Gay Patriot Header Image

Much ado, part II

I wanted to capture some details for future reference.

  • Comey affirms that NYT has been publishing false stories of Trumprussia collusion.
  • Comey admits to maliciously leaking his own memos.

    Hmm – does this put Comey in legal jeopardy? (UPDATE: Seems more and more like it should. Comey’s formal memos of what happened on his job are government property. Could they be privileged information? Even classified? Then who was Comey to take them out of the office when he was fired; much less, to leak them?)

  • Senator Jim Risch dismantles any ‘obstruction’ case against Trump:

    Risch: ‘I hope’, this is [Comey’s version of] the President speaking, ‘I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go…I hope you can let this go.’

    […]

    Comey: “Correct.”

    […]

    Risch: “Thank you for that. He did not direct you to let it go.”

    Comey: “Not in his words, no.”

    Risch: “He did not order you to let it go.”

    Comey: “Again, those words are not an order.”

    Risch: “He said ‘I hope’. Now, like me you probably did hundreds of cases, maybe thousands of cases charging people with criminal offenses…Do you know of any case where a person has been charged for obstruction of justice, for that matter of any other criminal offense, where they said or thought they hoped for an outcome?”

    […]

    Comey: “I don’t as I sit here.”

  • In other comments, Comey said that he interpreted Trump’s words as a direction, but that is, of course, B.S. Because
    1. Comey affirms above that he knew it wasn’t a direction, AND
    2. If Trump had given Comey a direction that Comey felt to be unethical or illegal, then Comey is in legal jeopardy for not having reported it sooner.
    3. Furthermore, per HotAir, Tom Cotton got Comey to acknowledge that he never threatened to resign over Trump’s behavior, as Comey did in a famous 2004 confrontation in John Ashcroft’s hospital room. Instead, and by his own admission, Comey told Trump “that I would see what we could do.”

    This exchange is stunning…ly bad for Comey:

    Rubio: Did you object to or inform the WH counsel about Trump’s “I hope” statement?
    Comey: “No.”
    Rubio: “Why not?”
    Comey: “I don’t know.”

  • We also have Comey and Trump both calling each other liars on certain points, which makes it he-said-he-said.

    Ever read Trump’s book? He has been dealing with lawyers day-in, day-out for DECADES. Figuring out how to influence people, without actually committing legal or ethical violations. His sister was a big-time Federal judge. The notion that President Trump would make inappropriate remarks to the likes of Comey, was always shaky.

  • Comey reveals that the Obama administration pressured him to downplay Hillary’s scandal. Call it a “matter”, not an “investigation”:

    LANKFORD: …the previous attorney general [Loretta Lynch] asking you about the investigation on the Clinton e-mails saying you were asked to not call it an investigation anymore. But call it a matter. You said that confused you. You can give us additional details on that?

    COMEY: Well, it concerned me because…the campaigns were talking about interacting with the FBI in the course of our work. The Clinton campaign at the time was using all kinds of euphemisms, security matters, things like that for what was going on.

    We were getting to a place where the attorney general and I were both going to testify and talk publicly about it I wanted to know was she going to authorize us to confirm we have an investigation. She said yes, don’t call it that, call it a matter. I said why would I do that? She said, just call it a matter…that concerned me because that language tracked the way the [Clinton] campaign was talking about the FBI’s work and that’s concerning…the attorney general was looking to align the way we talked about our work with the way [the Clinton campaign] was describing that. It was inaccurate. We had an investigation open for the federal bureau of investigation, we had an investigation open at the time. That gave me a queasy feeling.

    Where’s the outcry on that? Or, might it be coming? 🙂

UPDATE:

  • Alan Dershowitz – hardly a conservative – makes the interesting point that, if Trump ever had ordered Comey to stop an investigation, his actions would be totally constitutional. Worth viewing.

    Here’s what I got from it. A President can’t interfere with a judicial process. For example, he can’t tamper with juries or witnesses, end a prosecution (short of doing a presidential pardon), defy a subpoena or destroy evidence. But an FBI investigation is NOT a judicial process. Constitutionally, the FBI Director takes orders from the President. Past presidents have ended investigations they didn’t like. If Congress smells a rat, Congress can impeach the President; but that, too, is a non-judicial process (separate and political).

