<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for GayPatriot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-1/#comment-757801</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flat tax, not deductions, for most Americans it is withheld.  For 1099 income, multiply the earnings by the tax rate, send it in.  Period.

Simple.  Still have an IRS but a much smaller organization.  No audits required unless the 1099&#039;s don&#039;t match.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flat tax, not deductions, for most Americans it is withheld.  For 1099 income, multiply the earnings by the tax rate, send it in.  Period.</p>
<p>Simple.  Still have an IRS but a much smaller organization.  No audits required unless the 1099&#8242;s don&#8217;t match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did the IRS ask progressive groups the same kind of intrusive questions they asked of Tea Party groups?  (And if not, why not?) by Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/did-the-irs-act-progressive-groups-the-same-kind-of-intrusive-questions-they-asked-of-tea-party-groups-and-if-not-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-757798</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60513#comment-757798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; Now, get back to the all-you-can-eat buffet, you leftist cow.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

LOL! :-)

Regards,
Peter H.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite=""><p> Now, get back to the all-you-can-eat buffet, you leftist cow.</p></blockquote>
<p>LOL! <img src='http://www.gaypatriot.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama advisor always looking for someone else to blame by Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/obama-advisor-always-looking-for-someone-else-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-757797</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60490#comment-757797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#4 - What alanstorm said!!  In spades.

And yes, I went there.  Deal with it.

Regards,
Peter H.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 &#8211; What alanstorm said!!  In spades.</p>
<p>And yes, I went there.  Deal with it.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-1/#comment-757796</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; If we don’t have an agency responsible for collecting taxes, how will the government collect taxes?&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

I suggest you read the following:

&quot;In a fully free society, taxation—or, to be exact, payment for governmental services—would be voluntary. Since the proper services of a government—the police, the armed forces, the law courts—are demonstrably needed by individual citizens and affect their interests directly, the citizens would (and should) be willing to pay for such services, as they pay for insurance.

&quot;The question of how to implement the principle of voluntary government financing—how to determine the best means of applying it in practice—is a very complex one and belongs to the field of the philosophy of law. The task of political philosophy is only to establish the nature of the principle and to demonstrate that it is practicable. The choice of a specific method of implementation is more than premature today—since the principle will be practicable only in a fully free society, a society whose government has been constitutionally reduced to its proper, basic functions.&quot;

The source? Ayn Rand - &quot;Government Financing in a Free Society.&quot;

Checkmate.

Regards,
Peter H.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite=""><p> If we don’t have an agency responsible for collecting taxes, how will the government collect taxes?</p></blockquote>
<p>I suggest you read the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;In a fully free society, taxation—or, to be exact, payment for governmental services—would be voluntary. Since the proper services of a government—the police, the armed forces, the law courts—are demonstrably needed by individual citizens and affect their interests directly, the citizens would (and should) be willing to pay for such services, as they pay for insurance.</p>
<p>&#8220;The question of how to implement the principle of voluntary government financing—how to determine the best means of applying it in practice—is a very complex one and belongs to the field of the philosophy of law. The task of political philosophy is only to establish the nature of the principle and to demonstrate that it is practicable. The choice of a specific method of implementation is more than premature today—since the principle will be practicable only in a fully free society, a society whose government has been constitutionally reduced to its proper, basic functions.&#8221;</p>
<p>The source? Ayn Rand &#8211; &#8220;Government Financing in a Free Society.&#8221;</p>
<p>Checkmate.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama advisor always looking for someone else to blame by alanstorm</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/obama-advisor-always-looking-for-someone-else-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-757795</link>
		<dc:creator>alanstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60490#comment-757795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His roughest week?  Let&#039;s hope it becomes only his roughest &lt;b&gt;so far.&lt;/b&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His roughest week?  Let&#8217;s hope it becomes only his roughest <b>so far.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-1/#comment-757793</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; Despite the temper tantrums, and conspiracy theories being thrown out on this page and similar right-wing nut jobs sites, Obama’s approval ratings have remained untouched. &lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Oh, really? You spin more than Lynda Carter did in four seasons as Wonder Woman.

But you are wrong.  Voila:

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/05/19/worst-week-obamas-presidency-cnn-publishes-poll-saying-his-job-approv

Looks like this was the State-Run Media working with Axelrod and others to ensure Duh Won looked good.

