Gay Patriot Header Image

Trump on terrorist Losers

After expressing solidarity with the Manchester bombing victims, he said:

So many young, beautiful, innocent people, living and enjoying their lives, murdered by evil losers in life. I won’t call them monsters, because they would like that term. They would think that’s a great name. I will call them, from now on, losers, because that’s what they are, they’re losers. And we’ll have more of them. But they’re losers, just remember that.

This is what I’ve spent these last few days talking about in my trip overseas. Our society can have no tolerance for this continuation of bloodshed. We cannot stand a moment longer for the slaughter of innocent people. And, in today’s attack, it was mostly innocent children. The terrorists and extremists, and those who give them aid and comfort, must be driven out from our society forever. This wicked ideology must be obliterated, and I mean completely obliterated.

Emphasis in President Trump’s delivery. I find this interesting on several levels.

First, calling them “losers” is a Trumpism. He’s spent his life focused on the issue of winning vs. losing in business, and he speaks colloquially and from his heart. Translators (into other languages) may have to footnote the expression or come up with some local idiom that would strike us as odd (if we heard it translated back).

Second, it’s an Americanism. Trump is a throwback to a time when most Americans were focused on winning vs. losing. As General Patton said in a bygone era, “Americans love a winner and will not tolerate a loser. Americans play to win all the time.” This was before the Left programmed us to look down on winners and give everyone a participation trophy.

Third, it’s true. These terrorists are losers. They can’t think of anything better to do with the wonderful gift of life, than to try to ruin it for others. In addition to being evil, vicious, nihilistic, malicious, etc., they’re indescribably stupid. As such, only the stupidest of women should want to have sexual intercourse with them. They lack evolutionary fitness.

Fourth, it’s something new. I mean, I’ve called these Islamist terrorists “losers” before – but to hear the President of the United States do it, seems new. (If President Obama did it, please let me know in the comments. A search for “obama calls terrorists losers” turns up only Trump doing it.) It expresses a (rightful) depth of contempt for the terrorists that Obama probably never had. I also doubt that Obama ever talked about “completely obliterating” them.

Fifth, it’s strangely persuasive. Killing terrorists in wars, policing and effective border control all do have a place in the War on Terror. But, to really end terrorism, we will need to thrust a moral and social frame upon the terrorists that makes them seem “obviously” contemptible, or even ridiculous. So that, even to an America-hating leftist or a Muslim who may feel oppressed, being a suicide bomber no longer carries any status or moral authority or cachet. “Ugh, what a bunch of losers” is such a frame – and has the virtue, again, of being true.

Sixth and not least: Trump is saying it in the Middle East, to the faces of Palestinians (and earlier, Saudis). Kudos, Mr. President!

Seventh, the Usual Suspects hate it – you know, Whoopi Goldberg, The View, the leftie newspapers saying it makes light of things and doesn’t show enough seriousness – so you know that Trump must be on the right track.

UPDATE: Scott Adams seems to agree.

What kinds of people join the Losers [terrorists]? Mostly young males. And you know what brand young males do not want on them? Right: Losers.

If you call them monsters, they like it. If you call them ISIS or ISIL they put it on a flag and wave it around. If you call them non-Muslim, it just rolls off their backs because they have Korans and stuff. Almost any other “brand” you can imagine is either inert or beneficial to Loser recruitment.

Loser is different. No one joins the Loser movement. Try at home, with your family or friends, to concoct a more effective brand poisoning than Loser. You probably can’t.

UPDATE: Just to give credit where it’s due: in 2015, there was a push from the Obama administration to refer to the ISIS as “Daesh”. That, too, was a brand-poisoning exercise. Maybe not a great one. In Arabic, the letters are an acronym of ISIS’ name and evoke the Arabic words for “one who crushes and tramples” others, and “one who sows discord”. Perhaps our words “sociopath” or “fascist” are dynamic equivalents? Daesh is derogatory enough to make ISIS want to cut your tongue out. So, it’s a good shot. But 1) it evokes nothing in English, 2) it doesn’t get to the heart of the matter: these jihadists are losers.

