Gay Patriot Header Image

Racist Bigotry Is So Hawt in the Democrat Left Right Now

Posted by V the K at 7:12 pm - February 12, 2017.
Filed under: Racism (Real, Reverse or Faux)

The Democrats are eager to harness the #BlackLivesMatter movement to till the fields of social justice and pick the bright fluffy cotton of electoral participation. The Masters Leaders of the Democrat Party are even inviting some of them to serve inside the house, as it were, with positions of leadership and influence within the party. #BlackLivesMatter leaders got to advise President Obama. They were paraded on stage at the 2016 DNC Convention.  No one aspiring to be chairhumanoid of the Democrat Party can say anything but “wonderful” about the #BlackLivesMatter movement.

Here’s what one of the leaders of the #BlackLivesMatter movement had to say about white people.

“Whiteness is not humxness, in fact, white skin is sub-humxn,” she wrote. “All phenotypes exist within the black family and white ppl are a genetic defect of blackness.”

Khogali then proclaimed: “White ppl are recessive genetic defects. This is factual.”

Raising the question, do they know about Shaun King?

The delightful people of #BlackLivesMatter have been joined in fomenting urban unrest by the ‘Antifa’ movement, which supports the exact same economic policies as Bernie Sanders and on whose behalf Senate Democrats are voting in lockstep against every Trump nominee. They also have some delightful people in leadership positions.  And they have also been plastering Seattle with the poster below.


There may be a few people on the Democrat left who do not like that their party is being taken over by the violent, racist, and stupid. But, so far, they’ve confined their expressions of concern to comments on right-wing blogs.

Democrats Remind Uppity Black People of Their Place

Posted by V the K at 7:28 am - January 17, 2017.
Filed under: Racism (Real, Reverse or Faux)

Donald J. Trump’s efforts to reach out to African-Americans are not being well-received on the left.

When noted comedian and host of the hit show “Family Feud” Steve Harvey exited from a meeting with President-elect Donald Trump last week calling him “a great man,” to say there was a backlash would be a gross understatement. The word “coon” and “sellout” was immediately thrown out.

Remember, people on the Democrat Left also used the word ‘coon’ to describe America’s foremost neurosurgeon.

Update: “Mediocre Negroes

“It was a bunch of mediocre Negroes being dragged in front of TV as a photo-op for Donald Trump’s exploitative campaign against black people. And you are an example of that,” (Professor and CNN Commentator Marc Lamont) Hill shot back.

Well, Gang, We’ve Got a Mystery On Our Hands

Posted by V the K at 9:21 am - January 6, 2017.
Filed under: Racism (Real, Reverse or Faux)

According to the left, a six-year-old has sufficient wisdom, maturity, and insight to decide for xerself that xe is not the “gender” that corresponds to xer biological and genetic make-up and all adults are therefore obligated to accommodate the six-year-old’s chosen gender.

But when three eighteen-year-olds and a twenty-four year old kidnap a mentally challenged man and torture him for their own amusement, livestreaming the video, those same leftists are like, “Hey, you know, they’re just kids, and kids just act stupidly sometimes because they’re immature and don’t understand the consequences.”

Likewise, you have people on the left saying that when four black people torture a white guy while yelling “F— White People, F— Donald Trump,” it isn’t really a “hate crime.” (I really don’t believe in the whole hate crimes thing,  but the left does, so let’s work with that.) You know, because the details are kind of fuzzy. “We can’t really be sure what motivated them,” the lefties say. “Besides, they had a relationship before the attack, it wasn’t a random thing.”

But when a gay dude gets pistol whipped by his drug dealer and tied to a fencepost… oh, yeah, that’s totally a hate crime. No doubt. Nothing but anti-gay hate could possibly explain that.

And you know something, I can kind of see that what those four demonic sub-humans did in Chicago may not have been a “hate crime” in the sense of “an act of violence committed out of hatred for another person’s race, creed, or sexual orientation.”  There was hate in it, and there was hate expressed during it, but there were other things going on… including immature, stupid people just being violent for violence sake.