  • These exchanges settle a lot. Flaming skull time!

    Senator Burr: Are you confident that no votes cast in the 2016 presidential election were altered?
    Comey: I’m confident. By the time I left, I had seen no indication of that whatsoever.

    Senator Burr: Did the President, at any time, ask you to stop the FBI investigation into Russian involvement in the 2016 elections?
    Comey: Not to my understanding, no.

    Senator Burr: Did you ever have access to the actual [DNC e-mail] hardware that was hacked? Or did you have to rely on a third party to provide you the data that they had collected?
    Comey: In the case of the DNC…we did not have access to the devices themselves. [ed: which means, and as I’ve stated before, the FBI relied on a report by CrowdStrike, a discredited DNC-paid company]

    Senator Risch: While you were director, the POTUS was not under investigation [at any time], is that a fair statement?
    Comey: That’s correct.

    Senator Collins: I’m trying to understand whether there was any kind of investigation of the President under way.
    Comey: No.

    Senator Rubio: …the president agreed with your statement that it would be great if we could have an investigation…
    Comey: Yes, sir. He actually went farther than that. He — he said, “And if some of my satellites did something wrong, it’d be good to find that out.”

    Lefties: You are not living in reality, if you think Trump is in trouble on this set of issues.

No Matter How Many Times the Evidence Is Proven False, The Narrative Remains

Posted by V the K at 4:08 pm - February 3, 2017.
Filed under: Shiny Objects & Squirrels

There’s this Narrative, y’see. The Narrative is that “Donald Trump’s presidency is encouraging racist, alt-right, white nationalists to commit hate crimes against Muslims and people of color.”

So when a story comes along that fits The Narrative, it’s immediately published/broadcast. (“Too good to check.”) Like this one.

On Monday, news outlets across Wisconsin – and the nation – posted the story that “two Beloit students in residence halls were targets of hate crimes.”

Beloit College officials first reported that an anti-Semitic note was placed under a student’s door last Friday. Early Monday morning, an anti-Muslim threat was found spray-painted on another student’s residence hall door, and a swastika on a nearby wall.

Beloit security reportedly discovered the words, “Die,” “Sand nigger go home,” and #Muslimban in red paint on the student’s door on the second floor of the college’s Bushnell Hall.

And then it turns out to be fake. There’s a brief “correction” and then they go on to publicize the next fake hate crime that fits The Narrative.

“A Beloit College student admitted fabricating an incident in which a swastika, anti-Muslim and ethnic and racial slurs were spray-painted on a dorm room door and a nearby wall.”

The only violent hate crimes are happening on the left, e.g. Berkeley, CA

A Corrupt President Under Foreign Influence

So, President Obama gave the anti-American, terror-sponsoring Government of Iran over $10 Billion in the last four years and I’m supposed to be bothered because Donald Trump wants peaceful relations with Russia?

Senior Iranian officials late last week confirmed reports that the total amount of money paid to Iran over the past four years is in excess of $10 billion, a figure that runs counter to official estimates provided by the White House.

But wait, there’s more!: Obama Gifts Iran With Massive Uranium Shipment From Russia Sufficient “For More Than 10 Nuclear Bombs”

No wonder Obama desperately wants us distracted by that “Russian Hacking” story.

Is it Really Fair for Democrats to Terrorize People Like This?

Posted by V the K at 7:51 pm - November 11, 2016.
Filed under: Shiny Objects & Squirrels

Part of the reason so many angry Hillary voters are violently protesting is because in order to keep gays and women on the plantation, Democrats have engaged in blatant scaremongering tactics using surrogate groups like the Human Rights Campaign (a group that still exists only because perpetuating the illusion of victimhood is easier than getting a real job). And naturally, because these groups have been perpetuating the scare tactics, a lot of gullible Hillary voters now claim to be frightened.