UPDATE: Sean L gets into the spirit of the thing:

Perhaps we need to start using phrases that carry the same level of contempt in the Arabic world as “loser” does over here. How about “pig penises”?

Motives of Islamist Suicide Bomber a Mystery to Progressives

Posted by V the K at 7:42 am - May 24, 2017.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace

Washington Post Headline: In suburban Manchester, a search for what might have motivated the attacker.

Yeah, it’s a mystery all right, but it seems to have something to do with “radicalization.”

Experts say Manchester’s hidden radicalization problem is not unique to the city.

“What we have seen recently is the emergence of clusters where groups of people — who often live close to one another — radicalize relatively quickly,” said Raffaello Pantucci, the director for international security studies at the Royal United Services Institute in London. “This isn’t only happening in London or Manchester, but also in much smaller towns.”

The article uses “radical” or “radicalize six times, but never quite gets around to explaining exactly *what* is “radicalizing” people to commit terrorism.

“This is such a cosmopolitan city, but there are circles and groups of people which are extremely closed to outsiders,” said the man, who spoke on the condition that only his first name, Jay, be used. “That is where teenagers or young men and women become radicalized. If it can happen here, it can happen anywhere.”

“Radicalization” must be like some form of virus that just randomly strikes people and causes them to commit mass murder. I guess there’s no defense against it.

Maimed and Murdered Children: A Small Price to Pay for Liberal Virtue-Signaling

Posted by V the K at 9:26 pm - May 23, 2017.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace

Leftists in the United States and Europe have responded to the terror attack in Manchester as they have to previous incidents of mass murder by Islamic Supremacists… by expressing their unwavering solidarity with “Muslim Communities” whose feelings might be hurt by “Islamophobia” and the fear of a backlash.

As Bruce Bawer notes, Progressive politicians around the world have expressed sympathy for the terror victims, while vowing to make sure nothing is done to prevent future attacks that might hurt the feelings of Islamic Supremacists.

Manchester City Council leader Sir Richard Leese also spoke of “fear” and “division”: “Manchester is a proud, strong city and we will not allow terrorists who seek to sow fear and division to achieve their aims.” Guess what, pal? They did achieve their aims: they killed 22 people, including children, and injured several dozen. Dead infidels: that’s their objective, period. (Or, as you would say, full stop.)

As has been so often the case lately, the perpetrator of the mass murder was “known to authorities,” who did nothing to prevent his mass murder. Similarly, Omar Mateen had been interviewed by the FBI and determined not to be a threat. Likewise, the Tsaernev brothers, and the Fort Lauderdale airport shooters were also passed over by law enforcement before they committed their acts of terror.

In Paris, some women have started a protest against certain neighborhoods of the city that are so infested with Islamic Supremacist migrants that French women are no longer safe there. It’s a safe bet that almost all of these women voted for left-wing French politicians who supported the mass immigration of these Islamists.

And In Britain, a woman who tweeted that British Men should stand up and protect women from terrorists is being investigated for a “hate crime.”

The Manchester suicide bomber

Per The Telegraph, The suicide bomber who killed 22 people and injured dozens more at the Manchester Arena has been named as 22-year-old Salman Abedi.

Born in Manchester in 1994, the second youngest of four children his parents were Libyan refugees who came to the UK to escape the Gaddafi regime.

His parents were both born in Libya but appear to have emigrated to London before moving to the Fallowfield area of south Manchester where they have lived for at least ten years.

He had become radicalised recently – it is not entirely clear when – and had worshipped at a local mosque that has, in the past, been accused of fund-raising for jihadists.

(They’re still changing the article, so you might not find the exact text above.)

I’m sorry to say that lots of us saw this coming. As of last night, the media weren’t releasing his name; the delay always means that the perpetrator is a left-winger or (more likely) a Muslim.

