<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for GayPatriot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:32:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What took the IRS so long to come clean about the scandal? by Ted B. (Charging Rhino)</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/18/what-took-the-irs-so-long-to-come-clean-about-the-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-757570</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted B. (Charging Rhino)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60488#comment-757570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And the IRS is going to manage Obamacare?

Next they will be proposing to place the IRS in the Dept. of Homeland Security to unify their databases---for our own security.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the IRS is going to manage Obamacare?</p>
<p>Next they will be proposing to place the IRS in the Dept. of Homeland Security to unify their databases&#8212;for our own security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Pat Robertson understand what marriage is for? by Papa Giorgio</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/16/does-pat-robertson-understand-what-marriage-is-for/comment-page-1/#comment-757569</link>
		<dc:creator>Papa Giorgio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60395#comment-757569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@both GayPatriots. I would ask that both of you, and fans here, get the book &quot;What is Marriage,&quot; and read chapters 3 and four. I would enjoy input from you two (and others here).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@both GayPatriots. I would ask that both of you, and fans here, get the book &#8220;What is Marriage,&#8221; and read chapters 3 and four. I would enjoy input from you two (and others here).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Meanwhile, at Obama&#8217;s EPA. . . by V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/18/meanwhile-at-obamas-epa/comment-page-1/#comment-757564</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60491#comment-757564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, let&#039;s totally trust this Government to fairly and responsibly run expanded background checks on gun-owners and grant citizenship to illegal immigrants.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, let&#8217;s totally trust this Government to fairly and responsibly run expanded background checks on gun-owners and grant citizenship to illegal immigrants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal central?  Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by Texann</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/17/scandal-central-or-a-whole-lot-of-talk-that-will-amount-to-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-757563</link>
		<dc:creator>Texann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60480#comment-757563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the government is simply too big for Obama to be in charge because he cannot handle it, there is a simple fix, RESIGN.

When Bush was president. He was responsible for everything the federal government did. Abu Graib, Katrina, CIA breifings on Saddam Hussein&#039;s regime that were identical to every intelligence service around the world... And yet Obama cannot be held to account for failings in his own White House. Sigh, spit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the government is simply too big for Obama to be in charge because he cannot handle it, there is a simple fix, RESIGN.</p>
<p>When Bush was president. He was responsible for everything the federal government did. Abu Graib, Katrina, CIA breifings on Saddam Hussein&#8217;s regime that were identical to every intelligence service around the world&#8230; And yet Obama cannot be held to account for failings in his own White House. Sigh, spit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal central?  Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/17/scandal-central-or-a-whole-lot-of-talk-that-will-amount-to-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-757560</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60480#comment-757560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still think a lot of liberals and non-taxpaying voters look at this as their beloved party-of-Government going after the racists and greedheads they don&#039;t like and they support it fully or don&#039;t care. 

This country is f--ked.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think a lot of liberals and non-taxpaying voters look at this as their beloved party-of-Government going after the racists and greedheads they don&#8217;t like and they support it fully or don&#8217;t care. </p>
<p>This country is f&#8211;ked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What took the IRS so long to come clean about the scandal? by Texann</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/18/what-took-the-irs-so-long-to-come-clean-about-the-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-757558</link>
		<dc:creator>Texann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60488#comment-757558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The light at the end of the tunnel may be the Obamacare train wreck heading straight towards us driven by the IRS!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The light at the end of the tunnel may be the Obamacare train wreck heading straight towards us driven by the IRS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What took the IRS so long to come clean about the scandal? by ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/18/what-took-the-irs-so-long-to-come-clean-about-the-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-757557</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60488#comment-757557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To my eye, Miller seems shocked that a member of the government would not know or approve of what the IRS does every day to extract revenue from the People, for the member to spend.  &quot;Hey Kelly, I&#039;m the goose who lays your golden eggs - so what the heck are you doing to me?&quot; 

I&#039;m not sure what that means, except it doesn&#039;t mean anything good.   It could mean that Kelly was just grandstanding (in which case, we&#039;re all screwed).  Or, it could mean that the IRS is wayyyyyy out of touch (in which case, we&#039;re all screwed but there is a light at the end of the tunnel, if people like Kelly are going to talk about it and maybe fix it).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To my eye, Miller seems shocked that a member of the government would not know or approve of what the IRS does every day to extract revenue from the People, for the member to spend.  &#8220;Hey Kelly, I&#8217;m the goose who lays your golden eggs &#8211; so what the heck are you doing to me?&#8221; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what that means, except it doesn&#8217;t mean anything good.   It could mean that Kelly was just grandstanding (in which case, we&#8217;re all screwed).  Or, it could mean that the IRS is wayyyyyy out of touch (in which case, we&#8217;re all screwed but there is a light at the end of the tunnel, if people like Kelly are going to talk about it and maybe fix it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal central?  Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by Polly</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/17/scandal-central-or-a-whole-lot-of-talk-that-will-amount-to-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-757555</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60480#comment-757555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we had a few Republicans who could and would prevaricate with the alacrity of the Democrats, we&#039;d almost certainly have won at least two more Senate seats in &#039;12.