Remember, this is the same network that trumpeted Bush&#039;s falling approval ratings after Katrina.  In fact, they polled a misleading sampling of &quot;registered&quot; (not &quot;likely&quot;) voters, which - in case you don&#039;t know - are less likely to vote.

Try again, Wonder Woman.

Regards,
Peter H.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite=""><p> Despite the temper tantrums, and conspiracy theories being thrown out on this page and similar right-wing nut jobs sites, Obama’s approval ratings have remained untouched. </p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, really? You spin more than Lynda Carter did in four seasons as Wonder Woman.</p>
<p>But you are wrong.  Voila:</p>
<p><a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/05/19/worst-week-obamas-presidency-cnn-publishes-poll-saying-his-job-approv" rel="nofollow">http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/05/19/worst-week-obamas-presidency-cnn-publishes-poll-saying-his-job-approv</a></p>
<p>Looks like this was the State-Run Media working with Axelrod and others to ensure Duh Won looked good.</p>
<p>Remember, this is the same network that trumpeted Bush&#8217;s falling approval ratings after Katrina.  In fact, they polled a misleading sampling of &#8220;registered&#8221; (not &#8220;likely&#8221;) voters, which &#8211; in case you don&#8217;t know &#8211; are less likely to vote.</p>
<p>Try again, Wonder Woman.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surprisingly few actual consequences for outraging Obama by Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/surprisingly-few-actual-consequences-for-outraging-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-757792</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60576#comment-757792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; Agreed. It was wrong when it’s done by conservatives &lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Uh, mikey, please cite proof that conservatives used the IRS to target their enemies.  If not, STFU.

Unlike your side of the aisle, we have respect for the rule of law.

Regards,
Peter H.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite=""><p> Agreed. It was wrong when it’s done by conservatives </p></blockquote>
<p>Uh, mikey, please cite proof that conservatives used the IRS to target their enemies.  If not, STFU.</p>
<p>Unlike your side of the aisle, we have respect for the rule of law.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-1/#comment-757790</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeremiah Wright&#039;s lawyer who got his church out of an IRS probe is now IRS chief counsel.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/19/Chief-IRS-counsel-bailed-Jeremiah-Wright-s-church-out-of-IRS-probe-in-2008]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremiah Wright&#8217;s lawyer who got his church out of an IRS probe is now IRS chief counsel.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/19/Chief-IRS-counsel-bailed-Jeremiah-Wright-s-church-out-of-IRS-probe-in-2008" rel="nofollow">http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/19/Chief-IRS-counsel-bailed-Jeremiah-Wright-s-church-out-of-IRS-probe-in-2008</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surprisingly few actual consequences for outraging Obama by Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/surprisingly-few-actual-consequences-for-outraging-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-757789</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60576#comment-757789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This seems to be the sort of issue that splits liberals such that I don&#039;t really expect them to be on the same page.  I think many do actually have at least an instinctive if not sincere revulsion at the way certain groups were targeted by the IRS, even if they are loathe to blame Pres. Obama for whatever role he and his administration may have had in initiating or covering up the scandal.  But there is a huge percentage of Americans who openly admit that they don&#039;t see anything wrong with IRS discrimination against conservative groups since they don&#039;t really believe that anyone has any right to disagree with them too much.  I think the president would probably be better off if the second group would shut up so that the whole left half of America could present a united front of feigned concern.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to be the sort of issue that splits liberals such that I don&#8217;t really expect them to be on the same page.  I think many do actually have at least an instinctive if not sincere revulsion at the way certain groups were targeted by the IRS, even if they are loathe to blame Pres. Obama for whatever role he and his administration may have had in initiating or covering up the scandal.  But there is a huge percentage of Americans who openly admit that they don&#8217;t see anything wrong with IRS discrimination against conservative groups since they don&#8217;t really believe that anyone has any right to disagree with them too much.  I think the president would probably be better off if the second group would shut up so that the whole left half of America could present a united front of feigned concern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama advisor always looking for someone else to blame by V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/obama-advisor-always-looking-for-someone-else-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-757786</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60490#comment-757786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, it will work. It is impossible to hold a black Democrat accountable in the American political system. And the electorate is now dominated by low-information voters and the Free Sh-t Army; whose exposure to news is limited to &#039;The Daily Show&#039; and five second soundbites on &#039;Dingo and the Baby.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, it will work. It is impossible to hold a black Democrat accountable in the American political system. And the electorate is now dominated by low-information voters and the Free Sh-t Army; whose exposure to news is limited to &#8216;The Daily Show&#8217; and five second soundbites on &#8216;Dingo and the Baby.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-1/#comment-757785</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently this isn&#039;t limited to just IRS.  Looks like &quot;True The Vote&quot; was harassed by IRS, FBI, OSHA, and ATF

