Jar Jar Binky, thinks I should commit self murder–to go with the threats of physical violence and murder that he has uttered against me in the past. How lovely! Why you haven’t been banned from this site is a mystery to me.

Because, Cas, you and the LGBT community endorse and support telling conservatives to kill themselves.

And you also endorse and support the Barack Obama Party and the Barack Obama administration, which wishes death on conservatives.

Now, Cas, either repudiate the Barack Obama Party and the LGBT community for threatening death and violence against conservatives, or be exposed as demanding of others rules and standards that you won’t follow.

And, Cas, since you won’t follow the laws, you lose their protection.

And since you no longer have their protection, you can be told to kill yourself and have violence threatened against you all day long. We conservatives have recognized the main lesson of violent Islam: if you want liberals and “progressives” to leave you alone, you need to inflict enough pain on them to make them stop.

You don’t like it? Tough. You should have thought of that before you deemed the rules “irrelevant”. You should have thought of that before you supported and endorsed the Obama administration’s lies. You should have thought of that before you decided to support the IRS and the Obama Party targeting and abusing government power against conservatives.

In short, you should have respected and enforced the law equally. But since you won’t, there’s only one option left.

NDT thinks I am screaming. You need to get your hearing checked NDT.

Jar Jar Binky, thinks I should commit self murder–to go with the threats of physical violence and murder that he has uttered against me in the past. How lovely! Why you haven’t been banned from this site is a mystery to me.

Then the Purple Proboscis sniffs out an apparent argumentative problem–prove that it was doctored! Fun.

First things first: “The email has still not been released. ” are you referring to this email? Or some other email? Because, if it was this email, which is the one the Hot Air article was referring to, it looks like it was released. Just saying.

” What Cas Passing Gas is asserting is that ILC is shoveling smoke by using the word “refute.”” No. I am questioning his claim that that Hot AiIr (and by extension, ILC, who believes it did) proved its case.

After all the prognostications and salivation over an email that many on this site believed was the “smoking gun” for a scandal; and with people saying that the “changes” or “doctored” content are irrelevant–he chooses to NOW ask for proof of a position that others on this site implicitly accept as a bone of contention–that the emails were indeed changed, and that they definitely made the WH l& Hilary Clinton look much worse–lordy! Well, you do have a big set, big boy!

Could this have been just a silly little transcription error? Of course! But its kinda interesting to ask what a change in meaning that little “transcription error” made to the meaning of the document and how it just happened to coincide with Republican efforts to push the Benghazi issue up a notch AND attack Hilary Clinton. There is no way you would be arguing like this in your normally partisan way, if this were a Republican scandal and the roles were reversed. So, pardon me for thinking that your argument is just an clumsy attempt to muddy the waters or pass gas… or should that be a purple haze?

Lois Lerner targeted conservative groups when she worked at the FEC in the 1990s.

http://weaselzippers.us/2013/05/20/irs-official-lois-lerner-targeted-conservative-groups-while-working-for-fec/

A sizable conflict of interest arises when unionized employees on the government payroll (paid by the taxpayers) organize to influence the legislative process to benefit themselves in ways that the non government employed taxpayer himself is can not benefit.

The unionized Treasury employees are literally vested in supporting the political entities which deliver rewards to them. While each employee is a free agent in his political support, it is clear the NTEU under its President Collen Kelley is pro-Obama and opposed to many of the principles of the TEA Party.

According to The American Spectator the NTEU has 150,000 members and endorsed Obama in 2008 and 2012 gave hundreds of thousands of dollars in 2010 and 2012 election cycles to “anti-Tea Party candidates.” I have not checked those claims, but government unions in general are neither Republican leaning or pro-small government.

The basic question is pragmatic in nature: Can one assume with strong confidence that a unionized government worker automatically places non-partisan principle above personal benefit? Impartiality is the process of objectivity in which prejudice/bias for or against and interest is not involved.