It&#039;s beginning to look like lying is just good politics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we had a few Republicans who could and would prevaricate with the alacrity of the Democrats, we&#8217;d almost certainly have won at least two more Senate seats in &#8217;12.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s beginning to look like lying is just good politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal central?  Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by davinci</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/17/scandal-central-or-a-whole-lot-of-talk-that-will-amount-to-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-757544</link>
		<dc:creator>davinci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 12:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60480#comment-757544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I meant will NOT pass the House.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant will NOT pass the House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal central?  Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by davinci</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/17/scandal-central-or-a-whole-lot-of-talk-that-will-amount-to-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-757543</link>
		<dc:creator>davinci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 12:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60480#comment-757543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think the Senate version of immigration reform will pass the House.  There will be some tinkering with the current laws, including more visas for skilled workers and less for unskilled.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the Senate version of immigration reform will pass the House.  There will be some tinkering with the current laws, including more visas for skilled workers and less for unskilled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal central?  Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/17/scandal-central-or-a-whole-lot-of-talk-that-will-amount-to-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-757521</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 07:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60480#comment-757521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, keep in mind that there are two things going on here at the same time.  We have an administration that is trying the use the excuse of &quot;we weren&#039;t malevolent, we&#039;re just incompetent&quot; excuse on several items.  At the same time we have career bureaucrats that are not really part and parcel of this particular administration caught in activity that appears to be partisan activism.

What the Republicans really need to do, in my opinion, is play the long game here.  This is not so much about Barack Obama as it is about &quot;progressive&quot; Democrats in general.  The Republicans should leverage this as to why people should not vote for Democrats in any position in any level of government.  We saw this same activism with leaking of information when someone speaks out about a Democrat at many levels of government.  

This is a systemic problem and needs to be treated as such.  This is exactly why you don&#039;t want to vote for &quot;progressives&quot;.

&quot;Progressive&quot; Democrats are upsetting voters in many states with their rush to strip law abiding citizens of their civil rights after this election.  Colorado Democrats did not campaign on a platform of taking guns away from people but they certainly jumped on it after the Connecticut massacre.  I know people in Colorado who are Democrats and they aren&#039;t happy.

Look at what is going on with Democrats in the NY state legislature.  It is just one scandal after another.  These people are acting as if organized crime runs their party (maybe it does!).

But anyway, we can&#039;t limit the scope of this to just Obama.  This is exactly why you don&#039;t vote for Democrats at federal, state, or local levels.  You get dishonest political hacks that can&#039;t be trusted.  They flat out lied, for example, immediately after the ABA meeting where Lois Lerner let the cat out of the bag about the IRS stuff and said they didn&#039;t stage the question:

http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/05/questioner-initially-denied-irs-qa-was-set-up/

The problem seems to be that lying is their first instinct.  In many cases they seem to have no problem whatsoever telling a bald-faced lie and then coming back later and admitting it wasn&#039;t true.  Lies are their initial response, almost a a limbic response.

We need Republicans at the executive level to remove the Democrat appointees.  Bush made a huge mistake in that area keeping so many Clinton appointees and in appointing Democrats (Doug Shulman among them).  We need to purge the Democrats from the various agencies.