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/05/unreal-irs-shake-down-of-true-the-vote-involved-visits-from-fbi-osha-and-atf-who-checked-her-gun-safe-video/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently this isn&#8217;t limited to just IRS.  Looks like &#8220;True The Vote&#8221; was harassed by IRS, FBI, OSHA, and ATF</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/05/unreal-irs-shake-down-of-true-the-vote-involved-visits-from-fbi-osha-and-atf-who-checked-her-gun-safe-video/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/05/unreal-irs-shake-down-of-true-the-vote-involved-visits-from-fbi-osha-and-atf-who-checked-her-gun-safe-video/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama advisor always looking for someone else to blame by ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/obama-advisor-always-looking-for-someone-else-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-757784</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60490#comment-757784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WHAT THE IRS DID IS ILLEGAL.  As in, subject to criminal law.

But, per your link, Dan Pfeiffer is there to imply that it&#039;s just &quot;partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations&quot;.  (After admitting it happened and professing some sort of meaningless, i.e. consequence-free, outrage about it.)

Does anyone really not see the vileness, the Nixon-and-Beyond dishonesty of this Obama administration?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT THE IRS DID IS ILLEGAL.  As in, subject to criminal law.</p>
<p>But, per your link, Dan Pfeiffer is there to imply that it&#8217;s just &#8220;partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations&#8221;.  (After admitting it happened and professing some sort of meaningless, i.e. consequence-free, outrage about it.)</p>
<p>Does anyone really not see the vileness, the Nixon-and-Beyond dishonesty of this Obama administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama advisor always looking for someone else to blame by Ralph Gizzip</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/obama-advisor-always-looking-for-someone-else-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-757783</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Gizzip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60490#comment-757783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If it weren&#039;t for double standards Democrats would have no standards at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it weren&#8217;t for double standards Democrats would have no standards at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surprisingly few actual consequences for outraging Obama by ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/surprisingly-few-actual-consequences-for-outraging-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-757779</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60576#comment-757779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[heliotrope - Good one :-)  I had to read it a couple times, to see that it was satire: the satire is so close to life.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heliotrope &#8211; Good one <img src='http://www.gaypatriot.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   I had to read it a couple times, to see that it was satire: the satire is so close to life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surprisingly few actual consequences for outraging Obama by mike</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/surprisingly-few-actual-consequences-for-outraging-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-757778</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60576#comment-757778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;the abusive use of the IRS goes completely against who were fundamentally are as Americans.&quot;

Agreed.  It was wrong when it&#039;s done by conservatives and liberals.

However before we say no one is punished, I think we should wait for congress and the justice dept to have its say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the abusive use of the IRS goes completely against who were fundamentally are as Americans.&#8221;</p>
<p>Agreed.  It was wrong when it&#8217;s done by conservatives and liberals.</p>
<p>However before we say no one is punished, I think we should wait for congress and the justice dept to have its say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by heliotrope</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-1/#comment-757777</link>
		<dc:creator>heliotrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The obama admin said today legal or not its still wrong.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;Still &quot;wrong&quot; based on what? On a common moral code or based on slippery moral relevancy in which the ends justify the means until you are caught and have to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1DEG6BWgp0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;express faux outrage?&lt;/a&gt;

All things not illegal are therefore ethical and moral until decided otherwise. That is the Statist version of &quot;catch me if you can&quot; which is the operating procedure until faux outrage is necessary and strawmen are deployed and topics are shifted and blame by equivalency is placed and the spin machine starts crying &quot;irrelevant&quot; and &quot;out of context&quot; and &quot;we are the most transparent administration since .... &quot;

littlelettermike is awash in &quot;hoping&quot; people will just let Obama &quot;change&quot; the narrative so we can all just move along. (moveon.org. will handle the talking points.)

