What you are saying is not necessarily true. In this instance the man went hunting for a gay man to kill. However, all crime is criminal. The distinction is, should one who commits a hate crime recieve special treatment ……. meaning additional penalties for his or her “hate” crime.

Comment by SC.Swampfox — May 23, 2013 @ 11:11 am – May 23, 2013

The Obama administration IRS went looking for people to harass and punish based on their political donations, political affiliation, and exercise of their freedom of speech and religion.

Does this qualify as a hate crime?

40.ND30 > Stop trying to make “Piety Dance” happen. It’s not going to happen.

Comment by VS — May 23, 2013 @ 10:13 am – May 23, 2013

38.Miss Rita Beads . . .aka NDT

http://i1124.photobucket.com/albums/l569/rusty98119/IMG_20130520_100640_zps4c2cd236.jpg

V, you’ll appreciate this!

Comment by rusty — May 23, 2013 @ 9:30 am – May 23, 2013

Exactly the point, VS; you and your friend rusty are not about to perform the piety dances that you both demand conservatives do.

The point is not to force you into piety dancing; it’s to humiliate you by pointing out what hypocrites and liars you are.

Again, this is typical for the Obama Party, which is a group of lawless thugs that try to use the law to punish and harass others.

But once you’re exposed as lawless thugs, your ability to demand others obey the law is fatally crippled.

What you are saying is not necessarily true. In this instance the man went hunting for a gay man to kill. However, all crime is criminal. The distinction is, should one who commits a hate crime recieve special treatment ……. meaning additional penalties for his or her “hate” crime.

So many people miss the real point. “All violent crime is hate crime.”

This.

I’ve always been against ‘hate crimes’ leglisation because a) you force the defendent to try to prove a negative. “I didn’t do it! and I didn’t do it because he’s ” and b) if I’m mugged and shot for my wallet, and you’re mugged and shot for your boyfriend, why should the penalty for shooting you be greater? we’ve both been mugged, we’ve both been shot.

You left out the part about being ritualistically tied up in the freezing cold like a scarecrow.

And Sharon Tate had her baby cut out of her.

So, what’s your point???

He left a bar to do drugs with a pair of thugs and got beaten and robbed.

You left out the part about being ritualistically tied up in the freezing cold like a scarecrow.

http://i1124.photobucket.com/albums/l569/rusty98119/IMG_20130520_100640_zps4c2cd236.jpg

V, you’ll appreciate this!

1) I am not intelligent, responsible, or mentally stable enough to own a gun, so government should ban me and all those like me from owning or coming into contact with a firearm.

2) I do not understand and/or do not care about the consequences of allowing my child unsecured access to firearms, so the government must act to protect my children and others due to my own parental incapability, incompetence, and irresponsibility.

What we’ll find is that “Jeff”, like all gun-grabbers and Obama DOJ/IRS supporters, does not believe the rationale for such laws applies to him — which demonstrates that his demands for gun-grabbing have nothing to do with society’s benefit and everything to do with his selfish fascist desire to use the force of law to criminalize and punish the behavior of others.

Because its not like liberal bigots like rusty fake hate crimes to smear conservatives or claim “discrimination” to cover up for their misconduct at work.

Come on, rusty. Piety dance. Or just show what a pathetic groveling hypocrite you are.

I’m not sure how much of this can be easily broken down as a “liberal versus conservative” issue. I live in Arizona, and most of the liberal gays I know either pack heat or are at least respectful of people who do.

Again, it’s cultural. In Arizona, we’ll never allow ourselves to be disarmed. Perhaps the only people in NYC who aren’t metrosexual wimps are the gang-bangers who don’t care about gun laws.

As Peggy Noonan and others have pointed out, Obama has spent the last six years and more calling out Conservative groups and individuals by name. How easy (and typical of human behavior) would it be for bureaucrats to take that cue from their boss and take it upon themselves to persecute perceived political enemies? There would be a natural tendency to shield the boss from knowledge in an effort to give him plausible deniability. Remember that most, if not all, Obama’s power is built on a cult of personality.