And this is why I’m just not down with the entire concept of hate crimes.  That poor dude they tortured… his injuries are the same whether they did it because they hated him for being white, or because they are stupid violent people behaving like stupid violent people. (I won’t call them animals, they don’t deserve the dignity.) And they should be severely punished for their actions not their motivations.

Because, let’s face it, labeling some crimes as worse because “they are hate crimes” is pretty much just virtue signaling.

Still wonder which media outlet is going to be first out of the block explaining that the four people who tortured that white guy were “basically good kids, and they were just starting to turn their lives around. Their families are still in shock. ‘It’s just not like her,’” some relative will say.

Sorry for the meandering. I know that bothers some people.

Slate: Is America Ready for Black Musicians?

Posted by V the K at 11:37 am - January 2, 2017.
Filed under: Racism (Real, Reverse or Faux)

Oh, Good Lord.

Black women ruled music in 2016, whether the country was ready for it or not:

To the left, America (once you get 50 kilometers away from any major coastal population center) is always and will be forever Mississippi in 1954.

The Baby Boomer obsession with race goes back to the sixties. Everything boomers did in the sixties was subsequently discredited. Spitting on Vietnam war veterans… not cool. Sexual revolution… that’s how we got AIDS and broken families. Maoism?… not even the Chinese are into it. The Soviet Union collapsed and it turned out the counter-culture had been rooting for the losing team the whole time. Hippie culture? Reduced to mockery. But, from the Boomer left’s perspective, “Hey, but we were right on civil rights (not really, but that’s another post) and we are going to rub civil rights and race in the faces of the next two generations so maybe they’ll forget about how we destroyed the cities, spit on soldiers, embraced communism, and unleashed AIDS.”

The Millennial obsession is a combination of emulating their “parents,” the end result of a lifetime of indoctrination of race-obsessed boomers in media and academia, and because boomers control the media, and the way for Millennials to advance is to suck up and play to their prejudices.

FoxNews Sued by Black Employees for Racial Discrimination

J/K … it’s actually left-slanting fake news network CNN.

“Upon information and belief,” the suit says, “African-American employees have had to endure racial slurs and prejudicial biases from superiors such as, ‘it’s hard to manage black people’ and ‘who would be worth more: black slaves from times past or new slaves.’ ”

Earlier on CNN: “Donald Trump is a flat-out Racist.”

“Well, let me do it again, and let me do it in two languages: Es un racista. He is a flat-out racist and it’s what he’s played on for 16 months. He is a bigot. He is a racist.”

The Steve Bannon kerfuffle

I don’t know a great deal about it. This is a post where I’m not presenting information, so much as asking for it.

But, to set up the question: Via Instapundit we have this from The Hill: Breitbart News planning lawsuit against ‘major media company’.

Breitbart News is preparing a lawsuit against a “major media company” over claims that it is a white nationalist website…

The website has been under intense scrutiny since President-elect Donald Trump named Stephen Bannon as a senior White House counselor and strategist. Bannon is the former executive chairman of Breitbart News…

“…Breitbart News rejects racism in all its varied and ugly forms. Always has, always will,” [said a statement.] “The diversity of the company’s news coverage and its staff continue to embody Andrew Breitbart’s colorblind, distinctly American commitment to ‘E pluribus unum’—out of many, one.”

Critics have taken aim at the site’s coverage in recent days. While Bannon was executive chairman of Breitbart, the website published a story by David Horowitz referring to conservative commentator Bill Kristol as a “renegade Jew,” something that has been mentioned repeatedly in media coverage calling Breitbart a white nationalist website.

So, here’s what I “think I know”, at present.

  • was one of the first to go all-in for Trump. They are pro-deportation of illegals, but in no way white-supremacist.
  • Just as the media’s knickers are in a twist over Trump and over the Alt-Right, they’re in a twist over Trump keeping Bannon as a senior, Karl Rove-type advisor.
  • But it’s ridiculous. If all that the media has is one Jew (David Horowitz) slagging another Jew (Bill Kristol) over something to do with Jewishness, on while Bannon presided, let’s face it: They’ve got nothing.

