<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for GayPatriot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 06:46:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Changing IRS Scandal Timeline&#8230;.by The White House by mike</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/the-changing-irs-scandal-timeline-by-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-757885</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 06:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60584#comment-757885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;His administration is now drowning in scandals. Except that only his opponents know it. Breaking through the shield-wall of liberal ‘denial’ needs more time.&quot;

I am not so sure.  It takes actual evidence for there to be a long lived scandal and so far there is very little, just lots of speculation, projection and Monday morning QBing of decisions.  I hope the GOP does not shoot its wad too quickly.  The worst thing to happen is their obsession with bringing down Obama will = election loses in 2014.
It would be a disaster to have unified government in the last years of Obama.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;His administration is now drowning in scandals. Except that only his opponents know it. Breaking through the shield-wall of liberal ‘denial’ needs more time.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am not so sure.  It takes actual evidence for there to be a long lived scandal and so far there is very little, just lots of speculation, projection and Monday morning QBing of decisions.  I hope the GOP does not shoot its wad too quickly.  The worst thing to happen is their obsession with bringing down Obama will = election loses in 2014.<br />
It would be a disaster to have unified government in the last years of Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by JPerry2006</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-2/#comment-757878</link>
		<dc:creator>JPerry2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 05:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Passing by….

“How lovely! Why you haven’t been banned from this site is a mystery to me.”

While trolling these people is the utmost of fun, there come a point in time in which the best solution is to ignore VtK and NDT. 

These are people who support the murder and torture of gays and want to overthrow our gov’t to institute a theocratic regime. While it is disheartening people like this exist you can take solace in the following. 

First there is no evidence that the Obama administration has been damaged by this witch-hunt or conspiracy theory. There is no reason to believe that it will. They will throw fits on blogs like this and others, but let them. 

Second, despite being ignored by this blog and despite VtK and NDT hopes and dreams the man who killed Mark Carson will be found and brought to justice. They might provide for his defense team, but we live in a civilized world and the murder will go to prison. 

Third, again despite being ignored by this blog and VtK and NDT protests, in all likelihood article 3 of DOMA will go down. 

So while they are horrible people, while they support the murder of gays, and while they want to overthrow the US, they will fail and their little plots and temper tantrums won’t matter beyond this blog. 

That brings a smile to my face, as it should yours.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Passing by….</p>
<p>“How lovely! Why you haven’t been banned from this site is a mystery to me.”</p>
<p>While trolling these people is the utmost of fun, there come a point in time in which the best solution is to ignore VtK and NDT. </p>
<p>These are people who support the murder and torture of gays and want to overthrow our gov’t to institute a theocratic regime. While it is disheartening people like this exist you can take solace in the following. </p>
<p>First there is no evidence that the Obama administration has been damaged by this witch-hunt or conspiracy theory. There is no reason to believe that it will. They will throw fits on blogs like this and others, but let them. </p>
<p>Second, despite being ignored by this blog and despite VtK and NDT hopes and dreams the man who killed Mark Carson will be found and brought to justice. They might provide for his defense team, but we live in a civilized world and the murder will go to prison. </p>
<p>Third, again despite being ignored by this blog and VtK and NDT protests, in all likelihood article 3 of DOMA will go down. </p>
<p>So while they are horrible people, while they support the murder of gays, and while they want to overthrow the US, they will fail and their little plots and temper tantrums won’t matter beyond this blog. </p>
<p>That brings a smile to my face, as it should yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-2/#comment-757876</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Jar Jar Binky, thinks I should commit self murder–to go with the threats of physical violence and murder that he has uttered against me in the past. How lovely! Why you haven’t been banned from this site is a mystery to me.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because, Cas, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gaypatriot.net/2012/11/01/gay-left-wing-radio-host-tells-gay-romney-supporter-to-commit-suicide-says-he-should-not-be-allowed-to-vote/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;you and the LGBT community endorse and support telling conservatives to kill themselves&lt;/a&gt;.

And &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/04/29/Savage-Republicans-Dead&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;you also endorse and support the Barack Obama Party and the Barack Obama administration, which wishes death on conservatives&lt;/a&gt;.

Now, Cas, either repudiate the Barack Obama Party and the LGBT community for threatening death and violence against conservatives, or be exposed as demanding of others rules and standards that you won&#039;t follow.

