Gay Patriot Header Image

SJW’s Ruin SciFi Writing Awards

One of the lesser fronts in the culture wars is in the area of science fiction writing. But even here, the keyboard warriors of the social justice left carry on their tireless War on Joy.

The facts of this case are the same as in gaming and in every other industry that social justice warriors touch. They do not care about art forms. They do not care about science fiction. They do not even particularly care about talent. They care about enriching and ennobling themselves and their friends, and pushing a twisted, discredited, divisive brand of authoritarian politics.

The skirmish is between the Sad Puppies and the Social Justice Warriors. The Sad Puppies are group of science fiction writers and fans who believe that works should be judged on their quality and entertainment value, not whether they serve The Agenda. Their opposite numbers are entrenched writers and editors who believe that the value of a literary work is based solely on A. NOT being written by a white male and B. serving to advance the left’s social agenda.

The Sad Puppies were successful in organizing their nominations to SciFi writing’s Hugo Awards such that, for the first time in many years, a number of nominees were based on actual literary merit and not identity politics.

The SJW’s would have none of that, such that they decided that No Awards were preferable to awards that might be won by one of the Pale Penis People. They organized a campaign advising their brownshirts that if there were no works in a category with correct politics, they should all vote “No Award.”

The results of Hugo Awards voting were ugly and unprecedented. 5 major categories including best novella and best short story went with “no award.” To put that in perspective, in the previous 60 years of Hugo Awards, a total of 5 “no awards” have been given previously.

Puppies supporters say that slew of “no award” wins this year can at least partially be attributed to the fact that SJW votes were concentrated on that choice, while Puppies votes were distributed between as many as four deserving authors.

Maybe this topic isn’t as important, in the long run, as Obama’s Deal with Iran that lets the Mullahs inspect their own facilities for compliance, or the domination of public education by doctrinaire Marxists, but it is a reminder that be it a Lesbian Luau, a Christian-owned bakery, or the SciFi aisle at Barnes & Noble; there is no respite from the bullying and propaganda of the social left.

People Against Goodness and Normalcy Still Bitter About Chik-Fil-A

Posted by V the K at 11:05 pm - August 21, 2015.
Filed under: Liberal Intolerance

The leftist fun-suckers at the Denver city council are looking to block Chik-Fil-A from opening a franchise at the Denver International Airport because they disagree with the beliefs of some of the chain’s founders.

Some members of the Denver City Council want to punish Chick-fil-A for its owner’s Christian beliefs about marriage. They are contemplating blocking the very popular chicken sandwich joint from setting up shop in the Denver Airport.

Besides the owner’s views on same-sex marriage, some members of the Council raised concerns about the “religion-influenced operation, which includes keeping all franchises closed on Sunday,” according to the Denver Post.

It’s kind of a sour-leftist twofer. They get to revel in that smug exclusion of alternative viewpoints the left calls “tolerance,” and they get to deny people the pleasure of eating a chicken sandwich and waffle fries.

Meanwhile, the Christians who were attacked  by the Lesbian Gay Bullying Totalitarians (LGBT) and nearly lost their business for declining the opportunity to bake a cake for a lesbian wedding, in an act of charity and forgiveness, sent cakes to 10 gay rights groups with messages of love.

What do you bet at least 9 of those cakes were tossed in the dumpster amid a string of profanity that would shame a sailor?

NY Times Editorial: Gays Who Step Off the Democrat Plantation Should Be Punished

Posted by V the K at 7:05 pm - April 27, 2015.
Filed under: Civil Discourse,Liberal Intolerance

An editorial by the NYT’s Abe Rosenthal thinks the two gay hoteliers who met with Ted Cruz deserved the attacks and harassment they got for insolently reaching out to the other side in a civil manner.

It is, however, equally hard to understand what on earth they thought they were doing. There is not a Republican on the national scene who supports the right of Americans to marry whomever they choose. Very few of them truly believe in protecting the civil rights of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender Americans at all. And Mr. Cruz dwells on the far side of right-wing crazy on most issues, including this one.