The skeptic has a great deal of reason to doubt that the overwhelming focus on the Tea-Party by the IRS was not politically motivated.

http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/20/new-msnbc-theory-maybe-the-irs-commissioner-appointed-by-bush-targeted-tea-partiers-because-theyre-a-threat-to-the-gop/

http://www.today.com/id/37566848/ns/today/t/i-would-have-fired-bp-chief-now-obama-says/%20%85

But V, we all know that not being able to get there is a Bull $hit excuse. Why POTUS said “stand-down” we may never know – but the result of HIS actions are reprehensible and criminal.

No Internal Revenue Service at all nor 1099´s nor any tax forms that we are familiar with. It has had only one hundred years of existence. Paraphrasing an old song; ¨We got along before we met you, we´re going to get along without you now.¨ Now what can be created is a REVENUE RECEIVING AGENCY with no policing or investigating authority. Since the Fair Tax is based on sales. Large Corporations could forward tax collected on monthly basis with a report of sales, medium size businesses on a quarterly basis and small businesses, semi annually also with report of sales. This will be one helluva smaller beauracracy.

How did they know when the attack was going to end?

But the email doctoring turns “a player” into “THE player.” I think that distinction, given the political dimensions of the way this “scandal” has played out, is VERY important.

OK, Sherlock, PROVE the email was doctored.

The clock is set and ticking. Tick, tick, tick, …….

(For those who really don’t care, Cas Passing Gas is referring to a Benghazi email the Congressional investigators were permitted to see, but could not copy and no verbatim copy was released to the Congressional committee. The White House says the investigators DOCTORED the email they did not receive. The email has still not been released. Perhaps the email was not quoted entirely accurately, but that does not produce a “doctored email” in any way, shape or form.

Of course, perhaps someone produced a fake document, but that is not what Cas Passing Gas is asserting. What Cas Passing Gas is asserting is that ILC is shoveling smoke by using the word “refute.” A classic case of the pot calling the kettle black.)

That seems to be a very tall order. No lie is ever the antidote to further lying since the lie is always the progenitor of a family of lies. Putting principle above party is too often seen as treason to ideological loyalty.

Obama has lied, permitted others to lie and seeded a culture of lying.

The “pattern in Washington where everybody is always looking for somebody else to blame” describes a culture in which noble character can barely exist. It is a culture in which the people place more emphasis on results than on order, propriety or simple virtue.

What manner of character exists in refusing to upgrade security in Benghazi and ignoring pleas for help during the attack and then blaming the attack on demonstrably false forces while treating four murders as an unfortunate “bump in the road” in the rough and tumble risk of pursuing diplomatic gains?

How do IRS employees “go rogue” in a bureaucracy that is nothing less than the prototype for tracing, keeping and analyzing paper trails? It would not take a Sherlock Holmes to reverse engineer the paper trail and trace the questionnaires to their source and then the author and then the supervisor who signed off and then to the cell that permitted the abuse and then to the ……. Well, in violation of Godwin’s law …. interview the concentration guards and follow the leads and soon enough you have the little Eichmanns and then Eichmann himself and then Himmler and Heydrich and the others.

Hannah Arendt attended the trial of Eichmann and came away describing Eichmann as a “buffoon” with no ability to think beyond his task and with the capacity to ignore the standpoint of his victim’s humanity. She found him to be “incorruptible” in his sense of “duty” to his role. He had overcome his human conscience. He had settled for what Arendt called “the banality of evil.” Arendt noted that the “root” of evil can be uprooted. But the “banality of evil” is a fungus that spreads without roots. “Thou shall not kill” became “Thou shall kill with efficiency” as a functionary in the throes of a moral collapse which taught Eichmann and others what not to think. “Right” and “wrong” are manipulated in respect to the interpretations of the power structure and the exemplary functionary responded accordingly.

Obama and the amorphous Progressive crusade for fundamentally transforming America into a statist social justice and welfare entity place the ends above the means. Therefore, they breed a cultural indifference to what is ethical and turn to what “works” in their warfare for ideological change.

We are witnessing the lesser acts in the “banality of evil” being played out. Obama did not put these people in place. The little Eichmanns are Progressive zealots who are predisposed to read the patterns in the culture of corruption and to take their ideological imperatives in hand and play out the role of good little soldiers in the war for implementing victory in the Progressive crusade.