GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

Powered by Genesis

The Guns of Europe

July 2, 2017 by Jeff (ILoveCapitalism)

The last few years, amidst Europe’s ongoing terrorist attacks and Muslim-influx crisis, European gun sales have surged. Article from January 2016:

Gun sales have jumped 350 per cent in Austria amid ‘unease’ over increasing numbers of migrants following the Paris terror attacks…

The final months of 2015 showed increases in gun permit applications, while dealers reported huge demand for self defence weapons such as tasers, pepper spray and blank firing-guns.

It comes just months after shotguns were reported to have sold out across the country as residents became increasingly paranoid about refugee numbers.

Article from August 2016:

Applications for gun permits have gone up significantly in Switzerland, Austria and the Czech Republic. In places with stricter gun laws, such as Germany, non-lethal guns and pepper spray have become alternatives.

“There’s no official explanation for the rise, but in general we see a connection to Europe’s terrorist attacks,” Hanspeter Kruesi, a police spokesman in the Swiss canton of St. Gallen, told Reuters.

Czech Republic’s President saw the light:

President Milos Zeman used to advocate gun control, but called for easier access to guns in July [2016] following the terror attack in Nice.

“Earlier I spoke against possession of large amounts of weapons [in the hands of the people],” Zeman said in a July interview with newspaper Blesk. “After those attacks, I do not think so any more.”

And last week, the Czech Republic began to create their own version of our 2nd Amendment:

Czech lawmakers have passed legislation in the lower parliament that would see the right to bear firearms enshrined in the country’s constitution…

The legislation was passed with 139 deputies agreeing to the amendment to the constitution with only nine deputies voting against. The amendment will now be considered by the Czech Senate where it will require a supermajority of three-fifths…

…the Czech legislation reads: “Citizens of the Czech Republic have the right to acquire, retain and bear arms and ammunition.”

It’s rare to have that right in a country’s Constitution. Hopefully, it’s about to become less rare.

Unfortunately, Germany is busy turning its guns against its own People’s free speech:

German lawmakers approved a bill on Friday aimed at cracking down on hate speech on social networks…

Among other things, it would fine social networking sites up to 50 million euros ($56 million) if they persistently fail to remove illegal content within a week, including defamatory “fake news.”

“Freedom of speech ends where the criminal law begins,” said Justice Minister Heiko Maas, who was the driving force behind the bill…

Social networks also have to publish a report every six months detailing how many complaints they received and how they dealt with them.

This is fascism: the merger of Business and State, in which the State commandeers Business to achieve the State’s aims – such as, in this case, the enforcement of political purity and consensus. Looks like Mark Zuckerberg has no problem with it.

Are the Germans going to target ordinary citizens’ protests against Germany’s insane Muslim refugee policy? Sadly, yes:

By “right wing extremist” what German authorities really mean is anyone who questions the immigration policies of the Europe, or thinks differently than the general population.

The article cites the relevant sections of Germany’s criminal speech code – that sound good on paper, except they are so subjective that the authorities can, will and do use them to punish any speech they don’t like.

I’m not sure – my German is quite rusty – but I think that in this clip, Germany’s Vice Chancellor is saying that Muslim refugees are more German than the Germans who would object to their presence, and who should therefore be locked up.

Filed Under: Free Speech, Gun Control, Immigration Reform, Liberalism Run Amok, Political Correctness, Politics abroad, Religion Of Peace, Second Amendment, Social Media, War On Terror Tagged With: czech republic, facebook, Free Speech, germany, Gun Control, Immigration Reform, Islamic terrorism, Liberalism Run Amok, mark zuckerberg, Political Correctness, Politics abroad, Second Amendment, social media, war on terror

Anything to avoid saying ‘Muslim’

June 4, 2017 by Jeff (ILoveCapitalism)

The first step to solving a problem for real, is: Naming it honestly.

As Mark Steyn points out (hat tip V), our leftie-globalist-academic Superiors want us to believe that “sowing division” is what’s wrong with the endless stream of mass murders by Muslim terrorists. Because the desirable opposite is “unity”, led by those same Superiors.

Thus, they subtly equate their critics with Muslim terrorists. If, say, you’re a free-market populist who rejects the elite consensus, you’re as bad as a Muslim mass murderer. Because you’re also “sowing division”.

It’s similar to how the Left represents “hate speech” (i.e., criticism or rejection of the Left) as a form of violence, unprotected by the First Amendment. Under such insane terms, the Left is allowed to attack you with physical violence because they are only protecting themselves from the “violence” that you were about to think, or say.

Re: the London attacks, British media says they were done by “men of Mediterranean coloring”. It has a courtroom precision to it, which is nice, but also don’t say Muslim.