Jay Brown, a spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest gay rights organization, said its office had received calls throughout the day on Wednesday from frightened people who wanted to know what the election results might mean for them.
Some callers wondered if they should speed up wedding plans so they could be married before the inauguration, in case a President Trump tries to overturn gay marriage, he said. Others worried that the military would reinstate “don’t ask, don’t tell,” the ban on openly gay and lesbian service members that ended in 2011.

(Oddly enough, this apocryphal story of gays rescheduling same-sex weddings is being echoed by virtue-signaling liberals) in other parts of the country.

For months, I’ve been looking forward to a same-sex wedding taking place this winter, where I would be working as the couple’s photographer. Now that Trump is our President-Elect, they’ve moved up their wedding date in case they won’t be able to get married once he takes office. Another young woman who recently came to her family asked me, “Will it even be safe to be openly gay here anymore?” Another woman in her 30s that I know was emboldened to come out to her family yesterday. “It was hard, but important to be heard and seen.” She said that as scared she is, she feels that this is a way for her to be brave and take action after the election.

The idea that Trump is going to unilaterally overturn gay marriage within a month of taking office is stupid. And if that’s what you’re afraid of, yes, you are also stupid. The Democrat Party keeps you stupid and scared because it’s the best way to keep you voting for them. Even if Trump wanted to… which I doubt he does… it would take years to overturn the Obergefell decision (even if it is a decision that’s unsupportable by any objective reading of the Constitution).  And I don’t believe he has any intention of doing so. The Democrat Party every election scares women into thinking birth control and abortion will be outlawed by Republican presidents; none of whom have ever even made any attempt to outlaw either. 

The willingness of people willing to go through life ignorant and frightened for the benefit of a corrupt political party is both baffling and offensive.

Obama Administration Admits Their Omar Mateen Narrative Was Horse Crap

When Mohammedan Democrat Omar Marteen committed mass murder at a gay disco in Orlando, Florida, the Obama Administration professed to have no clue about his motives. The media were fed a line that he literally had nothing to do with ISIS, and only declared himself a jihadist when he was on the phone to police. He had no prior links to ISIS, and they even floated the idea that he was an oppressed gay man who for some reason decided to shoot up a gay disco for reasons having nothing to do with Islam or terror.

And those who have believed every other lie the Obama Administration and its media surrogates have told them embraced this lie too.

13450778_10209810205441516_4274263183459974622_n

Months after the fact, it comes out, in the form of one those Friday night document drops the regime uses when they wasnt to bury a story, that Omar Mateen had been heavily invested in ISIS propaganda for a long time.

The bulk of the evidence supporting the conclusion that Mateen was motivated by his support for ISIS wasn’t revealed until last week when Orlando authorities finally made Mateen’s phone conversations with police public in transcript form. From the Wall Street Journal:

Yo, the airstrike that killed Abu Wahid a few weeks ago—That’s what triggered it, okay?” he told the police negotiator, an apparent reference in the transcript to the Islamic State commander.

Abu Wahib, whose real name is Shaker Wahib al-Fahdawi, was known as one of the group’s more Internet-savvy leaders, often appearing in propaganda videos.

Only an “avid consumer” of Islamic State propaganda would know when Abu Wahib was killed, said Seamus Hughes, the deputy director of George Washington University’s Program on Extremism.

“This isn’t somebody who decided that night he was going to wrap his personal grievances around ISIS,” Mr. Hughes said.

Obama and the Democrat-Media Complex put out what they wanted to be true (“Nothing to do with Islam or terror, it was all about teh gunnz”) and the people who wanted to believe the Narrative — though it defied all reason and common sense — lapped it up.

When nations, companies or movements throw vengeful tantrums

Every grownup knows what a temper tantrum looks like. The kid didn’t get his way. It’s time to make the grownups pay – by causing obstacles, by screeching about anything and everything, by hitting, and so forth. The kid might still not win on the immediate issue X. But who knows, the grownups might just try to mollify him on another issue Y. It’s part revenge, part blackmail. We can expect a lot of tantrums now over Brexit.

