Maybe I should go to Missouri and behead some people to avenge the crimes committed against my Mormon ancestors.

Not to mention, I strongly doubt shouting “Jesus Loves You” was a thing 800 years ago.

kids, who don’t have the the self-esteem or wherewithal to deflect such a name

How do you grow a tough skin if everyone babies you your whole life?

I remember back in college, when I expressed my opinion on the stupidity of hate crimes and was told, “Yeah, well, that may work for *you.* No one’s going to mess with *you.*” Damn right, we should be raising kids to be strong and resilient, not whining girly-men.

Yesterday, two peaceful observant Muslims

See Comment #50

(And note, no one has ever been brutally murdered by people screaming “Jesus loves you!”)

Oh, really? I know you weren’t around centuries ago, but where did you go to school, VTK? I mean, really.

But, it already is.

While leftist poossies scream “hate crime” when someone calls them a name, they are remarkably silent on violence committed by Muslims; I guess because oppressed minorities are incapable of h8, or maybe just exempt from the standards of civilized society.

Does this qualify as a hate crime? – ND30″

As I said earlier, I am not for hate crime legislation. My point was that hate crime does exist. I guess that you missed that post. Juan said that all violent crime is hate crime. That is not necessarly true. As for the Obama administration they are indeed a bunch of damn ciminals, who hate their enemies. And, in my opinion have committed hate crimes.

Sticks and stones may break my bones,
But names will make liberals cry like little baby girls because they are p-ssies.

You left out the part about being ritualistically tied up in the freezing cold like a scarecrow.

And Sharon Tate had her baby cut out of her.
So, what’s your point???
Comment by My Sharia Moor — May 23, 2013 @ 10:41 am – May 23, 2013

Exactly. The details of Matthew Shepard’s death had little to do with his sexual orientation, and very, very much to do with the fact that his murderer’s were drug-addicted thugs and sadists. Much like the men who raped and murdered 12 year old Jesse Dirkhising around the same time in a crime that received almost no national attention because it wasn’t helpful to the narrative.

Yesterday, two peaceful observant Muslims ran down a British soldier and butchered him in the street while shouting “Allahu Akbar.” (And note, no one has ever been brutally murdered by people screaming “Jesus loves you!”) Clearly, they were motivated by hatred, but whatever their motivation, they committed a brutal crime and deserve brutal punishment.

I also note that as the soldier was being butchered, bystanders did nothing. The Albionese populace has been so thoroughly cowed and disarmed (as Jeff would wish) that they were incapable of responding to the brutality in their midst. That would never happen in Texas.

Compare: Calling someone a jerk to calling someone a n!gger or f@ggot.

There’s a difference.

Like that horrific crime that was committed on England’s streets yesterday. The perps personalized their act by singling out a man they thought was a soldier, not some random guy. If the guy wasn’t a soldier, there’s room to believe the crime would have never happened, calling into question intent.

What you are saying is not necessarily true. In this instance the man went hunting for a gay man to kill. However, all crime is criminal. The distinction is, should one who commits a hate crime recieve special treatment ……. meaning additional penalties for his or her “hate” crime.

Comment by SC.Swampfox — May 23, 2013 @ 11:11 am – May 23, 2013

The Obama administration IRS went looking for people to harass and punish based on their political donations, political affiliation, and exercise of their freedom of speech and religion.

Does this qualify as a hate crime?

40.ND30 > Stop trying to make “Piety Dance” happen. It’s not going to happen.

Comment by VS — May 23, 2013 @ 10:13 am – May 23, 2013

38.Miss Rita Beads . . .aka NDT

http://i1124.photobucket.com/albums/l569/rusty98119/IMG_20130520_100640_zps4c2cd236.jpg

V, you’ll appreciate this!

Comment by rusty — May 23, 2013 @ 9:30 am – May 23, 2013

Exactly the point, VS; you and your friend rusty are not about to perform the piety dances that you both demand conservatives do.

The point is not to force you into piety dancing; it’s to humiliate you by pointing out what hypocrites and liars you are.

Again, this is typical for the Obama Party, which is a group of lawless thugs that try to use the law to punish and harass others.

But once you’re exposed as lawless thugs, your ability to demand others obey the law is fatally crippled.

What you are saying is not necessarily true. In this instance the man went hunting for a gay man to kill. However, all crime is criminal. The distinction is, should one who commits a hate crime recieve special treatment ……. meaning additional penalties for his or her “hate” crime.

So many people miss the real point. “All violent crime is hate crime.”

This.

I’ve always been against ‘hate crimes’ leglisation because a) you force the defendent to try to prove a negative. “I didn’t do it! and I didn’t do it because he’s ” and b) if I’m mugged and shot for my wallet, and you’re mugged and shot for your boyfriend, why should the penalty for shooting you be greater? we’ve both been mugged, we’ve both been shot.

You left out the part about being ritualistically tied up in the freezing cold like a scarecrow.

And Sharon Tate had her baby cut out of her.

So, what’s your point???