The two gay dudes have since repented for being civil to a Republican, and promised it will not happen again.

And the Unhinged Hate Parade Marches On…

Posted by V the K at 5:09 pm - April 25, 2015.
Filed under: Leftist Nutjobs,Liberal Intolerance

The Left is really wailing and gnashing its teeth over Bruce Jenner not being on the Democrat Plantation like every good little tranny is supposed to be. Below are representative comments pulled from left-wing comment strings. These aren’t isolated; they are indicative of the majority of comments on these sites on this topic, as any perusal of the links will show. (See what I did there, lefty trolls? I provided actual links to prove the validity of my assertions. Try it sometime.)

From Left-Wing Site Raw Story:

“You should not be surprised when a person who waited until they were a half-assed Kardashian reality star to decide they wanted go from an old man to an old lady and live the last 15ish years or so of their life without a penis (I mean really, he’s been rich since he was 20 and most Trans folk will tell you they KNEW when they were children and with all that money he waits until after 65?) And he waits until he’s a reality star laughing stock and ready to receive his social security to “become an senior citizen old lady”? I mean you EXPECT a person like this to be “Of sound mind”? and wonder why they would play the equivalent of a Jew joining the Nazi party? Yeah it’s all so shocking…not…lol”

From Left-Wing Site: Huffington Post

She, he or whatever will fit right in with those F’Up logcabin Republicans that love to be screwed by their favorite party.

From Left-Wing Site: Crooks and Liars

You goddamn uncle tom trans-woman.
I have a friend who’s gay and republican, I think the reason is because he’s full of anger and self loathing from an abusive childhood. I think that could be it, they go to the party that’ll feed their anger and hatred. Not the one that has good policy

Also, Classy Leftist Comedian Bill Maher took the cheap and easy shot.

“The big interview is tonight. I think it’s going on right now! Please, no spoilers. I TiVo’d it—which is ironic, because sometimes my TiVo also cuts things off.”

But I think the one who rolled five sixes in “Lefty Derangement Yahtzee” is this comment from Reddit:

So Bruce Jenner, a transgendered person, is a member of a political party that keeps trying to pass laws that would make it legal for people to kill homosexual or transgendered people as abominations to God.

He is subsequently challenged to provide a source; he can’t, of course. However, other commenters join in to say, “He doesn’t need a source, everybody knows it.”

The Tolerant Left Responds to Bruce Jenner’s Republican Status

Posted by V the K at 10:14 am - April 25, 2015.
Filed under: Liberal Intolerance

From Weasel Zips:



Sooper Mexican has a lot more.

SJW’s: Support for the Second Amendment is “Homophobic”

Posted by V the K at 8:31 pm - March 4, 2015.
Filed under: Academia,Liberal Intolerance

A student at Kalamazoo College wanted to get the Student Government to engage in a debate about empowering students to exercise their Second Amendment and Human Right of Self-Defense via the Right to Bear Arms on Campus. The progressive fascists who run the student government were having none of it.

Members accused Ross of “racism,” “homophobia,” and “sexism,” and some even went so far as to accuse Ross’s pro-Second Amendment position of desiring to kill students in black hoodies.

“For anyone on this Commission to represent you would be to represent racism, sexism, homophobia,” Brown said. “And clearly you just spent two hours of your time listening that this body would like to be an anti-racist institution. So what you seek should not come from here. At least not this body with these people.”

The Open-Faced Stalinism of the American Left is all but impossible to hide now.

The Closed and Locked Minds of the Left

Posted by V the K at 8:28 am - February 26, 2015.
Filed under: Liberal Intolerance

Feminist K.T. Bradford wants people to stop reading anything written by white, heterosexual males.

Every time I tried to get through a magazine, I would come across stories that I didn’t enjoy or that I actively hated or that offended me so much I rage-quit the issue. Go through enough of that, and you start to resist the idea of reading at all.