&lt;i&gt;&quot;The Obama administration said ....&quot;&lt;/i&gt; is just the same as &quot;the black community thinks....&quot; or the &quot;Arab street believes.....&quot; and all the other crapola liberal &quot;thinkers&quot; resort to for their invented sources.

Was it &quot;wrong&quot; for &quot;the Obama administration&quot; to leave the Benghazi mission stripped of anything representative of protection in a hostile town where civil war erupts and the government of the country is slowly building itself up by using Scotch tape and old clarinet reeds?

Was it &quot;wrong&quot; for &quot;the Obama administration&quot; tell troops not to go to the aid of the besieged Benghazi mission? Was it &quot;wrong&quot; for the Commander-in-Chief to get the news of the Benghazi attack and then disappear from the scene of command as the episode unfolded? Was it &quot;wrong&quot; for the Commander-in-Chief to dodge calling it terrorism in unequivocal terms and to blame an unseen video when everyone on in Benghazi called it a terrorist attack and that there is no evidence that the video played any role in the Benghazi attack?

These questions are endless.

But, littlelettermike seems to support &quot;the Obama administration&quot; and to be simpatico with them when they have an epiphany about something being &quot;wrong.&quot; It is almost like Pavlov has trained this puppy. &quot;The Obama administration&quot; is forced to say something is &quot;wrong&quot; and the littlelettermike puppy runs around in circles and dribbles on command.

&quot;Wrong&quot; doesn&#039;t cut it littlelettermike. In &quot;the Obama administration&quot; it is based on the concept that even the corruptocrats have a code of honor. Horsefeathers! They have to be forced to say that &quot;mistakes were made&quot; which they follow up with promises left to be unfulfilled of &quot;getting to the bottom of the issue&quot; so that &quot;it will never happen again.&quot;

Everything is in the future and the past is neutered and forgotten. There is no wrong wrong, just temporary wrong.

And the drooling, adoring Progressives just want to Progress on their might-makes-right, political correctness path to crush the opposition in a crusade of statism. Grow the government. Socialize. Redistribute the wealth. Make everyone equal. &quot;All Power to the Imagination.&quot; &quot;Deeds Not Words.&quot; &quot;Each for All and All for Each.&quot; &quot;Every Man a King.&quot; &quot;Everything Within the State, Nothing Outside the State.&quot; &quot;Hasta la Victoria Siempre.&quot; &quot;Hope and Change.&quot; &quot;No War But Class War.&quot; &quot;Power to the People.&quot; &quot;Serve the People.&quot; &quot;The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Poorer.&quot; &quot;We are the 99%.&quot; &quot;A New Deal.&quot; &quot;A Fair Deal.&quot; &quot;A Square Deal.&quot; &quot;Its Time to Change America.&quot; &quot;Change We Can Believe In.&quot; &quot;Forward.&quot; &quot;Great Leap Forward.&quot; &quot;Grassroots Socialism.&quot; &quot;Those Who Are Against Chairman Mao Will have their Dog Skulls Smashed into Pieces.&quot; &quot;Reform the Objective World.&quot; &quot;Thought Reform.&quot; &quot;Cultural Revolution.&quot; &quot;Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom.&quot;