And, Cas, since you won&#039;t follow the laws, you lose their protection. 

And since you no longer have their protection, you can be told to kill yourself and have violence threatened against you all day long. We conservatives have recognized the main lesson of violent Islam: if you want liberals and &quot;progressives&quot; to leave you alone, you need to inflict enough pain on them to make them stop.

You don&#039;t like it? Tough. You should have thought of that before you deemed the rules &quot;irrelevant&quot;. You should have thought of that before you supported and endorsed the Obama administration&#039;s lies. You should have thought of that before you decided to support the IRS and the Obama Party targeting and abusing government power against conservatives.

In short, you should have respected and enforced the law equally. But since you won&#039;t, there&#039;s only one option left.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Jar Jar Binky, thinks I should commit self murder–to go with the threats of physical violence and murder that he has uttered against me in the past. How lovely! Why you haven’t been banned from this site is a mystery to me.</p></blockquote>
<p>Because, Cas, <a href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2012/11/01/gay-left-wing-radio-host-tells-gay-romney-supporter-to-commit-suicide-says-he-should-not-be-allowed-to-vote/" rel="nofollow">you and the LGBT community endorse and support telling conservatives to kill themselves</a>.</p>
<p>And <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/04/29/Savage-Republicans-Dead" rel="nofollow">you also endorse and support the Barack Obama Party and the Barack Obama administration, which wishes death on conservatives</a>.</p>
<p>Now, Cas, either repudiate the Barack Obama Party and the LGBT community for threatening death and violence against conservatives, or be exposed as demanding of others rules and standards that you won&#8217;t follow.</p>
<p>And, Cas, since you won&#8217;t follow the laws, you lose their protection. </p>
<p>And since you no longer have their protection, you can be told to kill yourself and have violence threatened against you all day long. We conservatives have recognized the main lesson of violent Islam: if you want liberals and &#8220;progressives&#8221; to leave you alone, you need to inflict enough pain on them to make them stop.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t like it? Tough. You should have thought of that before you deemed the rules &#8220;irrelevant&#8221;. You should have thought of that before you supported and endorsed the Obama administration&#8217;s lies. You should have thought of that before you decided to support the IRS and the Obama Party targeting and abusing government power against conservatives.</p>
<p>In short, you should have respected and enforced the law equally. But since you won&#8217;t, there&#8217;s only one option left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by Passing By</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-1/#comment-757873</link>
		<dc:creator>Passing By</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My goodness me, Such venom from NDT, Jaj Jah Binky, and Purpe Proboscis. Clearly hit a nerve...

NDT thinks I am screaming. You need to get your hearing checked NDT.

Jar Jar Binky, thinks I should commit self murder--to go with the threats of physical violence and murder that he has uttered against me in the past. How lovely!  Why you haven&#039;t been banned from this site is a mystery to me.

Then the Purple Proboscis sniffs out an apparent argumentative problem--prove that it was doctored! Fun. 

First things first: &quot;The email has still not been released. &quot; are you referring to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2013/05/politics/white-house-benghazi-email/&quot; / rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this email&lt;/a&gt;? Or some other email? Because, if it was this email, which is the one the Hot Air article was referring to, it looks like it was released. Just saying.

&quot; What Cas Passing Gas is asserting is that ILC is shoveling smoke by using the word “refute.”&quot; No. I am questioning his claim that that Hot AiIr (and by extension, ILC, who believes it did) proved its case.

After all the prognostications and salivation over an email that many on this site believed was the &quot;smoking gun&quot; for a scandal; and with people saying that the &quot;changes&quot; or &quot;doctored&quot; content are irrelevant--he chooses to NOW ask for proof of a position that others on this site implicitly accept as a bone of contention--that the emails were indeed changed, and that they definitely made the WH l&amp; Hilary Clinton look much worse--lordy! Well, you do have a big set, big boy!