Correct? Agree/disagree? What I would be most interested in here, is actual evidence – not mere assertion or opinion – that Steve Bannon and/or Breitbart are “white nationalists” or white supremacists. If any exists. (I have a gut-feeling against it.)

UPDATE – I didn’t see this coming: Trump Wants To Deport [Only] As Many Undocumented Immigrants As Obama Already Has.

UPDATE: Spengler (David P. Goldman) describes Bannon as “100% pro-Israel” – which would be unusual for a white supremacist. And the worst against Bannon that Jonah Goldberg can muster, is that Bannon is part of the alt-Right. Yawn, so is Milo. Sorry, Jonah. I do love you, most of the time.

I am open to a point suggested in the comments, that under Bannon’s leadership, has declined journalistically. But that’s a different matter. Being a poor journalist (arguably) doesn’t make you a racist.

Calls for Peace and Understanding After the Election Are “Racist” Now

Posted by V the K at 1:08 pm - November 14, 2016.
Filed under: Racism (Real, Reverse or Faux)

Don’t go “Whitesplaining” to this enlightened, tolerant liberal why we need to  put the election behind us and work together.

I keep hearing calls for unity in my country right now, though these aren’t spoken as the desperate prayers of hearts desiring peace between two hurting sides, they’re spoken as chastisements of one side by another. They are words of scolding and shaming delivered as a teacher to a petulant student. They are not spoken with benevolence but malice.

They are white voices speaking to the ears of the marginalized in the middle of their mourning.

This is the seed of our national acrimony: selective white outrage that seeks to control what is grief and what is acceptable and what the rules of the conversation are going to be. This is what privilege looks like. And this is the singular barrier to unity.

He also is only a little bit troubled by the violence of the Anti-Trump riots. After all, it’s only (other people’s) property and that is nothing compared to the millions of feelings that have been hurt.

A study in contrasts

Two black women support LEGAL immigration (as do I), border security and Donald Trump. About a year ago they felt angry – and expressed themselves peacefully. (h/t CrayCrayPatriot for telling me about them)

YouTube Preview Image

That’s good.

Now for the contrast: Shamefully, two black men this week beat up a (perceived? real or imagined?) Trump voter. (h/t Zero Hedge and InfoWars)

That’s a disgrace.

The difference here isn’t race. Isn’t era. Isn’t oppression-privilege “experience” or dynamics. Isn’t anger level. Probably isn’t even gender, all that much (since some women do fight, and many men don’t).

The key difference is IDEAS – and MORAL CHARACTER.

As Aristotle is supposed to have said:

Anybody can become angry – that is easy, but to be angry with the right person and to the right degree and at the right time and for the right purpose, and in the right way – that is not within everybody’s power and is not easy.

Exit question: Are Hillary or President Obama out there, telling people in no uncertain terms to calm down and accept the election’s outcome? (If yes: I’m glad, and feel free to post the link in the comments.)

UPDATE: Via ZH, a high school girl is attacked (by another high school girl) for supporting Trump. Pathetic!

YouTube Preview Image

Rich Hippie Commies Endorse Violent Hate Group

Posted by V the K at 12:09 pm - October 8, 2016.
Filed under: Racism (Real, Reverse or Faux)

Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream has openly and fully endorsed Black Lives Matter in its entirety and with not an ounce skepticism of the Narrative.

The Tweet, which has been liked over 30,000 times, was accompanied by a lengthy statement on systemic and institutionalized racism and called for others to join their cause by not standing idly by and to engage in meaningful action.

“Systemic and institutionalized racism are the defining civil rights and social justice issues of our time,” says the statement signed by Your Friends at Ben & Jerry’s. “We’ve come to understand that to be silent about the violence and threats to the lives and well-being of Black people is to be complicit in that violence and those threats.”

This is of a piece with Ben & Jerry’s longstanding support for the cop-murdering thug (and progressive icon) Mumia Abu Jamal.

I stopped eating their crappy ice cream over a decade ago. There are plenty of alternative sources for ice cream that don’t support violent racists.

