Comments for GayPatriot

Comment on Meanwhile, at Obama’s EPA. . . by davinci

davinci — Sat, 18 May 2013 23:12:46 +0000

Hey, as the commie Rev. Wright stated, “The chickens are coming home to roost.” Translation: all you Obama voters can now see what the man is really like. However, your love of giving him a BJ every day means you cannot see the forest for the trees.

Comment on To those who think IRS snooping was masterminded by rogue agents . . . by pst314

pst314 — Sat, 18 May 2013 22:55:13 +0000

Not only does George W. Bush have too much character to do something like this, the IRS is so full of leftists and union pukes that any GOP attempt to use the IRS as a political weapon would immediately result in numerous IRS employees complaining to the press and to Congress. (But as we know very few IRS employees would object to leftists using the IRS for political attacks.)

Comment on What took the IRS so long to come clean about the scandal? by Jason B

Jason B — Sat, 18 May 2013 21:22:44 +0000

Mike Kelly’s comments were exactly what the GOP needs to run with. It’s not just about “getting Obama” but about finding out exactly what happened within the scandals, and showing the American public that the government must rise above the partisan fray. They need to make the case that a limited government is a responsible government- and that the greater the size of the State, the more likely it is to abuse it’s power.

And the applause in the background means that the GOP just found it’s voice with the American people. And it also means that no one’s buying the stonewalling and the evasions of the IRS, DOJ, State Department, or the White House.

It’s going to be a long summer- and possibly next few years- for the Democrats and the Obama Admin.

Comment on Meanwhile, at Obama’s EPA. . . by Jason B

Jason B — Sat, 18 May 2013 21:18:44 +0000

When you politicize policy as much as Obama’s administration has, at some point it will rebound on you, just like it did with Nixon.

There will be more scandals. And they will all be linked.

Comment on Meanwhile, at Obama’s EPA. . . by Richard Bell

Richard Bell — Sat, 18 May 2013 21:13:20 +0000

If you’re a small business that has to deal with EPA, DEC, DEP you know it’s all corrupt and an anti capitalist, anti constitutional agenda.

Comment on Meanwhile, at Obama’s EPA. . . by Mike Roberts

Mike Roberts — Sat, 18 May 2013 19:37:21 +0000

Like you expect a CHICAGO politician NOT to be corrupt? None of this is at all surprising.

Comment on Scandal central? Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by eeyore

eeyore — Sat, 18 May 2013 18:53:57 +0000

It seems from my discussion with friends and others, there is only 15-20% of the people paying any attention to these scandals. The rest either haven’t heard about them or seen news items that have downplayed them so they don’t think they are a big deal. Most people wouldn’t watch CSPAN anyway to view any hearings or understand the issues since Dems say they aren’t a problem.

If Obama survives, Dems will play him as a martyr since Reps were just out to get him so you don’t want any of them voted back in.

Comment on Meanwhile, at Obama’s EPA. . . by Ignatius

Ignatius — Sat, 18 May 2013 18:21:01 +0000

Two words: Death Panels. Yeah, that Sarah Palin — she’s just one bus stop short of Krazy Town, isn’t she? Worrying about whether a federal bureaucrat would deny care based upon political affiliation? Sheesh!

Comment on Capricious Enforcement: A sign of the times by pst314

pst314 — Sat, 18 May 2013 18:11:17 +0000

The EPA has for years funded environmental pressure groups. This is just another side of the fascist game that the EPA creeps have long played.

Comment on Meanwhile, at Obama’s EPA. . . by crosspatch

crosspatch — Sat, 18 May 2013 17:56:46 +0000

Yet another example of career bureaucrats unable to keep their partisan activism out of their work. This is not “Obama administration” doing so much as it is the doing of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. That party must be purged from government. They can’t be trusted. They can’t win on the merit of their argument so they resort to suppression of the opposition by underhanded means.

This may have something to do with it, too. It might be government employee influence on management:

http://www.redstate.com/2013/05/16/meet-the-partisan-union-behind-the-partisan-internal-revenue-service/

Comment on What took the IRS so long to come clean about the scandal? by Ted B. (Charging Rhino)

Ted B. (Charging Rhino) — Sat, 18 May 2013 17:32:35 +0000

And the IRS is going to manage Obamacare?

Next they will be proposing to place the IRS in the Dept. of Homeland Security to unify their databases—for our own security.

Comment on Does Pat Robertson understand what marriage is for? by Papa Giorgio

Papa Giorgio — Sat, 18 May 2013 16:51:10 +0000

@both GayPatriots. I would ask that both of you, and fans here, get the book “What is Marriage,” and read chapters 3 and four. I would enjoy input from you two (and others here).

Comment on Meanwhile, at Obama’s EPA. . . by V the K

V the K — Sat, 18 May 2013 16:04:27 +0000

Yeah, let’s totally trust this Government to fairly and responsibly run expanded background checks on gun-owners and grant citizenship to illegal immigrants.

Comment on Scandal central? Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by Texann

Texann — Sat, 18 May 2013 15:36:44 +0000

If the government is simply too big for Obama to be in charge because he cannot handle it, there is a simple fix, RESIGN.

When Bush was president. He was responsible for everything the federal government did. Abu Graib, Katrina, CIA breifings on Saddam Hussein’s regime that were identical to every intelligence service around the world… And yet Obama cannot be held to account for failings in his own White House. Sigh, spit.

Comment on Scandal central? Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by V the K

V the K — Sat, 18 May 2013 15:14:49 +0000

I still think a lot of liberals and non-taxpaying voters look at this as their beloved party-of-Government going after the racists and greedheads they don’t like and they support it fully or don’t care.

This country is f–ked.

Comment on What took the IRS so long to come clean about the scandal? by Texann

Texann — Sat, 18 May 2013 15:04:17 +0000

The light at the end of the tunnel may be the Obamacare train wreck heading straight towards us driven by the IRS!

Comment on What took the IRS so long to come clean about the scandal? by ILoveCapitalism

ILoveCapitalism — Sat, 18 May 2013 14:52:02 +0000

To my eye, Miller seems shocked that a member of the government would not know or approve of what the IRS does every day to extract revenue from the People, for the member to spend. “Hey Kelly, I’m the goose who lays your golden eggs – so what the heck are you doing to me?”

I’m not sure what that means, except it doesn’t mean anything good. It could mean that Kelly was just grandstanding (in which case, we’re all screwed). Or, it could mean that the IRS is wayyyyyy out of touch (in which case, we’re all screwed but there is a light at the end of the tunnel, if people like Kelly are going to talk about it and maybe fix it).

Comment on Scandal central? Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by Polly

Polly — Sat, 18 May 2013 14:08:39 +0000

If we had a few Republicans who could and would prevaricate with the alacrity of the Democrats, we’d almost certainly have won at least two more Senate seats in ’12.

It’s beginning to look like lying is just good politics.

Comment on Scandal central? Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by davinci

davinci — Sat, 18 May 2013 12:18:02 +0000

I meant will NOT pass the House.

Comment on Scandal central? Or a whole lot of talk that will amount to nothing? by davinci

davinci — Sat, 18 May 2013 12:17:42 +0000

I don’t think the Senate version of immigration reform will pass the House. There will be some tinkering with the current laws, including more visas for skilled workers and less for unskilled.