Gay Patriot Header Image

The Left’s Response to Terror in One Stupid Tweet

Posted by V the K at 10:37 am - June 5, 2017.
Filed under: Liberals

Yes, this is really what the left thinks the answer to Islamic Supremacist terror is. Remember that “I’d Like to Teach the World to Sing” horsecrap I meantioned earlier, well…


The left thinks everything they needed to know they learned in kindergarten reading Dr. Seuss. That’s not true. You were supposed to learn more stuff after that.

Jodi Picoult (I never heard of her either) is a novelist with 14 million books in print. Her books seem to combine trashy romance with dysfunctional family dynamics. So… chick lit, basically.

Why leftie men often look like cucks

I missed this last week, but here it is now. Study: Physically Weak Men More Likely To Be Socialists.

An academic study from researchers at Brunel University London assessed 171 men, looking at their height, weight, overall physical strength and bicep circumference, along with their views on redistribution of wealth and income inequality. The study, published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, ​found that weaker men were more likely to favor socialist policies than stronger men.

Brunel University’s Michael Price believes this may be a product of evolutionary psychology. “This is about our Stone Age brains, in a modern society,” said Dr. Price. “Our minds evolved in environments where strength was a big determinant of success. If you find yourself in a body not threatened by other males, if you feel you can win competitions for status, then maybe you start thinking inequality is pretty good.”

So, physical “haves” feel less threatened and enjoy inequality. In other words, they’re dumb jock bullies. That’s one interpretation. But it’s undermined by Brunel’s own evidence:

“When Dr Price factored in time spent in the gym some, but not all, of the link disappeared,” notes The Times, suggesting there may be something to men with capitalistic views hitting the gym.

[ILC stares at his shoelaces, wonders if he should cough] That strikes me as more truthful.

  • Those who go to the gym, tend to be stronger.
  • And they tend to understand the importance of health and strength in daily life: not only in appearing impressive to people, but in actually having more energy, being able to move more easily, having a reliable daily feeling of accomplishment and positive discipline, etc.
  • And they tend to understand accountability for your own results. (Physical training teaches nothing, if not that.)
  • From there, and at the risk of over-generalizing, they often drift into common-sense libertarian-conservative views, emphasizing personal responsibility.
  • The process can also work in reverse: if you believe in personal responsibility, you may find yourself going “Hey, why don’t I hit the gym / get strong?”

At least that’s been my experience. I know some leftie gym buffs – again, you can’t over-generalize – but I live in a super-lefty area. (And the few who like MSNBC for real are always either women or weak, older men.) The percentage rate of being libertarian-conservative seems, to me, a bit higher among gym buffs than the general population. And the link is: philosophy of personal responsibility.

If you’d like to learn about strength training, a good place to start is www.startingstrength.com. (No affiliation.) They emphasize perfecting your “form” or technique to prevent injury. And that strength training is something for all people, of all ages. The leader, Mark Rippetoe, is sort of a gruff, dogmatic, ex-power-lifter – and I *think* he’s libertarian-minded, or at least anti-Hillary.

Do Hollywood Writers Know Any Actual Christians?

On a recent episode of Law and Order: SVU (which I was amazed to learn is still in production), the storyline concerned… I am not making this up… a Christian church that encourages teenagers to rape other teenagers to keep them from turning gay.

SVU’s writers saved their coup de grace for the final minutes of the episode. In those last moments, the audience learns that Lucas himself is a closeted homosexual, and the priest told him to have sex with Ann as penance for his own homoerotic thoughts.

Yeah, because Christian ministers *always* encourage teenagers to engage in premarital sex to ward off Teh Ghey.

It’s like everything Hollywood knows about Christianity comes from The Handmaids Tale: which is nothing but a paranoid fantasy of what the world would be like if Christians acted like Muslims.

Them and Us

Posted by V the K at 11:59 am - March 9, 2017.
Filed under: Liberals

C6cpdSEU4AAfY1a

“Nazi” is the New “Racist”

Posted by V the K at 10:25 pm - February 2, 2017.
Filed under: Leftist Nutjobs,Liberals

A sad and disappointing number of leftists have decided that the violence, vandalism, and arson committed by “Anti-Fascist” protesters in Berkeley last night was justified because Milo Yiannopoulos is a “Nazi,” and anything… *anything* … done in the name of fighting “Nazism” is justified.