Brexit doesn’t change much, “in the now”. First, it hasn’t even happened. (It will be weeks or months before Britain invokes Article 50.) Second, if and when it happens, it need not affect the existing terms of European trade, finance or hardly anything other than British border control. All that it will take to keep the existing trade going is a few new pieces of paper with a few new signatures.

No, Brexit is more of a matter for the future. Assuming it happens, it will mean that the UK’s -future course- is to avoid a full-on political merger with the rest of Europe; avoid the destruction of its borders and sovereignty; etc.

And, to the various socialist cronies of Europe, that’s unforgivable. And for years, vast problems (unrelated to Brexit) have been piling up for them. And for years, they’ve tried to not admit the full extent of their problems. Problems which they have caused and/or failed to deal with.

Guess what? Now that they didn’t get their way on Brexit, they’re going to blame everything on Brexit. Even though Brexit is mostly unrelated.

It’s as if termites have eaten away at your home for years. Your home is ready to crash. You have failed to deal with it. Now your partner insists that you stay home on Saturday night and don’t go to that casino. Guess what? Your plan is to light a little fire to help your termite-eaten home crash faster; and when the cops arrive, you’ll blame your partner for everything. Now that’s a tantrum.

It’s already begun. Earlier we had the credit downgrades on the UK. It’s pure payback, of course. Nothing fundamental has changed about the UK’s finances. The ratings companies became political, some years ago. Governments can and will torture the ratings companies; therefore, they do the bidding of governments. The downgrades then add to market turmoil. In other words: Kid throws tantrum.

Another example is, crashing Italian banks that demand massive new bailouts. European banks’ finances have been rotten for years. Their stocks were inevitably going to crash at some point, when the world admitted the reality. But guess what? Brexit! So give us new bailouts!

It’s the new Climate Change, or maybe the new Salted Caramel. Everything this year is going to be Brexit. Decaying art? Brexit! Venezuelan collapse? Brexit! Fukushima radiation levels? Brexit! Solar flares? Brexit! U.S. recession? Personal negativity? Brexit!

Why not? The world – or at least, the media-socialist-crony world – hates UK Independence (and border control) that much. Everyone will agree to join the fun and not be honest about the longstanding, real causes of a great many problems.

UPDATE – it continues: The European Central Bank’s leader, Mario Draghi, predicts low economic growth and currency devaluations from Brexit. Let’s be clear.

  • Europe was already going to be stuck in years of low growth.
  • Currency devaluation is what Draghi has already been wanting and attempting, for years.

But guess what? The new scapegoat, Brexit!

Begun, the Bathroom Wars Have

Posted by V the K at 7:21 am - May 10, 2016.
Filed under: Shiny Objects & Squirrels

Isn’t it interesting that the Obama Administration does absolutely nothing about ‘Sanctuary Cities’ that defy Federal Immigration laws, but they are coming down like a ton of bricks on North Carolina for requiring people to use biologically-appropriate bathrooms in state-owned buildings? (Contrary to the left’s dishonest propaganda, businesses may do as they please, under the law, which is as it should be).

Congratulations to the Obama Regime for deftly keeping the craptacular economy and word that the regime systematically lied about the Iranian Nuclear deal out of the news cycle for another day.

By the way, Target’s proud support of bathroom misappropriation isn’t working out too well for them; their stock is down and their public image has been damaged. They’re now reportedly going to meet with the American Family Association to discuss their concerns. (I bet it kills them to have to meet with “bigots.”) The AFA has offered the perfectly (to mentally well-adjusted normal people) reasonable suggestion that the stores simply add a unisex bathroom for people with vaginas who insist that they are men, and people with penises who insist that they are women. Perhaps they can add a litter box for people who think they are kitty cats, a fire hydrant for people who think they are dogs,  and a sturdy tree branch over a freshly-washed car for people who think they are birdies.

Well, That Didn’t Take Long

Posted by V the K at 5:20 am - January 4, 2016.
Filed under: Shiny Objects & Squirrels

On New Year’s Eve, yours truly made a couple of predictions.

The Republicans, having completely sold out and fully-funded the Obama Agenda through 2018 — will now go back to playing Pretend Opposition for the election year, perhaps even passing bills they know Obama will veto to try and fool the yokels into thinking they are a legitimate opposition party.

