Gay Patriot Header Image

Leftists Lament “Vacation-Shaming” President Obama

Posted by V the K at 2:33 pm - August 21, 2014.
Filed under: Media Bias,Obama Watch

The leftist elite in charge of the media want you to know, it’s wrong and probably racist to criticize Obama for vacationing lavishly in the midst of multiple crises at home and abroad.

The Huffington Post laments that, poor Obama, those lavish parties with rich trust-fund Democrats are the hardest work of all.

For those who vacation not on isolated ranches but in hot spots of the rich and powerful, even everyday socializing can be turned into work.

Obama previously spent time on Martha’s Vineyard hobnobbing with important donors. This year, he will headline a fundraiser two days after he begins his annual period of rest.

Let’s run a quick check and see if the MFM were concerned about “Vacation-Shaming” from… I don’t know… say… 2001-2008?


Obama Administration Treating Foley Beheading as a Criminal Matter

Have I mentioned lately that our country is run by moonbats?

ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER’S Justice Department is opening a criminal investigation into the beheading by Islamic State militants of American journalist James Foley, the latest move by the Obama administration to use the criminal justice system to pursue terrorists.

Above all else, the Obama Administration wants to make sure that Islamic terrorists get their Miranda Rights and their taxpayer-provided ACLU attorneys.

A real leader would not treat this situation as an episode of Law and Order: Beheadings Unit. A real leader would be saying, “These sub-human pieces of sh-t need to be wiped from the face of the Earth. We will strike and bomb them until they big for mercy; and then we will show them none.”

But… nope.

Meanwhile, Eric Holder will not be investigating the beating deaths of two white college students by a racist black mob in College Station, Texas.

As for President Obama, he is very teed off about the whole ISIS Situation.


Churches Follow the Advice of Secular Gay Leftists, Rapidly Lose Membership

Posted by V the K at 11:15 am - August 21, 2014.
Filed under: Religion (General)

The conventional wisdom among the secular left is that churches must embrace gay-marriage (as well as abortion, redistribution of wealth, gun control, global warming, and all of those other things the secular left is gung-ho for) or they will perish because they aren’t cool enough to attract hip, socially-conscious secular leftists to their denominations.

In the real world, though, it’s not working out that way. Since the Episcopal Church became the pro-gay, pro-socialism, and all the rest, its membership has fallen almost 19%. The Evangelical Lutheran Church embraced gay marriage in 2009, and its membership has taken a similar tumble and it has lost over 600 congregations. The United Church of Christ — home of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright and a bastion of bat-[stuff] crazy leftism — embraced gay marriage full-bore and has been declining rapidly, 20.5% gone and still losing members. The Presbyterian Church has lost more than 20% of its members since deciding to ordain gay and lesbian clergy.

Meanwhile, conservative evangelical congregations and Mormons (whom the Secular Left would consider ‘hardcore’) are continuing to grow.

The secular left doesn’t understand religion. To the secular left, religion is a hobby (and a silly one, at best) and churches are just social clubs. The idea that there is Eternal Truth, and that it is the role of churches to protect and preserve it, is utterly alien to people whose concept of truth is built around “it depends on what the definition of ‘is’ is.” One thing Christians understand that leftist don’t is you can follow God’s word, or you can be popular and worldly. You can’t do both.

Secular leftists don’t want to go to church; in fact, they want to destroy religion because it’s a threat to the state. Churches that follow the advice of people who want to destroy them get what they deserve. [See also, Republicans and Illegal Immigration.]

Lesbian SNL Writer Disappointed at Missing Opportunity to Lecture Sarah Palin

Posted by V the K at 2:25 pm - August 20, 2014.
Filed under: Media Bias

Back in 2008, when Tina Fey was earning herself a lifelong meal-ticket in leftist Hollywood by mocking Sarah Palin on Saturday Night Live, Palin had occasion to visit the set. One of the writers had planned to deliver the usual courteous leftist greeting … a stern lecture on tolerance and celebrating the lives of gay people.

Paula Pell, writer: I planned that I was going to come up and talk to [Palin] and shake her hand and welcome her and say, “My wife and I are very good people, and we live a very socially conscious life, and we do a lot for our community, and I just want you to know the face of gay couples and gay people,” and I had this whole speech planned. Then I just kind of came up to her in the chaos in the hallway and just nodded and said “hi” and walked off.

I didn’t know SNL was being written by activist lesbians; no wonder it hasn’t been funny for the last 20 years.

Another interesting tidbit from the source article, it seems the cast and the writers just couldn’t bring themselves to make fun of Obama, he was just too perfect and wonderful.