Mendacity and Mediocrity for the Masses and Power to the Politburo. Than it the world of littlelettermike and his drooling classes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The obama admin said today legal or not its still wrong.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Still &#8220;wrong&#8221; based on what? On a common moral code or based on slippery moral relevancy in which the ends justify the means until you are caught and have to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1DEG6BWgp0" rel="nofollow">express faux outrage?</a></p>
<p>All things not illegal are therefore ethical and moral until decided otherwise. That is the Statist version of &#8220;catch me if you can&#8221; which is the operating procedure until faux outrage is necessary and strawmen are deployed and topics are shifted and blame by equivalency is placed and the spin machine starts crying &#8220;irrelevant&#8221; and &#8220;out of context&#8221; and &#8220;we are the most transparent administration since &#8230;. &#8221;</p>
<p>littlelettermike is awash in &#8220;hoping&#8221; people will just let Obama &#8220;change&#8221; the narrative so we can all just move along. (moveon.org. will handle the talking points.)</p>
<p><i>&#8220;The Obama administration said &#8230;.&#8221;</i> is just the same as &#8220;the black community thinks&#8230;.&#8221; or the &#8220;Arab street believes&#8230;..&#8221; and all the other crapola liberal &#8220;thinkers&#8221; resort to for their invented sources.</p>
<p>Was it &#8220;wrong&#8221; for &#8220;the Obama administration&#8221; to leave the Benghazi mission stripped of anything representative of protection in a hostile town where civil war erupts and the government of the country is slowly building itself up by using Scotch tape and old clarinet reeds?</p>
<p>Was it &#8220;wrong&#8221; for &#8220;the Obama administration&#8221; tell troops not to go to the aid of the besieged Benghazi mission? Was it &#8220;wrong&#8221; for the Commander-in-Chief to get the news of the Benghazi attack and then disappear from the scene of command as the episode unfolded? Was it &#8220;wrong&#8221; for the Commander-in-Chief to dodge calling it terrorism in unequivocal terms and to blame an unseen video when everyone on in Benghazi called it a terrorist attack and that there is no evidence that the video played any role in the Benghazi attack?</p>
<p>These questions are endless.</p>
<p>But, littlelettermike seems to support &#8220;the Obama administration&#8221; and to be simpatico with them when they have an epiphany about something being &#8220;wrong.&#8221; It is almost like Pavlov has trained this puppy. &#8220;The Obama administration&#8221; is forced to say something is &#8220;wrong&#8221; and the littlelettermike puppy runs around in circles and dribbles on command.</p>
<p>&#8220;Wrong&#8221; doesn&#8217;t cut it littlelettermike. In &#8220;the Obama administration&#8221; it is based on the concept that even the corruptocrats have a code of honor. Horsefeathers! They have to be forced to say that &#8220;mistakes were made&#8221; which they follow up with promises left to be unfulfilled of &#8220;getting to the bottom of the issue&#8221; so that &#8220;it will never happen again.&#8221;</p>
<p>Everything is in the future and the past is neutered and forgotten. There is no wrong wrong, just temporary wrong.</p>
<p>And the drooling, adoring Progressives just want to Progress on their might-makes-right, political correctness path to crush the opposition in a crusade of statism. Grow the government. Socialize. Redistribute the wealth. Make everyone equal. &#8220;All Power to the Imagination.&#8221; &#8220;Deeds Not Words.&#8221; &#8220;Each for All and All for Each.&#8221; &#8220;Every Man a King.&#8221; &#8220;Everything Within the State, Nothing Outside the State.&#8221; &#8220;Hasta la Victoria Siempre.&#8221; &#8220;Hope and Change.&#8221; &#8220;No War But Class War.&#8221; &#8220;Power to the People.&#8221; &#8220;Serve the People.&#8221; &#8220;The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Poorer.&#8221; &#8220;We are the 99%.&#8221; &#8220;A New Deal.&#8221; &#8220;A Fair Deal.&#8221; &#8220;A Square Deal.&#8221; &#8220;Its Time to Change America.&#8221; &#8220;Change We Can Believe In.&#8221; &#8220;Forward.&#8221; &#8220;Great Leap Forward.&#8221; &#8220;Grassroots Socialism.&#8221; &#8220;Those Who Are Against Chairman Mao Will have their Dog Skulls Smashed into Pieces.&#8221; &#8220;Reform the Objective World.&#8221; &#8220;Thought Reform.&#8221; &#8220;Cultural Revolution.&#8221; &#8220;Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mendacity and Mediocrity for the Masses and Power to the Politburo. Than it the world of littlelettermike and his drooling classes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on David Gregory update by ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/david-gregory-update/comment-page-1/#comment-757776</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60517#comment-757776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitch, exactly.  It&#039;s not that Gregory posed a threat; it&#039;s that other citizens are under threat of prosecution, who also don&#039;t pose a threat.  So, why isn&#039;t Gregory?  Special treatment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitch, exactly.  It&#8217;s not that Gregory posed a threat; it&#8217;s that other citizens are under threat of prosecution, who also don&#8217;t pose a threat.  So, why isn&#8217;t Gregory?  Special treatment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surprisingly few actual consequences for outraging Obama by ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/20/surprisingly-few-actual-consequences-for-outraging-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-757775</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60576#comment-757775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan - Evidently, liberals are in denial (or pretending to be) about the fact that what the IRS did is illegal.  Evidently, we need to drive home the point that what the IRS did is, in fact, criminal.