Could this have been just a silly little transcription error? Of course! But its kinda interesting to ask what a change in meaning that little &quot;transcription error&quot; made to the meaning of the document and how it just happened to coincide with Republican efforts to push the Benghazi issue up a notch AND attack Hilary Clinton. There is no way you would be arguing like this in your normally partisan way, if this were a Republican scandal and the roles were reversed. So, pardon me for thinking that your argument is just an clumsy attempt to muddy the waters or pass gas... or should that be a purple haze?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My goodness me, Such venom from NDT, Jaj Jah Binky, and Purpe Proboscis. Clearly hit a nerve&#8230;</p>
<p>NDT thinks I am screaming. You need to get your hearing checked NDT.</p>
<p>Jar Jar Binky, thinks I should commit self murder&#8211;to go with the threats of physical violence and murder that he has uttered against me in the past. How lovely!  Why you haven&#8217;t been banned from this site is a mystery to me.</p>
<p>Then the Purple Proboscis sniffs out an apparent argumentative problem&#8211;prove that it was doctored! Fun. </p>
<p>First things first: &#8220;The email has still not been released. &#8221; are you referring to <a href="http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2013/05/politics/white-house-benghazi-email/" / rel="nofollow">this email</a>? Or some other email? Because, if it was this email, which is the one the Hot Air article was referring to, it looks like it was released. Just saying.</p>
<p>&#8221; What Cas Passing Gas is asserting is that ILC is shoveling smoke by using the word “refute.”&#8221; No. I am questioning his claim that that Hot AiIr (and by extension, ILC, who believes it did) proved its case.</p>
<p>After all the prognostications and salivation over an email that many on this site believed was the &#8220;smoking gun&#8221; for a scandal; and with people saying that the &#8220;changes&#8221; or &#8220;doctored&#8221; content are irrelevant&#8211;he chooses to NOW ask for proof of a position that others on this site implicitly accept as a bone of contention&#8211;that the emails were indeed changed, and that they definitely made the WH l&amp; Hilary Clinton look much worse&#8211;lordy! Well, you do have a big set, big boy!</p>
<p>Could this have been just a silly little transcription error? Of course! But its kinda interesting to ask what a change in meaning that little &#8220;transcription error&#8221; made to the meaning of the document and how it just happened to coincide with Republican efforts to push the Benghazi issue up a notch AND attack Hilary Clinton. There is no way you would be arguing like this in your normally partisan way, if this were a Republican scandal and the roles were reversed. So, pardon me for thinking that your argument is just an clumsy attempt to muddy the waters or pass gas&#8230; or should that be a purple haze?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Changing IRS Scandal Timeline&#8230;.by The White House by crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/the-changing-irs-scandal-timeline-by-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-757871</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60584#comment-757871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, look who has a history!

Lois Lerner targeted conservative groups when she worked at the FEC in the 1990s.

http://weaselzippers.us/2013/05/20/irs-official-lois-lerner-targeted-conservative-groups-while-working-for-fec/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, look who has a history!</p>
<p>Lois Lerner targeted conservative groups when she worked at the FEC in the 1990s.</p>
<p><a href="http://weaselzippers.us/2013/05/20/irs-official-lois-lerner-targeted-conservative-groups-while-working-for-fec/" rel="nofollow">http://weaselzippers.us/2013/05/20/irs-official-lois-lerner-targeted-conservative-groups-while-working-for-fec/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Changing IRS Scandal Timeline&#8230;.by The White House by ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/the-changing-irs-scandal-timeline-by-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-757867</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60584#comment-757867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama is one of the most ill-intentioned presidents ever. His administration is now drowning in scandals. Except that only his opponents know it. Breaking through the shield-wall of liberal &#039;denial&#039; needs more time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is one of the most ill-intentioned presidents ever. His administration is now drowning in scandals. Except that only his opponents know it. Breaking through the shield-wall of liberal &#8216;denial&#8217; needs more time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the March 2010 meeting between Obama &amp; the IRS Union Chief by heliotrope</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/the-march-2010-meeting-between-obama-the-irs-union-chief/comment-page-1/#comment-757865</link>
		<dc:creator>heliotrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60582#comment-757865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nteu.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The National Treasury Employment Union (NTEU)&lt;/a&gt; website asks members to &quot;oppose legislation H.R. 1780 to push federal employees out of the FEHBP and into the insurance exchanges established under the Affordable Care Act.&quot;

A sizable conflict of interest arises when unionized employees on the government payroll (paid by the taxpayers) organize to influence the legislative process to benefit themselves in ways that the non government employed taxpayer himself is can not benefit.

The unionized Treasury employees are literally vested in supporting the political entities which deliver rewards to them. While each employee is a free agent in his political support, it is clear the NTEU under its President Collen Kelley is pro-Obama and opposed to many of the principles of the TEA Party.

