap exists? And are left-wing politicians correct, when they claim to be the answer?

Powerline reminds us of research from 2011 about the gender gap being a myth. And also how, on the surface at least, Hillary and Obama are hypocrites – for example, Hillary has paid her women 72 cents on the dollar (compared to her men). While left-wing hypocrisy is a delightfully inexhaustible subject, the first piece is most interesting for the points it makes.

Basically, research supports the idea that men *on average* tend to choose more dangerous (or less popular) careers; more stressful specializations within the same career; and more uncomfortable and undesirable work locations. And tend (on average) to work longer hours including more nights and weekends, and to take fewer lengthy mid-career breaks. When adjusted for such factors, the gender pay gap disappears – or even turns slightly in favor of women.

If you disagree, please feel free to post your facts/logic in the comments.

UPDATE: Peter Schiff makes a good point, that if he *could* pay a woman less for the same work, women would have a competitive advantage. He “would be an idiot to hire a man” – and would gladly hire nothing but women. He doesn’t, because it just isn’t so. (At least in financial services. Maybe, over in show business, George Clooney’s career will indeed age better than Patricia Arquette’s.)

UPDATE: At the same link, Schiff adds, “in adult entertainment [as opposed to Arquette/Hollywood] women are paid much more…this disparity has nothing to do with discrimination…The porn audience cares about the female stars…So pay rates reflect market forces…I wonder if at the next Adult Video News awards a male winner will demand equal pay during his acceptance speech?”

Hillary: When I Said Businesses Didn’t Create Jobs, I Meant Businesses Create Jobs

Posted by V the K at 10:56 pm - October 27, 2014.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

According to the Heiress Apparent, ““Don’t let anybody tell you that it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs” is actually “shorthand” for “Corporations and businesses create jobs.”

“Trickle down economics has failed. I short-handed this point the other day, so let me be absolutely clear about what I’ve been saying for a couple of decades,” she said. “Our economy grows when businesses and entrepreneurs create good-paying jobs here in America and workers and families are empowered to build from the bottom up and the middle out — not when we hand out tax breaks for corporations that outsource jobs or stash their profits overseas.”

Yeah, whatever, you old Communist hag.

I’m sorry. Was that uncivil?

Hillary Clinton’s Radical, Extremist Ideology

You have heard by now that, at a Democrat rally in Massachusetts, the woman Democrats wish to anoint as president in 2017 demonstrated her understanding of economics by saying this:

Don’t let anybody tell you it’s corporations and businesses create jobs.”

So, basically, any of you who have jobs in the private sector are technically unemployed according to the Democrats’ most favoritest politician. (The one who “misplaced” $6 Billion taxpayer dollars while running the Department of State, Oops.)

What you may not have heard is that statement is just one link in a rather long chain of HRC expressing her contempt for private enterprise and the free market, and supporting socialist collectivism. (Hat Tip: Oregon Muse)

1) “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.” – Hillary Clinton 6/29/2004
2) “It’s time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few… And to replace it with shared responsibility, for shared prosperity.”- Hillary Clinton 5/29/2007
3) “(We)…..can’t just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people.” – Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
4) “We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own … in order to create this common ground.” – Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
5) “I certainly think the free-market has failed.” – Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007

In the age of Obama and Elizabeth Warren (the hard-left Democrat Senator who supports a $22-an-hour minimum wage and lied about being an American Indian so she could become an Affirmative Action hire at Harvard), the Democrat Party is gradually coming out of the closet as full-bore socialists. The State may not technically own all businesses, but given the heavy regulation and blatant targeting of companies like Gibson Guitars and regulatory attacks like Operation Choke Point against legal gun dealers … it’s become an increasingly semantic distinction. Call it ‘Regulatory Socialism.’

Monica Lewinsky Blames the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy

Posted by V the K at 7:15 am - October 21, 2014.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

Monica Lewinsky — the woman true blue Democrats believe is the only woman Bill ever cheated on Hillary with — has returned from wherever Democrats have been hiding her for the last 16 years, and is sharing her wisdom with the world.

In 1998, as you can imagine, there was a media frenzy. Even though it was pre-Google, (that’s right, pre-Google). The World Wide Web (as we called it back then) was already a big part of life.

Overnight, I went from being a completely private figure to a publicly humiliated one. I was Patient Zero.