Also, for anyone who follows the situation of Europe drowning under its Muslim immigrants, a recurring theme is that the immigrants very often don’t work (the supposed reason for bringing them in), don’t integrate, and give birth to a second generation that is MORE radical and LESS integrated than the first.

Trump and Saudi Arabia

Probably more than any other country, Saudi Arabia has “hacked our democracy”. I keep meaning to write a post on their ownership share of U.S. media, and why they would be on board with a “Trump is a Russian agent!” narrative.

During the election, Trump rightly criticized Hillary for taking money from the world’s worst country for women and gays. And he had a nasty Twitter exchange with a Saudi prince.

What a difference a year makes. First, the new US-Saudi arms deal:

According to a statement just issued by the White House, Trump “has just completed largest single arms deal in US history, negotiating a package totaling more than $109.7 billion” which will boost Saudi Arabia’s defense capabilities, bolstering equipment and services in the face of extreme terrorist groups and Iran. The White House added that the deal will create defense jobs while also reaffirming America’s commitment to Saudi Arabia…

According to estimates cited by The Independent, including restocking and future commitments over the next ten years, the deal could balloon to $350 billion worth of arms…

I’m not at all sure this is good news.

  • How is it different from what any pet of the Deep State would have done? (Obama, Hillary, Jeb Bush, Lindsay McCain?) I don’t know.
  • Does it boost U.S. jobs as much as Trump says? I don’t know.
  • I know it will help Saudi Arabia to conquer its neighbor Yemen and gain control of its oil reserves. (Not necessarily good.)
  • Does it put U.S. defense technology in the hands of people who hate us? Probably.
  • Does it mean that Saudi-controlled elements of U.S. media will ease their war on Trump? I don’t know.

I do know that Trump’s speech in Riyadh was epic. As Bruce Bawer puts it:

It was gag-inducing to hear him praise the “magnificent kingdom” of Saudi Arabia, “the splendor of your country,” “the grandeur of this remarkable place,” and so on…But then something happened…

…he began mixing the ethereal praise with realistic businessman-type talk about the value of international partnership…[and] underscored the fact that in order for such a partnership to work, something would have to change. And it would have to change a lot. The Islamic world, he insisted, had to turn into a place where young Muslims could grow up “innocent of hatred.”

And then he spelled out the results of that hatred, presenting first a roll call of some of the “barbaric attacks” on America – 9/11, Boston, San Bernardino, Orlando – and then a list of other places (“Europe, Africa, South America, India, Russia, China, and Australia”) where that hatred has manifested itself.

However delicately he worked his way around to it, it was nothing less than an accusation.

No, he didn’t explicitly charge Muslim leaders with funding terrorism – but he told them, in no uncertain terms, that they needed to cut off funds to terrorists…And, yes, he spoke of “Islamic” (not “Islamist” or “radical Islamic”) terror. And he made it clear he wasn’t just talking about terrorism – he was talking about Islam itself. He condemned “the oppression of women, the persecution of Jews, and the slaughter of Christians.”

Kudos, Mr. President!

Full video here (scroll down). Short excerpts here and here. Full text here. Addressing Saudi princes, telling them to their faces, “Terrorists do not worship God, they worship death…Drive them out of this Earth!”

Obama Official Happy About Christian Genocide

Posted by V the K at 9:52 am - May 9, 2017.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace

The Obama Administration made an out-and-proud Islamic Supremacist a Homeland Security AdviserNow, the guy is openly celebrating the slaughter of Christians by his fellow Islamic Supremacists.

Why couldn’t Obama have hired one of those “peaceful” moderate Muslims we hear so much about.

Thought for the day

A sign seen at the recent Berkeley riots:

Hate speech IS Free speech

My thoughts on the above:

The Left tries to criminalize “hate speech” because, as Milo likes to point out, the Left wants to justify their own physical violence. Defining offensive speech as a crime will blur the line between speech and actions. Then lefties can claim that their many crimes of physical assault, vandalism, robbery, murder, etc., are self-defense, or justified by the victim’s beliefs/speech that are so offensive. Muslims try to pull the same trick.