James Downey, producer-writer: If I had to describe Obama as a comedy project, I would say, “Degree of difficulty, 10 point 10.” It’s like being a rock climber looking up at a thousand-foot-high face of solid obsidian, polished and oiled. There’s not a single thing to grab onto — certainly not a flaw or hook that you can caricature. [

And then there's this.

Downey: The last couple seasons of the show were the only two in the show's history where we were totally like every other comedy show: basically, an arm of the Hollywood Democratic establishment. [Jon] Stewart was more nuanced. We just stopped doing anything which could even be misinterpreted as a criticism of Obama

In a Country Not Run by Moonbats…

Posted by V the K at 12:06 pm - August 20, 2014.
Filed under: Leadership,Leftist Nutjobs

In a country not run by moonbats, the brutal beheading of an American citizen would warrant a more significant response than Obama’s usual hashtag diplomacy. (#BringBackOurHeads)

In a country not ruled by moonbats, you would not find a state governor openly siding with the savages that are looting and burning one of his cities, demanding that a policeman be prosecuted before an investigation has taken place, and, oh, by the way, allowing the accomplice of a thug to walk free.

In a country not run by moonbats, thugs and rabble-rousers would not be permitted to block the portage of a ship engaged in legitimate lawful commerce.

In a country not run by moonbats, the media might find more important stories to cover than the name of a football team.

Le sigh.


ISIS and Obama’s Narcissism

So, yesterday, the Mohammedan savages of the Islamic State (ISIS) sawed off the head of an American journalist on live video, but no one on the left seems to care very much.

President Obama does not want to deal with ISIS and makes it clear that he does so only with the greatest reluctance. Some say this is out of fear of angering the far left base of his party, but that’s not it. It’s because just a few months ago, he was trash-talking ISIS as the “JV Squad” of Al Qaeda, whom he had put “on its heels” by personally making the “gutsy call” of taking out Osama bin Laden. (Because, you see, no other president would have had the guts to do that. [Well, Bill Clinton didn't, and he bragged about his failure to kill Osama bin Laden.]}

No, Obama does not want to deal with ISIS because their barbarity is a reminder of his own disastrous foreign policy failure. To admit that this “JV Squad” is a problem would be admitting that he underestimated them, that his policies allowed them to become a threat. His ego simply will not permit him to confront his failure; that would require admitting that he failed.

Secretary of State John F. Kerry matches his boss for egocentric narcissism. He has very little interest in ISIS, his bailiwick is “Global Warming.” Not so much because he believes it is a genuine crisis as it is because he believes that his position will win him plaudits from the New York Times editorial page, the faculty lounge at Harvard, the international elites, and his fellow yachtsmen; the people that really matter.

The Obama Administration will do little to fight ISIS unless they do something really bad, like shoot a 292 pound thug who just robbed a convenience store, or their actions become an unignorable political liability to the Democrat Party. Until such time as that happens, ISIS can go on murdering and beheading as much as they please.

Todd Akin… Meet Amanda Curtis

Posted by V the K at 6:58 am - August 19, 2014.
Filed under: 2014 Elections,Media Bias

The Montana Democrat Party has nominated Amanda Curtis as their candidate for that state’s open U.S. Senate seat.

Ms. Curtis being a Democrat politician and a pathological narcissist (but I repeat myself) has maintained a political video blog (or, possibly, an audition tape for The Daily Show), in which she expresses her Very Important Opinions on things.

YouTube Preview Image

So, as a Democrat she…

  • Sneers at Second Amendment Rights
  • Sneers at Christianity
  • Sneers at Family Values, and
  • Sneers at the notion that the National Debt is a serious problem.

At least we know where she stands. She’s really no different than the rest of the Democrat Party, but unlike Democrat Senators like Cory Booker and Kay Hagan, she lacks the sense to keep those opinions more discreet.

If the Republicans had a National Media Establishment that was determined to act as its PR wing, Ms. Curtis would quickly become the face of the Democrat Party; much as the MFM made idiot Republican Tea Party Establishment candidate Todd Akin the face of the Republican Party in 2012.  Todd Akin was the centerpiece of the Democrat/Media “War on Women” narrative. Despite being completely disavowed by the Republican Party, every Republican candidate was forced to answer for Mr. Akin’s stupidity.