The first person to have their reputation completely destroyed worldwide via the Internet. There was no Facebook, Twitter or Instagram back then. But there were gossip, news and entertainment websites replete with comment sections and emails could be forwarded.

That’s right, it’s all the fault of the internet, Monica. And there is absolutely no one else to blame. Nope, no one at all. Absolutely no one who made any bad decisions that could have resulted in your … ahem… “reputation”… being destroyed.

Gawdam Internets, always  causing trouble for innocent women and old married dudes.

victim_card

But where was Hillary in all this?

Leon Panetta, former top Clinton staffer and Obama CIA director, is out there serving the Clintons by taking shots at President Obama…errrr, excuse me, out there promoting his new book:

For Bill Clinton, history will remember that he “always kept fighting back” to get things done…“Whether it was Democrats or Republicans, you know, he found a way to be able to do some things, to be able to accomplish some things that were important.”

He makes a similar observation about Hillary Clinton, saying she would be a “great” president. “One thing about the Clintons is, they want to get it done,” he says, in words that draw an implicit contrast with Obama…

And Barack Obama’s legacy?

“We are at a point where I think the jury is still out,” Panetta says. “For the first four years, and the time I spent there, I thought he was a strong leader on security issues. … But these last two years I think he kind of lost his way.

“These last two years” – translation, since the indispensable, brilliant Hillary left – so no, nothing happening now is her fault.

But let’s get down to specifics, Mr. Panetta. How has Obama lost his way? From Politico:

Panetta’s criticisms of the Obama administration are similar to the criticisms former Defense Secretary Robert Gates laid out in his own memoir: that those inside the White House sometimes put politics first on matters of war and peace.

Panetta describes efforts to reach a deal with Iraq to allow U.S. troops to remain in the country in the runup to the December 2011 expiration of the status-of-forces agreement — a deal Obama has said he couldn’t achieve because Iraqi leaders wanted U.S. troops gone. “Privately, the various leadership factions in Iraq all confided that they wanted some U.S. forces to remain as a bulwark against sectarian violence,” Panetta writes…

“I privately and publicly advocated for a residual force that could provide training and security for Iraq’s military…But the president’s team at the White House pushed back…”

2011…isn’t that more like three years ago?

So, let’s see. Panetta, Gates, and the Joint Chiefs all pushed in 2011 for a residual U.S. force in Iraq, that would have prevented today’s crisis with ISIS. (Sorry for the rhyme.) They even did so publicly. Did Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton? Perhaps a little, but not very much. From Jennifer Rubin in June 2014:

Clinton’s failure to impress upon the president the importance of a significant force and to negotiate a deal with Iraq under whatever circumstances existed represents a key failure – one that has directly contributed to the rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and the collapse of the Iraqi military.

So for “PBS NewsHour” Clinton tried out a new tale: “Certainly when President Obama had to make the decision about what to do, he was deciding based on what the Bush administration had already determined, because they were the ones who said troops have to be out by the end of 2011.”

This is patently untrue. The Bush team had always intended that there be a follow-up to the SOFA [Status of Forces Agreement]…The game plan for the Bush team and the Obama team was to conclude a deal [to leave a residual force]; Clinton and her boss failed to do so.

For Hillary to claim that the Bushies planned on having all troops out by 2011 is itself a potshot at Obama. If true, it would mean that Obama hardly did anything to “end the war” – he only followed a Bush plan.

But what does all of this add up to? Well, Clinton Central has evidently decided that the way to get elected in 2016 is:

  1. Keep playing the “Blame Bush” card when possible. And if it isn’t possible,
  2. Blame Obama.

As always, we should expect the Clintons to tell a mixture of truth and falsehoods to get what they want, which is: Power.

Translating Hillary

Posted by V the K at 8:36 pm - September 6, 2014.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

What she said:

“Climate change is the most consequential, urgent, sweeping collection of challenges we face. The threat is real, and so is the opportunity… if we make the hard choices.”

What she meant:

Screw coal miners. I don’t need to win West Virginia or Kentucky to be elected president, so they can suck it. And those environmental “non-profits” have a lot more money to throw around than a bunch of dirt-kickers in coal country, and I’m a get me some o’ that!

Hillary’s Fashion Sense

Posted by V the K at 9:48 pm - July 30, 2014.
Filed under: Hillary Clinton

How many school bus seats were skinned to make that overcoat?