Comments for GayPatriot

Comment on More Obama scandal news by Peter Hughes

Peter Hughes — Wed, 22 May 2013 02:09:54 +0000

#3 – Can we say impeachment?

Regards,
Peter H.

Comment on Clint Eastwood Vindicated! by Steve

Steve — Wed, 22 May 2013 01:31:26 +0000

AUDIO: Sharyl Attkisson “My computers were compromised” (Radio Interview)

http://commoncts.blogspot.com/2013/05/audio-sharyl-attkisson-my-computer-was.html

Comment on More Obama scandal news by Louise B

Louise B — Wed, 22 May 2013 01:27:37 +0000

You missed a couple of scandals. The Sebelius who oversees the implementation of Obamacare is asking private health insurance companies to give her funds. Can we say conflict of interest?

Also the EPA (besides the old scandal of hiding government work behind aliases) charges fees to conservatives but not to liberals. Can we say equal protection?

Comment on Tom Coburn: My Hero by KCRob (SoCalRobert)

KCRob (SoCalRobert) — Wed, 22 May 2013 00:11:18 +0000

You should see (well… maybe not) some of the comments (e.g., at Business Insider) by bitter lefties saying that Tea Party Okies deserve what they got; Coburn is evil; the rest of the country shouldn’t bail out the teabaggers in OK, etc…

I’m quite the misanthrope and have a pretty dim view of humanity but even at that, I cannot comprehend the hateful, mean, and poisonous worldview apparently held by a lot of caring “liberals”.

How can people live nursing that sort of hatred day in and day out?

These people have no political philosophy other than that government should punish other people they don’t like.

Comment on No Bush warrant for e-mail correspondence of NYTimes reporters by Peter Hughes

Peter Hughes — Tue, 21 May 2013 23:08:58 +0000

Snatchy, please explain what your posting has to do with James Rosen.

If you can, that is.

Regards,
Peter H.

Comment on Let’s Help The Dogs of Oklahoma City! by Peter Hughes

Peter Hughes — Tue, 21 May 2013 23:07:22 +0000

As insensitive, disappointing, and deplorable Lizz Winstead’s remarks were, I hope the attention she is bringing to various charities on her Twitter following of 76,000+ will amount to something.

Peter’s translation of Snatchy’s comment: “It’s ok because she’s a liberal, and we can excuse what she said.”

Hypocritical cow.

Regards,
Peter H.

Comment on Clint Eastwood Vindicated! by Bill G

Bill G — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:52:30 +0000

Outstanding!
Was the response from the chair the sound of one hand clapping?

Comment on Let’s Help The Dogs of Oklahoma City! by VS

VS — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:48:39 +0000

As insensitive, disappointing, and deplorable Lizz Winstead’s remarks were, I hope the attention she is bringing to various charities on her Twitter following of 76,000+ will amount to something. Still, despite her apology, she had made an off-color (and cliche) political joke involving the tornado just three tweets before. #ALeopardDoesn’tChangeItsSpots

Comment on Clint Eastwood Vindicated! by Texann

Texann — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:43:16 +0000

Thanks for connecting the dots! Needed the giggle.

Comment on Let’s Help The Dogs of Oklahoma City! by VS

VS — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:42:33 +0000

Pets to many are as sacred as children. They’re their world. I caught this on CBS yesterday. So touching to see not only this woman survive, but her dog pop out like that.

Comment on Clint Eastwood Vindicated! by Peter Hughes

Peter Hughes — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:22:26 +0000

He just made my day!

Sorry, couldn’t resist.

Regards,
Peter H.

Comment on Let’s Help The Dogs of Oklahoma City! by Peter Hughes

Peter Hughes — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:21:36 +0000

#1 – V, haven’t you figured it out yet? Libtards are misanthropic creatures who constantly wish ill on people whom they despise.

And yes, I went there. Deal with it.

Regards,
Peter H.

Comment on Did W (or his minions) ask what books his political adversaries were reading? by crosspatch

crosspatch — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:11:45 +0000

If Nixon wanted to rummage through someone’s files or correspondence, he had to arrange for someone to break in. Now he can just get gmail to hand over their email and maybe manage to gain access to someone’s computer. No conventional burglary required.

Nixon’s “plumbers” broke into Ellsberg’s psychiatrists office to get dirt on him so he could be discredited after leaking the Pentagon Papers. Obama gets a judge to allow turning over of journalists’ personal emails on the grounds of searching for a “leak” but once they have the private emails, they possibly have “dirt” on the journalist that has nothing to do with the defense leak.

Nixon broke into DNC headquarters in DC in order to gain information about his political opposition. Obama just uses the IRS to compel political opponents to give up the information under “color of law”.

Obama is a sneakier weasel than Nixon ever was and technology allows him to break in and obtain information without a physical burglary.

Comment on Let’s Help The Dogs of Oklahoma City! by V the K

V the K — Tue, 21 May 2013 22:09:19 +0000

While Liberals like Daily Show producer Lizz Winstead, Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, and leftist scrunt Sally Kohn were seizing on the disaster to score political points... Glenn Beck loaded up two semi trucks with relief supplies and had them driven to the disaster site. Conservatives versus liberals; we win again.

Comment on Scandal news by Passing By

Passing By — Tue, 21 May 2013 21:31:51 +0000

[Purple Prognosticator] resorts to nit-picking as the primary diversion in order to avoid confronting the actual issue at hand.”

Agree.

Comment on Scandal news by Passing By

Passing By — Tue, 21 May 2013 21:30:37 +0000

“Woo-Hoo! 69!”

Comment on More Obama scandal news by V the K

V the K — Tue, 21 May 2013 19:18:18 +0000

Fascinating. Progressives have attacked Ronald Reagan for decades claiming he was out of touch and didn’t know what was going on.

Now. Progressives defend Barack Mugabe by claiming he was out of touch and didn’t know what was going on.

Comment on More Obama scandal news by heliotrope

heliotrope — Tue, 21 May 2013 18:57:23 +0000

remarkable curiosity about the content of conservatives’ prayers

Since our “hearts and prayers” go out to the victims of the tornados in Oklahoma, could someone please delineate the politically correct wording for our prayers?

I don’t need the IRS on my a$$ for getting the words wrong. OK?

Comment on Scandal news by V the K

V the K — Tue, 21 May 2013 18:56:56 +0000

Woo-Hoo! 69!

Comment on Tom Coburn: My Hero by heliotrope

heliotrope — Tue, 21 May 2013 18:53:52 +0000

No, money comes out of the butt of Bernanke. Whether he is a unicorn, I can not say.