Then I thought: What if I only read stories by a certain type of author? Instead of reading everything, I would only look at stories by women or people of color or LGBT writers. Essentially: no straight, cis, white males.

Cutting that one demographic out of my reading list greatly improved my enjoyment of reading short stories…

Sidenote: Is it just me, or does it seem like until 1 or 2 years ago, the word ‘cis’ didn’t really exist; but now it’s everywhere throughout the social justice world as their epithet of choice to demean and ‘otherize’ normal people?

Hat Tip: Sondra K

Professor Punished for Gay Marriage Thoughtcrime

Posted by V the K at 11:29 am - December 18, 2014.
Filed under: Academia,Liberal Intolerance

Background: A philosophy professor at Wisconsin’s Marquette University (annual tuition and fees: $24,000) told her class that gay marriage was an unacceptable debate topic in her class because there was only one correct opinion on gay marriage, and expressing any other opinion was hate speech.

A political science professor by the name of John McAdams got wind of this and blogged about it. In the spirit of academic freedom and tolerance… the University suspended him and barred him from campus.

A tenured Marquette University political science professor has been officially barred from campus and suspended for writing a blog post criticizing a philosophy instructor who refused to allow a conservative student to debate the topic of gay marriage in her classroom.

The suspended professor, John McAdams, received a letter on Tuesday from Richard Holz, the dean of the Wisconsin school, informing him of his suspension. […]

According to McAdams, Abbate told the student that topics like gay marriage would not be discussed because gay students might find it offensive and because, she said, “you don’t have a right in this class to make homophobic comments.”

Expressing an opinion contrary to the opinion of a leftist is now officially defined as harassment.

Lefty wet dream: Using the power of government to crush dissent

Posted by Jeff (ILoveCapitalism) at 7:27 pm - November 5, 2014.
Filed under: Civil Discourse,Liberal Intolerance,Liberalism Run Amok

Recent years have seen a disquieting affair in American politics. It seems that a certain local official – a conservative, partisan Republican – decided that he hated a leading Democrat in his State. The Democrat’s policies threatened the official’s wife’s job. The official and his wife joined in public protests against the policies, but not merely that. The official went on to use his office to harass a bunch of liberals with over-investigation.

This Republican official only ever found some minor offenses where the leading Democrat was not at all implicated – but it didn’t stop him from continually widening his secret investigation of the hated Democrat, his staff, and many of the State’s liberal advocacy groups.

The investigation included police raids on liberal staffers’ homes which frightened their families, seized their equipment and forced large legal bills upon them, with the victims kept under gag orders (where they couldn’t protest the raids). Plus the convenient (and probably illegal) leaking of their documents. It worked: One side of the political advocacy in that State was hindered, if not paralyzed.

Does that sound more like Nazi Germany than America? Yes, it does. By the way, the persecuted “Democrat” was Scott Walker, the Republican governor of Wisconsin. The persecuted “liberal” advocacy groups were conservative supporters of his policies. And the “Republican” doing all that persecuting was John Chisholm (D), Milwaukee’s pro-union District Attorney.

George Will and William A. Jacobson have written about this matter. The legal fallout is still happening (and will doubtless go to Wisconsin’s Supreme Court). Thus far, the fallout includes both federal and State judges who have been outraged by the sheer one-sidedness and/or groundlessness of many of Chisholm’s actions.

Since Walker just won re-election by seven points, we know that Chisholm’s tactics didn’t work – this time. But, regardless of who won, Chisholm has undermined the legitimacy of American government. Walker’s opponent, Mary Burke, has done all she could to keep Walker under a cloud for the mere fact of Chisholm investigating him. And if Burke had won, she would now be under a cloud for having won illegitimately, by exploiting governmental suppression of her opponents’ voices.