I believe in keeping a strong line between speech and actions. For example, I believe that someone’s taunting (words) or alleged political-social beliefs or drawings of Mohammed can never justify your throwing the first punch at them.

The world does have some hateful people in it and genuine occurrences of “hate speech” – and I don’t like them. But that’s what my own right of free speech is for: to refute others’ dumb/wrong speech. And my right to free association, also: so that I may avoid people I don’t like, kick them out of my own house at least, and so on.

In this dim and confused world, any truthful speech will offend somebody, somewhere. The right to speak your conscience freely is the same as the right to say things that will offend others and hurt their feelings. The two are inseparable.

From the comments: A pointer to the Neal Boortz quote,

Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection.

UPDATE: On April 20 and as if on cue, Howard Dean said “Hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment.” Wrong, Mr. Dean. Threats and “fighting words” may not be protected, but Ann Coulter’s political speech (what you choose to call “hate speech”) is protected. And should be.

Why Reason and Common Sense Are Losing to Emotionalism and Virtue Signaling

Posted by V the K at 3:06 pm - March 25, 2017.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace

Mass importation of third world Mohammedans drains economies, is societally corrosive, increases violence, and provides no tangible net benefits to Western Democracies. Furthermore, the mass importation of unassimalable third world Mohammedans is opposed by majorities in most Western countries.

These are facts.

So why is large-scale Mohammedan migration encouraged by the political and social elites of these countries. According to this man’s opinion, blame upper-class white women and their endless need to virtue-signal.

Which explains why Angela Merkel and the Government of Sweden have embarked on this suicidal course. (The author describes Sweden as what happens when the Womyn’s Studies Department at your local university runs a country.)

The Crocodile Hungers

Posted by V the K at 1:11 pm - March 16, 2017.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace

European Leftists: “We have defeated Geert Wilders! We have shown the Mohammedans how much we love them! The Progressive Project can go forward!”

Turkish Foreign Minister: “Begun the Holy Wars are.”

Mevlut Cavusoglu, Turkey’s foreign minister, did not welcome the victory for Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s centre-right People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD).

“Now the election is over in the Netherlands…when you look at the many parties you see there is no difference between the social democrats and fascist Wilders,” he said according to a translation by Hurriyet.

“All have the same mentality. Where will you go? Where are you taking Europe? You have begun to collapse Europe. You are dragging Europe into the abyss. Holy wars will soon begin in Europe.”

“Let Them In,” They Said

Posted by V the K at 8:29 am - March 9, 2017.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace,War On Terror

Democrat Senators Chuck Schumer and Dippy Blond Seat-Warmer Kirsten Gillibrand went to the wall — with assistance from a Democrat Mayor and a leftist middle-school teacher — to help a Mohammedan child rapist gain entry to the United States.

When Tanveer Hussain and Abid Khan weren’t allowed into the United States, they blamed President Trump. So did the media outlets that covered the story. The controversial Democrat mayor of Saranac Lake reached out to fellow New York party members Senator Charles Schumer and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand. They leaned on the local embassy and Hussain and Khan were waved through.

“Still a country that welcomes athletes from across the globe,” Senator Schumer’s statement read. The statement, shared on Hussain’s Facebook page, declared, “So proud of the town of Saranac Lake for their efforts and their open hearts.”

Later Hussain’s brother would explain one difference between Saranac Lake and Kashmir. “In Kashmir, we have a tradition of showing love to children,” he said. Kashmir’s idea of showing love to children was very different than that of Saranac Lake. Tanveer Hussain would be charged with molesting a 12-year-old girl who was a student at the school.

At the time, Chuck and Kirstie were keen to “stand up to Donald Trump” by getting unvetted Mohammedans into the country. I guess they really showed him. Too bad it led to a little girl getting raped, though. Although apparently, many of the people who worked to bring the child molester into the country think it was a small price to pay for their virtue-signaling. Besides, rape is only wrong when it’s committed by white, upper-middle class college students, or so it would seem.