Hillary: Everyone’s a Little Bit Racist

“When talking about race-relations in the country, and the shootings of black men by police officers, debate moderator Lester Holt asked Mrs. Clinton: “Last week you said that we have to do everything possible to improve policing to go right at implicit bias. Do you believe police are implicitly biased against black people?

Mrs. Clinton replied: “I think implicit bias is a problem for everyone, not just police. I think unfortunately too many of us in our great country jump to conclusions about each other and therefore I think we need all of us to be asked the hard questions ‘why am I feeling this way?’”

YouTube Preview Image

America Today

Charlotte, NC has become America’s latest Riot Zone. Here is why:


Now, according to #BlackLivesMatter, the guy in Charlotte was just “sitting in his car reading a book” when racist cops shoot him for no reason, and he most definitely didn’t have a gun. How can that be plausible when President Obama has told us repeatedly that guns are freely available in minority communities but books are impossible to find?

With regards to the Glenn Reynolds controversy, I honestly don’t see what’s wrong with using your car as a defensive weapon if people are attacking you.

Update: Rush Limbaugh noted something extraordinary about the current spate of rioting; it’s occurring in North Carolina, where the officer involved in the shooting was also black, and not in Oklahoma, where the officer was white and the decision to shoot was far more questionable. Also, almost three quarters of arrested rioters are from outside the state. The obvious conclusion is that NC is being agitated because the polls are so close there, while OK is solidly red and not worth the resources.

Clinton: Blacks Are No Good at Self-Government; Time to Replace Them with a Lighter Skinned Population


Detroit has 10,000 empty, structurally sound houses—10,000. And lot of jobs to be had repairing those houses. Detroit just came out of bankruptcy and the mayor’s trying to do an innovative sort of urban homesteading program there. But it just gives you an example of what could be done. And I think any of us who have ever had any personal experience with either Syrian Americans or Syrian refugees think it’s a pretty good deal.

So, what he is saying is that a black majority American city is incapable of rebuilding itself, and the only solution is to import a new population. Sounds kind of… what’s the word… racist?

The Left Finds Another Moonbat Athlete to Lionize

San Francisco Quarterback Colin Kaepernick refused to stand for the National Anthem and has justified it stating that he — like the Hijab-Wearing Olympic Islamist — thinks America is a racist country unworthy of his respect. 

“I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses Black people and people of color,” Kaepernick told NFL Media

Says the guy with the nine-figure contract sitting on a bench surrounded by millionaire black athletes.

Judging from the comments (not so much at the link, but at this site and other outlets covering the story), his supporters are defending him because his actions are ‘Free Speech.” The NFL is defending him on the same basis: “ In respecting such American principles as freedom of religion and freedom of expression, we recognize the right of an individual to choose to participate, or not, in our celebration of the national anthem.”

And, of course, what he did is free speech. But do you think he would be receiving the support of the NFL and leftists generally if he had said “Marriage is only between a man and woman,” or “If people are in this country illegally, they should be deported?”

The Religion of White Guilt

Posted by V the K at 12:22 pm - August 20, 2016.
Filed under: Racism (Real, Reverse or Faux)

Remember the ur-leftist who sneered at Ben Shapiro that his belief in freedom was “cute?” That debate actually took place in 2014. It took some digging, but I was finally able to attach a name to the High Priest of Leftist Government … Professor James Wellman, chair of the comparative religion department at University of Washington. And while he is a Presybterian minister, his main religious belief seems to be White Guilt.

I remain a part of the Christian tribe and a country that does not live up to taking care of the orphan, the poor, the invisible ones. A country that has done great damage to other cultures and yet one that claims over and over again to be exceptional. So I live with the guilt of being in this country and accepting its privilege and knowing how much damage a dominate Christian culture has done to native people, gay people, black people, Iraqi’s (sic), women it makes me repent.


And because he has sadfeels about being white, all other people should give up their freedom and bow to Government. But I notice his White Guilt has not led him to quit his well-paid, taxpayer funded sinecure as Chair of the comparative religion department at University of Washington and give it to a native person, a gay person, a black person, an Iraqi’s or a woman.