I’m sure that some honest lefties remain in this world, who are outraged by Chisholm’s actions. But many other lefties will find it A-OK. Using the power of the State to crush dissent against leftism: it’s what some of them dream of. After all, it’s what Lois Lerner apparently tried to do (when she had the IRS target conservatives), and it’s what many lefties abroad have practiced for generations.

UPDATE: Outrageous ‘John Doe’ prosecution of Scott Walker supporters in Wisconsin ends. Along the way, WI’s Government Accountability Board admitted that the investigations were legally “indefensible”. And yet…they happened. Heads ought to roll. Will they? At least some of the victims are pursuing a federal civil rights lawsuit against Chisholm.

What Does This Tell You About the American Left?

Atheist blowhard/CableTV talking head Bill Maher attacked American troops as cowards and praised the 9/11 hijackers for their courage. The American Left supported him.

Bill Maher makes a career of attacking Christians especially Roman Catholics; the American Left supports him.

Bill Maher attacks Sarah Palin as a “c-nt” and refers to her son Trig as a “Retard.” The American Left really, really, really supports him.

Bill Maher criticizes Islam … suddenly, the American Left doesn’t like him any more and his comments are considered “Hate Speech.”

What lesson can we take from this?

Wedding Cake Fascists Claim a Scalp

Posted by V the K at 8:31 pm - September 30, 2014.
Filed under: Liberal Intolerance

Glenn Beck interviews a couple who lost their bakery business because of the selfish intolerance of LGBTQWXYZ activists.

GLENN: You guys lost your bakery. Tell me the story quickly in your own words of what happened.

AARON: Well, you know, marriage was defined by the State of Oregon’s Constitution as between a man and a woman up until I believe it was May of this year. Our belief that marriage is between a man and a woman. And the Bible coincides with that.

You know, we — we — you know, we had a small bakery. We did wedding cakes. Birthday cakes. All sorts of cakes.
In January 2013, we had a gal come in and asked us to basically create a piece of artwork for something the Bible clearly states is, you know, not the definition of marriage. So through all this, we’ve ended up losing our shop due to some really mean-spirited tactics that was used by — I wouldn’t say all the LGBT community. Because we met quite a few of them that are really nice, but there are some that really wanted us to close our doors. And through everything that’s been done. You know, they’ve harassed the wedding vendors that we did business with. They protested. Boycotted. In fact, there’s still an only boycott on Facebook going on. And I get it. They killed the wedding end of our business and we did have to close our doors last September. And, you know, I went to back to work driving trucks. So…

A business destroyed, a life’s work ruined… keep high-fiving each other, gay leftists.

Never Missing an Opportunity to be Jerks

The founder of Chik-Fil-A (a.k.a. “H8 Chicken”) passed away this weekend, and news of his passing was received by the miserable left with their usual level of class and maturity.

More here, if you feel the need to have your accurate stereotypes about leftists reinforced.

More Fascism from the Left

There is a GoFundMe page for contributions to the legal defense fund for policeman Darren Wilson, who either 1.) Shot down an innocent little black child who was just minding his own business out of sheer hate, or 2.) Shot a violent, aggressive 300 lb black man in self-defense after being assaulted, or 3.) Something in-between.

Barack Obama’s Justice Department, the Governor of Missouri, the MFM and the Left have all made up their minds that Number 1 is what happened. To the left, a trial at this point is just a formality; the mob has made their intentions clear and the mob must be satiated.

Therefore the left, since they know what is best for everyone, is demanding that GoFundMe take down the legal defense fund for Darren Wilson. Because — much like Christians who do not want to participate in gay weddings — his rights are forfeit to the will of the mob.

Hate Is the Fuel of the Left, Says Former Leftist

Posted by V the K at 8:06 am - July 27, 2014.
Filed under: Liberal Intolerance

Writing in the American Thinker, former hardcore Communist Danusha Goska provides “Ten Reasons I Am No Longer a Leftist.” It should come as no surprise that the No. 1 reason is the left’s deranged hatred.