If the Republicans had media, or if the media were fair and balanced, every Democrat running for office would be forced to answer for Ms. Curtis’s remarks; which would be replayed endlessly across cable and network news. Pundits would write long pieces about the Democrats’ “War on Family Values/Gun Rights/Christianity/Fiscal Responsibility.” Others would lament that Ms Curtis and those like her represented an “extremist wing” that was “out of the mainstream” and insist that the Democrats disavow her and her kind.

But we all know that’s not how the game is played.

… While Rome Burns

Posted by V the K at 8:35 am - August 18, 2014.
Filed under: Obama Watch

President and Mrs. Obama enjoyed a lovely jazz concert last night as part of their lovely, multi-million dollar getaway to Martha’s Vineyard.


Meanwhile, back in America


Also, Missouri’s Democrat Governor is really, really mad at the police for releasing facts to the public that contradict the MFM’s “Innocent schoolboy who was just walking down the street when he was gunned down by a racist cop” narrative. e.g. the video of Michael Brown robbing a convenience store minutes before he was shot. The autopsy report that shows Michael Brown was coming at the officer that shot him, not running away.  Such facts need to be kept from the public, lest they invade the “National Conversation Lecture About Race” Leftists are so eager to have give.

The Parsimony of Leftists

Posted by V the K at 11:01 pm - August 17, 2014.
Filed under: Liberals

Interesting thread at AoSHQ today, in which commenters discussed their experiences with liberal family members and acquaintances.  This story kicked it off.

About twenty years ago we had a family reunion. Instead of meeting at some public park or somebody volunteering to host it at their house, as my parents did back in 1976 where I got drunk off my butt and smoked weed with another uncle (but that’s another story), we decided to have it at a Mexican restaurant close to where most of us lived. We arrived first and arranged with the management to reserve some tables. Soon the liberal contingent showed up and immediately started ordering, and they weren’t shy about scarfing many appetizers, entrees, and slamming down beer and margaritas like Prohibition had just ended.

And then, at the end of the evening, every member of the liberal side of the family got up and walked out, leaving their bills unpaid.

In retrospect, we should have made clear that it was expected that everyone would pay for their own meals. I think we expected that everyone would know this, but apparently it did not get communicated, and apparently we were very naive. The problem is, it would never occur to my father, my brother, or myself to go to a restaurant, gobble down a bunch of food, and then walk out without asking the obvious question, who’s paying for this?

As it turned out, my father was the one who ended up paying for it. I think my brother helped, but back in those days, I didn’t have much money, otherwise I would have helped, too, more than my own meal. We were in an unenviable situation where it would have been gauche to make our liberal relatives aware of their bad manners and irresponsible behavior. Looking back on it, perhaps we should have. But my dad was so pissed, he didn’t want anything more to do with them that evening. He just said screw it, and paid.

Turns out, a lot of AoSHQ morons have similar stories to share.  By consensus, this was apparently the threadwinner.

Crazy lib SIL is always bitching about the one per cent and then expecting, neigh demanding we pay airfare, rental cars, hotel bills, groceries, vacations, etc. She even expects us to pay for her daughters college.

Rather than take the train from NYC to New Jersey to visit us, she demanded hubby get her a limo. When her mother, my MIL had strokes and couldn’t take a previously planned vacation, she took it

You read these stories, and consider your own experience with leftists, and you can understand why Sandra Fluke… a woman whose sole political agenda is “somebody else should pay for my birth control” … is a Democrat heroine.

Livin’ in Idiocracy 2/2

Posted by V the K at 10:09 pm - August 17, 2014.
Filed under: American Embarrassments

From one of your journalistic betters and the Huffinpaint Post.

No, he wasn’t kidding.

But no doubt Mr. Reilly holds the proper opinions on gay marriage (supports), Global Warming (is happening), and the Tea Party (American Taliban). And on the left, holding the correct opinions = “smart.”

Livin’ in Idiocracy: 1/2

Posted by V the K at 10:02 pm - August 17, 2014.
Filed under: American Embarrassments

Thomas Sowell asks, “Is thinking obsolete?

Some have said that we are living in a post-industrial era, while others have said that we are living in a post-racial era. But growing evidence suggests that we are living in a post-thinking era.

And this Democrat Politician answers with an emphatic (if implied) “F–k yeah!”


Offended Gay Person Takes to Social Media to Whine About Something

Posted by V the K at 1:27 pm - August 15, 2014.
Filed under: Gay Culture

Have you heard the one about the queer who walked into the Apple Store and got offended because they allegedly called him a fag.

He’s offended because he prefers “queer.”

“So here’s a thing. I got called a f@g by an #Apple employee here in #Portland. … Being queer and having worked with queer youth, I know first-hand that this is an example of the type of #homophobic beliefs and actions that lead young people to harm themselves.”