According to &lt;i&gt;The American Spectator&lt;/i&gt; the NTEU has 150,000 members and endorsed Obama in 2008 and 2012 gave hundreds of thousands of dollars in 2010 and 2012 election cycles to &quot;anti-Tea Party candidates.&quot; I have not checked those claims, but government unions in general are neither Republican leaning or pro-small government.

The basic question is pragmatic in nature: Can one assume with strong confidence that a unionized government worker automatically places non-partisan principle above personal benefit? Impartiality is the process of objectivity in which prejudice/bias for or against and interest is not involved.

The skeptic has a great deal of reason to doubt that the overwhelming focus on the Tea-Party by the IRS was not politically motivated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nteu.org" rel="nofollow">The National Treasury Employment Union (NTEU)</a> website asks members to &#8220;oppose legislation H.R. 1780 to push federal employees out of the FEHBP and into the insurance exchanges established under the Affordable Care Act.&#8221;</p>
<p>A sizable conflict of interest arises when unionized employees on the government payroll (paid by the taxpayers) organize to influence the legislative process to benefit themselves in ways that the non government employed taxpayer himself is can not benefit.</p>
<p>The unionized Treasury employees are literally vested in supporting the political entities which deliver rewards to them. While each employee is a free agent in his political support, it is clear the NTEU under its President Collen Kelley is pro-Obama and opposed to many of the principles of the TEA Party.</p>
<p>According to <i>The American Spectator</i> the NTEU has 150,000 members and endorsed Obama in 2008 and 2012 gave hundreds of thousands of dollars in 2010 and 2012 election cycles to &#8220;anti-Tea Party candidates.&#8221; I have not checked those claims, but government unions in general are neither Republican leaning or pro-small government.</p>
<p>The basic question is pragmatic in nature: Can one assume with strong confidence that a unionized government worker automatically places non-partisan principle above personal benefit? Impartiality is the process of objectivity in which prejudice/bias for or against and interest is not involved.</p>
<p>The skeptic has a great deal of reason to doubt that the overwhelming focus on the Tea-Party by the IRS was not politically motivated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-1/#comment-757862</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pfeiffer&#039;s comments on one of the talking head shows on Sunday got a little heat when the host (I don&#039;t remember which one it was) started asking about where Obama was.  Pfeiffer was saying that Obama was in constant contact with his &quot;national security staff&quot; and the host doesn&#039;t seem to understand that important piece of Washington jargon and says something like &quot;he wasn&#039;t in contact with Hillary Clinton, he wasn&#039;t in contact with the CIA, he wasn&#039;t in contact with ... &quot; and so on.  To which Pfeiffer repeats &quot;he was in contact with his national security staff&quot;.  That means that Tom Donilon was actually the primary communications channel between Obama and the rest of the team.  Tom Donilon is Obama&#039;s National Security Advisor and the national security staff reports to him.  Donilon has no military experience, no intelligence community experience, is basically a political hack and is known as &quot;leaker in chief&quot; in Washington circles.  So basically things were effectively being run by someone who has no idea what the hell they are doing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pfeiffer&#8217;s comments on one of the talking head shows on Sunday got a little heat when the host (I don&#8217;t remember which one it was) started asking about where Obama was.  Pfeiffer was saying that Obama was in constant contact with his &#8220;national security staff&#8221; and the host doesn&#8217;t seem to understand that important piece of Washington jargon and says something like &#8220;he wasn&#8217;t in contact with Hillary Clinton, he wasn&#8217;t in contact with the CIA, he wasn&#8217;t in contact with &#8230; &#8221; and so on.  To which Pfeiffer repeats &#8220;he was in contact with his national security staff&#8221;.  That means that Tom Donilon was actually the primary communications channel between Obama and the rest of the team.  Tom Donilon is Obama&#8217;s National Security Advisor and the national security staff reports to him.  Donilon has no military experience, no intelligence community experience, is basically a political hack and is known as &#8220;leaker in chief&#8221; in Washington circles.  So basically things were effectively being run by someone who has no idea what the hell they are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the March 2010 meeting between Obama &amp; the IRS Union Chief by crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/the-march-2010-meeting-between-obama-the-irs-union-chief/comment-page-1/#comment-757858</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60582#comment-757858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IRS office couldn&#039;t have started this operation with only a few hours notice, that much is clear.  The policy decisions would have had to have been made much earlier, criteria drawn up, questionnaires created, etc.  But it is plausible that the operation was mentioned in the meeting to get final political buy off on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IRS office couldn&#8217;t have started this operation with only a few hours notice, that much is clear.  The policy decisions would have had to have been made much earlier, criteria drawn up, questionnaires created, etc.  But it is plausible that the operation was mentioned in the meeting to get final political buy off on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Changing IRS Scandal Timeline&#8230;.by The White House by V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/the-changing-irs-scandal-timeline-by-the-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-757847</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 23:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60584#comment-757847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSDNC has Conspiracy Theory to explain IRS Scandal - It was a Republican False Flag  