Huzzah.

Obama will take “Executive Action” on gun control that will, naturally, target law abiding gun owners and not the gang bangers that killed 390 in Chicago and 343 in Baltimore this past year.

Called it.

 

To a Lot of People, This Flag Represents Hatred and Bigotry

Posted by V the K at 7:42 pm - June 23, 2015.
Filed under: Shiny Objects & Squirrels

290396F000000578-3125676-image-a-56_1434414532906

John Nolte has a point, if you’re on the wrong side of gay marriage or any other agenda items, then this is the flag of your oppressor. This is the flag they waved as they took away your business, made you lose your job, or vandalized your church.

This Confederate Battle Emblem business isn’t really about sparing people’s feelings, or ending discrimination. It’s about showing who has political power, and who doesn’t. And I have proof for this proposition.

Another Self-Inflicted Hate Crime?

Posted by V the K at 7:45 pm - June 18, 2015.
Filed under: Shiny Objects & Squirrels

From the “what a stereotypical leftist thinks a bigoted Christian sounds like” wording of the “hate note” to the fact that the “victim” is publicizing a “GoFundMe” Account, this smells like rotten fish.

A Baltimore woman claims to have found this note “inside her door” attacking her for her “Rainbow and Obama” themed front yard. So, she immediately sets up a GoFundMe account and begins seeking publicity on social media.

I am starting this fundraiser so I can work to make my Home even More “relentlessly gay” If we go high enough, I will see if I can get a Rainbow Roof!

Because my invisible relentlessly gay rainbow dragon should live up there in style!

11401493_10207186861580957_5830465916864805813_n0

And people are apparently donating money to this. Because it’s not like, you know, veterans or disadvantaged children could use some charity.

Helping a scam artist fund her invisible gay dragon should be all of our priority.

The Power of the Press

Posted by V the K at 5:51 pm - March 31, 2015.
Filed under: Shiny Objects & Squirrels

Isn’t it interesting how the ginned-up outrage over Indiana’s Religious Freedom Law has completely driven coverage of Hillary’s email scandal and Obama’s “Neville Chamberlain Goes to Teheran” Act out of the news?

Distracting Americans – from the economy?

If it isn’t Michael Brown or Elizabeth Lauten, it’s Eric Garner(*) or Trayvon Martin or some other media frenzy. In other words, our media “treats” us to a series of frenzies; frenzies that are stupid because – apart from many of the media claims dissolving under scrutiny – there are more important things for the nation to notice.

I’m beginning to think it’s deliberate. For one thing, over the years I’ve seen how the frenzies get nourished (or prevented) by various political fixers, special interests and even government agencies. For another thing, it’s common sense: if the phrase “powerful people” means anything, then certain people have the power to promote (or block) certain media stories to suit their interests.

Finally, whenever you’re confronted with vicious nonsense, you should ask the question “Who benefits?” And again, the series of stupid frenzies does a job: it blots out public notice and discussion of nationally-important topics. It especially blots out discussion of the scandals/failures of the Obama administration.

And that could be Gruber, the IRS scandal, Obamacare, the NSA’s blanket/warrantless spying, Fast and Furious, vote fraud, unconstitutional rule-by-decree, or any number of failures (Iraq/ISIS) for which a Republican president would be crucified. But I think the most glaring problem where President Obama needs a distraction is: his terrible economy.

And now for a little news on the economy. Black Friday retail sales were a disaster by conventional measures. According to the National Retail Federation, sales during the four-day Thanksgiving holiday period plunged by 11% (from $57.4 billion a year ago, to $50.9 billion).

NRF’s CEO Matt Shay offered an absurd explanation – he claimed that sales were down because of (1) Teh Interwebs and (2) an improving economy:

He also attributed the declines to better online offerings and an improving economy where “people don’t feel the same psychological need to rush out and get the great deal that weekend, particularly if they expected to be more deals,” he said.

But Cyber Monday was also weak. And Shay implies that, if sales had not declined (or had even been up), that would have been a sign of a *bad* economy…Riiiiiiiight.