As Milo has never advocated genocide, political violence against opponents, or the control of all industrial assets by the state on behalf of German workers… he does not fit the commonly accepted definition of “Nazi.” But as I am reminded constantly, “literally” now means “figuratively;” “absolutely” is an acceptable affirmation; the Oxford comma is dead, and “Nazi” now means “someone a leftist hates on the basis of their ideas.”

It used to be that if you disagreed with the left, they called you a “racist.” Now, they call you a Nazi. Coincidentally, the decision to label all opponents as “Nazis” comes only a week after the left decided it’s “OK to Punch Nazis.”

By the way, no one was arrested for the violence at Berkeley last night. So, the violent leftists now know that they can act out with impunity.

Update:  Left-Wing Columbia U. Professor (and Friend of Obama) Rashid Khalidi says that the Obama White House is “infested” with Joos.  But it’s OK, he’s not a ‘Nazi,’ he’s a Mohammedan.

Trump Derangement Syndrome Cripples Brave Woman

Strong independent woman finds herself emotionally crippled and unable to form a relationship… because Trump was elected.

I’ve lost the desire to attempt the courtship phase. The future is uncertain. I am not the optimistic person I was on the morning of Nov. 8, wearing a T-shirt with “Nasty Woman” written inside a red heart. It makes me want to cry thinking of that. Of seeing my oldest in the shirt I bought her in Washington, D.C., that says “Future President.”

There is no room for dating in this place of grief. Dating means hope. I’ve lost that hope in seeing the words “President-elect Trump.”

This is not the Onion.

Many of the comments agree, this woman is a wreck and any man she isn’t dating should feel relieved.

Another conspicuous display of emotional extortion in the Left’s ongoing theatrical production of “You Did This To Me.”

Have ‘Daily Show’ Politics Worn Out Their Welcome?

All I know is my gut says “Maybe.” 

This year will be remembered for its toxic fluff. Provocateurs and dime-store Howard Beales such as Seth Meyers, John Oliver, Lena Dunham and Andy Richter have demonstrated zero political efficacy. If anything, we’ll never know how much their smugness ostracized potential allies and inflamed the opposition’s base. No one — even the undereducated and marginalized — enjoys being condescended to. And yet, part of the Democratic strategy was to talk down to the citizens of America or to shame them into not voting for Trump. This sort of satire was arguably successful earlier in Jon Stewart’s run on The Daily Show, but it was fresh at the time. It had teeth and seemed to matter. But that formula has been rinsed.

The approach needs to change because it no longer works. It wasn’t clever enough and it underestimated the opposition. Even after taking a gut-wrenching loss on Nov. 8, many outlets and rogue social media celebrities have doubled down on their coverage of pop culture/reality crossover content, whimsical post mortems and open letters.

The most damning of these unintentionally hilarious postelection missives is the Lena Dunham’s Lenny Letter obituary of HRC’s political career, in which Hillary is described as an infallible deity and no mere corporeal form but, instead, “light itself.” That’s not all. The first graph ends with, “She will be the finest world leader our galaxy has ever seen.” But this isn’t Clickhole. It’s the marrow of liberal confusion and hysteria.

The fictional Leslie Knope of Parks and Recreation wrote a bewildering open letter (is there any other kind) the day after the election in which she pulled out some PG invective, calling Trump “a giant fart monster.” That’s a perfect example of the type of doughy, undercooked humor Parks and Rec coasted on for more than half a decade.

The Rainbow Coalition

Posted by V the K at 6:06 am - December 1, 2016.
Filed under: Liberals

The leading contenders for Chairhumanoid of the Democrat National Committee are as follows:

Personally, I’m rooting for Keith Ellison. But I think it’s the gay dude who best embodies the true spirit of the modern Democrat Party.

In 2007, as Buckley was running for chair of the state Democratic Party, video surfaced on YouTube showing him making sexually explicit comments and unzipping his pants on camera. “Would you like me to (kcuf) you hard?” he says into the camera.