London’s Muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan, did at least call them “cowardly terrorists”. And Prime Minister Theresa May slammed the “evil ideology of Islamist extremism” – but then went back to calling for “unity”, plus Internet censorship. As opposed to, say, deporting the UK’s known Muslim radicals and improved vetting of Muslim immigrants, or better enforcement of the UK’s existing laws against inciting violence.

It’s beyond question that the murderers were doing it for Allah. One can only hope that the good people of the UK will wake up.

Filed Under: Anti-Western Attitudes, Civil Discourse, Free Speech, Islamic Intolerance, Liberal Dhimmitude, Liberalism Run Amok, Political Correctness, Politics abroad, Religion Of Peace, War On Terror Tagged With: Anti-Western Attitudes, civil discourse, Free Speech, Islamic Intolerance, Islamic terrorism, Liberal Dhimmitude, Liberalism Run Amok, london, Political Correctness, Politics abroad, Religion Of Peace, sadiq khan, theresa may, war on terror

Kathy Griffin fired, but is that enough?

June 1, 2017 by Jeff (ILoveCapitalism)

CNN has fired Kathy Griffin from their next New Year’s Eve program. As V noted earlier, she posed for a so-called ‘artist’ with herself holding a blood-drenched, beheaded effigy of President Trump. In a single image, she managed to align herself with Islam (or ISIS imagery), Satanism (or satanic imagery), and assassination of the President of the United States.

To his minor credit, Anderson “Vanderbilt” Cooper tweeted “For the record, I am appalled by the photo shoot Kathy Griffin took part in. It is clearly disgusting and completely inappropriate.” (Minor because it’s something he should have done hours faster, and perhaps an understatement.)

It remains to be seen whether Hollywood and the Left will actually shun Griffin, or rehabilitate her once the dust settles? After all, the first reaction of a CNN panel (led by Jake Tapper) was a dismissive “We’ve got much bigger issues to focus on.”

And indeed, they do. After all, CNN is the Home of Fake News, such as:

  • proclaiming that Hillary is somehow healthy and a lock to win the election;
  • pushing the fake/scripted views of a seven year old as a serious reason for the U.S. to make war in Syria; and
  • pushing evidence-free, anonymously-sourced innuendo against Trump.

But maybe CNN’s dismissive, first reaction didn’t focus-group very well?

The whole thing got me thinking about denunciations in general. After all, conservatives and libertarians are supposed to denounce every little thing done by every little kook – or else we somehow are that thing. Recently,

  • Jacob Schwartz was arrested for child pornography. He isn’t a nobody. He is a longtime Democrat activist and staffer. His father is a huge Democrat donor and insider, having served as an Obama delegate and a lawyer for Bernie Sanders, the SEIU and ACORN (remember them?).

    Young-ish Jacob allegedly possessed graphic images of a 6-month old baby being raped. He was a top staffer to NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio. Schwartz also appeared on Chris Cuomo’s program on CNN (them again!). Hillary’s campaign manager, Robby Mook, can be seen standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Schwartz – or at least he could, before Schwartz’s arrest triggered Democrats into disappearing the inconvenient photo.

    My question is, has Robby Mook denounced Schwartz, in no uncertain terms? Has Hillary Clinton? Or the DNC? Or CNN? Has Chris Cuomo indicated his regret at having Schwartz as a guest? I couldn’t find any such statements.

    Each of them, who has not yet done such a statement, therefore supports pedophiles and pedophilic rape – if we apply the Left’s usual logic about these things.

  • Marina Abramović is another left-wing “artist” who promotes imagery and practices that are awfully reminiscent of Satanism, with that Spirit Cooking thing she’s into.

    John Podesta is, of course, one of THE top Clintonites, as he was Hillary’s campaign chair and her preference for Secretary of State.

    It’s known that Podesta was invited, on warmly intimate terms, to a private Spirit Cooking “dinner” that his brother Tony probably attended, and which Podesta himself may have attended.

    Has either of the Podestas denounced Satanism, or at least Abramović? Has Hillary Clinton denounced either of the Podestas? I don’t think so.

    Again, apply the Left’s typical logic of you-are-clearly-for-that-bad-thing-if-we-don’t-agree-that-you-have-denounced-it-enough, and see where it would go, here.

  • And don’t get me started about Antifa – and the failure of many lefties to denounce their violence.

So, firing Kathy Griffin from a New Year’s Eve program that was going to happen in 7 more months: is that enough? Or should we call for more? If yes, what?

UPDATE: She says “I went too far, and I was wrong.”