Given that the left prides itself on being the liberator of women, homosexuals, and on being “sex positive,” one of the weirder and most obvious aspects of left-wing hate is how often, and how virulently, it is expressed in terms that are misogynist, homophobic, and in the distinctive anti-sex voice of a sexually frustrated high-school misfit. Haters are aware enough of how uncool it would be to use a slur like “fag,” so they sprinkle their discourse with terms indicating anal rape like “butt hurt.” Leftists taunt right-wingers as “tea baggers.” The implication is that the target of their slur is either a woman or a gay man being orally penetrated by a man, and is, therefore, inferior, and despicable.

San Francisco Leftists and German Neo-Nazis Find Common Ground

What could bring San Francisco Progressive Leftists and German Neo-Nazi skinheads together in harmonious unity? Why, Jew-hatred, of course. (And also authoritarian fascist socialism, but mostly Jew-hatred.)

In San Francisco (CIty Motto: “More exposed wangs than a whole season of Game of Thrones”), that bastion of progressive leftism, protesters turned out to oppose the only state in the Middle East that recognizes gay rights and support a regime where the only debate about gay rights  is whether they have the right to be thrown off high buildings or crushed under rocks.

And in Berlin, a combined anti-Jew protest organized by Mohammedans and German Neo-Nazis erupted in periodic chants of “Gas the Jews! Gas the Jews!

I guess these groups have to unite in order to destroy Jews and Christians; because Jews and Christians are so intolerant.


First, Everything Was Rape, Now, Everything Is Child Pornography

Twice in the last couple of weeks, leftists have compared something Conservatives believe in to being tantamount to supporting child pornography.

First, windbag New York Senator Chuck Schumer compared Texas Senator Ted Cruz’s support of the First Amendment to support for Child Pornography.

“Are you against anti-child pornography laws?” Schumer asked of Cruz, who was not present in the chamber at the time. “Is he against anti-child pornography laws? Is he an absolutist?” Schumer continued.

And of course, the left-wing media took their cue, as Comedy Central’s Jon Stewart decided to compare support for the Second Amendment and support for the Washington Redskins to support for Child Pornography.

And this all makes perfect sense to the left. If you think political speech should not be regulated by Congress, you must support child rape. If you support a Constitutional, Human Right of self-defense, you must support child rape. If you support

It’s a strategy that has served the left perfectly well so far. Are you opposed to Government-run health care? You must be a racist who hates blacks. Do you think voters should have to show ID to protect the integrity of the vote? You must be a racist who hates blacks. Do you think people should pay for their own contraception? You, sir, are practically a rapist.

And these idiotic ad hominems work. Good Lord, we have a stupid, stupid electorate.

Is the Men’s Rights Movement a Reaction to Deranged Feminist Misandry?

Posted by V the K at 9:58 am - May 30, 2014.
Filed under: Leftist Nutjobs,Liberal Intolerance



Feminists are blaming the Men’s Rights Movement for the murders committed by psycho whackjob Elliot Rodger in San Diego; primarily on the basis that wedging Rodger into the “War on Women” narrative is useful to the feminist left’s agenda; and admitting that he was a deranged sociopath is not. A typical, albeit mild, response is from the Washington Post’s Caitlin Dewey.

Rodger’s misogynistic rhetoric seems undeniably influenced by the manosphere, and his manifesto has kicked off a loud debate about how modern society treats women, online and off. If there was ever a time to take a closer look at online misogyny, it’s now.

I am reminded of a Biblical passage relating to motes and beams. The fact is that before there was a Man’s Movement, there was a women’s movement. And the Women’s Movement has produced some extremely hate-filled feminist rhetoric that is widely embraced by the progressive left.