As Gabriel Malor points out in your link: at a minimum, the IRS&#039; sharing of confidential information about people with liberal groups is punishable by up to a year in jail, for each IRS employee who did it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan &#8211; Evidently, liberals are in denial (or pretending to be) about the fact that what the IRS did is illegal.  Evidently, we need to drive home the point that what the IRS did is, in fact, criminal.</p>
<p>As Gabriel Malor points out in your link: at a minimum, the IRS&#8217; sharing of confidential information about people with liberal groups is punishable by up to a year in jail, for each IRS employee who did it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-1/#comment-757774</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While JPerry&#039;s childish temper-tantrum is amusing on a certain level, it is alarming how much of the country shares his fascist, cult-of-personality mindset as regards Obama.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While JPerry&#8217;s childish temper-tantrum is amusing on a certain level, it is alarming how much of the country shares his fascist, cult-of-personality mindset as regards Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal news by JPerry2006</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2013/05/19/scandal-news/comment-page-1/#comment-757772</link>
		<dc:creator>JPerry2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=60543#comment-757772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always get a good laugh when reading treads on this page. 

Despite the temper tantrums, and conspiracy theories being thrown out on this page and similar right-wing nut jobs sites, Obama’s approval ratings have remained untouched. Given that you are bat crazy I’m going to assume you believe that poll takers are also apart of some grand conspiracy to do whatever, but for those who don’t wear tinfoil or need to enhance our manhood with guns it is nevertheless amusing that Obama hasn’t been effected by your next round of conspiracy theories. 
You see the public is immune to your craziness. From Obama’s a Muslim, to he’s not an American, to he’s a Marxist and now to the claims that he purposely allowed our ambassadors to be killed and his use of the IRS to “silence” the tea baggers no one buys you garbage anymore. 

This is what is going to happen. You’re going to continue your temper tantrums on sites like this. The GOP will continue to obstruct the president as they have for the past four years. No meaningful legislation will get passed, but beyond that nothing is going to happen. You can throw your fits, dream about lynching the president, but your not going to gain any ground other then what you have right now. 

So while nothing will get done for the next four years, and you’ll have the political victory of standing by terrorists and criminals being able to legally buy guns, I’m going to sit back and enjoy the fit of rage you nut jobs will express for the next four years because nothing will happen to Obama. It will be a lot of fun, second only to the fit you guys will throw should the SCOTUS throw out prop 8 and article 3 of DOMA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always get a good laugh when reading treads on this page. </p>
<p>Despite the temper tantrums, and conspiracy theories being thrown out on this page and similar right-wing nut jobs sites, Obama’s approval ratings have remained untouched. Given that you are bat crazy I’m going to assume you believe that poll takers are also apart of some grand conspiracy to do whatever, but for those who don’t wear tinfoil or need to enhance our manhood with guns it is nevertheless amusing that Obama hasn’t been effected by your next round of conspiracy theories.<br />
You see the public is immune to your craziness. From Obama’s a Muslim, to he’s not an American, to he’s a Marxist and now to the claims that he purposely allowed our ambassadors to be killed and his use of the IRS to “silence” the tea baggers no one buys you garbage anymore. </p>
<p>This is what is going to happen. You’re going to continue your temper tantrums on sites like this. The GOP will continue to obstruct the president as they have for the past four years. No meaningful legislation will get passed, but beyond that nothing is going to happen. You can throw your fits, dream about lynching the president, but your not going to gain any ground other then what you have right now. </p>
<p>So while nothing will get done for the next four years, and you’ll have the political victory of standing by terrorists and criminals being able to legally buy guns, I’m going to sit back and enjoy the fit of rage you nut jobs will express for the next four years because nothing will happen to Obama. It will be a lot of fun, second only to the fit you guys will throw should the SCOTUS throw out prop 8 and article 3 of DOMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