Umm, “too far” in what? When I go too far, it’s because I love something. I ate too much chocolate or lemon pie. I tried to power clean too much weight. So, if Kathy “went too far” in making visible her fantasy of beheading the President and soaking his head in the blood, then deep in her soul, she loves…??? Something about this is still “off”.

Filed Under: Annoying Celebrities, Big Hollywood, Civil Discourse, Democratic Scandals, Leftist Nutjobs, Liberal Hypocrisy, Liberal Intolerance, Mean-spirited leftists, Media Bias, Progressive immorality, Religion Of Peace, Trump-hatred, Unhinged Liberals Tagged With: anderson cooper, Annoying Celebrities, Big Hollywood, chris cuomo, civil discourse, cnn, Democratic scandals, Hillary Clinton, isis, Islamic terrorism, jacob schwartz, john podesta, kathy griffin, Leftist Nutjobs, Liberal Hypocrisy, Liberal Intolerance, Marina Abramović, Mean-spirited leftists, media bias, Progressive immorality, Religion Of Peace, robby mook, satanism, spirit cooking, Trump-hatred, Unhinged Liberals

How About No, You Stupid Bint

November 14, 2015 by V the K

Well, there it is. The stupidest possible response to Paris Attacks. From an MSNBC idiot progressive with a stripper name. 

CTxzTcRUEAAGVXA

#BeginRant

Sick and tired of all these progressives who attack people who just want to cut Government spending a little as “terrorists who must be destroyed” because cutting welfare spending “doesn’t reflect our American values.” And then when real terrorism happens with real violence and real death it’s like, “Hugs all around everybody, let’s form a healing circle.”

These people are so stupid, they’d hug a grizzly bear and try to make friends with it.

A suggestion for Ms Krystal Ball; why don’t you take your ‘Peace and Love’ act to Malmo, or one of the No-Go Zones in Paris you claim don’t exist. Walk down the street wearing something sexy; see how that goes for you.

And to all the phonies on Facebook and Twitter changing their profile pictures to French flags and retweeting #StandWithParis hashtags: Bite me.  A lot of them are the same people that denounce those of us on the right who insist on seeing Islamism for what it is: a threat to gays, women, and Western Civilization. When we said mass importation of Mohammedans was a bad idea, they called us bigots and racists. Now that they see the results of their policies, they’re all, “Oh, such a tragedy. We must stand strong.” It’s not a tragedy, you idiots, it’s a massacre committed by barbarians that you side with over the civilized. 

Oh, and some idiot in Paris hauled out a piano and played ‘Imagine.’ Yeah, that will totally address the problem.

Idiot.

If you really really want to do something about the threat of terrorism, then this is what you should do:

1. Buy a firearm, learn how to use it, carry it wherever it is legal to do so.

2. GTFO of any large American city, they are all terror targets, and it’s only a matter of time before the Islamo-Barbarians carry out a massive attack here.

3. Do not count on politicians to do anything for you; they are worthless.

#EndRant [Read more…]

Filed Under: Religion Of Peace, War On Terror Tagged With: Islamic terrorism

Hasan convicted, but media still avoids the dreaded T-word?

August 23, 2013 by Jeff (ILoveCapitalism)

A Yahoo! current lead article, from the Associated Press:

Maj. Nidal Hasan has been convicted of premeditated murder for the 2009 shooting rampage at Fort Hood…

Military jurors found the Army psychiatrist guilty on Friday for the attack that killed 13 people and injured more than 30 others at the Texas military base.

Hasan shouted “Allahu akbar!” before attacking and showed other signs that his motive was Islamic jihad. But only us rightie wingnuts (/sarc) will call his actions either jihad, or terrorism, or (since he fought the Army and nation that he was sworn to serve) treason. The AP article avoids the J- and T-words, and instead says delicately:

Through media leaks and statements to the judge, the American-born Muslim signaled that he believed the attack was justified as a way to protect Islamic and Taliban leaders from U.S. forces in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Others have discussed how the judge in Hasan’s trial sanitized the evidence of Hasan’s real motive, as did the Obama administration when they labeled his actions “workplace violence”.

Please feel free to correct this post, by commenting with links to Establishment media reports that use either ‘jihad’, ‘terrorism’ or ‘treason’ honestly to describe Hasan’s murder spree.

UPDATE: So far, SwiperTheFox has nicely given it a shot (see #15, here), but I wasn’t persuaded (see #24, here).

Filed Under: Media Bias, National Security, Political Correctness, Post 9-11 America, Religion Of Peace, War On Terror Tagged With: Islamic jihad, Islamic terrorism, Maj. Nidal Hasan, media bias, National Security, Political Correctness, Post 9-11 America, Religion Of Peace, war on terror

Categories

Archives