Some rather clever boys have invented a nail polish that will change color in the presence of rape drugs. [I refuse to call them "date rape" drugs. Drugging someone so you can have sex with them is just plain rape. "Date rape" is apparently a term used when a woman consents to sex with a guy, and then some days or weeks later changes her mind when he doesn't call.] It’s intended to protect women against sexual assault.
Good idea, right? You would think woman would embrace this form of protection.
Women, yes. Feminists, no. In fact, feminists are even more angry than their resting state of angry over this invention.
“I don’t want to f[***]ing test my drink when I’m at the bar,” said Rebecca Nagle, one of the co-directors of an activist group called FORCE: Upsetting Rape Culture. “That’s not the world I want to live in.”
Ah. So you see, all their “rape culture” rhetoric isn’t about preventing rape, it’s about “changing the world.”
Specifically, it’s about changing the world so that men have no power or status in it. (What did you think they meant by “Smash the Patriarchy?”) “Rape Culture” is just the latest cudgel. “Do you oppose the radical agenda of the feminist left? Well, you obviously support Rape Culture!”) Imagine how the Duke lacrosse case would have worked out if the feminists had had their way?
To a militant feminist “rapist” is just a synonym for “man.”
Discuss this incendiary opinion.
The Westboro Baptist Street Theater Troupe … who have been successfully trolling the entire country with their antics for decades … have decided to drop by Ferguson MO, because apparently God hates cops and Black People, too.
In a country not run by moonbats, the brutal beheading of an American citizen would warrant a more significant response than Obama’s usual hashtag diplomacy. (#BringBackOurHeads)
In a country not ruled by moonbats, you would not find a state governor openly siding with the savages that are looting and burning one of his cities, demanding that a policeman be prosecuted before an investigation has taken place, and, oh, by the way, allowing the accomplice of a thug to walk free.
In a country not run by moonbats, thugs and rabble-rousers would not be permitted to block the portage of a ship engaged in legitimate lawful commerce.
In a country not run by moonbats, the media might find more important stories to cover than the name of a football team.
Not only are California Public Schools venerating the Cult of Obama, they are also embracing a Sex Ed curriculum that goes well beyond “How to not get pregnant or an STI.”
According to KPIX-TV, the book that will be used this fall in the Fremont Unified School District includes topics like masturbation, bondage, orgasms, the use of vibrators and how to buy and use condoms. It includes pictures and diagrams that parents think are too explicit for their teens.
There is something just plain creepy about adults who want to teach teens about sex to that level of detail.
Let’s face it, if you invited a 14 year old over to your house and taught her about masturbation, bondage, orgasms and the use of vibrators, you’d go to prison.
Insane. (Naturally, the demonstration is in Chicago, the city that gave us the SCOAMF.)
U.S. policy fueled the sectarian strife that helped create ISIS and will send the message that adding more U.S. weaponry to the mix brings only more death and destruction, further embittering the peoples of the region towards the West.
In justifying the bombing, Obama last night said that the U.S. can’t “turn a blind eye to genocide.” In the light of his steadfast support for the month-long Israeli slaughter of Gaza – resupplying munitions to the Israeli Defense Force mid-battle – his statement perhaps surpasses even the most hypocritical statements of George W. Bush.
These people obviously inhabit some alternative reality where genocide is okay as long as Mohammedans are committing it and Obama staunchly supports Israel.
From Heather Has Two Mommies to Why Mommy Is a Democrat, the left has recognized the power of children’s books for indoctrination and propaganda. They seem to be a little miffed that someone else is using the technique to promote a non-leftist cost. (The Washington Post story actually states that only left-wing social causes are suitable for children’s books.)
The Internet is up in arms about a children’s book that claims to teach the importance of gun rights and protecting the second amendment. The book, “My Parents Open Carry,” follows 13-year-old Brenna Strong and her parents as they run errands together — with their firearm tagging along.
And by “The Internet” they mead “Lefty nutjob websites inhabited by hippies, Democrats, and other whining losers.”
Now available with its companion volume, “My Parents Are Paranoid Yokels.” – Huffington Post Commenter
The good liberals at Raw Story quickly revert to gay-baiting. (Funny how when lefties want to demean someone, they call them gay.)
Personally, based on the gay porn ‘stache and Max Factor eye-lights, Dad may be open about carrying his gun, but I think there’s something he’s not being open about. … Maybe gay Dad or valium mom has to pop someone’s brain cap off with their 9 mm.
And, of course, what list would be complete without a completely deranged, unhinged rant from DailyKos.