He’s not a fag, he’s a queer.

Got it?



Daily Beast Writer Frets That Gay Executions Make Obama’s Job Harder

Posted by V the K at 7:52 am - August 14, 2014.
Filed under: Gays in Other Lands

While the American Gay Left works itself into a furious lather over people who don’t want to bake cakes for their weddings, Iran continues to execute gay people. (HT: Peter H.)

Two men, Abdullah Ghavami Chahzanjiru and Salman Ghanbari Chahzanjiri, were hanged in southern Iran on August 6, possibly for consensual sodomy.

The Daily Beast, of course, frets about the effect of these executions on the real victim: Barack Obama. Iranians murdering gay people (possibly) makes it so much harder for the Light Worker to achieve the all-important foreign policy legacy.

The Obama administration has been attempting a rapprochement with the Iranian regime. Fending off Iran hawks in Congress and the D.C. punditocracy, the administration has argued for a policy of constructive engagement, pursuing diplomacy over military action to halt Iran’s nuclear program. The execution of two gay men, while it may not be surprising, certainly doesn’t make that “engagement” any easier.

Dammit, Iran, stop killing gay people. You’re making things hard on Obama.

Desperate Democrats Blow the Rape Whistle

Fanatical Abortion Supporter Wendy Davis is lagging in all the polls in her race for Texas Governor. So, the Democrats and their allies have decided to accuse her opponent of being pro-rape.


The backstory is, her opponent, Gregg Abbott, was once a justice on the Texas Supreme Court, who offered a dissenting opinion in a case that involved rape. A woman was raped by a traveling salesman. Rather than sur the rapists employer for hiring a sex offender, she wanted to go after the deeper pockets of the company that subcontracted the company the rapist worked for. Abbott’s opinion was that it was lawful for her to sue the rapist’s direct employer, but not the larger corporation that contracted out to his employer.

In other words, Gregg Abbott thinks rape is okay.

Meanwhile, the Democrats revere Bill Clinton who was credibly accused of rape by Juanita Broaddrick.

The Democrats quite literally have nothing to offer except free [stuff] from the Government, and deranged allegations that their opponents are racists who support rape.

And sadly, the country has become such an Idiocracy that the strategy works.

Gay Illegals Demand Amnesty

Posted by V the K at 4:49 pm - August 13, 2014.
Filed under: Illegal Immigration

Will Obama pass up the opportunity to pander to two Democrat constituencies simultaneously? (Would Obama pass up an opportunity to golf on Sunday?)

Gay immigrants are mounting a campaign to demand that they be included in any unilateral moves President Obama makes this year to halt deportations, arguing that they face unusual circumstances that otherwise might leave them on the outside.

Considering that gray-haired, mustachioed illegals with crow’s feet and bursitis are claiming to be schoolkids to get in on Obama’s previous Amnesty, what will illegals do to convince sap leftist judges that they’re entitled to Amnesty because of Teh Ghey? Imagine brigades of left-wing activist lawyers teaching illegals Undocumented Democrats to talk like Paul Lynde.

Guess What FSA Wants Now?

Posted by V the K at 11:55 am - August 13, 2014.
Filed under: Entitlements

The high cost of a product that half the population needs multiple times a day, every month for approximately 30 years,” Valenti began in her August 11 piece, “is simply, well, bullshit.”

But cost was hardly the crux of Valenti’s argument. “This is less an issue of costliness than it is of principle,” she later admitted, because “menstrual care is health care.”

If leftists want it, it’s a human right and you have to pay for it. If leftists don’t like it, you should be forbidden from having it.

It’s how they roll.

The Wedding Cake Fascists Are at it Again

Posted by V the K at 8:24 pm - August 12, 2014.
Filed under: Gay America,Gay Marriage

Seems a couple of lesbians got their feelers hurt because a maker of wedding dresses declined to make dresses for them. Rather than do what sane and reasonable people would do (i.e. take their business somewhere where their money was welcome), they decided to attack and destroy the dressmaker for refusing to celebrate their lifestyle; because it has now become the social entitlement of all gay people to have their lifestyles and relationships praised and celebrated by everyone, with severe punishments for those who decline to cheer or even fail to clap loudly enough.

And in Florida, a clergyman is under attack by the Human Rights Campaign (it must be fundraising time again) for refusing to preside at the funeral of a gay man, which he says would be at odds with his religious beliefs. But, of course, gay people’s self-esteem and hurt feelings must trump anyone’s spiritual beliefs, right?