A more sensible explanation is that Americans have less money to spend, because they are struggling to cover basic necessities:

…the Journal analyzed Labor Department data on 2013 out-of-pocket spending for the middle 60% of the population by income — households earning between about $18,000 and $95,000 a year, before taxes.

The data show they are losing ground. Overall spending for the group rose by about 2.3% over the six-year period from 2007, even as inflation totaled about 12%. At the same time, income for the group stagnated, rising less than half a percent…

There it is. The WSJ analysis did not look at 2014, but I can assure you, trends continued in 2014 (aside from our very recent decline in oil/gas prices). In Obama’s bad economy, people struggle more than ever just to cover food, rent and health care: (more…)

My Crazy Conspiracy Theory

The Feminist Left is promoting a ‘Narrative’ (cough… Big Lie … cough) that college and university campuses are basically Rape Zones where wild-eyed men rape women constantly in a mad frenzy of rapey rapiness (because… The Patriarchy!). In fact, the Narrative is so powerful that a feminist journalist can publish articles about gang rapes without any proof that they actually happened and universities will respond by punishing the men that didn’t commit the rapes that didn’t happen even after the feminist journalist pretty much admits there’s no proof that they happened, but it doesn’t matter anyway because… ‘The Narrative.’

The ‘Narrative’ is being used as justification for university officials to strip men accused of sexual misconduct of their Constitutional protections and, in some cases, to damage their careers and reputations.

So, is it crazy to think that the goal of the militant feminist left is to turn institutions of higher education into environments that are so hostile to heterosexual men that even larger numbers of them will forgo college educations. Meaning that women will receive an even more disproportionate number of degrees and thus making the sisterhood dominant in positions of power and influence in society?

I know, it’s a crazy idea… but on the other hand, the left are crazy (and malevolent) people.

Just to be clear, I am not saying that I believe that this is a feminist conspiracy, just using that language as a launching point for further discussion

Just to be clear, I am not saying that I believe that this is a feminist conspiracy, just using that language as a launching point for further discussion

Democrats to Use Ray Rice to Gin Up the Feminist Vote

Posted by V the K at 9:43 am - September 15, 2014.
Filed under: Shiny Objects & Squirrels

I thought I smelled a rat.

[Democrat] Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand on Sunday said there could be congressional hearings following the domestic violence incident between Baltimore Ravens player Ray Rice and his wife.

In an interview on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” the Democratic senator from New York said the “way the NFL handled this was awful, it was outrageous.”

“If the NFL doesn’t police themselves, then we will be looking more into it,” she said. “I wouldn’t be surprised if we had hearings.”

Gillibrand was one of 16 women senators to send a letter to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. urging a “zero-tolerance policy” for domestic violence.

Funny how the NFL… the people who actually punished Ray Rice, are “outrageous.” But the New Jersey judge and prosecutor who let him off scot-free are not criticized at all; because they are loyal party apparatchiks.

The fundamental transformation of the United State Obama promised apparently includes the Soviet-style inject of politics into every aspect of like including sports and entertainment.

On the latter note, the “entertainment networks” are trying to help Hillary out with blatant propaganda in the form of new shows featuring a “take charge” female secretary of state (“Madame Secretary” on CBS) and a smart, effective woman president (“State of Affairs” on NBC). If you recall, the networks wanted to do Hillary hagiographies a year or so ago, but Republicans threatened to boycott so they backed down. So, this is the networks way of providing Hillary with the equivalent of millions of dollars in campaign advertising through other means.

Yeah, You Guys, Knock It Off

Posted by V the K at 9:04 pm - July 12, 2014.
Filed under: Shiny Objects & Squirrels

CNN Tackles the very important issue of gay white dudes who act like Black Women; after all, you don’t see black women doing gay white dude stuff like wearing pajamas, drinking hot cocoa, and talking about getting health insurance.

BsT-tOJCYAEQ7qU

The Shiny Racist Squirrels Keep Coming

The Democrats have done a darned fine job of using the racial comments of a dottering billionaire with extremely poor taste in women to completely change the subject from Obama’s failed foreign policy (Ukraine, Middle East), failed domestic policies (Obamacare) and disastrous economic policies (1Q GDP Growth .1%). And they intend to keep the hits coming because Race Hate keeps the public distracted and the Leftist Base angry.