The “Left Behind” series and “My Parents Open Carry” are creating a nation of bullies with guns and I do not believe in that hateful fundamentalist biblical God who is featured in that series, or that dreadful Children’s book. I will protect my belief system and my freedom to live the way I choose to live with violence if it comes to that reality in the United States of America. That fundamentalist “Left Behind” and “My Parents Open Carry” God sucks in my opinion, and he does not rule over my life nor will he make law over my freedom as an American Citizen!
[Hat Tip: Commenter Steve]
What’s the deal with Queers for Palestine? What leads gay people to side with Islamist regimes that embrace an ideology that calls for the extermination of gays and the brutal oppression of women; up to and including officially sanctioning rape?
One of the dumbest epithets hurled at conservative gays is that to be gay and conservative is akin to being a Jewish and Nazi. Yet, the Queers for Palestine are literally cheering on the Islamists who are quite open about their desire to exterminate not just Jews and gays, but also Christians, secularists, and even Muslims who aren’t Muslim enough for their tastes.
The Queers for Palestine claim that Israeli support for gay rights is just a scam.
There’s even a conspiracy theory that Israel’s support for gay rights exists only to make the countries around it look bad. It’s called “pinkwashing,” and it’s an odd lie put about by brainless boobies who, despite the fact that if they ever actually went to the Middle East with their rainbow flags and terrible music they’d be lynched, support terrorists in Gaza no matter what against the evil Jewish state. Bitch, please.
Would any gay person really want to live in a country run by Hamas or any of its ideological brethren?
On a related note: Zionism works.
Yesterday on the floor of the US House of Representatives, Republican Congressman Tom Marino correctly observed that when Democrats (under Speaker Nancy Pelosi) held the House, the Senate, and the presidency they did nothing to address the issue of illegal immigration. Ms. Pelosi was so incensed at this accurate statement that she chased Congressman Marino around the House Chamber, screeching and calling him names (or at least, adjectives). [Video at link]
So, the Democrats in the Senate are led by Harry Reid, a very elderly man who appears to be succumbing to the onset of senile dementia with his endless deranged rants against the Koch Brothers and passing clouds. And in the House, the Democrats are led by an elderly deranged woman who chases people around the chamber screeching at them and calling them names.
The Roman Senate under Caligula had more decorum.
You can always spot the crazy ones, it’s in their eyes.
Some obviously self-hating gheys in Seattle participated in a “die-in” to show their hatred for the only country in the Middle East where Gay Rights are protected, and their support for a murderous anti-gay Islamist terror regime.
Makes total sense, right?
The Left-Wing Newsrag ‘The Guardian’ publishes a piece in which the sensitive, enlightened, progressive author describes her heartbreaking heartache at the levels of intolerance and racism displayed by Thomas the Tank Engine.
In the episode “Tickled Pink”, poor vain James, is ordered by Topham Hat to get a new coat of paint. But while James has only had an undercoat of pink slathered on, Topham Hatt interrupts and demands that James go pick up Hatt’s granddaughter and deliver her and her friends to a birthday party right now.
James is mortified that he has to travel while pink and proceeds to hide from all the other trains along the way. When he’s caught, the other trains – including Thomas – viciously laugh and mock him.
But once James gets back on the rails and picks up Granddaughter Hatt and her friends, all seemingly ends well because the girls love pink.
And then she really loses it. [To get the full effect, imagine Kathy Bates shrieking the next passage at James Caan in Misery.)
Well guess what? It’s not OK. You think a little boy watching Thomas is going to file away the lesson that pink is OK for boys? No, what kids remember is that James was laughed at, cruelly, over and over again, because he looked different and was clad in a “girly” pink color.
The author also thinks that the way diesel trains on Thomas the Tank Engine spew black smoke is clearly racist.
Meanwhile, the Palestinians (who are, of course, supported by The Guardian, the author of the piece, and all “good” leftists,) have children’s shows that openly advocate Jew-killing.
A young girl on Al-Aqsa TV’s “Tomorrow’s Pioneers” told a child host that she wants to grow up to be a policeman so she “can shoot Jews,” according to a translation of the May 2 episode by Palestinian Media Watch.
The host then excitedly asked: “All of them?”
“Yes,” the young girl replied, to which the child host responded, “good.”
Mark Morford was the “journalist” who offered, in 2008, that Obama was “The Lightworker.”
“Many spiritually advanced people I know identify Obama as a Lightworker, that rare kind of attuned being who has the ability to lead us not merely to new foreign policies or health care plans or whatnot, but who can actually help usher in a new way of being on the planet, of relating and connecting and engaging with this bizarre earthly experiment.”
Much to the GOP’s bitter revulsion, it turns out a calm, intellectual black man really can run an entire country – certainly far better than an inarticulate Texas bumbler, and even in the face of what is easily the most obstructionist, hateful, acidic and often downright racist Congress in modern memory. Quite an achievement, really.