http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/20/new-msnbc-theory-maybe-the-irs-commissioner-appointed-by-bush-targeted-tea-partiers-because-theyre-a-threat-to-the-gop/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSDNC has Conspiracy Theory to explain IRS Scandal &#8211; It was a Republican False Flag  </p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/20/new-msnbc-theory-maybe-the-irs-commissioner-appointed-by-bush-targeted-tea-partiers-because-theyre-a-threat-to-the-gop/" rel="nofollow">http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/20/new-msnbc-theory-maybe-the-irs-commissioner-appointed-by-bush-targeted-tea-partiers-because-theyre-a-threat-to-the-gop/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by Roberto</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-1/#comment-757846</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 23:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Senator Ted Cruz wants to abolish the IRS. It looks like my letter writing campaign is finally beginning to bear fruit. Senators Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Minority Leader McConnell, Pat Toomey, John Thune were the among those on my list.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Senator Ted Cruz wants to abolish the IRS. It looks like my letter writing campaign is finally beginning to bear fruit. Senators Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Minority Leader McConnell, Pat Toomey, John Thune were the among those on my list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-1/#comment-757845</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 23:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really, all the Government&#039;s tax collectors should need to know about you is the amount of your tax bill; not your age, your race, your connections, what books you read, what health care you have, or with whom you associate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, all the Government&#8217;s tax collectors should need to know about you is the amount of your tax bill; not your age, your race, your connections, what books you read, what health care you have, or with whom you associate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surprisingly few actual consequences for outraging Obama by V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/surprisingly-few-actual-consequences-for-outraging-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-757844</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 23:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60576#comment-757844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a time when President Mugabe did demand quick action and accountability

http://www.today.com/id/37566848/ns/today/t/i-would-have-fired-bp-chief-now-obama-says/%20%85]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a time when President Mugabe did demand quick action and accountability</p>
<p><a href="http://www.today.com/id/37566848/ns/today/t/i-would-have-fired-bp-chief-now-obama-says/%20%85" rel="nofollow">http://www.today.com/id/37566848/ns/today/t/i-would-have-fired-bp-chief-now-obama-says/%20%85</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama advisor always looking for someone else to blame by mixitup</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/obama-advisor-always-looking-for-someone-else-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-757843</link>
		<dc:creator>mixitup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 23:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60490#comment-757843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An F-16 can fly at Mach 2, with a 2000 mile range - being in theater it could have done some real damage rather quickly.  I have no doubt they could have found a couple of volunteers to fly a mission. Not to mention the Seals, Special Forces or any other combat warrior available. 

But V, we all know that not being able to get there is a Bull $hit excuse. Why POTUS said &quot;stand-down&quot; we may never know - but the result of HIS actions are reprehensible and criminal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An F-16 can fly at Mach 2, with a 2000 mile range &#8211; being in theater it could have done some real damage rather quickly.  I have no doubt they could have found a couple of volunteers to fly a mission. Not to mention the Seals, Special Forces or any other combat warrior available. </p>
<p>But V, we all know that not being able to get there is a Bull $hit excuse. Why POTUS said &#8220;stand-down&#8221; we may never know &#8211; but the result of HIS actions are reprehensible and criminal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by Roberto</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-1/#comment-757842</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 23:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[crosspatch.