Not only that, but one of the “refugees” that somehow got through Obama’s “thorough vetting process” (“It takes over a year, you guys. We ask them lots and lots of times if they’re terrorists.”)  turns out to be an ISIS-affiliated terrorist. (“Oopsie!”)

Federal lawmakers are investigating how a former Iraqi insurgent fighter was able to lie about his identity and still get through America’s ‘extreme’ vetting process.

The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee has asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions to find out why the terror suspect’s pending arrest was allegedly spiked just over a week before the election. [Oh, I think we can guess why – V]

U.S. officials said earlier this week that nearly a third of the FBI’S 1,000 ongoing domestic terrorism investigations involve those admitted to the U.S. as refugees.

Remember when Barack Obama characterized the refugees he was swarming into the country as “widows and orphans?” That was a lie to placate you while he ushered in terrorists and child rapists.

In perhaps the most glaring example of Iraqi terrorists getting into the U.S, two Iraqi refugees living in Bowling Green, Ky., were convicted in 2013 of plotting to help Al Qaeda. The men were also hit with additional charges after their fingerprints matched ones found on IEDs used in Iraq to kill U.S. soldiers

Wait, I thought that never happened and Kellyanne Conway made it up. That’s what the media said, anyway.

The Left Will Eat Itself III

Posted by V the K at 10:50 am - February 21, 2017.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace

A left-wing professor at Wake Forest University is under siege from left-wing students because he wrote an opinion piece stating the truth that Mohammedanism is profoundly, deeply, and fundamentally anti-gay.

Shannon Gilreath, a professor of law and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies wrote the op-ed, “Europe’s Islam problem and U.S. immigration Policy”, for The Washington Blade on January 19, arguing in it that Islam fundamentally clashes with gay rights. “I come from the American Left. I am a feminist. I am a gay rights activist,” he begins. “Consequently, the argument I am about to make for tighter U.S. controls on immigration of Muslims may surprise some readers. It shouldn’t.” Gilreath goes on to claim that “Islam is endemically antithetical to the well-being of gay people,” contending that “If anything approaching this kind of destruction had been unleashed under the banner of any political organization, the Nazis or Klan for examples, the Left would be quick to condemn and short on tolerance for adherents who ask us to believe that they only subscribe to the ideology’s nonlethal tenets,” but that “because this mayhem is perpetrated in the name of religion…the gloves stay on.” “American liberals don’t want to hear this argument,” he explains, “because they share, ironically, with American conservatives a rather unreflective commitment to the defense of religion at all costs.” The article spawned a demonstration on campus by students who claimed that his article was “offensive and overgeneralizing,”

The little bubble these snowflakes live in don’t handle the truth very well.  But the professor is wrong about the left’s “defense of religion at all costs.” The left only defends religions other than Christianity. The left wants the Christian faith disparaged in public education and media, its expression banned from the public square, and its practitioners banned from holding public office.  The Mohammedans agree with all of this.

The Democrat-Feminist-Islamist Nexus

One of the organizers of the “Women’s March,” Linda Sarsour — you probably saw her, the woman in the hijab the feminists were parading everywhere, because a woman wearing an Islamic symbol of women’s subjugation is so foreign and edgy, it’s bound to offend all those knuckle-dragging, bitter-clinging, deplorables in flyover country — turns out to be an Islamic Supremacist with links to a terrorist organization.

Imagine my shocked face.

Oh, and one of the other featured speakers at the event tortured an old man to death for $9,000.

One other thing and then, I hope, no more posts about the left-wing’s tantrum last weekend (because surely the months and years ahead will be filled with even more left-wing tantrums) I saw multiple versions of this meme this weekend which kind of illustrates the ignorance of the Feminist left and their ability to latch onto vapid clichés pretty damn well.

(more…)

Speaking of Denial

Posted by V the K at 2:27 pm - December 20, 2016.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace

The families of victims who were gunned down by Islamist Democrat Omar Mateen are filing a lawsuit against the people and organizations they claim are responsible for “radicalizing” him… Twitter, Facebook, and Google.