I would also recommend reading this:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/05/16/republicans_and_the_long_game_118448.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, keep in mind that there are two things going on here at the same time.  We have an administration that is trying the use the excuse of &#8220;we weren&#8217;t malevolent, we&#8217;re just incompetent&#8221; excuse on several items.  At the same time we have career bureaucrats that are not really part and parcel of this particular administration caught in activity that appears to be partisan activism.</p>
<p>What the Republicans really need to do, in my opinion, is play the long game here.  This is not so much about Barack Obama as it is about &#8220;progressive&#8221; Democrats in general.  The Republicans should leverage this as to why people should not vote for Democrats in any position in any level of government.  We saw this same activism with leaking of information when someone speaks out about a Democrat at many levels of government.  </p>
<p>This is a systemic problem and needs to be treated as such.  This is exactly why you don&#8217;t want to vote for &#8220;progressives&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Progressive&#8221; Democrats are upsetting voters in many states with their rush to strip law abiding citizens of their civil rights after this election.  Colorado Democrats did not campaign on a platform of taking guns away from people but they certainly jumped on it after the Connecticut massacre.  I know people in Colorado who are Democrats and they aren&#8217;t happy.</p>
<p>Look at what is going on with Democrats in the NY state legislature.  It is just one scandal after another.  These people are acting as if organized crime runs their party (maybe it does!).</p>
<p>But anyway, we can&#8217;t limit the scope of this to just Obama.  This is exactly why you don&#8217;t vote for Democrats at federal, state, or local levels.  You get dishonest political hacks that can&#8217;t be trusted.  They flat out lied, for example, immediately after the ABA meeting where Lois Lerner let the cat out of the bag about the IRS stuff and said they didn&#8217;t stage the question:</p>
<p><a href="http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/05/questioner-initially-denied-irs-qa-was-set-up/" rel="nofollow">http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/05/questioner-initially-denied-irs-qa-was-set-up/</a></p>
<p>The problem seems to be that lying is their first instinct.  In many cases they seem to have no problem whatsoever telling a bald-faced lie and then coming back later and admitting it wasn&#8217;t true.  Lies are their initial response, almost a a limbic response.</p>
<p>We need Republicans at the executive level to remove the Democrat appointees.  Bush made a huge mistake in that area keeping so many Clinton appointees and in appointing Democrats (Doug Shulman among them).  We need to purge the Democrats from the various agencies.</p>
<p>I would also recommend reading this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/05/16/republicans_and_the_long_game_118448.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/05/16/republicans_and_the_long_game_118448.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal central?  Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/17/scandal-central-or-a-whole-lot-of-talk-that-will-amount-to-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-757518</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60480#comment-757518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt; Is the investigation of these scandals likely to have real and significant consequences for our government, or are they a lot of talk that will amount to...nothing much?&lt;/blockquote&gt;I think it could go either way.  The story is still being written...by us.

I am far less interested in gaming Republican vs. Democrat in all this, than I am in gaming Liberty vs. Tyranny.  I will happily join with any Democrats/lefties who love human freedom for real.  Operative words, &quot;for real&quot;.  Any reaction less than total outrage on conservatives&#039; behalf on the IRS thing, and grave questions on &lt;em&gt;both&lt;/em&gt; the AP thing and Benghazi, ain&#039;t it.

These latest scandals reveal that Obama has crossed a moral (not political) Rubicon.  It now must be clear to any &lt;em&gt;honest, aware&lt;/em&gt; person that Obama and/or the company (underlings) that he chooses to keep, are wannabe-tyrants.  If Obama &amp; Co. aren&#039;t, then they must now prove it by doing &lt;em&gt;*a lot*&lt;/em&gt; more to fix these scandals.

If they don&#039;t: then they have a tyrannical nature and goals, to which no &lt;em&gt;honest, aware&lt;/em&gt; person can shut their eyes any longer.  NOTHING they say about their good intentions should be believed (until and unless it is matched by a surfeit of big deeds).

From here on out (and again assuming that we don&#039;t see an immediate, 180-degree turnaround): No honest lover of human freedom can view Obama positively.  And no one who views Obama positively can be an honest lover of human freedom.