Tyranny of the Mentally Ill

Posted by V the K at 1:05 pm - November 29, 2016.
Filed under: Liberals

Oh, Good Lord: OSU Diversity Officer Scolds People Sharing Pic Of Dead Terrorist, People Should “Think Of His Pain”, “Black Lives Matter”

screen-shot-2016-11-29-at-10_23_21-am

Leftist Priorities

Posted by V the K at 2:57 pm - November 21, 2016.
Filed under: Liberals

Left-Wing Icon Stephen Colbert lost his two brothers and fathers in an airplane crash.  But he says that Hillary losing the election was harder on him.

(more…)

The Bubble

Posted by V the K at 10:29 am - November 20, 2016.
Filed under: Liberals

Wow, even the thick-headed leftists at SNL seem to be getting it. The benefits of a Trump presidency are already happening. I think my favorite moment is at about 1:36.

YouTube Preview Image

Milo Triggers the Left Again

Posted by V the K at 12:26 pm - September 21, 2016.
Filed under: Liberals

Seriously, Milo’s mere existence triggers the left.

Alt right provocateur and Breitbart tech editor Milo Yiannopoulos angered the furry community yesterday by posting a drawing to Facebook that someone made of Milo as a snow leopard.

So, this led to furries tweeting… well, based on the examples shown, the tweets from furries were a lot less nasty than the typical SJW response to Milo expressing his opinion. IOW, I didn’t see any explicit death threats.

I figure ‘Furry Rights’ will be the next trendy thing after middle-aged white women get bored with trannies. That or paedophiles.

Update and Bump: Old white leftist hag throws tantrum at Milo appearance, gets told to GTFO (H/T Peter H.) The left really can’t handle it that a bottom twink is the hero of the alt-right.

screen-shot-2016-09-16-at-10-58-22-am

The Only Good Part About This Election: Watching Leftists Lose Control of Their Faculties

Finding things to be happy about in this election is rare. One of the few sunny spots is watching left-wingers become completely unhinged, especially as Hillary’s poll-numbers start to tank. (The Hillary campaign is looking like the cockpit in an episode of ‘Mayday’ about the time the automated cockpit voice is yelling “Pull up! Pull up!”)  The left is trying to rescue Hillary by throwing one faux outrage after another against the wall in hopes of finding something that sticks.

Today, there was something about Trump’s adult offspring that was supposed to be bad, but all I saw of it was a crawl on CNN “Trump’s kids have turbulent night” or something. But, then they moved to trying to reignite the birther outrage, but that kind of totally backfired on them. (The media are suckers for the birther thing, and Trump played them like a golden fiddle, perhaps procured in Georgia during a contest with some guy with horns and a cape.)

So, later on they decided to try and gin up faux outrage by claiming… I am not making this up… that Trump called for Hillary’s assassination.  What he said was that since Hillary is such a fan of Australian-style gun control, maybe she should disarm her Secret Service detail. Now, even a leftist Democrat operatives knows that he was just using hyperbole to make a point, but that didn’t stop them from pretending that this was a call for an assassination and demanding that the Secret Service lock Trump away.

The left knows that their voters are highly emotional, poorly informed, and can be manipulated if they can just find the right stimuli; like in 2012 when they convinced highly emotional, poorly informed feminist voters that Mitt Romney was going to outlaw tampons.  Hillary’s “basket of deplorables” remark was part of this strategy. It was a message to highly emotional, poorly informed voters that might not like her very much that people that they hate (“Racists! And Sexists! And Xenophobes! Oh, My!”) would be happy if Trump won. And what she was saying was, “Isn’t making people you don’t like unhappy more important than my history of corruption and pathological inability to tell the truth?”

They’re going to keep flinging stuff until they find something that works.

In the meantime, they are just going totally bat-guano looney-tunes.

(more…)

Left-Wingers

Posted by V the K at 8:00 am - September 15, 2016.
Filed under: Liberals

Pretty much every word of this is true.

Many left-wing people have a very nice life, but they like to be sad. To help with this, they choose to be sad for other people. Sometimes these people are far away and sometimes they are nearby, but different to them.

In the olden days, left-wing people tried to make it better for other people. Nowadays, they like to protect them by being offended when a working-class person person doesn’t behave properly.

Left-wing like to help other people by being offended on their behalf. This means that the other people can carry on with their lives and the left-wing people do all the work. This isn’t really fair, but the left-wing people seem to carry on doing it, so they must enjoy it. Despite all this effort left-wing people are still very sad.