A Nation of Thugs

Posted by V the K at 8:19 pm - August 15, 2016.
Filed under: Racism (Real, Reverse or Faux)

Forgive me if this is a bit stream-of-consciousness, but I’m not feeling blogging today. I’m just going to opine on the top Non-Trump news story, which is that in Milwaukee, over the weekend, there were several homicides. One of these was the case where a young black thug pointed a stolen gun at a black cop and the cop shot and killed him. (Maybe guns should come with warning labels. “WARNING: Pointing this at a police office may result in serious injury or death.”) The Democrat Media Complex altered the facts to fit The Narrative and issued headlines like “Unrest in Milwaukee After Police Fatally Shoot Unarmed Man.”

What the DMC described as “unrest” was things like rioters burning down businesses and targeting white people for violence. (Tell me again how #BlackLivesMatter is all about peaceful reform?)  When asked why the shooting of an armed thug with a long criminal record who was pointing a stolen gun at a cop should read to violence, the rioters answered with an almost verbatim recitation of the Democrat Party Line:

“It’s sad, because you know, this what happened because they not helping the black community, like you know, the rich people, they got all this money, and they, like not trying to give us none.”

IOW: “You don’t give us enough free sh-t, so we’re burning down our own neighborhoods to teach you a lesson.” Which is what you might expect under a city that’s been governed by Democrats and Socialists since 1908.

It’s bad enough that there are entire generations and voting populations who have been indoctrinated to think this way: You are entitled to commit acts of violence because other people have more stuff than you do. What is worse is that there are literally two major political parties (the Democrats and the Greens) who, for political purposes, completely support and indulge this thinking, and a third and fourth party (Republicans and Libertarians) too cowed by the tyranny of political correctness to denounce it.

In a properly functioning society, thugs would be arrested, imprisoned, or put down for the types of violence we’ve seen in Milwaukee, and in Baltimore before that, and in Oakland before that, and in Ferguson before that, and in Chicago every weekend night.

But we’ve gotten so into Book of Isaiah “Calling Evil Good and Good Evil” territory that when thugs loots and burn their way through their own neighborhoods and blame it on Government for not giving them enough free sh-t, the response from the political class is a chorus of, “Well, how much can we give you, then?”

The left's new hero; move aside, hijab wearing Olympic failure.

The left’s new hero; move aside, hijab-wearing, America-bashing, Olympic FAIL.


A leader of the #BlackLivesMatter hate group is furious that cops are handing out ice cream to children. I am not making this up.

Immutable Law of Life: Miserable people don’t want to become happy; they want everyone else to become as miserable as they are.

#BlackLivesMatter Vows to Clean Up Their Communities, Support Fatherhood, Stigmatize Thug Culture

Posted by V the K at 7:32 pm - August 1, 2016.
Filed under: Racism (Real, Reverse or Faux)

Nah, just kidding, they demand Free Sh-t.

Dozens of groups associated with the Black Lives Matter movement spelled out their demands on Monday for the first time, saying they want criminal justice and law enforcement reform, free tuition and forgiveness on student loans.

And in return for giving into their demands, #BLM promises…. nothing. Not even recognition of America’s Right to Exist.

Still Waiting

Posted by V the K at 6:13 pm - July 17, 2016.
Filed under: Racism (Real, Reverse or Faux)

Two weeks ago, I said:

If BLM and its core principles really are peaceful, two things are going to happen.

1. BLM is going to crack down hard on elements within its groups that advocate violence.

2. BLM’s rhetoric is going to change from confrontational to cooperative

I will wait and see if these things happen.

At a recent pointless #BlackLivesMatter (I think it might have been during the #DayofRage) protest… the advocacy of violence, the violent rhetoric, and the failure to denounce either… goes on.

And meanwhile, an editor at the Democrat Left “Think Progress” website says that killing police is “justice.” (But he’ll probably claim it was ‘just a joke’ or that he actually was making a brilliant and subtle point that only *sounded* like he approved of police murder when he didn’t mean that at all.)