And all he has to do to reach this assessment is ignore all of the scandals, ignore the president’s pattern of childish behavior, ignore the people who have died because of the incompetence of the VA, proclaim Obamacare a success despite none of its promises being fulfilled, ignore that Obama’s foreign policy has allowed an even-m0re-radical-than Al Qaeda terrorist group to take power over vast swaths of the Middle East, ignore the soaring debt, ignore that income for working class families is down, ignore the collapsing border situation, and ignore the rapidly rising food and energy prices the Government isn’t talking about.
If you put all that aside, Obama’s presidency rises to the level of almost mediocre.
Republicans in the Senate blocked a measure that would have undone the Hobby Lobby ruling and forced businesses to provide free abortificant drugs to female employees.
And the lefties threw epic hissy-fits when denied their Free Stuff From the Government; like two year olds in the toy aisle at Wal-Mart, but with less dignity and more f-words.
Why should anyone be forced to pay for someone else’s contraceptives? Because things liberals want (free contraception, marijuana) become mandatory Government entitlements. Things liberals hate (guns, tobacco) become illegal. That’s the way it works in a Democracy. There are no “rights,” just opinions enforced by power.
An increasingly vocal and open group of prominent British Academics is claiming that paedophilia is a perfectly normal and natural thing.
“Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” said the presentation. “At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.”
The presentation in question was presented at an academic conference at Cambridge University in the UK, where other topics included: “Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,” and “Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.”
And — like every other horror of the current ear — this has its roots in the sexual liberation movement of the 1970′s.
With the Pill, the legalisation of homosexuality and shrinking taboos against premarital sex, the Seventies was an era of quite sudden sexual emancipation. Many liberals, of course, saw through PIE’s cynical rhetoric of “child lib”. But to others on the Left, sex by or with children was just another repressive boundary to be swept away – and some of the most important backing came from academia. [Emphasis added]
Hey, “Love is Love,” right?
IMHO, things are pretty messed up when it’s okay to openly discuss normalizing pedophilia in an academic setting; but you can get fired for expressing the wrong opinion on gay marriage.
The left has dutifully responded with unhinged, deranged hysteria over the 5-4 Supreme Court Decision that Hobby Lobby was not require to provide abortion-inducing drugs to its female employees. Hillary Clinton, Senator Elizabeth Warren, DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, celebrity nincompoop Seth Rogan, George Takei, Michael Moore, Lena Dunham, Sandra Fluke, — all the Thought Leaders on the left agree — that the Supreme Court has just outlawed contraception, is allowing companies to “deny women access to health care.” As though companies that don’t buy women groceries are denying them access to food.
And then there is this take — I am not making this up — from this NY Daily News columnist on the effects of the Hobby Lobby decision.
Noncompliant females will be stripped of their burqas and stoned to death.
Like the Facebook friend who claimed that because of the Hobby Lobby decision, stores could refuse to sell groceries to unwed single mothers. Idiocy.
Hillary Clinton knows she’s lying when she claims that this decision denies women access to contraceptives. So does Elizabeth Warren. So does Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.
But they also know that the Democrat base are low-information voters who get their news from The Daily Show and from the Morning Zoo Crews on FM radio will believe it when they hear that Hobby Lobby is going to force women into Burqas and stone them to death. Democrat strategists know Obama won by convincing low-information voters that Mitt Romney was going to outlaw tampons. And that’s why they pull this kind of stuff. And get away with it because they own the media and know they will not be fact-checked, or ridiculed for making preposterous assertions. And that’s why the Democrat Politician-Celebrity-Media Axis of Evil is promoting the lie.
They ring the bell (“War on Women”) and their LIV’s drool (vote Democrat).
Remember how Ronald Reagan rounded up all the gay people and put them in concentration camps?
Michael Stipe does, apparently.
“In the early Eighties, as a 22-year-old queer man living during the Reagan-Bush administration, I was afraid to get tested for HIV for fear of quarantine, the threat of internment camps and having my basic civil rights stripped away,” he said.
The deranged paranoia of the gay left is something to behold; as are the politicians who enable it for political gain. And notice how Rolling Stone and the LOGO network act like his paranoia was completely reasonable and justified his choice not to take basic measures to protect his health and the health of others.
A very progressive woman traveled to Haiti to prove she was “down with the struggle,” and ended up getting raped by Haitian man who was unimpressed by her pleas for comradeship against the capitalist oppressors.
“I pleaded with him to honor my commitment to Haiti, to him as a brother in the mutual struggle for an end to our common oppression, but to no avail. He didn’t care.”