We haven’t seen much of our pet left-wingers in the comments lately; are they at a candlelight vigil for Hillary, or too busy harassing Christian bake shop owners?

Peek into the Mind of a Berkeley Leftist

Posted by V the K at 9:33 pm - September 14, 2016.
Filed under: Liberals

A homeless perverted social parasite with a criminal record for indecent exposure was arrested for masturbating next to a children’s playground in Berkeley, CA.

I am a bit surprised that that sort of thing is still illegal in Berkeley, but, hey, well done Berkeley Police.

A commenter by the handle Iceland_1622 takes issue with the arrest, and all the sex negativity.

“Children are not* going to perish and fall down dead from seeing male genitals, however it’s akin to people having sex in public in the nude. Young children receive ‘confused and ‘conflicting’ messages about sexuality as per such an incident. It’s for making babies and there is a time and a place to express one’s sexuality and this was not the time nor the place. Back to deep residential treatment vs. just incarceration hopefully. Punishment is not the answer or resolution to such issues.”

Aw, pity the poor pervert. What he did really wasn’t really that bad. Why does our society have to be so uptight about sexuality and genitals and stuff?

Commenter Anposter is similarly sympathetic toward the pervert.

This guy clearly had major issues last time he was caught engaging in similar behavior. I’m hoping he gets the treatment he obviously needs but I doubt he will. We’re not that advanced as a civilized society.

Ah, “treatment,” is there no social ill it cannot correct.

Unwhite Liberal Confronts Smug White Liberals

Posted by V the K at 11:35 am - September 3, 2016.
Filed under: Liberals

I bet the comments on the HuffPo are a hoot, but I haven’t bothered to look.

My problem with Liberalism is that it’s more concerned with policing people’s language and thoughts without requiring them to do anything to fix the problem. White liberal college students speak of “safe spaces”, “trigger words”, “micro aggressions” and “white privilege” while not having to do anything or, more importantly, give up anything. They can’t even have a conversation with someone who sees the world differently without resorting to calling someone a racist, homophobic, misogynistic, bigot and trying to have them banned from campus, or ruin them and their reputation. They say they feel black peoples’ pain because they took a trip to Africa to help the disadvantaged, but are unwilling to go to a black neighborhood in the City in which they live. These same college students will espouse the joys of diversity, but will in the same breath assume you are only on campus because of affirmative action or that all black people grew up in poverty. My personal favorite is declaring with surprise how articulate a black classmate is despite the fact that we are attending the same institution of higher learning as they are.

The White Liberal culture encourages talking about diversity and shaming others for their alleged racism, but many times they themselves work in environments that are mostly white. When questioned they’ll defensively state that they promote strictly on merit. Black people aren’t suggesting that we want someone unqualified to get the position, but I find it telling that they assume that we are not qualified. These same Liberals are quick to be against school choice, while their kids go to private or well-regarded public schools. Leaving poor black children behind in underperforming schools and providing less opportunity to improve their lives is inconsequential to keeping true to their white liberal politics. Many people are quick to espouse the political values of liberalism without having to live with the often harsh reality of those policies.

The Party of Elderly Feminists

Posted by V the K at 8:03 am - July 28, 2016.
Filed under: Liberals

Has anyone noticed that the Democrat Party is now completely run by and for elderly left-wing feminists? Hillary of course, Nancy Pelosi, Elizabeth Warren, Cecile Richards, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Jan Schakowsky (D-Illinois) Nita Loewy (D-NY) and the whole “Progressive Caucus” in the House. The party’s priorities… abortion, false narratives about women earning less than men, gun control, and expansion of the bureaucracy so other feminists can get Government-funded office jobs … reflect the prerogatives of women who came of age in the 1960s and 1970s and whose views are stuck in that era.

And as the Democrat Party has become the party of elderly left-wing feminists, their bitter contempt for whites males … and their fossilized ‘Mad Men’ Era view of same… has become ever more evident. To quote Nancy Pelosi:

“I think that, so many times, white — non-college-educated white males have voted Republican. They voted against their own economic interests because of guns, because of gays, and because of God, the three G’s, God being the woman’s right to choose.”