So, we can expect the Democrats… both in media and outside … to continue hyping race indefinitely; they would sure rather talk about that than their agenda, that’s for true.

 

Progressive Leftists Push More Speech Censorship; Mrs. Obama Approves

Posted by V the K at 8:19 am - March 11, 2014.
Filed under: Shiny Objects & Squirrels

Since leftists have solved all the economic, social, and fiscal problems in the country; they have turned their attention to policing speech. The latest object of their inexhaustible ire is the word “bossy.” The progressive hive mind has determined that “bossy” is a sexust term that undermines chicks’ self-esteem, or something.

[Obama bundler and Facebook COO Sheryl] Sandberg — the chief operating officer of Facebook and author of the best-selling book “Lean In” — is spearheading the launch of a campaign today to ban the word “bossy,” arguing the negative put-down stops girls from pursuing leadership roles.

The First Mooch Our esteemed First Lady is very much on-board with this very important issue. And this is a very VERY important to the progressive left. But the debt, Benghazi, Fast & Furious, and IRS abuse are “phony scandals.”

 

So let me get this right:

The administration—whose latest foray into unobstructed, unlegislated, we’ve-got-this, go-it-aloneism was the fabulously ‘effed up roll-out of HealthCare.gov—is going to make 2014 the year of the Executive Branch takes on the world without the messiness of involving the People’s Branch of the federal government?

This’ll be something to see…

-Nick (ColoradoPatriot, from The Ranch)

Holding Christie More Accountable than Obama

While the MFM was busy giving the Chrispie Chreme Bridge Scandal 17 times more coverage in one day than Obama’s IRS scandal got in six months, the Obama administration appointed an Obama campaign donor to investigate the Obama Administration’s abuse of the IRS to target and cripple groups opposed to the policies of the Obama Administration.

Ah, Chicago Style Government.

Also, the IRS is seeking to implement a new rule to shut down Tea Party style opposition to Dear Reader’s regime.

The IRS wants to create a new bureaucratic definition that re-labels those common voter information activities by re-naming them “candidate-related political activity.” For short, IRS calls it CRPA, but CRAP would fit better.

This is actually a gag rule. But the IRS’s new speech restrictions do not apply to labor unions, trade associations, political parties, or other non-profit groups such as 501(c)(3)’s. The impact is limited to the 501(c)(4)’s, which are the favorite vehicle for Tea Party groups.

OK, so Obama is just trying to shut down the free speech of political opponents. Nothing here for the media to cover. I mean, it’s not like he ever snarled up traffic at rush hour for political purposes.
And wait
And wait

By the way, are you aware more people have been fired over Bridgegate than over Fast and Furious, Benghazi, and the Obamacare debacle combined. (1>0)

Update: Just when you thought it couldn’t get any more stupider.

White Santa/Black Santa

So, there’s this nontroversy being ginned up because Megyn Kelly of FoxNews — responding to a click-bait article on Slate that claimed the Caucasian-ness of Santa Claus hurt black people’s feelers — made the offensive, shocking, outrageous observation that … um… Santa Claus is a fictional literary character who has usually been depicted as white.

I know, try to restrain your outrage. You might hurt yourself.

The left got very, very upset about this. And you know it was a serious news story because Jon Stewart got all fake-angry about it and made funny faces. Also, CNN.

Anyway, why is this news? I have several theories why the left chose this story to be the “Thing everybody is supposed to be crazy-mad about this week.”

a. The left needed to change the subject from the SCOAMF’s boorish, juvenile antics at the Mandela funeral and plummeting poll numbers and his claims about Obamacare winning “Lie of the year.”

b. FoxNews is creaming CNN (and Comedy Central) in the ratings, and this is the left’s way of lashing out.

c. To people who don’t have a freakin’ clue how fiscally boned the USA is, this really is a very important news story, along with that Disney twink who posted nudies and something-something Beyonce.

d. All of the above.

(more…)