She probably doesn’t want to hear this, but if a woman wants to deter a rapist, a loaded Glock is probably going to be more effective than left-wing rhetorical pablum.
Then, after it was over, she blamed … not the savage who raped her ... but the White Male Patriarchy.
Women are not the source of their oppression; oppressive policies and the as-yet unaddressed white patriarchy which still dominates the global stage are,” she explained.
That’s a novel defense. “I didn’t rape you, it was the as-yet unaddressed white patriarchy which still dominates the global stage.” Would this defense work for murder? Aaron Hernandez’s defense team would very much like to know.
I have heard it said that liberalism is a mental disorder, and I am not sure that’s true. But it does seem like mentally disordered people tend to become liberals.
The left in general does not care for beauty pageants because they make unattractive women feel bad. But Miss Nevada’s answer to a question about rape really set off the feminist left, who claimed her answer promoted “Rape Culture.”
The lefties absolutely, positively hate the idea that women should defend themselves. They recommend… I am not making this up … state imposed indoctrination of all men to deprogram them from being the rapists the feminist left claims all men are.
I imagine it would work kind of like what that one guy in Clockwork Orange went through.
Update: A supposedly grown-up woman editor at Cosmo responded to the notion of women defending themselves using the same adjective six-year-old children use to describe lima beans: “Icky.”
Leftist Progessives are simultaneously the biggest libertines and the most obnoxious prudes in the world.
On the one hand, the left stands for unlimited promiscuous sex without consequences: Abortion on demand, government-mandated free contraceptives, slut walks, access to Pron in public libraries, and… of course… facilitating the ability of minors to have as much sex as they want without parental knowledge.
On the other hand, left-wing Political Correctness demands that the Captain of the Navy’s Blue Angels have his career destroyed because some of the men under his command made some lewd comments about women and some Family-Guy caliber Ghey Jokes. A reprimand, I can understand, if the remarks were directed at a fellow serviceman while on-duty, but… Seriously?
So, basically, on the left, one is encouraged to pursue sexual gratification without any responsibility or consequences. But on the other hand, joking about sex, or acknowledging… in the immortal words of Bernie Mac … that “man is a sexual being’… that can destroy your career.
Honestly, those people are nuts.
Or maybe I’m the one who’s nuts for thinking that standards of discretion and privacy should be consistent with one’s sexual mores.
When you tire of politics, there is always horror:
The Florida mental health counselor accused of murdering her lesbian lover’s two-year-old daughter earlier this week wrote a note claiming a sermon inspired the killing, it has been revealed.
Kimberly Lucas, 40, is accused of drowning her former girlfriend Jacquelyn Jamason’s two-year-old daughter Elliana and attempting to kill her 10-year-old son Ethan.
Lucas wrote in the note that a sermon by Metropolitan Community Church Pastor Lea Brown ‘really, really touched” her the day before the revenge killing carried out in response to Jamason ending their relationship.
Both of the women were mental health counselors. Ponder that.
Feminists are blaming the Men’s Rights Movement for the murders committed by psycho whackjob Elliot Rodger in San Diego; primarily on the basis that wedging Rodger into the “War on Women” narrative is useful to the feminist left’s agenda; and admitting that he was a deranged sociopath is not. A typical, albeit mild, response is from the Washington Post’s Caitlin Dewey.
Rodger’s misogynistic rhetoric seems undeniably influenced by the manosphere, and his manifesto has kicked off a loud debate about how modern society treats women, online and off. If there was ever a time to take a closer look at online misogyny, it’s now.
I am reminded of a Biblical passage relating to motes and beams. The fact is that before there was a Man’s Movement, there was a women’s movement. And the Women’s Movement has produced some extremely hate-filled feminist rhetoric that is widely embraced by the progressive left.
- “I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honourable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.” – Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor
- “To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he’s a machine, a walking dildo.” -– Valerie Solanas
- “I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig.” — Andrea Dworkin
- “Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear” — Susan Brownmiller
- “The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men.” — Sharon Stone
- “The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.” — Sally Miller Gearhart
- “All men are rapists and that’s all they are” — Marilyn French
And there is more. Much, much more. It’s not limited to a few websites at the back of the internet; deranged feminist misandry permeates academia, politics, and pop culture. Entire cable networks like Lifetime and Oxygen are devoted to spreading the message that men are terrible. Womyn’s studies programs exist at every major university. A feminist professor or politician can express the idea that the world would be better off without men and be praised as a visionary, but let a man say the same thing about women and he’s branded a hater and bigot.
Is it a surprise that after decades of feminist man-bashing that some men would start to push back?
Progressive leftists want there to be two sets of rules; one set that lets them silence and stigmatize those whom they disagree with, and another to let them express their hatred in any vile terms they choose.