The poor old biddy thinks “God, guns, and gays” is still clever. Maybe it was back in the 70’s.   And she thinks those poor stupid males who won’t vote for a party that holds their values in utter contempt, and wants to redistribute their wages to feminist crones, are “voting against their own economic interests.”  That’s daft.

And isn’t it peculiar that in a party so fanatically pro-abortion that they actually oppose health and safety standards for place where abortions are performed, that they won’t actually say the word ‘abortion.’ It’s always ‘right to choose,’ ‘reproductive rights,’ or even ‘family planning?’ If abortion is such a great and important thing, why not just come out and say the word?

Leftists Love to Listen to Themselves Talk

Posted by V the K at 8:45 am - July 14, 2016.
Filed under: Liberals

Preezy Obama and a bunch of others spent four and a half hours talking with each other about gun control yesterday and emerged from the talkathon deciding that… they wanted to talk more about gun control.

After a three-hour convening of law enforcement, civil rights leaders, and Black Lives Matter activists that stretched to nearly four-and-a-half hours, President Obama declared the meeting a model of reaching out and finding common ground.

So, the secret to finding common ground is to exclude anyone from a discussion who might disagree with you. [And don’t say, “But law enforcement was present, too.” There are plenty of left-wing law enforcement people who want to outlaw guns.] Certainly sounds like the way Obama operates.

Personally, I would rather be waterboarded than listen to Chicago Jesus prattle on and on and on and on and on and on for four hours about how bad guns and racist bitter clingers are. As awful as waterboarding is, it’s over in like two minutes.

I can barely stand an hour long meeting. The longer a meeting goes, the less is actually accomplished, in my experience. When I end meetings, my closer is usually, “OK, we’re done with that. Let’s get back to work.” But to left-wing bureaucrats and social parasites (activists), yammering at each other is supposed to be “work” I guess.

64653795

Leftsplaining How White People Are Supposed to React to Cop Shootings

Posted by V the K at 2:31 pm - July 9, 2016.
Filed under: Liberals

A social leftist snowflake in Seattle shares her mindthoughts on the issue of how white people should react to “The Televised Execution of Black People.” Here’s the TLDR version:

1. Liberals, artists, and LGBTQAWXYZ are the most racially enlightened beings in the universe.
2. People who don’t live in cities are dumb.
3. If you’re not wallowing in white guilt, seek out an urban liberal artist or gay person to teach you how.
4. Once you have learned how wrong it is to be white, share your wisdom with those unenlightened hicks from the suburbs and rural areas (but try to be patient, because, remember, they aren’t as enlightened as you.)

a2634d816691c9babeb73adde3673944

 

Nowhere does the most special of special snowflakes counsel, “When you see media coverage of a policeman shooting a black person, you should calm your t-ts and wait until you learn more about the facts and circumstances.”

Also, there’s this:

We tolerate the regular, televised execution of Black men in our streets because when it comes down to it, we don’t value their lives quite as highly as our own.

Oh, pumpkin, that’s not racism, that’s human nature. It’s normal to value one’s own life above the lives of strangers. My personal hierarchy of lives I care about goes: Immediate Family; Extended Family; Pets; Friends; Other People’s Pets; Stray Cats; Certain Porn Stars; the rest of the Human Race.

It isn’t that I don’t care about the rest of humanity *at all,* but I care much more about those whom I have bonded with than people I don’t know. However, that does not mean I “tolerate” injustice or violence against people I don’t know. It means I, rationally, recognize the limits of my ability to do anything about it.

Gay Left Absolves Rad Mohammedism; Blames Christian Right for Orlando Slaughter

Posted by V the K at 9:11 pm - June 12, 2016.
Filed under: Liberals

Gay Left Magazine ‘The Advocate’ toes the line on the left-wing narrative: Don’t Give in to Islamophobia Spreading on Social Media After Shooting. In other words, “Our Democrat masters insist on continuing to import 250,000 immigrants and refugees from gay-hating Muslim countries every year and we must fully support that.”

Their article quotes ACLU lawyer Chase Strangio, who blames Christians for the Islamist attack along with several other left-wing politicians and then echoes the left’s call for outlawing the civilian ownership of firearms.

Chase-550x305

13450143_553517208165383_5382870865912555530_n