  • “I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honourable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.”  – Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor
  • “To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he’s a machine, a walking dildo.”  -– Valerie Solanas
  • “I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig.” — Andrea Dworkin
  • “Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear” — Susan Brownmiller
  • “The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men.” — Sharon Stone
  • “The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.” — Sally Miller Gearhart
  • “All men are rapists and that’s all they are” — Marilyn French

And there is more. Much, much more. It’s not limited to a few websites at the back of the internet; deranged feminist misandry permeates academia, politics, and pop culture. Entire cable networks like Lifetime and Oxygen are devoted to spreading the message that men are terrible. Womyn’s studies programs exist at every major university. A feminist professor or politician can express the idea that the world would be better off without men and be praised as a visionary, but let a man say the same thing about women and he’s branded a hater and bigot.

Is it a surprise that after decades of feminist man-bashing that some men would start to push back?

Progressive leftists want there to be two sets of rules; one set that lets them silence and stigmatize those whom they disagree with, and another to let them express their hatred in any vile terms they choose.

Gay Marriage Extremists Launch Intimidation Campaign Against Pro-Gay Marriage Professor

Douglas Laycock is a law professor at the University of Virginia, a supporter of gay marriage, but also a supporter of religious liberty. Therefore, he is now the target of an intimidation and harassment campaign from the intolerant gay left.

An outfit called GetEQUAL (led by its co-director Heather Cronk) has launched a national e-mail campaign attacking Laycock for his role in shoring up the legal arguments of those who support what it calls “religious bigotry.”

GetEQUAL has also recruited a University of Virginia law student (Greg Lewis) and an alum (Stephanie Montenegro) to send an open letter to Laycock asking him to consider the “real-world consequences that [his] work is having.” And they have submitted a Freedom of Information Act request seeking e-mails between Laycock and various right-wing and religious liberty groups.

Laycock has apparently committed the unforgivable Thoughtcrime of valuing religious liberty and freedom over the oh-so-delicate feelings of … I’m just going to say it… pansies. (Not used as a pejorative against their sexuality, but against their mewling, whiny, complete lack of emotional strength.)

I think it would be really constructive for him to hear how his work is being used to hurt the LGBTQ community. I don’t think he has any ill intent. I think he’s very thoughtful and moderate, and willing to hear both sides. But I think that everyone really has a lot to learn.

The Gay Leftist Thought Police are just echoing the anti-freedom of conscience attitude of Washington Post Columnist Johnathan Capehart.

[T]olerance, no, is not – it should not be a two-way street. It’s a one-way street. You cannot say to someone that who you are is wrong, an abomination, is horrible, get a room, and all of those other things that people said about Michael Sam, and not be forced — not forced, but not be made to understand that what you’re saying and what you’re doing is wrong.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech… except when gay people’s feelings are hurt.”- The 1st Amendment as construed in the Age of Obama.

Two More Victims of the Left’s Intolerance

Two upstate New York Radio hosts were fired today for disagreeing with the City of Rochester’s decision to pay for elective genital mutilation surgery.

Entercom Rochester on Thursday announced the firings of Kimberly Ray and Barry Beck from WBZA, calling their comments “hateful” and saying they don’t represent the station.

Ray referred to someone seeking gender reassignment surgery as “a nut job.” Beck equated the issue to having the city pay for breast enhancement or liposuction for a mentally ill woman.

It’s baffling to any sensible person why debt-ridden cities should be paying for elective surgery anyway.

On the other hand, leftist clown Ed Schultz is quitting radio.

More Intolerance from the Gay Left Thought Police

As I warned after the scalping of Brendan Eich (the Mozilla Guy), the Gay Left Thought Police are only getting more obnoxious.  Now, they have decided that affiliating with the Boy Scouts makes you unfit for public service.

California is proposing to ban members of the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) from serving as judges because the Boy Scouts do not allow gay troop leaders, The Daily Caller has learned.

In a move with major legal implications, The California Supreme Court Advisory Committee on The Code of Judicial Ethics has proposed to classify the Boy Scouts as practicing “invidious discrimination” against gays, which would end the group’s exemption to anti-discriminatory ethics rules and would prohibit judges from being affiliated with the group.

Remember when Gay Rights Activists objected to people being punished for what they did in their private lives? Seems like ancient history.