In the lawsuit, Michigan attorney Keith Altman alleged that ISIS is “dependent of Twitter, YouTube [which Google owns] and Facebook to terrorize,” and that the group uses the social media platforms to recruit and spread its message.

This is like suing the Kool-Aid company over the Jonestown Massacre.

Their lawyer is from a firm called… I am not making this up… 1-800-LAW-FIRM.

15492445_10158065142605515_6361271716943395481_n

Deep, Deep Denial

Posted by V the K at 10:37 am - December 20, 2016.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace

15589749_1820448098176510_3764366961127689549_n

So, did the truck act alone? When did the truck become radicalized? Is there something we, as a society, could have done to reach out to the truck and prevent this tragedy?

Alternately, was the truck perhaps hacked by Vladimir Putin?

Blame It On Christmas

Posted by V the K at 10:31 am - December 2, 2016.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace

ABC News: “Christmas party may have triggered San Bernardino terror attack” (Warning: Obnoxious Autoplay at Link)

“Authorities believe the terrorist attack on Dec. 2, 2015, in San Bernardino may have been triggered by a mandatory employee training session and lunch replete (sic) with holiday decorations, including a Christmas tree, that shooter Syed Farook was forced to attend.”

In their quest to ‘understand’ the unimaginable – “What would make someone mass murder?” – the MFM are seeking to legitimize the jihadis’ complains that everyday things are unacceptable.

To sane people, mass murder is not a rational or reasonable response to an office party. Mass murder is not a reasonable or rational response to possible homosexual attraction and the temptation of available partners at a gay nightclub. Mass murder is not a reasonable or rational response to not getting along with your class study group. Mass murder is not a reasonable or rational response to feeling lost on campus.

The left continues to search for some level of appeasement that will satisfy the jihadis. They won’t find it. “Islam” doesn’t mean “Tolerance,” it means “Submission.”

Abdul Razak Ali Artan: Islamist Poster Boy

Posted by V the K at 9:04 am - November 29, 2016.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace

I’m now comfortable enough that this has been verified. Before he went on his vehicular assault and stabbing spree, Abdul Razak Ali Artan was held up as a model Mohammedan by the folks who think we need to invite his ilk into our country by the millions.

“I wanted to pray in the open, but I was scared with everything going on in the media. I’m a Muslim, it’s not what the media portrays me to be. If people look at me, a Muslim praying, I don’t know what they’re going to think, what’s going to happen. But, I don’t blame them. It’s the media that put that picture in their heads so they’re just going to have it and it, it’s going to make them feel uncomfortable. I was kind of scared right now. But I just did it. I relied on God. I went over to the corner and just prayed.”

Also, he probably lied about his age to enter the country (Great vetting program you got there, Barky) because the US incentivizes “refugees” to lie about their age… and about being refugees.

IDK which is more remarkable; the ability of Mohammedans to lie without conscience, or the willingness of liberals to lap their lies up.

Random Violence in Buckeye Country

Posted by V the K at 4:09 pm - November 28, 2016.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace

69217225

The Left is… once again… disappointed that a terror attack was not committed by a white, Christian, Trump-voting NRA member. Therefore, the attack in Columbus OH today can be officially downgraded from a “horrific terror attack,” to a mere “random act of violence by a lone wolf who’s motivation may never be known.”

The left was briefly excited because early reports indicated it was a mass shooting. But, alas, they were let down again as the Mohammedan immigrant refugee only used a car and a machete butcher knife in his attempt to murder multiple people.

Obama Administration Admits Their Omar Mateen Narrative Was Horse Crap

When Mohammedan Democrat Omar Marteen committed mass murder at a gay disco in Orlando, Florida, the Obama Administration professed to have no clue about his motives. The media were fed a line that he literally had nothing to do with ISIS, and only declared himself a jihadist when he was on the phone to police. He had no prior links to ISIS, and they even floated the idea that he was an oppressed gay man who for some reason decided to shoot up a gay disco for reasons having nothing to do with Islam or terror.