So the significance-in-moral-fact is already huge... already done.  How it plays out politically, though: Who the heck knows?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> Is the investigation of these scandals likely to have real and significant consequences for our government, or are they a lot of talk that will amount to&#8230;nothing much?</p></blockquote>
<p>I think it could go either way.  The story is still being written&#8230;by us.</p>
<p>I am far less interested in gaming Republican vs. Democrat in all this, than I am in gaming Liberty vs. Tyranny.  I will happily join with any Democrats/lefties who love human freedom for real.  Operative words, &#8220;for real&#8221;.  Any reaction less than total outrage on conservatives&#8217; behalf on the IRS thing, and grave questions on <em>both</em> the AP thing and Benghazi, ain&#8217;t it.</p>
<p>These latest scandals reveal that Obama has crossed a moral (not political) Rubicon.  It now must be clear to any <em>honest, aware</em> person that Obama and/or the company (underlings) that he chooses to keep, are wannabe-tyrants.  If Obama &amp; Co. aren&#8217;t, then they must now prove it by doing <em>*a lot*</em> more to fix these scandals.</p>
<p>If they don&#8217;t: then they have a tyrannical nature and goals, to which no <em>honest, aware</em> person can shut their eyes any longer.  NOTHING they say about their good intentions should be believed (until and unless it is matched by a surfeit of big deeds).</p>
<p>From here on out (and again assuming that we don&#8217;t see an immediate, 180-degree turnaround): No honest lover of human freedom can view Obama positively.  And no one who views Obama positively can be an honest lover of human freedom.</p>
<p>So the significance-in-moral-fact is already huge&#8230; already done.  How it plays out politically, though: Who the heck knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal central?  Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by cjorach</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/17/scandal-central-or-a-whole-lot-of-talk-that-will-amount-to-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-757516</link>
		<dc:creator>cjorach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60480#comment-757516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By mouthing words of defeat you are playing into the hands of the  lap dog media who are circling the wagons around President Obama. There are only a few who speak truth to power so the people will hear and not give up their freedom. Give up their freedom for a leader who has so little respect for the truth and the people he was elected to serve. Think about how your words demoralize the few who still have hope for a bright future for America and her people. Don&#039;t stand down as President Obama stood down when four died in Benghazi begging for help that never came.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By mouthing words of defeat you are playing into the hands of the  lap dog media who are circling the wagons around President Obama. There are only a few who speak truth to power so the people will hear and not give up their freedom. Give up their freedom for a leader who has so little respect for the truth and the people he was elected to serve. Think about how your words demoralize the few who still have hope for a bright future for America and her people. Don&#8217;t stand down as President Obama stood down when four died in Benghazi begging for help that never came.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal central?  Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by Jason B</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/17/scandal-central-or-a-whole-lot-of-talk-that-will-amount-to-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-757515</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60480#comment-757515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re being pessimistic. These scandals aren&#039;t the Clinton/Monica or the Bush/Iraq scandals. Those were obvious inside-the-beltway &quot;gotcha&quot; scandals. These aren&#039;t. They&#039;re still unfolding, and it&#039;s going to be a while before we get anywhere near &quot;critical mass.&quot; Reporters, bloggers, and bystanders who have tried (or will try) to get ahead of the story by trying to massage or minimize it, have (and will) keep stubbing their toes on the facts as they unfold in greater and greater detail.

Keep in mind, we&#039;re only in Week 1 of these scandals, at least for the AP/IRS scandals. And in the media&#039;s eyes , Benghazi is now legitimized and is on Week 1, as well. More scandals- and more actual detail about the existing scandals- will drop in the coming weeks. These scandals all have long legs, and Obama has shown a complete cluselessness in handling the scandals. He&#039;s still operating under the assumption that the media will come back to worship him and it&#039;ll go away. I don&#039;t think they can- or will- at this point. He&#039;s burned too many bridges. 

I&#039;ll leave with this: John Adams once said &quot;Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re being pessimistic. These scandals aren&#8217;t the Clinton/Monica or the Bush/Iraq scandals. Those were obvious inside-the-beltway &#8220;gotcha&#8221; scandals. These aren&#8217;t. They&#8217;re still unfolding, and it&#8217;s going to be a while before we get anywhere near &#8220;critical mass.&#8221; Reporters, bloggers, and bystanders who have tried (or will try) to get ahead of the story by trying to massage or minimize it, have (and will) keep stubbing their toes on the facts as they unfold in greater and greater detail.</p>
<p>Keep in mind, we&#8217;re only in Week 1 of these scandals, at least for the AP/IRS scandals. And in the media&#8217;s eyes , Benghazi is now legitimized and is on Week 1, as well. More scandals- and more actual detail about the existing scandals- will drop in the coming weeks. These scandals all have long legs, and Obama has shown a complete cluselessness in handling the scandals. He&#8217;s still operating under the assumption that the media will come back to worship him and it&#8217;ll go away. I don&#8217;t think they can- or will- at this point. He&#8217;s burned too many bridges. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave with this: John Adams once said &#8220;Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal central?  Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/17/scandal-central-or-a-whole-lot-of-talk-that-will-amount-to-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-757513</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60480#comment-757513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Low Information Voters make up the bulk of the electorate; and they don&#039;t care about anything they don&#039;t see personally affecting them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Low Information Voters make up the bulk of the electorate; and they don&#8217;t care about anything they don&#8217;t see personally affecting them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal central?  Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/17/scandal-central-or-a-whole-lot-of-talk-that-will-amount-to-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-757511</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60480#comment-757511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Based on these FB posts, I have to agree:

&quot;Okay. Let&#039;s just say it. If you have any patience whatsoever for this latest round of Republican subterfuge delaying and distracting from the pressing issues challenging this country - issues Congress should be addressing with great determination, speed, and vigor, just de-friend me now.
 I&#039;m sick to death of the partisan behavior that masquerades as doing the job those elected officials swore an oath to do. In the great BBC series &quot; I Claudius&quot; the emperor Caligula (played marvelously by John Hurt) states, &quot;If the Senate had but one neck, I&#039;d hack it through!&quot;
 I don&#039;t condone violence (including that being done to our system of government) but I certainly understand his frustration.&quot;

Comment to this post:
&quot;ABC&#039;s White House emails didn&#039;t exist; Tea Party groups should not get tax free status; and though I think the law should be repealed, the monitoring of phone numbers alone to try to protect the life of a CIA agent is legal. You&#039;ll find Rove and the Koch brothers orchestrated most of this.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on these FB posts, I have to agree:</p>
<p>&#8220;Okay. Let&#8217;s just say it. If you have any patience whatsoever for this latest round of Republican subterfuge delaying and distracting from the pressing issues challenging this country &#8211; issues Congress should be addressing with great determination, speed, and vigor, just de-friend me now.<br />
 I&#8217;m sick to death of the partisan behavior that masquerades as doing the job those elected officials swore an oath to do. In the great BBC series &#8221; I Claudius&#8221; the emperor Caligula (played marvelously by John Hurt) states, &#8220;If the Senate had but one neck, I&#8217;d hack it through!&#8221;<br />
 I don&#8217;t condone violence (including that being done to our system of government) but I certainly understand his frustration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Comment to this post:<br />
&#8220;ABC&#8217;s White House emails didn&#8217;t exist; Tea Party groups should not get tax free status; and though I think the law should be repealed, the monitoring of phone numbers alone to try to protect the life of a CIA agent is legal. You&#8217;ll find Rove and the Koch brothers orchestrated most of this.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal central?  Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by SoCalRobert</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/17/scandal-central-or-a-whole-lot-of-talk-that-will-amount-to-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-757508</link>
		<dc:creator>SoCalRobert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60480#comment-757508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;re pretty close. Too many Americans think that as long as other people are being taken to Room 101, it&#039;s no biggie; they don&#039;t see a problem. Lefties think government exists to punish people they don&#039;t like so they&#039;re onboard. Those two groups make up a good chunk of the electorate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re pretty close. Too many Americans think that as long as other people are being taken to Room 101, it&#8217;s no biggie; they don&#8217;t see a problem. Lefties think government exists to punish people they don&#8217;t like so they&#8217;re onboard. Those two groups make up a good chunk of the electorate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To those who think IRS snooping was masterminded by rogue agents . . . by Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/17/to-those-who-think-irs-snooping-was-masterminded-by-rogue-agents/comment-page-1/#comment-757506</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 02:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60458#comment-757506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s funny how a few years ago, Obama&#039;s supporters wanted to talk about how different Bush was from Obama.  And now when they run into trouble, they want to talk about how Bush is like Obama.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how a few years ago, Obama&#8217;s supporters wanted to talk about how different Bush was from Obama.  And now when they run into trouble, they want to talk about how Bush is like Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To those who think IRS snooping was masterminded by rogue agents . . . by Ted B. (Charging Rhino)</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/17/to-those-who-think-irs-snooping-was-masterminded-by-rogue-agents/comment-page-1/#comment-757500</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted B. (Charging Rhino)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60458#comment-757500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In light of what&#039;s alleged --- I have to &quot;...drop &#039;em and spread &#039;em&quot; for the IRS just to buy Health Insurance???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In light of what&#8217;s alleged &#8212; I have to &#8220;&#8230;drop &#8216;em and spread &#8216;em&#8221; for the IRS just to buy Health Insurance???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Only the president can end the Benghazi &#8220;sideshow&#8221; by Trevor Loudon&#039;s New Zeal Blog &#187; The Council Has Spoken!! This Week’s Watcher’s Council Results – 05/17/13</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/14/only-the-president-can-end-the-benghazi-sideshow/comment-page-1/#comment-757496</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Loudon&#039;s New Zeal Blog &#187; The Council Has Spoken!! This Week’s Watcher’s Council Results – 05/17/13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60309#comment-757496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Fifth place *t* with 1 vote – Gay Patriot &#8211; Only the president can end the Benghazi “sideshow” [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fifth place *t* with 1 vote – Gay Patriot &#8211; Only the president can end the Benghazi “sideshow” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