No Internal Revenue Service at all nor 1099´s nor any tax forms that we are familiar with. It has had only one hundred years of existence. Paraphrasing an old song; ¨We got along before we met you, we´re going to get along without you now.¨ Now what can be created is a REVENUE RECEIVING AGENCY with no policing or investigating authority. Since the Fair Tax is based on sales. Large Corporations could forward tax collected on monthly basis with a report of sales, medium size businesses on a quarterly basis and small businesses, semi annually also with report of sales.  This will be one helluva smaller beauracracy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>crosspatch.</p>
<p>No Internal Revenue Service at all nor 1099´s nor any tax forms that we are familiar with. It has had only one hundred years of existence. Paraphrasing an old song; ¨We got along before we met you, we´re going to get along without you now.¨ Now what can be created is a REVENUE RECEIVING AGENCY with no policing or investigating authority. Since the Fair Tax is based on sales. Large Corporations could forward tax collected on monthly basis with a report of sales, medium size businesses on a quarterly basis and small businesses, semi annually also with report of sales.  This will be one helluva smaller beauracracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama advisor always looking for someone else to blame by V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/obama-advisor-always-looking-for-someone-else-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-757841</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60490#comment-757841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question about Benghazi: Obama and his bootlickers claim they couldn&#039;t send help to the consulate because &quot;it wouldn&#039;t have gotten there in time.&quot; 

How did they know when the attack was going to end?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question about Benghazi: Obama and his bootlickers claim they couldn&#8217;t send help to the consulate because &#8220;it wouldn&#8217;t have gotten there in time.&#8221; </p>
<p>How did they know when the attack was going to end?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama advisor always looking for someone else to blame by B. Daniel Blatt</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/obama-advisor-always-looking-for-someone-else-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-757840</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60490#comment-757840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very well, thank you, VS.  Had a great writing day today and could finish the first draft of Chapter Twenty the conclusion of Part I (of the first book) by tomorrow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well, thank you, VS.  Had a great writing day today and could finish the first draft of Chapter Twenty the conclusion of Part I (of the first book) by tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by heliotrope</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-1/#comment-757838</link>
		<dc:creator>heliotrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whoa! Cas Passing Gas pontificates:&lt;blockquote&gt;But the email &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;doctoring&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; turns “a player” into “THE player.” I think that distinction, given the political dimensions of the way this “scandal” has played out, is VERY important.&lt;/blockquote&gt;OK, Sherlock, PROVE the email was doctored.

The clock is set and ticking. Tick, tick, tick, .......

(For those who really don&#039;t care, Cas Passing Gas is referring to a Benghazi email the Congressional investigators were permitted to see, but could not copy and no verbatim copy was released to the Congressional committee. The White House says the investigators DOCTORED the email they did not receive. The email has still not been released. Perhaps the email was not quoted entirely accurately, but that does not produce a &quot;doctored email&quot; in any way, shape or form.

Of course, perhaps someone produced a fake document, but that is not what Cas Passing Gas is asserting. What Cas Passing Gas is asserting is that ILC is shoveling smoke by using the word &quot;refute.&quot; A classic case of the pot calling the kettle black.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa! Cas Passing Gas pontificates:<br />
<blockquote>But the email <i><b>doctoring</b></i> turns “a player” into “THE player.” I think that distinction, given the political dimensions of the way this “scandal” has played out, is VERY important.</p></blockquote>
<p>OK, Sherlock, PROVE the email was doctored.</p>
<p>The clock is set and ticking. Tick, tick, tick, &#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>(For those who really don&#8217;t care, Cas Passing Gas is referring to a Benghazi email the Congressional investigators were permitted to see, but could not copy and no verbatim copy was released to the Congressional committee. The White House says the investigators DOCTORED the email they did not receive. The email has still not been released. Perhaps the email was not quoted entirely accurately, but that does not produce a &#8220;doctored email&#8221; in any way, shape or form.</p>
<p>Of course, perhaps someone produced a fake document, but that is not what Cas Passing Gas is asserting. What Cas Passing Gas is asserting is that ILC is shoveling smoke by using the word &#8220;refute.&#8221; A classic case of the pot calling the kettle black.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama advisor always looking for someone else to blame by VS</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/obama-advisor-always-looking-for-someone-else-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-757837</link>
		<dc:creator>VS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60490#comment-757837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How&#039;s the novel coming, Dan?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;s the novel coming, Dan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surprisingly few actual consequences for outraging Obama by Texann</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/surprisingly-few-actual-consequences-for-outraging-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-757835</link>
		<dc:creator>Texann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60576#comment-757835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like your idea Carolynp!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your idea Carolynp!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