And those who have believed every other lie the Obama Administration and its media surrogates have told them embraced this lie too.

13450778_10209810205441516_4274263183459974622_n

Months after the fact, it comes out, in the form of one those Friday night document drops the regime uses when they wasnt to bury a story, that Omar Mateen had been heavily invested in ISIS propaganda for a long time.

The bulk of the evidence supporting the conclusion that Mateen was motivated by his support for ISIS wasn’t revealed until last week when Orlando authorities finally made Mateen’s phone conversations with police public in transcript form. From the Wall Street Journal:

Yo, the airstrike that killed Abu Wahid a few weeks ago—That’s what triggered it, okay?” he told the police negotiator, an apparent reference in the transcript to the Islamic State commander.

Abu Wahib, whose real name is Shaker Wahib al-Fahdawi, was known as one of the group’s more Internet-savvy leaders, often appearing in propaganda videos.

Only an “avid consumer” of Islamic State propaganda would know when Abu Wahib was killed, said Seamus Hughes, the deputy director of George Washington University’s Program on Extremism.

“This isn’t somebody who decided that night he was going to wrap his personal grievances around ISIS,” Mr. Hughes said.

Obama and the Democrat-Media Complex put out what they wanted to be true (“Nothing to do with Islam or terror, it was all about teh gunnz”) and the people who wanted to believe the Narrative — though it defied all reason and common sense — lapped it up.

Same Planet, Different Worlds

Posted by V the K at 9:05 am - September 23, 2016.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace

What the media are telling you is going on in Mohammedan-Occupied Sweden (CNN).

At a bench on the streets of Stockholm, Imane Asry, Shama Vafaipour and Maryam Dinar touch up their makeup and adjust their artfully wrapped hijabs. In pointy heels, wide-leg trousers and loosely draped neutral tones, these three women who look like they could be models are preparing to take photos for their Instagram accounts. The resulting shots are seen by their hundreds and thousands of followers.

Like any modern-day fashionista, Muslim women are expressing their style and showcasing it to the world through social media. The added twist, however, is doing so in a way that maintains the sense of modesty dictated by Islamic values.

What’s actually going on:

Swedish Police are losing the battle against increasing levels (of) crime and violence in the country as now 55 areas are labeled “No-Go” Zones.

In February Express.co.uk reported the Scandinavian country has seen a huge surge in crime since the start of the migrants crisis in Europe with a rise in sex assaults, drug dealing and children carrying weapons.

Bombings in New York City and New Jersey

Posted by V the K at 6:34 am - September 19, 2016.
Filed under: Religion Of Peace

Since I seldom Twitter any more, I don’t know if the left broke out the #TerrorHasNoReligion and #StandWithIslam hashtags. Personally, I was really hoping it would be Lutherans this time. You know, just to mix things up a little. But, alas, no, it’s the Mohammedans yet again.

Or, is it?

“You probably have all seen the news by now, the explosives detonated in New York City, that was me,” the first post said.

“I did it because I cannot stand society. I cannot live in a world where homosexuals like myself as well as the rest of the LGBTQ+ community are looked down upon by society.”

It also singled out Donald Trump, saying, “I am not going to live in a country where it is OK to have a misogynist, xenophobic, racist Islamophobic, republican candidate running for President of The United States!”

[Note: I am pretty sure this was just a bad attempt at trolling. I shouldn’t have to explain that, but, there are some very stupid people who make it necessary to explain that.]

The cops are looking for Ahmad Khan Rahami, a naturalised US citizen who was born in Afghanistan. i.e. a refugee. Like the million more Mohammedan refugees from Jihadistan that Hillary and Obama want to expedite into the country.

No word so far on how he feels about gay oppression.

Also, I have finally started watching season six of ‘The Walking Dead’ on Netflix. Speaking of ‘The Walking Dead,’ here’s how Hillary responded to news of the bombing.

Update: 29 people were injured. Someone should inform Gary Johnson.