In Oakland, radical leftists are indoctrinating children to carry out their Stalinist agenda.
Black Lives Matter activists have formed a girl scout troop of sorts in Oakland California to indoctrinate the female children of activists from the city.
Calling themselves the “The Radical Brownies”, the group meets for marches, protests and arts and crafts and seemingly eerie looking maneuvers that resemble militant-style poses.
And just as reminder of the high moral character of people supported by the SJW’s of #BlackLivesMatter, consider this wonderful young gentleman from Michigan. As he was being sentenced to life in prison for robbing, brutalizing, and murdering two teenage boys, he stood and made this statement.
“I’d like to say sorry to the families of Aiyanna Jones, Michael Brown, Eric Garner,” Young said. “And I want to apologize to them for not being able to get justice for their loved ones who was murdered in cold blood – and in respect for the peaceful protest, I want to say hands up don’t shoot. Black lives matter – that’s it your honor.”
He should be receiving his honorary degree from Columbia U any day now; and perhaps his own show on National Public Radio.
Jeb Bush and Mittens Romney are meeting in Utah this week. These are two incredibly wealthy men, born into wealthy, powerful political dynasties, who have never once had to worry about how to pay a bill in their life. Between the two of them, they represent support for allowing illegal immigrants to take jobs from working Americans, federal control of local school curricula through Common Core, and massive Government regulation to stop ‘Global Warming.’
So, naturally, the party establishment has decided they are ideal to represent the concerns and priorities of the Republican base. Despite what the deranged left claims, every Republican presidential candidate since 1988 has been a Milquetoast Progressive-Moderate chosen by the Party Establishment. And they have lost the popular vote in 5 of those 6 elections. But, hey, they’ve got all the money and power, so there’s not a damn thing we can do about it.
BTW, the GOP elected to majorities in the House and Senate in November have already caved to the Obamacrats on abortion and Amnesty. And it’s still January.
In New York, an eighteen year old woman is planning on getting married to her biological father, who is also the man she lost her virginity to.
We stopped and said that we didn’t know what was going on but admitted that we had strong feelings for each other. We discussed whether it was wrong and then we kissed. And then we made out, and then we made love for the first time. That was when I lost my virginity.
I seem to recall gay marriage activists claiming that the idea that something like this would happen was ludicrous right-wing scaremongering.
Now that it’s actually happening, they’ll shrug it off as “no big deal.”
And spending a Trillion dollars a year on EBT cards, Obamaphones, and corporate welfare for connected cronies doesn’t help much either. (AOSHQONT)
Iowa Senator Joni Ernst provided the Republican response to the Emperor’s State of the Empire address. (In case you didn’t watch, it was apparently two straight hours of the Emperor promising more Free [Stuff] from the Government punctuated with episodes of arrogant “I won” gloating.) The Democrat left saw this as an occasion to spew hate, as they view pretty much all occasions.
Leading the pack were the mean girls of MSDNC, like Alex Wagner and Ronan Farrow.
Joni Ernst delivering response in the style of an in-flight safety video.
And then a chorus of “tolerant” Democrats joined in, many of whom used the same anatomical reference to refer to Senator Ernst as Bill Maher uses to refer to Sarah Palin (“See You Next Tuesday”).
Other Democrats hauled out the tired “Stepford Wives” cliche, because nothing says hip like referencing a movie made in 1975, just like nothing says “We respect women,” like cheap insults based on their ladyparts.
Within the Islamic State (which according to the Obama Regime is neither Islamic nor a state) exercised its authority within the defined geographical over which it has complete legal authority (i.e. a state) in support of Sharia (i.e. the Islamic law the Islamic State claims as the basis of its authority) and committed the following acts.
And the number of people murdered by Organized Christian Forces for not following Biblical Law remains at 0.
Also, the Saudi government police chopped off a woman’s head in the middle of Islam’s Holiest City. No word from the Obama Regime on whether that was True Islam or not.
The spoiled brat activists of #BlackLivesMatter were at it again yesterday, disrupting MLK observances in Atlanta, beating up a cop in Seattle, and blocking traffic in the Bay Area. None of the Democrat leadership has denounced any of this and some of them are actively joining the protests.
And then there’s this clown. (Literally).
Let me ask you something: Have you ever once heard the MFM describe the #BlackLivesMatter protest as “Fringe” or “Extremist?”
Here are a few things #BlackLiesMatter has advocated:
Are these demands not considered radical and extreme by the liberal media? All the Tea Party wanted was for the Government to spend less money and follow the Constitution. This was enough for the left to label them radical, extreme, and even “terrorists.”
But #BlackLivesMatter wanting to kill cops and destroy the global economy… not extreme and not radical. Or, at least, far less radical or extreme than advocating for Government fiscal responsibility and accountability.
Well… OK, then.