The Gaslighters in the woodwork

Let’s be honest: The problems of American blacks today are caused largely by white intellectuals and politicians, and I mean the left-wing ones.

In the 1930s, such people created Planned Parenthood specifically to abort black babies (google Margaret Sanger). In the 1960s, such people created the Welfare State (Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society”) which annihilated the traditional black family and led generations of American inner-city blacks away from productive pursuits, into dead-ends of left-wing “community activism” and much worse.

And today, such people pander to (or sometimes form the white membership of) the group #BlackLivesMatter, which perversely tries to lead blacks into a dead-end of complaining, hateful racism against whites. If ever, after we entered the 20th century, there was some kind of plot by American whites to destroy blacks and keep them down: American left-liberalism would be it. (If.)

Racism is both an illusion and a real problem (as illusions sometimes can be). Racism in America is being fomented even as we speak, by privileged, white American left-liberals. Not racism in the sense that America discriminates terribly against blacks, but the opposite: racism in the sense that America wants to give blacks an unreal sense of entitlement. Racism in the sense that America throws crutches and deadweights to blacks (not helping hands) and foments mistaken beliefs, both about blacks and among blacks.

Whose fault is it? If, for your entire life, the rich white lady who gets away with every crime (*cough* Hillary among others) tells you that America OWES you a living and owes you intense accommodation of your whims and that she will use government (force) to make sure you get it, wouldn’t you begin to believe her? I would.

In effect and for generations, narcissistic American lefties have been trying to gaslight American blacks.

Gaslighting is a form of psychological abuse used by narcissists in order to instill in their victims an extreme sense of anxiety and confusion to the point where they no longer trust their own memory, perception or judgment…

The intention is to, in a systematic way, target the victim’s mental equilibrium, self confidence, and self esteem so that they are no longer able to function in an independent way. Gaslighting involves the abuser to frequently and systematically withhold factual information from the victim, and replace it with false information.

And yet some people blame blacks, the recipients of systematic gaslighting by American leftists. And blame blacks on the basis of their race. In short: Yes, Virginia, some people are nasty racists.

As tragic, current events have put “race” into the news and caused GayPatriot to increase its coverage, I have encountered perhaps 1 or 2 of these people in our comments. If “conservative” in America means that you value human dignity, independence and freedom – if – then I can’t consider these people conservatives; I personally, and sadly, am forced to think of them as accomplices to the vicious and evil schemes of the Left.

Here (#17) are (#19) three (#38) recent comments that I have in mind.

…Negroes seem incapable of governing or producing anything of value.

Black people are a violent, criminal, underclass.

If all blacks disappeared, America’s cities would become much safer and more livable.

I could spell out what’s wrong with the above quotes. (For example: What about white meth addicts and dealers, as a violent and criminal underclass? What about certain white Democrat leaders, like the Clintons or Jon Corzine (D), as a violent and criminal overclass? What about brilliant black Americans like Ben Carson, Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Condi Rice, Janice Rogers-Brown and Allen West? How about if we take people as individuals and categorize them by their behavior and ideas and character content, not by something dumb like their genes and melanin content?)

I could spell it out, but another part of me says: Why bother? Hate is hate. It’s part of racism. That being so, it’s enough to say that anyone who wants to bring it here to GayPatriot ought to take it elsewhere.

I want less criminal violence in America: less from poor people – who may be white or black or any race; AND, less criminal violence from certain rich people and top leaders in the Political-Financial Complex – who, again, may be white or black or any so-called “race”.

Community Activist: “Abolish the police.”

We need to abolish the police, period. Demilitarize the police, disarm the police, and we need to come up with community solutions for transformative justice.” — Jessica Disu, community activist

“Sounds good to me” – Every urban thug.

You should really treat yourself to the video so you can see the smug look of simultaneous self-righteousness and clueless vacuity as she makes her proclamation.

What do you suppose she means by “community solutions for transformative justice?”

Nothing. She means nothing by it. She just likes the sound of the words as they dribble out of her pie hole.

You know who else thought they were a “community solution for transformative justice?” The KKK.