In the Conservatarian view, everyone should have the right to shop wherever they want. BUT, shopkeepers (business owners) should have an equal right to choose not to do business with those they don’t want to do business with.  Some customers will be disappointed, but that situation is preferable to tyranny; and there will always be other businesses for them to patronize.

The liberal/left/progressive view is this: “You will do what we tell you to do or we will use the power of the State to ruin your business and destroy you personally.”

I strongly feel the clergyman (if the story is accurate and there’s no guarantee it is) is wrong to refuse to perform the service, and I would think it would go against whatever vows or covenants he may have made. But as an individual, I respect his right to refuse to be in servitude to someone else against his will. Because I love freedom that much.

Hat Tip: Steve on the Bridezilla Lesbians

Liberal Guilt Always Sides with Barbarism the Savages

Posted by V the K at 8:00 pm - August 12, 2014.
Filed under: Racism (Real, Reverse or Faux)

This is what we know. A cop shot an unarmed black teenager. Then, many members of the urban community showed their dismay with this situation by looting and burning businesses in their neighborhood that were owned by people who had nothing to do with the shooting (except for the stores protected by Citizens exercising the Second Amendment rights liberals are forever trying to infringe).

And if you think that looting, rioting, and burning down innocent people’s business is a stupid… even barbaric… way to behave, then, that just proves you’re an out-of-touch white racist. Because progressive leftist liberals know that rioting is just the way black people are supposed to respond to these events, because they can’t be expected to exercise restraint or common sense.  Because just as the left refuses to get disturbed about ISIS slaughtering religious minorities, and is downright supportive of Hamas in its genocidal ambitions against the Jews, a lot of them look at the riots and looting and say… “Yeah, I guess that’s OK.”  (Much easier when it’s happening to people in flyover country, who might as well be in Iraq for all the coastal elites care about them.)

A few examples:

And to put the icing on this particular cake, MSDNC’s Ronan Farrow tried to give himself street cred by telling a guest that his own mama was pretty black, in her own way. Now, Ronan Farrow is so white he makes Mitt Romney look like James Brown. And Mia Farrow is so white, she makes Betty White look like Barry White.  But there is this weird desperation on the part of White Liberals to try and look like their “down with the struggle;” which is how they end up rooting for barbarism in the first place.

On the Passing of Robin Williams

Posted by V the K at 6:49 pm - August 12, 2014.
Filed under: Hollywood Legends

I was preparing dinner last night, and I dropped the pepper shaker on the floor, and heard myself exclaim “Shazbot!” I immediately thought, “Where did that come from?” My mouth is prone to unusual things coming out of it, but that Obscure Reference was a new one. I knew the source, of course. I had just never used that particular colorful metaphor before.

It was only after dinner, that I learned that Robin Williams had killed himself.

Strange coincidence, but I get those all the time. Little reminders that the Universe is neither random nor godless.

I don’t get affected by celebrity deaths, but it’s obvious from Facebook, the blogosphere, and such limited media as I have been exposed to that his passing affected a lot of people. Depression is a hard thing, and it must especially hard on a comedian. I lost a friend, in an indirect, non-suicidal way, to depression three years ago; he died while undergoing treatment in a hospital for his depression. (As another coincidence, his surname was also Williams.)

And I couldn’t help but wonder if all of those Family Guy jokes ripping on Robin Williams had contributed to his state of mind. How could it have felt for a comedian at the Winter Solstice of his career to not only witness a rising, seminal comic (Seth MacFarlane) occupy his former level of celebrity, but also to be a recurring target of that comic’s jokes. That must have been brutal.

Lots of people sad today. Are you?


Well, This Seems Massively Dysfunctional

Posted by V the K at 8:02 pm - August 11, 2014.
Filed under: Transgender Issues

This makes the Bundys from Married… with Children seem like the picture of middle-class propriety.

A transgender couple are preparing to tell their children when they get get older that their father actually gave birth to them and the person that they call their mother is in fact their father.

Yeah, that’s definitely not going to lead to any sort of confusion. (And in Kentucky, of all places.)

I know I am at odds with a lot of other people on this blog, and with the overwhelming Narcissism of contemporary society, but I really think that parents shouldn’t expose kids to their own weirdness.

The transgender couple still have their original sex organs because they cannot afford reconstructive surgery.

The cost of male to female surgery can range from £4,000 to £15,000, while female to male surgery can exceed £30,000.

Well, that sure seems like a gender inequality issue… but I can’t be sure which gender if coming out on the short end.