My basic reaction to both the Oscars and the SOTU
Y’know, the State of the Union Address and the Oscars have a lot in common. They are annual ceremonies held by coastal elites without the first clue about how normal Americans live. They are full of politics, full of pomp, insanely hyped by the media, and they will each be completely forgotten within a week of the broadcast. And in both cases, the point is to celebrate their ability to get the public to buy into elaborate fantasy worlds painstakingly created by people who have no grounding in real life.
In Hollywood, people who can’t stand each other pretend to like each other. In Washington, people who like each other pretend they can’t stand each other. In both cases, the goal is to keep the public in the dark about what’s really going on.
Hollywood person Billy Crystal, who played one of prime time’s first gay characters back in the 1970′s (and also a gay flight attendant in SST Death Flight) is, like most normal people, getting a little tired of the whole ‘gay sex everywhere all the time’ thing.
Speaking during a panel interview in Pasadena, the actor said: “Sometimes I think: ‘Ah that’s too much for me’.
“Sometimes, it’s just pushing it a little too far for my taste and I’m not going to reveal to you which ones they are. I hope people don’t abuse it and shove it in our face to the point where it feels like an every-day kind of thing,” Crystal added.
The gay left is already outraged (it’s kind of a default response in the gay left) over his failure to breathlessly celebrate all things gay. Doubtless, the PC Police will force him to apologize within the week and say what he really meant was, ‘We need to see a lot more gay sex in media, ideally everywhere, all the time, because… you know, we need to see that, to stop, um, bullying.”
So, the Republican presidential bench for 2016 looks like Mitt Romney Again, Bush 3, Chris Christie and… oh my stars, Lindsey Graham is thinking of rerunning Landslide McCain’s amazing 2008 performance. (McCain was stupid enough to believe all the liberals who said “John McCain is a Republican I could vote for” really meant it, and weren’t just saying it as a way to express hatred toward Bush 43.)
Alternately, we have Hillary Clinton – the “dead broke” former First Lady who somehow misplaced $16 Billion at the State Department and wants us to think that even though she’s the smartest woman alive she totally had no idea Bill was cheating on her. We have alleged Cherokee Indian Liz Warren whose economic philosophy makes Eugene Debs look like Milton Friedman. Also, Martin O’Malley, for some reason. And Joe Biden, I guess.
Our political class definitely has an “inbred European aristocracy” feel to it, doesn’t it?
Exactly none of the people listed is worth voting for. Bring on the Sweet Meteor of Death (SMOD).
Whoever does win in 2016 is going to take on Obama’s legacy of $20 Trillion of National Debt, an economy strangled in regulation, a country with so many people dependent on welfare that reform is impossible, a gutted military, a foreign policy and international reputation in shambles, and an out-of-control civil bureaucracy packed with party hacks.
Are any of the people I named capable of fixing the mess that Emperor Obama is going to leave behind?
What would the author of Letter from Birmingham Jail think of his civil rights movement today, considering that it has degenerated to obnoxious spoiled brats with nothing better to do than harass people in supermarkets, to glorifying two-bit thugs like Mike Brown and Trayvon Martin, and lining the pockets of race-hustlers like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton? Would MLK be proud to know that he is lauded in the same breath as a punk who got high, roughed up an innocent store owner to steal some Swisher Sweets, and then died after trying to grab a gun from a cop? Would it please him to know that the African-American leadership of the current Civil Rights Movement is uniformly anti-Semitic, and the movement is a hotbed of anti-semitism, now aligned with groups whose explicit goal is the extermination of Jews? What would he think of the Civil Rights movement he led allying itself with a political party that was happy to see over 20,000,000 black babies snuffed out in the womb because white liberals regard them as “populations we don’t want to have too many of.”
I do not think he would be overly pleased.
The spoiled children of BAMN (By Any Means Necessary) now seek to annoy San Francisco’s Uber-Left LGBT population.
#BlackLivesMatter tried to disrupt the lives of white gay guys in San Francisco’s gay-oriented area, the Castro, yesterday night. “We will annoy them and until we make them care!”
For once, I am looking to the Oscars; can’t wait to see Al Sharpton’s spoiled children disrupt the Hollywood Left’s Annual Orgy of Self-Congratulation.
#BlackLivesMatter protesters turn out to be mostly Rich White Trustafarians.
Boston reporters went to the homes of several Boston area protesters who were arrested for blocking highways on Thursday. What they found were adult children playing revolutionary while living with their rich parents. – GatewayPundit
The Mayor of Boston fired a #BlackLivesMatter(UnlessTheyGetKilledByOtherBlacks-Or-GetAbortedByWhiteLiberalsByTheMillions) protester for ditching on her “job” and making a public nuisance of herself.
Ruotsalainen, a Finland native, could not be reached for comment yesterday. She pleaded not guilty in Quincy District Court to seven charges: trespassing, throwing glass on a public way, willfully obstructing an emergency vehicle, conspiracy, disorderly conduct, resisting arrest and throwing an object on a public way.
When a conservative says, “Government is too big, too expensive, and tries to do too much,” the typical idiot-leftist reply is, “Oh, so you want to fire all the cops and firemen that protect our communities.” No, dipsh-t, we want to fire all the Gender and Labor Migration Consultants.
Obama’s “Smart Diplomacy” stunt of sending James Taylor to serenade the French failed to impress the Eurotopians.
European commentary to this event has been universal …. it is one of those WTF moments …. and yes …. this John Kerry (what the hell was he thinking) story has been covered extensively in Europe. On a side note …. I asked some of my friends in Russia on what did they think about this U.S. attempt at diplomacy …. sighhhh …. they are still laughing. As to what is my take …. looking on the bright side we should say that we were extremely lucky …. it could have been John Kerry singing “you got a friend” instead of James Taylor.
A Facebook Friend suggests sending these folks next time:
If news accounts are correct, a Libertarian-leaning Australian Senator had a terse reply to a Multiculturalist Social Democrat who wanted to curtail free-speech rights in the name of not offending the oh-so-delicate feelers of Islamics.
An anti free speech social Democrat named Gary Burns in Australia got a firm rebuke when he wrote to senator David Leyonjhelm about how Australia’s multiculturalism is the law. Leyonjhelm responded harshly, saying “Go f**k yourself you communist turd.”
I think pretty much the same thing whenever I hear certain politicians flapping their yaps, but I keep it to myself. I know it was not a civil way to reply, and not one that should typify political discourse, but what should one’s response be to people who want to take your human rights away from you? Some would argue that Leyonjhelm should have replied with a well-thought out argument on the virtues of free and open speech. That probably would have been a waste of time; you can’t reason people out of what they weren’t reasoned into.
Meanwhile, the recipients of Senator Leyonjhelm’ s email have responded with Drama Queen Butthurt.
“This boofhead is not a fit or proper person to represent the good people of NSW. I’ve been called many things in life but never a communist,” he said.
“When I received the offensive email from the Senator I was so shocked I clutched my pearls and reached for the smelling salts.”
Mr Burns has previously sued broadcaster John Laws under the Anti-Discrimination Act for calling gay men “pillow biters”.
You could write about how hard it is to come to an opinion on Islam, and whether Islam itself is responsible for the terror committed in its name. Or, is it true what the politicians say, and Islam itself is a “religion of peace” hijacked by radicals. I am going to try to jam a lot of thoughts into a post without making it TLDR, and hopefully provoke some contentious, internets-worthy debate.
It’s easy to take a knee-jerk position on Islam and terror. The knee-jerk progressive left tree hugger special snowflake position is that “Islam has nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism, and to think so is racist against millions of Islamics who haven’t directly committed an act of terror.” Because, you know, no one knows better than secular Western leftists what the True Spirit of Islam is.
It’s easy to want to believe this take, because Gen X and each succeeding generation have been indoctrinated in multiculturalism and taught that, literally, the worst sin a person could commit is being a racist, worse than murder or rape, or even child-rape. Roman Polanski raped a 13 year old girl, Victor Salva raped an 11 year old boy and both are respected in the show business world. Paula Deen used a racial slur 25 years ago and her show business career is over. So, being racist carries more social stigma than child rape and it’s pretty easy to just go along with the notion that it’s unfair to try and think there’s something wrong with Islam. But on the other hand, we confront the nagging reality that Buddhists, Hindus, Taoists, and Presbyterians aren’t blowing up people every day in the name of religion.
And we *want* to believe that Islam is a religion of peace, not just because of the indoctrination we’ve been getting since childhood, but because it offends the rational part of our brain to write off an entire culture of people. The rational part of our brain also recognizes that however many Mohammedans there are in the world, it’s obvious that a vast majority of them are not committing terrorist acts. We can accept the idea that it’s just a fringe group of whackjobs. (Granted, even if that fringe is only 10% of Muslims, that’s still over 100M people we have to worry about. That’s a problem.)
Remember, kids, Hillary says we need to “empathize” with these people.
And the LGBTQRZX$$$ left will express 0.000000000000001% of the outrage they expend for Christians who don’t want to bake cakes for gay weddings over this.
Maybe Obama should send Cat Stevens over to play guitar for them.
A caller to Rush Limbaugh made this point.
The Obamacrats are adamant… ADAMANT… that Islamist Terrorists are not Islamic because Islam is a “religion of peace” and terrorism is un-Islamic. Therefore, they say, those who practice terrorism cannot really be Islamic.
And yet, when a terrorist is sent to GITMO, the administration bends over backwards to make sure they have access to Korans, prayer rugs, halal food… all the things an observant Muslim requires.
Why do they do this, if the terrorists aren’t really Islamic?